RFK Jr once beheaded a dead whale with a chainsaw and tied head to roof of his family’s minivan
Story by Myriam Page • 3h • 3 min read

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news...da5dcb8caf82de&ei=46

He dumped a roadkill bear cub in New York’s Central Park, now this.

In the resurfaced 2012 interview, Kick Kennedy recounted one day when she was six and the family learned a dead whale had washed up on the beach at Hyannis Port, southeast of Boston.

The actor-turned-philanthropist said that, on hearing the news, her dad headed down to the beach armed with a chainsaw to cut off the whale’s head.

He then strapped the grim body part to the roof of the family’s minivan using bungee cords and then drove the family to Mount Kisco, New York – a drive around four to five hours long.

“Every time we accelerated on the highway, whale juice would pour into the windows of the car, and it was the rankest thing on the planet,” Kick recalled in the interview.

“We all had plastic bags over our heads with mouth holes cut out, and people on the highway were giving us the finger, but that was just normal day-to-day stuff for us.”

There is an interesting story in Vanity Fair this month about RFK, Jr. Pretty sure that's where this excerpt comes from.

He is a full blown looney tune and always has been. The guy was a heroin addict for 15 years. It fried his brain.

quote:

The guy was a heroin addict for 15 years. It fried his brain.

So that explains what killed his brain worms that apparently he caught by consuming roadkill carrion. The heroin fried the worms too.

And I thought it was just the toxic environment that killed the worms after migrating to his brain.

Sounds like a perfect person to rule America!

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
There is an interesting story in Vanity Fair this month about RFK, Jr. Pretty sure that's where this excerpt comes from.

He is a full blown looney tune and always has been. The guy was a heroin addict for 15 years. It fried his brain.

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/...ainsaw-investigation

And this guy STILL got more primary votes than quemala

Well, the good thing is that the Harris Team didn't want his fried brain anywhere near their rule of America.

He's perfect for Trump, the loser.

I see his son is off fighting in Ukraine. Must be some interesting family discussions.

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
There is an interesting story in Vanity Fair this month about RFK, Jr. Pretty sure that's where this excerpt comes from.

He is a full blown looney tune and always has been. The guy was a heroin addict for 15 years. It fried his brain.

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/...ainsaw-investigation

And this guy STILL got more primary votes than quemala

Oddly, RFK Jr did not more delegate votes by party rules at a party convention.

I said primary votes. Checks notes.. yep, primary.

He certainly seems to be a nut.
But, the one thing I have not read or heard about RFK
He went after Biden, Kameltoe and Trump, but never the voters who support them.
The others could take note of that.

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:
I said primary votes. Checks notes.. yep, primary.

I know what you sai. Again, what matters is did the DNC follow its rules in delegates voting?

The answer is yes. This, your observation is irrelevant, does not accurately state the law of party candidate selection under this fact pattern.

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:
I said primary votes. Checks notes.. yep, primary.

I know what you sai. Again, what matters is did the DNC follow its rules in delegates voting?

The answer is yes. This, your observation is irrelevant, does not accurately state the law of party candidate selection under this fact pattern.

Irrelevant to you, perhaps. She was installed, without voter say so, only the elites. And that, my friend, is one way to oligarchy.. which leads to dictators

It exactly states what it states, the common voter was given no say. There is no way around it

Weird jeffee, just weird.

What do you have to say about the brain worms, the roadkill bear cub and the whale head strapped to his car?

Or is it that you would just rather not consider that?

Poor Joe, why can't he just serve out his term in peace?

Even now, the GOP can't shake the failed farce impeachment investigation.

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/...te-house-republicans

24 hours ago
Biden impeachment backlash builds within House GOP

quote:

He is a full blown looney tune and always has been.

That^^^would be anyone who supports the Democratic Party.

I would vote for him as an Independent before I voted for any Democrat — strictly for his stance on freedom of speech.

The Democratic Party is the party of looney tunes.

quote:

I would vote for him as an Independent before I voted for any Democrat — strictly for his stance on freedom of speech.

Yea, we know already. If not for one reason, any will do.

I almost understand, but not quite.

As bad as I think Trump and RFK Jr are, I don't hate them like you hate democrats.

I abide the old saying that hate harms those who hate more than those they hate.

It's a psychology thing. I think it's a truism. Anyway, I check my hate weapon at the door. It's worse than useless.

And BTW, freedom of speech is a protected right per the constitution, with caveats per SCOTUS. So far, I think their precedence is correct. Whatever Musk or RFK Jr has to say is nonsense.

Chlorox enemas, UV light bulbs. Those kind of loony tunes??

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:
I said primary votes. Checks notes.. yep, primary.

I know what you sai. Again, what matters is did the DNC follow its rules in delegates voting?

The answer is yes. This, your observation is irrelevant, does not accurately state the law of party candidate selection under this fact pattern.

