quote:

Establishment Republicans would rather lose with honor and dignity than get their hands dirty and their noses bloodied in a street fight.

Politics ain’t beanbag, as the expression goes, except to genteel Republicans who prefer the wimp approach of giving a pleasant concession speech as opposed to taking the badass approach and punching back twice as hard when attacked.

Trump



Greg Gutfield, one of the few remaining conservative voices on Fox News, made the case for Donald Trump on his recent show.

Watch or allow me to paraphrase:

When you are watching vintage Trump, you have to realize this is how he is going to be in meetings with people who are not friendly to the United States.


He is not a figurehead, he’s an agent, he’s your agent, he’s America’s lawyer. He’s in the room to represent his client, America. Your needs and your concerns. He’s supposed to be an asshole. He’s not interested in impressing the other people in the room.

I want an agent or a lawyer with that relentless energy that makes people upset. And the country needs that.



This guy is going to be that way in a room with people that have been screwing us over. You want the guy that nobody likes because they don’t like him for a reason.

Fortunately, I have never been through a divorce, sued anyone, nor been a criminal defendent. But if I did, I would want a lawyer who is tough, a badass, willing to fight tooth and nail for me the client. Not someone who puts up a civil and stately argument, while leaving his or her client on the losing end.


There is much hand-wringing and pearl-clutching among the Republican smart set over Trump’s demeanor, his mean tweets and name-calling, his eagerness to fight on the same scorched earth playing field as do Democrats.

Trump gives his opponents nicknames. It’s branding and he is a master of that due to his New York City upbringing and years in the business and reality television world. And it works. Just ask Low Energy Jeb, Little Marco, or Crooked Hillary.

But to the Wall Street Journal, National Review, and many on Fox News, this behavior is abhorrent. Were they upset with nicknames like “Bushitler”? Or Paul Ryan pushing granny in a wheelchair off a cliff? Or Mitt Romney supposedly not paying any taxes, killing his employees, and torturing his dog?

Are elected Republicans fighting a weaponized administrative state that accused Trump of colluding with the Russians to steal the 2016 election? Or 51 intelligence officials lying through their teeth about Hunter Biden’s laptop? Or the lawfare used against Trump? Or the credible allegations of election fraud?

No fight, only a few Congressional hearings and strongly worded tweets.

Meanwhile the American people are getting screwed. Most Americans are living paycheck to paycheck. American veterans are living in squalor on the streets while illegal aliens are living in luxury hotels, receiving food, healthcare, education, and other services that many hardworking Americans cannot afford.

Who is fighting for them?

Democrats instead are advocating for male athletes competing against women, tampons in boys’ bathrooms, and unlimited abortion of full-term babies. World War III is brewing with American young adults potentially drafted to fight and defend the borders of Israel, Ukraine, or Taiwan, while our border is left wide open.

Who are our advocates? Word-salad Kamala and Tampon Tim? Or the mean loudmouth with orange hair?

America is in decline, economically, socially, and culturally. Who will fight to stop or at least slow the decline? Reversing things is a tall order, even for Trump, given the forces marshalled against him – media, Hollywood, academia, Wall Street, much of his own party, and the fourth branch of government, the administrative state or ruling class.

Trump is willing to fight, unlike most elected Republicans and surrogates. Which is why Trump remains popular to this day, despite the fierce opposition, including a recent assassination attempt.

Do Trump supporters want to marry him? Live with him? Vacation with him? Be his valentine? No, they want an advocate, someone willing to roll up his sleeves and fight for them.

Trump isn’t the cause of this anti-establishment movement, instead he is the result of it. The Tea Party arose due to feckless Republican leadership under George W. Bush ushering in the reign of Barack Obama.

Trump and MAGA was the result of Republicans genuflecting to Obama, offering no pushback to his “fundamental transformation of America” which continues to this day.

Who is America’s advocate? Who is fighting for the Constitution, the rule of law? Who wants America first rather than America last?

The American people have little voice. We elect representatives to be our advocates. They talk a good game as candidates, but few follow through on those promises once in office. They may be nice and polite, but save that for the country club pool party, not the rough and tumble world of U.S. and global leadership.

