one of us
| Here he goes again...
Do the math, Overkill. It's been posted here a million times for your benefit. |
| Posts: 444 | Location: Georgia | Registered: 07 November 2001 | 
IP
|
|
one of us

| pertinax, Here he goes again... Do the math, Overkill. It's been posted here a million times for your benefit.[/QUOTE] Nothing to add ![[Big Grin]](images/icons/grin.gif) |
| |
one of us
| The initial momentum should be zero. The immediate momentum should be the product of the mass and the velocity. Clear? Can you do your own math? Cheers! Ming |
| Posts: 1002 | Location: Midwest USA | Registered: 01 September 2001 | 
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Check out .470 Mobogo's sight doesn't he do some kind of momentum test with a sled?? |
| |
one of us
| Guys...! I dont think that Momentum is any god number for hunting cartridges. Look at this... A 5 kg stone that is flying at 100 f/s. Has the same momentum as a 4-Bore. And i think that a 4-Bore will hit harder than a 5 kg stone that i can throw. The foot pounds energy is a much better number. A 5 kg stone at 100 f/s will have a energy of 1000 joule. What do you think guys. Is the Momentum a god number for hunting cartridges ![[Confused]](images/icons/confused.gif) |
| Posts: 751 | Location: sweden | Registered: 15 January 2002 | 
IP
|
|
One of Us
| I think the TKO (Taylor KNock out Figures are alright) sometimes numbers do not tell the full story though OK. I think my 45/70 kills better and hits harder than my 30/06 out to 100 yards but the paper figures do not really support much difference yet I see it with the game I have shot. |
| |
one of us
| Overkill,
Find out what sectional density is & why it is important (something about penetration), and read Robertson's THE PERFECT SHOT.
If you don't want to buy it, I'll tell you what it says: SD about .330; fps about 2400; caliber big enough for the animal, small enough for you. Not theory, just observation.
You can't even calculate momentum and you want to discuss what it means? Forget all that pseudo-scientific crap that would be over your head even if it were true.
Your example with the stone was a good one, but the stone wasn't going 2400fps. And what was its sectional density?
Remember: .330; 2400fps; right caliber. If you don't believe me (no reason why you should), look it up in THE PERFECT SHOT. |
| Posts: 2272 | Location: PDR of Massachusetts | Registered: 23 January 2001 | 
IP
|
|
one of us
| quote: Originally posted by Overkill: My point here is to know if a bullet can knock over a animal.
It can't, but it might fall over after you shoot it. Why? |
| Posts: 2272 | Location: PDR of Massachusetts | Registered: 23 January 2001 | 
IP
|
|