Irrelevant to you, perhaps. She was installed, without voter say so, only the elites. And that, my friend, is one way to oligarchy.. which leads to dictators

It exactly states what it states, the common voter was given no say. There is no way around it

So why is it relevant to you how the Dems chose their candidate? You don't vote for that party anyway.

On the way to oligarchy? Lol! What do you think the Dems should have done to pick a candidate after Biden withdrew, when it was too late to hold a new primary?

I asked you that question before, and you never answered. Weird.

What matters are the rules of the Party being applied equally.

When President Biden withdrew, there was nothing else to do.

The delegates were free to vote for who they wanted at the convention.

Your position is irrelevant and not the status of the law.

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:

Your position is irrelevant and not the status of the law.

Oddly, the state primaries are covered by laws, but the DNC isn't.
Strange huh?

But you are willing engaging in voter suppression, aren't you?

quote:

Originally posted by Magine Enigam:

quote:

I would vote for him as an Independent before I voted for any Democrat — strictly for his stance on freedom of speech.

Yea, we know already. If not for one reason, any will do.

I almost understand, but not quite.

As bad as I think Trump and RFK Jr are, I don't hate them like you hate democrats.

I abide the old saying that hate harms those who hate more than those they hate.

It's a psychology thing. I think it's a truism. Anyway, I check my hate weapon at the door. It's worse than useless.

And BTW, freedom of speech is a protected right per the constitution, with caveats per SCOTUS. So far, I think their precedence is correct. Whatever Musk or RFK Jr has to say is nonsense.

The new speech is digital via social media and the precedent is censorship — not good. Elon and Robert Jr are on the right side.

As to your other point…I don’t “hate” democrats…but I DO hate ALL that they stand for.

quote:

So why is it relevant to you how the Dems chose their candidate? You don't vote for that party anyway.

A silly little thing called democracy...... Your party ain't much into it.....

Folks who think VP Harris’ nomination was in violation of something undefined by them, need to go read on Hubert Humphrey’s nomination.

No candidate for nomination being McCarty and Wallace went to the convention with enough delegates to claim nomination. President Johnson had withdrew.

Humphrey declared his candidacy for nomination too late for the primaries.

Two hours of negotiations with President Johnson’s support obtained by Humphrey’s public support for the Administration’s war policy won the delegates to achieve nomination.

McCarty was the peace, end war candidate.
RFK after winning the California Primary had been assassinated freeing those delegates.
Wallace was Wallace.

McCarthy on that single ballot came in second with 600 odd delegates casting their vote for him.

Wallace got 140.

President Nixon won the election.

There was nothing corrupt about VP Harris nomination. Like Humphrey, any democrat was free to make their pitch for enough delegates to win the nomination at the convention.

The delegates were not forced by a violent mob or paramilitary force to vote VP Harris.

There was not time nor any requirement to hold the state primaries.

I wish President Biden had chosen not to seek nomination sooner. After the debate, I came here and said President Biden has to withdraw or he carries more about himself as a person who coveted personal prestige and power, like Trump, than the nation.

To President Biden’s credit, he recognized this and withdrew. A person is never too late to do the right thing.

At the convention, President Biden said it all. He loved being President, “but I love the country more.”

That is the great juxtaposition of our time and where the two parties are.

Trump’s best plan to stay out of prison is to run for this office and win.

His policies are nothing but his own self-preservation. A self put in jeopardy by his own actions.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

The new speech is digital

When you say "digital", do you include this?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news...368d3c34db383&ei=100

Trump mocked over new batch of digital trading cards — which come with pieces of his ‘knock-out’ debate suit
Story by Gustaf Kilander • 3h • 2 min read

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:

Your position is irrelevant and not the status of the law.

Oddly, the state primaries are covered by laws, but the DNC isn't.
Strange huh?

But you are willing engaging in voter suppression, aren't you?

Here's another argument you haven't pursued yet:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news...7c938142831f9&ei=100

GOP group claims Dred Scott decision means Kamala Harris can’t be president? Really?
Opinion by Yvette Walker • 50m • 3 min read

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

I would vote for him as an Independent before I voted for any Democrat — strictly for his stance on freedom of speech.

The new speech is digital via social media and the precedent is censorship — not good. Elon and Robert Jr are on the right side.

After thinking a bit about your post, wondering where you are coming from, my algorithm produced this article. I think this explains:

https://www.financial-world.or...position-and-regime/

Why Telegram owner’s arrest shocked both russian opposition and regime?
The day after Pavel Durov, the Russian billionaire émigré and founder and CEO of the messaging service Telegram, was arrested in France, the most fascinating aspect was the range of those who immediately came to his defense

Published August 27, 2024 20:00
by Sededin Dedovic

I got skulls and heads of animals all over the place. Reckon most of us do. Always wanted a croc skull but haven’t had the opportunity.

quote:

Originally posted by Magine Enigam:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

I would vote for him as an Independent before I voted for any Democrat — strictly for his stance on freedom of speech.

The new speech is digital via social media and the precedent is censorship — not good. Elon and Robert Jr are on the right side.

After thinking a bit about your post, wondering where you are coming from, my algorithm produced this article. I think this explains:

https://www.financial-world.or...position-and-regime/

Why Telegram owner’s arrest shocked both russian opposition and regime?
The day after Pavel Durov, the Russian billionaire émigré and founder and CEO of the messaging service Telegram, was arrested in France, the most fascinating aspect was the range of those who immediately came to his defense

Published August 27, 2024 20:00
by Sededin Dedovic

What exactly ME does your article explain? Anything??? Or are you just throwing it out there for the shock factor? Russia — oh the horrors!

quote:

What exactly ME does your article explain? Anything??? Or are you just throwing it out there for the shock factor? Russia — oh the horrors!

All I'm saying is that maybe the article explains why unfettered "free speech" per digital social media and those who advocate it are approved by you.

The article shows how it is used for ill-intended and ill-effect purposes. And Trump has shown us how it is used for several means as a primary fascist tool. I can understand why those who believe in lies and want to spread lies and dis/misinformation and propaganda want unrestrained access for their unhinged BS.

But, it's a catch 22.

Flood the zone with lies and propaganda, or censor and by whom? Who is going the be the truth police? It's a nasty game. I figure that if Trump gains control, one of the first things he will want to control is the media, social media included.

I'm just saying that given the decline in public confidence in media, and also the general decline in ability to sort out truth, and the rabid fever of liars to spread their "truth", and the growing platforms, and the desire of people like Musk to be unfettered, we are in for some real trouble.

I don't know how to deal with it on a broad scale. It appears that people can't be educated. Lies are effective. On a personal scale, I don't participate in social media, like Facebook, except this forum if that's classed as a form of social media.

1990 called, they want their foreign policy back - Barrack Omaba, 2012

Russia, Russia, Russia- Adam Schitz 2016-2021

quote:

Originally posted by Magine Enigam:

quote:

What exactly ME does your article explain? Anything??? Or are you just throwing it out there for the shock factor? Russia — oh the horrors!

All I'm saying is that maybe the article explains why unfettered "free speech" per digital social media and those who advocate it are approved by you.

The article shows how it is used for ill-intended and ill-effect purposes. And Trump has shown us how it is used for several means as a primary fascist tool. I can understand why those who believe in lies and want to spread lies and dis/misinformation and propaganda want unrestrained access for their unhinged BS.

But, it's a catch 22.

Flood the zone with lies and propaganda, or censor and by whom? Who is going the be the truth police? It's a nasty game. I figure that if Trump gains control, one of the first things he will want to control is the media, social media included.

I'm just saying that given the decline in public confidence in media, and also the general decline in ability to sort out truth, and the rabid fever of liars to spread their "truth", and the growing platforms, and the desire of people like Musk to be unfettered, we are in for some real trouble.

I don't know how to deal with it on a broad scale. It appears that people can't be educated. Lies are effective. On a personal scale, I don't participate in social media, like Facebook, except this forum if that's classed as a form of social media.

It is a real problem! Somehow the issue must be dealt with. But banning speech in the way thats happening or being touted isn't the right answer.
It has really obvious opportunity for misuse, just as the current situation is being misused.
Musks community checks is at least an attempt to deal with it.

an interesting article that shocked me a little.

https://thehill.com/opinion/ca...rugs-sex-duis-rapes/

Some of the article may be true. It's not an easy task to sort out what is and what isn't.

I did read the whole thing, and thanks for posting the link. It's interesting at least and there are references to some facts.

The sentence that got me first was:

"A lot has changed. The Democratic Party has evolved from the party of the working man to the party of the man who thinks he’s a woman."

That told me to watch out and a clue about the author. Slant defining the Democratic Party as "the party of the man who thinks he’s a woman" is almost funny if we knew the author was joking. He failed to mention the woman who thinks she's a man.

Anyway, if the Kennedy's shun RFK Jr because of his association with Trump, apparently they have their limits regarding depravity and debauchery. OTOH, some people seem to have lost all grasp of morals.

Its definitely biased. Most of the actual insinuations seem to have fact behind them though. Like it or not, the trans issue, however important or not it is, seems to be a hill that the democrats are prepared to die on. And it does seem to be an issue that is in the populations mind.

quote:

Originally posted by jdollar:
Chlorox enemas, UV light bulbs. Those kind of loony tunes??

Damn doctors. Always weighing in. Like they know anything.

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
There is an interesting story in Vanity Fair this month about RFK, Jr. Pretty sure that's where this excerpt comes from.

He is a full blown looney tune and always has been. The guy was a heroin addict for 15 years. It fried his brain.

Nuttier than squirrel shit!