Republican primary voters made their choice. Overwhelmingly. They chose, as Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg described him, “a badass.” Trump’s policies and accomplishments are the best since Reagan. It’s not about worshiping Trump but instead about results and making America great again.

As Trump described in a 2016 campaign rally,

Our movement is about replacing a failed and corrupt political establishment with a new government controlled by you, the American People. There is nothing the political establishment will not do, and no lie they will not tell, to hold on to their prestige and power at your expense.

As Gutfield said, Trump is America’s advocate, its pitbull lawyer. So what if he can be an asshole at times? You’re not marrying the guy.

When it comes to your trial lawyer, your surgeon, or your president, you want the person who will fight like hell for your case, your life, or your country. So what if he’s full of himself and can at times be a jerk.

Better that than being left with a guilty verdict or in the morgue. It’s time to separate personality from performance.

When negotiating with Putin, Xi, or any other world leader, I don’t want Mr. Nice Guy representing me if he gets rolled by badass foreign leaders. I want a tough guy on my side, one our opponents fear. Out of fear comes respect. Whether they like my guy or not doesn’t matter.

When losing is not an option, we don’t want excuses, platitudes, and congenial words. We want a fighter.

As Dan Bongino likes to say, “Cutsey time is over.” Bring on the badass!

quote:

The choice for America’s leadership is clear, and the contrast between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris represents a pivotal moment in our nation’s history. In evaluating who should lead us, it is crucial to reflect on the tangible results and the vision each candidate offers.

Donald Trump, with his track record of addressing critical issues such as hate crimes, gun violence, and human trafficking, presents a compelling case for support from both the working man and the businessman; Kamala Harris, as Biden’s political successor, represents a continuation of failed policies that have plagued our country over the past four years.

Donald Trump’s presidency was marked by decisive actions to combat some of the most pressing issues facing our society. His administration implemented robust measures to address hate crimes, gun violence, and human trafficking, laying a foundation for a safer and more just America. These initiatives were not just symbolic; they had real impacts on communities across the country, reflecting Trump’s commitment to creating a more secure environment for all Americans.

One of Trump’s notable actions was the signing of an executive order reinforcing that Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 applies to discrimination rooted in anti-semitism. This move was crucial in protecting minority communities from hate-fueled violence and discrimination. By clarifying and expanding the scope of civil rights protections, Trump not only addressed a pressing societal issue but also strengthened the legal framework against hate crimes.

Economically, creating a safer society translates into more vibrant and stable communities. Businesses thrive in environments where people feel secure, and families can invest in their futures without fear. The economic implications of a more secure society are profound, contributing to a stronger economy overall. This is particularly evident in regions that have historically struggled with higher rates of violence and discrimination, where the economic benefits of enhanced safety and stability are most pronounced.

Trump’s administration also made significant strides in addressing gun violence through the Fix NICS Act. This legislation aimed to improve the background check system to ensure that dangerous individuals could not acquire firearms. By closing gaps in the system, Trump’s administration took a crucial step towards preventing violent crimes and protecting communities.

The economic argument for addressing gun violence is compelling. Communities plagued by high rates of gun violence often face economic stagnation due to lower property values, reduced investment, and increased healthcare costs. By working to mitigate these issues, Trump’s policies helped to foster a more conducive environment for economic growth and development.


Recognizing the importance of safeguarding America’s children, Trump signed the STOP School Violence Act and established a Commission on School Safety. These initiatives were designed to examine and implement strategies to protect students from violence. This focus on school safety not only addresses immediate threats but also contributes to long-term educational and economic outcomes. Safe schools are essential for a productive workforce, as they ensure that students can focus on learning rather than being preoccupied with safety concerns.

The economic benefits of investing in school safety are clear. By creating safer learning environments, we reduce the long-term costs associated with violence and create a more capable future workforce. Additionally, parents are more likely to invest in communities where their children are safe, further boosting local economies.



Trump’s administration also launched the Foster Youth to Independence initiative, aimed at preventing and ending homelessness among young adults transitioning out of the foster care system. This initiative was a vital step in addressing the unique challenges faced by these young individuals, offering them a pathway to stability and success.

