one of us
| The gun is too new. But do you really want one ?There were some interesting postings about it here and it seemed everyone hated the stock. |
| |
one of us
| The stock fit me quite well, and I like the fact that it is adjustable for length of pull (longer in the summer, shorter in the winter) and drop at the comb. And since it has a composite stock, I won't feel guilty taking it into the marsh... |
| Posts: 454 | Location: Califon, NJ USA | Registered: 18 January 2002 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| I shot one recently and they aren't for everyone. I think it is basically a really good mechanical design that will go through many iterations (ergonomically) before it is widely accepted. The funny little swinging front sight sucks big time.
"Experience" is the only class you take where the exam comes before the lesson.
|
| Posts: 11142 | Location: Texas, USA | Registered: 22 September 2003 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| The field models I looked at only had a front and mid-barrel bead. What is a swinging front sight? |
| Posts: 454 | Location: Califon, NJ USA | Registered: 18 January 2002 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| The one I shot had a swinging front sight that locked the bead either one inch to the left, centered or one inch right of the centerline of the bore for "leading" passing shots. Looked like an Arisaka anti-aircraft sight. You can imagine the ribbing the owner got from us yahoos.
"Experience" is the only class you take where the exam comes before the lesson.
|
| Posts: 11142 | Location: Texas, USA | Registered: 22 September 2003 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Forgot to mention; every other shot it broke loose from the center position and was flip-flopping around. And that gun is for sale, BTW.
"Experience" is the only class you take where the exam comes before the lesson.
|
| Posts: 11142 | Location: Texas, USA | Registered: 22 September 2003 |
IP
|
|