THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIG BORE FORUMS

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    475 A&M - it has to be said...

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
475 A&M - it has to be said... Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
Cartridges of the world has just printed the ridiculously optimistic figures for the 475 A&M yet again.

I notice for some of the old german calibres such as the 7mm vom hoffe, the author has seen fit to include 'optimistic' in brackets after the ballistics.

And then is quite happy to quote the 475 A&M with ballistics approaching 10 000ftlbs!!!

When that cartridge hits even 9000ftlbs I will be getting 6000 from my 375H&H.

Who do we e-mail about this crap?

Karl.

 
Posts: 3533 | Location: various | Registered: 03 June 2000Reply With Quote
<Mitch>
posted
Karl, I think you would be lucky to get an honest 8000 ft. lbs. out it. I don't know where you would sent an e.mail.
 
Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Karl,

Cartridges of the World is replete with technical errors. Look at the cartridge dimensions and you will find a number of them incorrect.

 
Posts: 18352 | Location: Salt Lake City, Utah USA | Registered: 20 April 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of 470 Mbogo
posted Hide Post
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Karl:
Hi Karl,
I know exactly what you mean. You keep reading things and wonder if the guy putting it together is sleeping at the wheel. I think that overly optimistic figure has been publish from the first issue. They finally backed down the 460 Weatherby velocity to 2600 fps but you still hear "that most powerful at 8000 ft lbs." phrase. I can tell you from experience with my 470 which is a bigger case than the A&M that 2650 to 2670 is probably the max. I stay at 2500 for pressure and shootability reasons. 470 Mbogo
 
Posts: 1247 | Location: Sechelt B.C. | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
<R. A. Berry>
posted
Right,
This bad data just got started, or repeated first, in the P.O. Ackley books without verification, and has simply been perpetuated in a "ho hum" manner.

------------------
DaggaRon
RAB

 
Reply With Quote
<jagtip>
posted
Ever notice how many of them selectively use double standards when exaggerating figures for one cartridge while being a bit too conservative with another???I believe that this is just the writer's prejudice revealing itself through his preferential treatment.Maybe that's just human nature.
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
As mentioned above, there are quite some myths and inconsistencies perpetuated in different manuals.
Time to do something about it.
If the 10th edition has made corrections you know who to thank.

Karl.
 
Posts: 3533 | Location: various | Registered: 03 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ACRecurve
posted Hide Post
What kind of myth will be next? An undefeated season for the Aggies? I guess it's possible if the A&M can generate 10000 ft-lbs of KE!
Good Hunting and Gig 'em.

------------------
Andy Cooper

 
Posts: 6711 | Location: Oklahoma, USA | Registered: 14 March 2001Reply With Quote
<Matt77>
posted
my favourite is, in the 4th edition I believe, the author stated something like, the 8mm rem mag is only hurt by the less than desirable bullet selection.. then a paragraph later he stated that there is a good selection of bullets for the reloader!! The opposite page with the 8 X 57, he said that there were a good number of bullets...
he contridicts himself so much. Where's the editor? Other than the picture of himself on the sleave?
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of 470 Mbogo
posted Hide Post
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Matt77:
Hi Matt,
As buyers of these kind of books maybe we should contact the author and suggest that it has to pass the accuratereloading proof reading department before publishing. That would set that book straight. 470 Mbogo

[This message has been edited by 470 Mbogo (edited 12-12-2001).]

 
Posts: 1247 | Location: Sechelt B.C. | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Heh Heh!, Did you ever see P.O. at the loading bench, I wouldn't be surprised if he got 10,000 out of anything...He loaded until a primer blew and then cut back .5 grain and called it max.

Try some of Ackleys max loads in any caliber, you will get a wake up call.

------------------
Ray Atkinson

ray@atkinsonhunting.com
atkinsonhunting.com

 
Posts: 42321 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The issue is of course 'safe maximums', not 'absolute maximums' or 'destructive testing' as used in Industry.

I think enabling say a 475/460 wby to acheive 10 000ftlbs(which is the same as enabling a 416 rem to acheive 7000ftlbs)
would class as destructive testing.

Unless of course african 'pros' are advising clients to push their 416 Remingtons to 2800fps with a 400gn bullet these days?

I'll leave that wake up call for someone with a lot of money and a remote firing rig


Karl.

 
Posts: 3533 | Location: various | Registered: 03 June 2000Reply With Quote
<Bill T>
posted
They also said, (about the .475 A & M), "It's recoil is the equivilant of going a couple of rounds with the world heavyweight boxing champ", what crap! Bill T.
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ACRecurve:
What kind of myth will be next? An undefeated season for the Aggies? I guess it's possible if the A&M can generate 10000 ft-lbs of KE!
Good Hunting and Gig 'em.


First they have to learn the art of tortilla throwing

 
Posts: 1646 | Location: Euless, TX | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Right on Bill T, I'd much rather go 10 rounds with the worlds boxing champ!!!

------------------
Ray Atkinson

ray@atkinsonhunting.com
atkinsonhunting.com

 
Posts: 42321 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fla3006
posted Hide Post
How about this for a stupid remark in Cartidges of the World: "The 500 Jeffery is similar to the 505 Gibbs, but it has a shorter case and is loaded to higher velocity and energy. The two are interchangeable."
 
Posts: 9487 | Location: Texas Hill Country | Registered: 11 January 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fla3006
posted Hide Post
I always wondered how the 475 could be so much more powerful than either the 460 or various 500's based on the Weatherby/Rigby case given that it fell in between.
 
Posts: 9487 | Location: Texas Hill Country | Registered: 11 January 2002Reply With Quote
<333-OKH>
posted
The url for Cartridges of the World is www.krause.com the publisher. On the menu bar at the top of the page click on "about us", bottom of that page click on "contact us" and scroll down to publications.
If enough people complain they will take notice, like most corporations, they have to get more than the occasional complaint. If all 7000 plus of us hammered them it should do the trick. Who wants to go throughthe book and do the editing Krause has neglected?

------------------
If Elmer didn't say it, it probably ain't true.

 
Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    475 A&M - it has to be said...

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia