Any comment Jeffe? I noticed that you conveniently avoided my last post on the subject. You must have been too busy defending Trump.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg5eqzrlj1o

If you wish to engage me, personally, please use the PM function -

Steve

Cowards hide and then assassinate you. Back shooters.

Character does not matter to them.

quote:

Jeffrey Michael Kelly, 60, allegedly had more than 120 guns and over 250,000 rounds of ammunition in his home, including a machine gun that was in his car, leading prosecutors to believe he was planning a "mass casualty" event.

Lots of enthusiasm for the Second Amendment there.

quote:

Originally posted by Nakihunter:
Steve

Cowards hide and then assassinate you. Back shooters.

Character does not matter to them.

I believe that he does not want to continue supporting the position he has taken in public because he is wrong, demonstratively so.

Just in the past couple of weeks several articles have been published by major new sources(AP, BBC) and they directly refute his position that only the left engages in political violence.

It is not that hard to say that political violence is wrong, no matter who commits it.

quote:

Originally posted by Nakihunter:
Steve

Cowards hide and then assassinate you. Back shooters.

Character does not matter to them.

Maki, you are a past master in the subject

And yet, still no acknowledgement that political violence happens on both sides of the aisle.

Quite telling really.

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:
And yet, still no acknowledgement that political violence happens on both sides of the aisle.

Quite telling really.

I will agree. But, I believe there is more from the left.

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Ahrenberg:

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:
And yet, still no acknowledgement that political violence happens on both sides of the aisle.

Quite telling really.

I will agree. But, I believe there is more from the left.

A fair position to take.

I'm not sure which side engages in more but I do think the right is more effective at it. The article I posted last week about the far right former military guy offering was nutty. Here it is again, the shooting took place in the area that I grew up in, I graduated with the Under sheriffs brother in my class.

Here it is again:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news...0d50f7fab4c503&ei=50

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:
And yet, still no acknowledgement that political violence happens on both sides of the aisle.

Quite telling really.

sure, steve - the left rioted for nearly a year, with murders, rape, looting, guns, and arson, the right had jan6, no pallets of bricks and rocks, no "milkshakes", no frozen water bottles, no looting, no rape, no arson, and no murders

now, man up and acknowledge that jan6 shutdown congress for a couple hours, but the dems little sit-in caused a multi-day shutdown of congress --

you won't, because you are inherently incapable of impassive review of facts.

you do need to cut back on sugar, it was working pretty well for you, glad you are getting the help you need

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:
And yet, still no acknowledgement that political violence happens on both sides of the aisle.

Quite telling really.

sure, steve - the left rioted for nearly a year, with murders, rape, looting, guns, and arson, the right had jan6, no pallets of bricks and rocks, no "milkshakes", no frozen water bottles, no looting, no rape, no arson, and no murders

now, man up and acknowledge that jan6 shutdown congress for a couple hours, but the dems little sit-in caused a multi-day shutdown of congress --

you won't, because you are inherently incapable of impassive review of facts.

you do need to cut back on sugar, it was working pretty well for you, glad you are getting the help you need

The sit in was nothing compared to J the 6th, you look like a tool for making the comparison.

I will freely admit rioting went on for months, but both the left and the right engaged in it. See Portland post Floyd and note that both sides partook for months.

I see your "sit in" with J the 6th and raise you Tim McVeigh.

Good to see you man up and admit you were wrong. I didn't think you had it in you.

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:


The sit in was nothing compared to J the 6th,

like i said, unable to look objectively at facts

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

you won't, because you are inherently incapable of impassive review of facts.

you should go back on your sugar free diet, jr

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:


The sit in was nothing compared to J the 6th,

like i said, unable to look objectively at facts

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

you won't, because you are inherently incapable of impassive review of facts.

you should go back on your sugar free diet, jr

Princess, you are a joke.

A sit in comparable to J the 6th

Nutter does not quite cover you honey.

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:


The sit in was nothing compared to J the 6th,

like i said, unable to look objectively at facts

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

you won't, because you are inherently incapable of impassive review of facts.

you should go back on your sugar free diet, jr

Princess, you are a joke.

A sit in comparable to J the 6th

Nutter does not quite cover you honey.

congress delayed a couple hours - obstruction of congress charges
congress delayed for DAYS - no obstruction of congress charges?

so, thanks for making it PERFECTLY clear that you believe in a different set of rules based on the person, rather than the CRIME --

poor thing, i pity you - cut back on the soda, it might be better for you

last time i checked, LAWS don't actually care about your position or your politics -- but is bert-land, i guess it does -

even being an employee, in good standing, disrupting the business get's your trespassed --

so, since it's bloody obvious your partake, what's your favorite strain there in colo?

own it steve, literally you have ZERO ethics if you can't say shutting the congress for days is objectively worse than shutting it down for a couple hours -

pathetic -- and to think, you thought you'd call ME out for dipstick behavior - sigh, and Halloween is coming, little stevie will be all in the candy, though he might have started already -- i recall you tell me your doctor said you should eat so much sugar, as it causes bad behaviors in children before their brains are fully developed.. and here i thought you would stick to your diet

To compare a sit in with attack on Congress on J the 6th you would need to BAT SHIT CRAZY....No need to wonder about you princess, you took all the guessing out of it. Full tilt NUTTER



I would bless your heart honey, but it just wouldn't help.

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:
Any comment Jeffe? I noticed that you conveniently avoided my last post on the subject. You must have been too busy defending Trump.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg5eqzrlj1o

His lawyer says he was a genius but not menacing. I guess shooting things up is simply child's play, not very menacing. Like Jeff seems to think of Jan 6th. Just a minor thing, really.

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:
To compare a sit in with attack on Congress on J the 6th you would need to BAT SH!T CRAZY....No need to wonder about you princess, you took all the guessing out of it. Full tilt NUTTER



I would bless your heart honey, but it just wouldn't help.

ahh, sweety... don't you think you've had enough sugar for today, as you can't control your utterances? rational persons have no need to swear in public

with is BIGGER, little stevie?
6 hours or 72 hours?

you can do it -- or call fifi and get on the phone with gladys, she might help you out

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:
To compare a sit in with attack on Congress on J the 6th you would need to BAT SH!T CRAZY....No need to wonder about you princess, you took all the guessing out of it. Full tilt NUTTER



I would bless your heart honey, but it just wouldn't help.

ahh, sweety... don't you think you've had enough sugar for today, as you can't control your utterances?

with is BIGGER, little stevie?
6 hours or 72 hours?

you can do it -- or call fifi and get on the phone with gladys, she might help you out

Somebody is straggling with anger issues tonight.

Maybe you should stop while you are behind princess.

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:
To compare a sit in with attack on Congress on J the 6th you would need to BAT SH!T CRAZY....No need to wonder about you princess, you took all the guessing out of it. Full tilt NUTTER



I would bless your heart honey, but it just wouldn't help.

ahh, sweety... don't you think you've had enough sugar for today, as you can't control your utterances?

with is BIGGER, little stevie?
6 hours or 72 hours?

you can do it -- or call fifi and get on the phone with gladys, she might help you out

Somebody is straggling with anger issues tonight.

Maybe you should stop while you are behind princess.

yes, stevie, i can see you are struggling with anger and emotional issues today, after all, you started this thread by "calling me out" .. sucks when you bit off more than you can chew - i mean, you can't even tell us if 6 is bigger or smaller than 72 -- you should follow your own advice... i mean, 6 is < or > than 72 isn't actually a college level question, but we see you struggle with honesty -- it's okay, most people grow out of that about 25.. there's hope for you, sweety

is this the point where you become unhinged and start babbling profanity, AGAIN?

Bit off more than I can chew? With you child? Hardly.

You are just a angry little girl, who has been proven wrong, publicly and now is butt hurt.

What is smaller? You are honey, you are definitely smaller.

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:
Bit off more than I can chew? With you child? Hardly.

You are just a angry little girl, who has been proven wrong, publicly and now is butt hurt.

What is smaller? You are honey, you are definitely smaller.

awww.. name calling .. aren't your precious -- hmm, we don't gendershame here, honey, that would be against liberal principals -

is 6 greater or less than 72? it's a SIMPLE question, should be right up your alley -- you can count to 72, right?

"proven" by you? honey, you wouldn't know a fact if it was slap across your face .. you work of option and emotion .. it's kinda cute on a fetching lay.. on you? well, let's just say it's not quiet as cute ...

sugar and strain for you? honey, you might should think about only doing one or the other, you are starting to babble, rant, and swear.. you are my hero

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:
To compare a sit in with attack on Congress on J the 6th you would need to BAT SHIT CRAZY....No need to wonder about you princess, you took all the guessing out of it. Full tilt NUTTER



I would bless your heart honey, but it just wouldn't help.

+1, chalk and cheese. The epitome of a false equivalency.

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:
To compare a sit in with attack on Congress on J the 6th you would need to BAT SHIT CRAZY....No need to wonder about you princess, you took all the guessing out of it. Full tilt NUTTER



I would bless your heart honey, but it just wouldn't help.

+1, chalk and cheese. The epitome of a false equivalency.

obstruction of congress ---- obstruction of congress? mike, help me to find the difference

cliches are cute, but not normally the refuge of a first rate mind, like yourself

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:
To compare a sit in with attack on Congress on J the 6th you would need to BAT SHIT CRAZY....No need to wonder about you princess, you took all the guessing out of it. Full tilt NUTTER



I would bless your heart honey, but it just wouldn't help.

+1, chalk and cheese. The epitome of a false equivalency.

obstruction of congress ---- obstruction of congress? mike, help me to find the difference

cliches are cute, but not normally the refuge of a first rate mind, like yourself

One was a violent attack on Congress the other was peaceful protest. Does that seem the same to you? My goodness you cannot possibly be this DAF, or can you? You just might be that dumb.

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:
To compare a sit in with attack on Congress on J the 6th you would need to BAT SHIT CRAZY....No need to wonder about you princess, you took all the guessing out of it. Full tilt NUTTER



I would bless your heart honey, but it just wouldn't help.

+1, chalk and cheese. The epitome of a false equivalency.

obstruction of congress ---- obstruction of congress? mike, help me to find the difference

cliches are cute, but not normally the refuge of a first rate mind, like yourself

One was a violent attack on Congress the other was peaceful protest. Does that seem the same to you? My goodness you cannot possibly be this DAF, or can you? You just might be that dumb.

. . . it definitely makes one wonder.

How many senseless shooting have occurred in America this week?

Why pick just one?

Stupid lefties!

And stupid righties!

Brainwashed moron by their own corrupt political system!

Hahahahahaha!!! You guys and your BS.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARephoYZ0FQ

"Who is the biggest enemy America faces"

- - - Democrats.

Strangely, the up charges on 1/6 were obstruction of congress.

Violence has statutes against it, and obstruction of congress has statutes against it.

If you are for rule of law, why are you excusing the Democrats obstruction? Sure, there is a difference between the two acts, but both are illegal, and the democrats certainly intended to obstruct congress to get their way.

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:
To compare a sit in with attack on Congress on J the 6th you would need to BAT SHIT CRAZY....No need to wonder about you princess, you took all the guessing out of it. Full tilt NUTTER



I would bless your heart honey, but it just wouldn't help.

+1, chalk and cheese. The epitome of a false equivalency.

obstruction of congress ---- obstruction of congress? mike, help me to find the difference

cliches are cute, but not normally the refuge of a first rate mind, like yourself

One was a violent attack on Congress the other was peaceful protest. Does that seem the same to you? My goodness you cannot possibly be this DAF, or can you? You just might be that dumb.

. . . it definitely makes one wonder.

So I guess military tribunals for people who disagree with him is Ok? What about suspending the Constitution for a few days? He’s already made both statements publicly….