quote:Originally posted by jeffeosso: Again, Judy, you ignorant SLUT!!. You corrected JACK SHIT In fact, judidiot ... you are actually that stupid.
sorry to sour your thread, OK
jeffe
Judy starts the same old "energy in/out" argument that has been heard ever since the first sling shot rock flew through a sparrow, and because she won't bow down to his argument she's a troll, slut, jack shit, judidiot and stupid. I'll just bet a dollar that if ol' Jeffy is married he calls his wife and kids the same kind of names. In other words he's a wife and child abuser, although not in the sexual sense. But he probably denies it because he's too bound up in trying to bully weaker people aside to see himself that way.... He's just a typical loudmouth texas boy whose emotional IQ ain't yet caught up to his shoe size.
Well Jeffy, what part are ya denyin? You sayin' you never called Judy a slut, jack shit, judidiot or stupid? 'Cause that's what I'm reading. What makes you think you're so honourable when you spout that kind of filth in public at a woman?
And please don't fall back on the old jimmy-kiddieporn dodge that "Judy" is actually a queer. If that's what you think why'd you call him a slut? NOooooooo jeffy-o. You're just being rude. Maybe you can convince everybody else here that you call strange women sluts in public but you're mister cool with your own family. Maybe you're even right. But I have no sympathy and a hard time believeing you.
If you would rather be treated respectfully, please change the way you behave. Don't be a peccas.
[ 09-30-2003, 03:43: Message edited by: BBBruce ]
Posts: 36231 | Location: Laughing so hard I can barely type. | Registered: 21 April 2001
quote:Originally posted by Pecos45: ~judy, forgive me for [yada yada yada]....
Once again class:
kiddieporn, we're not your class.
quote:"The violent reaction of a person or animal being struck by a bullet is caused BY that person or animal's physiological reaction to being shot
First time I've heard you using those words jimmy. Funny thing, Edmond used them this weekend, I think in the JFK thread. Given how much you whine at him and call him names, seems to me the least you can do is not plagiarize him. Or do you know what "plagiarize" means?
See y'all, I told you jeffeosso would not answer my questions <not for me anyway> and would only call me names. He is so predictable and pathetic. Almost as pathetic as peabrain.
Regarding Ross' 585 Nyati. This quote matches what I remember reading in one of my ex's magazines. ==================================================
quote: Robgunbuilder One Of Us Member # 3171
posted 09-29-2003 19:31 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MartyTW-While I was suffering thru building my NYATI, I learned quite a bit about the origins of the case and in fact saw the original M98 based NYATI built by sterling Davenport for Seyfried. There are a number of rim variations including some rebated to .590 ( .416 Rigby the original version.) , but most are .640 ( same as the 505 Gibbs). The problem is there are other differences in the rim thickness, extractor cut bevel, extractor cut diameter etc. I worked with Dieter Horneber to pretty much standardize what we have and produce a case that effectively works in the 10-15 Nyati's that I know of. If you want those dimensions, I can send them to you. I have developed a revised version that actually works quite well and is insensitive to minor brass neck thickness problems.-Rob
-------------------- There are few problems you can't fix with a 1917 Browning or a welding Torch!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posts: 1889 | From: Las Vegas,NV | Registered: Jan 2001 | IP: Logged
jeffeosso, Robgunbuilder clearly says M98, not magnum mauser, brevex, etc, etc, but M98. That is because that was what Ross' rifle was built on. Or, is Robgunbuilder wrong too?
Kent, what have you hunted besides cattle and barrels? Nothing . . . BIG surprise there.
Peabrain, you ever own any guns? No . . . they all belonged to your in-laws. Too bad, at least your in-laws are cool, eh. Actually, that is for the best, isn't it. We wouldn't want an armed peabrain runnin' around would we.
Posts: 2404 | Location: A Blue State | Registered: 28 September 2002
quote:Originally posted by Overkill: I have shoot a big male moose today with my .460 Weatherby loaded with 500 grains Hornady RN at 2600 FPS!
It was standing at 80 yards and I shoot it behind the shoulder with the first shoot. He then start to run for 50-60 yards. Then I shoot the 2nd shoot when he is running and I hit him right in the shoulder bone. He goes down at once.
Then when we looked at the wound channel it was 35 mm in diameter. But when we looked at that bullet that hit him in the shoulder bone.. the hole was BIG! I put my fist into it The wound was around 100 MM in diameter. I think thats because the "bone hit"
Well, that was the first "460 wby moose" story.
With all the antagonism I forgot why I came here. Your post.
Congrats Ok. Really great. You'll have the makin's for sausage this year.
Posts: 36231 | Location: Laughing so hard I can barely type. | Registered: 21 April 2001
quote:Originally posted by Judy: Overkill-I don't know about your moose, but our moose are definitely difficult to put down quickly with body hits! I witnessed a big bull soak up 5, 250gr fail safes, all in the chest cavity, from a 338 Win mag, and keep on truck'n. He made it out into a lake, in water over our heads, before expiring. Made removal a real pain in the a_s. He ran about 1/2 - 3/4 mile before swimming for a 100 yards or so. This moose tipped the scales at 1300 pounds + or -.
And I've witnessed a mature bull moose (61" spread) take one shot to the heart with a 7x57 mauser shooting 175-grain bullets, dropping it instantly.
5 body shots and the moose runs about 3/4 of mile? Sounds like poor shot placement to me.
Posts: 1005 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 23 August 2002
jeffeosso, what are you talking about in this post of your's? Specifically, my posting of 'other peoples data and claiming it as my own'. ==================================================
Why do you pretend that EVERYONE here doesn't know you are the same person and a troll? In fact, you have a track record of arguing for or with yourself, to create yet another id, and then later change the handle. GO AWAY
quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Originally posted by Judy: George, let me get this straight. I am a 'troll' because.. allow someone to answer that question, not pose your STUPID suppositions. Have always been a troll, axel. Your MO is to start nice, play the wounded beast, turn into an ass, and post other people's data as your own.
jeffeosso, to help you out, check out www.bigbores.com. They make custom big bore rifles. The use K98 action <NOT magnum mausers> for the 500 Jeffery rifles they build. you F*(*()* idiot.
wait, it was YOU, as Axel or Toad, that attacked Nick on this... your own past demonstrates this for you. Since you promised, as axel, not to return until you had completed several rifles... why don't you add a 585 on a remington 700, as you also said that was safe, as axel.
That is because the 500 Schuler/Jeffery was intentionally designed to work through the K98 action, and NOT require the difficult to obtain and extremely expensive magnum mauser action.
BTW, how's that pedersoli 45/70 kodiak that you claimed to have HAND reamed to 45/120.... ? And then acted like you didn't know how to load that round? then "showed your knowledge" by correcting some of those loads.. and then your ignorance by accepting other ones. your illness is frieghtening...
PS I am not a troll. I am just: 1.) More clinically damaged than some of the posters here.[/QB] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No one hates you.. you are not a victim. You are an idiot that is no longer being tolerated. You are NOT specical.
Please jeffeosso, provide ONE instance when I posted some information on this site, or any other for that matter, and claimed it was mine, when if fact it was not! I wish you luck, your are going to need it, since I have NEVER done this.
As far as, momentum goes, I have googled. You are real smart boy there jeffeosso, you must have made it to 7th grade science class. Momentum is defined as mass times velocity. Momentum is always conserved <law of conservation of momentum>. I need your help though. Can you answer this question, since you are so smart, when a bullet strikes an animal is it an elastic or inelastic collision? If you don't mind answering two questions, what are the effectual differences exist between elastic and inelastic collisions with regard to the conservation of momentum?
Posts: 2404 | Location: A Blue State | Registered: 28 September 2002
jeffeosso, you are a slanderous individual. Your accusations of my stealing other's data and posting it as my own are false. When you admit that I may, repeat may, apologize for pointing out your gross ignorance.
Posts: 2404 | Location: A Blue State | Registered: 28 September 2002
With no moderators allowed to ban members it has been the tried and proven Accurate reloading method of removing trolls and windbags by attacking them on the political forum and letting them get the last word in.
Setting up a comfy home for the deranged in effect.
-And guaranteed to keep them off the streets here for at least a few months.
Who's turn is it to play homemaker this time?
Karl.
Posts: 3534 | Location: various | Registered: 03 June 2000
quote:Originally posted by tasunkawitko: i might have missed it in all of the mud-slinging, but has anyone paused to remember that a moose in sweden is the same as an elk here?
Just reversed my friend.
Sort of like saying a woman in Cyberland is a man in Michigan.
Posts: 2753 | Location: Climbing the Mountains of Liberal BS. | Registered: 31 July 2002
gator1 - if I am not mistaken that statement about gender is aimed at me. Boy are you going to crap if we ever meet. You are right though, with regard to the moose / elk. The scandanavian moose is smaller than it's North American cousins though. Just google if you don't believe me. These scandanavian moose are only about 1/2 to 2/3 the size of our moose.
My moose is bigger than your moose
[ 10-05-2003, 00:38: Message edited by: Judy ]
Posts: 2404 | Location: A Blue State | Registered: 28 September 2002
>>>The scandanavian moose is smaller than it's North American cousins though. Just google if you don't believe me. These scandanavian moose are only about 1/2 to 2/3 the size of our moose.<<<
that was sort-of my point. the .460 WM is an elephant gun, and i think tnat the meat damage alone would be enough of a reason to use something a little more sedate.....say, a 6.5se?
quote:Originally posted by Judy: gator1 - if I am not mistaken that statement about gender is aimed at me. Boy are you going to crap if we ever meet. You are right though, with regard to the moose / elk. The scandanavian moose is smaller than it's North American cousins though. Just google if you don't believe me. These scandanavian moose are only about 1/2 to 2/3 the size of our moose.
My moose is bigger than your moose
Man, this does sound frighteningly like a crossdressing janitor at a machine shop....
quote:Originally posted by Judy: gator1 - if I am not mistaken that statement about gender is aimed at me. Boy are you going to crap if we ever meet. You are right though, with regard to the moose / elk. The scandanavian moose is smaller than it's North American cousins though. Just google if you don't believe me. These scandanavian moose are only about 1/2 to 2/3 the size of our moose.
My moose is bigger than your moose
Man, this does sound frighteningly like a crossdressing janitor at a machine shop....
jeffe
HELLO!!! hay bruthy and judy brown path, goo bak to politticks four um, yur bothe two bascket cassess an need help of dr -mook
Posts: 78 | Location: alaska | Registered: 05 March 2003
bruce, judy and mookie - why don't all three of you losers return to the political forum? your generous contributions are not needed or wanted here - BD
Posts: 72 | Location: 49th state | Registered: 01 July 2003
jeffeosso - while I freely admit that I post information I gathered off of the internet, you have a problem admitting you do the same thing. I HAVE either, shot / witnessed the shooting of elk with a 416 Rigby. In these cases the elk flopped over onto their sides so hard they rolled onto their backs. Perhaps this is some nervous system phenomena, but if it is, it is far faster and more violent than any involunetary muscle spasm I have ever seen! Perhaps you should research the questions I asked you about momentum big guy. Specifically, the differences between elastic and inelastic collisions. You may also wish to study the law of conservation of engery and it's interaction with the law of conservation of momentum.
Here is an idea. Why don't you FINALLY go out with those BIG guns you like to brag about <specifically that 500 Jeffery, but load those 535 gr bullets up to 2450 fps this time pussy> and shoot a javelina or scrawny Texas deer. I bet you will be 'shocked & awed' <to quote your precious Dumbya> at the ballistic results. Of course if you are man enough to handle REAL big game shoot an elk, moose, bison, or buffalo.