Economically, investing in the well-being of youth transitioning out of foster care has significant benefits. By providing support and resources, we reduce the likelihood of these individuals facing long-term economic hardships, such as unemployment and poverty. This investment in human capital ultimately contributes to a more robust and resilient economy.


One of Trump’s most impactful initiatives was his relentless fight against human trafficking. The Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act, signed during his presidency, tightened criteria for evaluating countries’ efforts to combat trafficking. Additionally, Trump established a task force dedicated to addressing the issue of missing or murdered Native American women and girls, demonstrating a comprehensive approach to tackling this grave issue.

Trump’s administration created the first-ever White House position focused solely on combating human trafficking. This move highlighted the seriousness with which Trump approached the issue, ensuring that it received the attention and resources necessary to make a difference. Trafficking often has far-reaching economic consequences, including the costs associated with law enforcement, healthcare, and social services, not to mention the human cost. By addressing this issue, Trump’s administration helped to reduce the impact and create a more stable environment for economic growth.

As the Democrat nominee, Kamala Harris represents a continuation of the policies that have led to significant challenges over the past four years. Under Biden-Harris, we have seen a rise in crime, increased economic uncertainty, and a lack of effective action on critical issues such as human trafficking and gun violence. Harris, as Biden’s political successor, intends to perpetuate these failed policies, which have already had detrimental effects on American communities and the economy.

Their handling of these issues has been marked by inaction and ineffective measures. The rise in crime and the lack of progress reflect a broader failure to protect and serve the American people; Harris’s continuation of these policies would only exacerbate these problems, leading to further economic and social instability.

In the upcoming election, Donald Trump offers a clear and compelling alternative to the failed policies of progressive Democrats. His implementation of strong measures to address hate crimes, gun violence, and human trafficking speaks to his commitment to creating a safer and more prosperous America. For both the working man and the businessman, Trump’s presidency demonstrated tangible benefits, from improved safety and reduced crime rates to enhanced economic stability.

By contrast, Kamala Harris represents a continuation of policies that have failed to address these critical issues effectively. Voting for Trump is not just a choice for a different policy approach but a vote for a safer, more secure, and economically vibrant America. As we approach this pivotal election, it is essential to consider not only the past but also the future that each candidate promises. Donald Trump’s vision for America offers hope and a clear path to recovery and growth, making him the best choice for our nation’s future.

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
Any article that starts out lamenting the fact that Greg Gutfeld is "one of the few remaining conservative voices at FOX News" deserves to be used as a$$wipe, not to be read.

quote:

Originally posted by Scott King:

President Trump failed with corona....

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by Scott King:

President Trump failed with corona....

Honest question - seriously -

Let's unpack that -
wanted to block travel from China - Biden called him xenophobic
(was a little distracted by the impeachment) -
Rolled out a huge mobile hospital to NYS, unused
put hospital ships in NYC, unused
started operation warp speed, creating new therapeutics for an prior unknown "novel" virus - was said it could take 5 years to dev a vax .. still might, as it's not a vax, but it's been pushed on the majority of americans
issued (regardless of veracity) guidance on how to prevent the spread -

so, in failing corona, what could he have done MORE for it?

oh, this past 2 weeks, more people i know or co-workers, are stilling getting it, and one I don't know, good ole joe, are getting it - even triple vaxxed ...

So, what could have, with the knowledge in the moment, gone better?

and, of course, more americans died from covid under biden's watch than trumps - that's a result of time, not of presidential effort, but it's measurable


Trump didn't kill 10-15k people by forcing active covid cases into nursing homes and THEN under report the deaths - THIS is failing

~Ann

quote:

Originally posted by Bill Leeper:
If Trump had the intelligence and ability to come across as reasonably conservative, both fiscally and socially, he could easily win this election. He does not have that ability, because he doesn't have the intelligence. He is already looking for excuses for his loss, for something to blame other than his own failings. If we get stuck with Kamala, it will be Trump's fault and the fault of his followers for refusing to run a decent candidate. Bill

quote:

Like the below article mentions.....many republicans would much prefer to lose with fake dignity than win....

quote:

Originally posted by Bill Leeper:
If Trump had the intelligence and ability to come across as reasonably conservative, both fiscally and socially, he could easily win this election. He does not have that ability, because he doesn't have the intelligence. He is already looking for excuses for his loss, for something to blame other than his own failings. If we get stuck with Kamala, it will be Trump's fault and the fault of his followers for refusing to run a decent candidate. Bill

quote:

Originally posted by Aspen Hill Adventures:

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by Scott King:

President Trump failed with corona....

Honest question - seriously -

Let's unpack that -
wanted to block travel from China - Biden called him xenophobic
(was a little distracted by the impeachment) -
Rolled out a huge mobile hospital to NYS, unused
put hospital ships in NYC, unused
started operation warp speed, creating new therapeutics for an prior unknown "novel" virus - was said it could take 5 years to dev a vax .. still might, as it's not a vax, but it's been pushed on the majority of americans
issued (regardless of veracity) guidance on how to prevent the spread -

so, in failing corona, what could he have done MORE for it?

oh, this past 2 weeks, more people i know or co-workers, are stilling getting it, and one I don't know, good ole joe, are getting it - even triple vaxxed ...

So, what could have, with the knowledge in the moment, gone better?

and, of course, more americans died from covid under biden's watch than trumps - that's a result of time, not of presidential effort, but it's measurable


Trump didn't kill 10-15k people by forcing active covid cases into nursing homes and THEN under report the deaths - THIS is failing

People have short memories. Especially here.

quote:

Originally posted by Scott King:

quote:

Originally posted by Aspen Hill Adventures:

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by Scott King:

President Trump failed with corona....

Honest question - seriously -

Let's unpack that -
wanted to block travel from China - Biden called him xenophobic
(was a little distracted by the impeachment) -
Rolled out a huge mobile hospital to NYS, unused
put hospital ships in NYC, unused
started operation warp speed, creating new therapeutics for an prior unknown "novel" virus - was said it could take 5 years to dev a vax .. still might, as it's not a vax, but it's been pushed on the majority of americans
issued (regardless of veracity) guidance on how to prevent the spread -

so, in failing corona, what could he have done MORE for it?

oh, this past 2 weeks, more people i know or co-workers, are stilling getting it, and one I don't know, good ole joe, are getting it - even triple vaxxed ...

So, what could have, with the knowledge in the moment, gone better?

and, of course, more americans died from covid under biden's watch than trumps - that's a result of time, not of presidential effort, but it's measurable


Trump didn't kill 10-15k people by forcing active covid cases into nursing homes and THEN under report the deaths - THIS is failing

People have short memories. Especially here.

https://natlawreview.com/artic...rosecutions-are-rise

I think it said 17% of the distributions were fraudulent?

Yes ann, especially here people have, short memories willful ignorance.

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by Scott King:

quote:

Originally posted by Aspen Hill Adventures:

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by Scott King:

President Trump failed with corona....

Honest question - seriously -

Let's unpack that -
wanted to block travel from China - Biden called him xenophobic
(was a little distracted by the impeachment) -
Rolled out a huge mobile hospital to NYS, unused
put hospital ships in NYC, unused
started operation warp speed, creating new therapeutics for an prior unknown "novel" virus - was said it could take 5 years to dev a vax .. still might, as it's not a vax, but it's been pushed on the majority of americans
issued (regardless of veracity) guidance on how to prevent the spread -

so, in failing corona, what could he have done MORE for it?

oh, this past 2 weeks, more people i know or co-workers, are stilling getting it, and one I don't know, good ole joe, are getting it - even triple vaxxed ...

So, what could have, with the knowledge in the moment, gone better?

and, of course, more americans died from covid under biden's watch than trumps - that's a result of time, not of presidential effort, but it's measurable


Trump didn't kill 10-15k people by forcing active covid cases into nursing homes and THEN under report the deaths - THIS is failing

People have short memories. Especially here.

https://natlawreview.com/artic...rosecutions-are-rise

I think it said 17% of the distributions were fraudulent?

Yes ann, especially here people have, short memories willful ignorance.

PPP loan scammers? while trumps signature is on the label, it has nancy's pawprints all over it -

but what could trump have done "better" in your opinion, but based on information available at the time?

wanna talk abject failures of gummit spending? let's try solyndra

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Like the below article mentions.....many republicans would much prefer to lose with fake dignity than win....

Does any one name in particular come to mind?

quote:

Originally posted by Aspen Hill Adventures:

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by Scott King:

President Trump failed with corona....

Honest question - seriously -

Let's unpack that -
wanted to block travel from China - Biden called him xenophobic
(was a little distracted by the impeachment) -
Rolled out a huge mobile hospital to NYS, unused
put hospital ships in NYC, unused
started operation warp speed, creating new therapeutics for an prior unknown "novel" virus - was said it could take 5 years to dev a vax .. still might, as it's not a vax, but it's been pushed on the majority of americans
issued (regardless of veracity) guidance on how to prevent the spread -

so, in failing corona, what could he have done MORE for it?

oh, this past 2 weeks, more people i know or co-workers, are stilling getting it, and one I don't know, good ole joe, are getting it - even triple vaxxed ...

So, what could have, with the knowledge in the moment, gone better?

and, of course, more americans died from covid under biden's watch than trumps - that's a result of time, not of presidential effort, but it's measurable


Trump didn't kill 10-15k people by forcing active covid cases into nursing homes and THEN under report the deaths - THIS is failing

People have short memories. Especially here.

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by Scott King:

President Trump failed with corona....

Honest question - seriously -

Let's unpack that -
wanted to block travel from China - Biden called him xenophobic
(was a little distracted by the impeachment) -
Rolled out a huge mobile hospital to NYS, unused
put hospital ships in NYC, unused
started operation warp speed, creating new therapeutics for an prior unknown "novel" virus - was said it could take 5 years to dev a vax .. still might, as it's not a vax, but it's been pushed on the majority of americans
issued (regardless of veracity) guidance on how to prevent the spread -

so, in failing corona, what could he have done MORE for it?

oh, this past 2 weeks, more people i know or co-workers, are stilling getting it, and one I don't know, good ole joe, are getting it - even triple vaxxed ...

So, what could have, with the knowledge in the moment, gone better?

and, of course, more americans died from covid under biden's watch than trumps - that's a result of time, not of presidential effort, but it's measurable


Trump didn't kill 10-15k people by forcing active covid cases into nursing homes and THEN under report the deaths - THIS is failing

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by Scott King:

President Trump failed with corona....

Honest question - seriously -

Let's unpack that -
wanted to block travel from China - Biden called him xenophobic
(was a little distracted by the impeachment) -
Rolled out a huge mobile hospital to NYS, unused
put hospital ships in NYC, unused
started operation warp speed, creating new therapeutics for an prior unknown "novel" virus - was said it could take 5 years to dev a vax .. still might, as it's not a vax, but it's been pushed on the majority of americans
issued (regardless of veracity) guidance on how to prevent the spread -

so, in failing corona, what could he have done MORE for it?

oh, this past 2 weeks, more people i know or co-workers, are stilling getting it, and one I don't know, good ole joe, are getting it - even triple vaxxed ...

So, what could have, with the knowledge in the moment, gone better?

and, of course, more americans died from covid under biden's watch than trumps - that's a result of time, not of presidential effort, but it's measurable


Trump didn't kill 10-15k people by forcing active covid cases into nursing homes and THEN under report the deaths - THIS is failing

Scott
Not picking on you.

I am not reading anything about what trump good have done better with the knowledge at hand at the time. I am open to hearing it

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
We should have never shut down…fact.

But if you think Trump did that wrong…just check out how Walz dove off the deep end wearing a lead deep diving belt.

That guy is bat-shit crazy. He makes Kami look conservative.

quote:

Originally posted by JTEX:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Like the below article mentions.....many republicans would much prefer to lose with fake dignity than win....

Does any one name in particular come to mind?

Snort.

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:
That, or Josh still has a functioning moral compass

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:
That, or Josh still has a functioning moral compass

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:
That, or Josh still has a functioning moral compass

I have one. It says try to keep a (D) away from executive power executive power.

quote:

Originally posted by JTEX:

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:
That, or Josh still has a functioning moral compass

By having a moral compass I take that you mean not protecting our borders from illegal invasion and drug smuggling? Not protecting our citizens from crime and destroying our economy.

Got it!

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:
That, or Josh still has a functioning moral compass

I have one. It says try to keep a (D) away from executive power executive power.