I said javelina <that is jeffeosso's idea of wild boar> and scrawny Texas white deer as that is all this big guy has ever shot. Come on jeffeosso broaden your horizons. Folks, all I am trying to do is educate an ignorant man. Damned if it ain't almost impossible, though.
Posts: 2404 | Location: A Blue State | Registered: 28 September 2002
quote:Originally posted by Judy: Overkill-if the bullets had dumped all their energy into the animals <e.g. not over-penetrated> perhaps the bullets would have knocked the animal over! I have seen elk 'knocked over' by a 458 Win mag <well to be accurate, they fell over so quickly they landed on the backs>! The bullets were found on the off side under the hide. judy
quote:Originally posted by two canoes: jeffeosso--go home and sleep off what ever you have been ingesting-cause you make most of us sick, with your dumb remarks.
Two Canoes, I don't agree with you, but I will tame it down.
Jeffe, You got on the first one as it slunk onto this thread. The regular members know it from way back. The newer members have now been alerted to its bullshit. You've even uncovered a few more of its personalities mate by the number of two digit posters above.
Job done mate.
Karl
Posts: 3534 | Location: various | Registered: 03 June 2000
quote:Originally posted by Judy: jeffeosso, you are a slanderous individual. Your accusations of my stealing other's data and posting it as my own are false. When you admit that I may, repeat may, apologize for pointing out your gross ignorance.
So......... Judy/Axle/POSer/ToddE, you never stole anyone's intellectual property and misrepresented it as yours?
quote:Originally posted by Judy: jeffeosso, you are a slanderous individual. Your accusations of my stealing other's data and posting it as my own are false. When you admit that I may, repeat may, apologize for pointing out your gross ignorance.
uh huh
quote:Originally posted by Mike375: The first paragraph is from the website and the second paragraph is Axel posting. The only difference is that the Website has a dash after Underlever and then says "A lever, whereas the Axel posting has "is a lever". So it appears that Axel is so stupid that he is unable to copy and paste and therefore has to manually type all this stuff he copies from websites. This would account for the fuck ups with his formulas, that is, he makes typos when copying.
From the Website:
Jones Underlever - A lever, mounted to the underside of the receiver of a break-open gun, extending half way around the trigger guard and ending in a knob the shooter can grasp. When the lever is turned 90 degrees to the right, a pair of tapered, opposing lugs move out of mating bites in the barrel lumps, allowing the barrels to drop open on the hingepin. While not the fastest-opening design for the lockup of a break-open gun, it is arguably the strongest.
The Troll Posting:
The Jones underlever is a lever, mounted to the underside of the receiver of a break-open gun, extending half way around the trigger guard and ending in a knob the shooter can grasp. When the lever is turned 90 degrees to the right, a pair of tapered, opposing lugs move out of mating bites in the barrel lumps, allowing the barrels to drop open on the hingepin. While not the fastest-opening design for the lockup of a break-open gun, it is arguably the strongest.
jeffeosso - what you are talking about? I never posted any of that. I don't even know what the heck that post you cut and pasted is talking about. You need help, you realize that don't you? <I sincerely hope he does>
Posts: 2404 | Location: A Blue State | Registered: 28 September 2002
Judy, FWIW, to some at AR, Judy=~Judy=RogueMoon=Axel=Todd=??, who was/is a Doctor, Pancake House Waitress, Machinist, ???. That seems to explain some of the heartburn some have for you, or someone, at least. What all that has to do with Overkill's moose, ???.
Posts: 1944 | Location: Moses Lake, WA | Registered: 06 November 2001
![[Big Grin]](images/icons/grin.gif){kind=icon}
![[Roll Eyes]](images/icons/rolleyes.gif){kind=icon}
![[Wink]](images/icons/wink.gif){kind=icon}
![[Confused]](images/icons/confused.gif){kind=icon}
![[Razz]](images/icons/tongue.gif){kind=icon}
![[Eek!]](images/icons/shocked.gif){kind=icon}