THE ACCURATE RELOADING POLITICAL CRATER

Page 1 2 

Moderators: DRG
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Canada bans U.S. pork imports Login/Join 
One of Us
posted
https://apple.news/Apy_XjX1TRhGgzZN-sD6ngA

I am just speechless that anyone could have pretended Team Tariffs was a good idea.
 
Posts: 13574 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Now, Trump is postulating 250 percent tariff on dairy.

https://apple.news/AyUISdub7Rp-adPpsW2fN-A


This is madness.
 
Posts: 13574 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Id like to see TB 40s view on this?
 
Posts: 5226 | Location: South Island NZ | Registered: 21 July 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Most, if not all ag in Canada is manipulated by the gov.
Dairy was all but prohibited to cross the border. The big dairy producing states could have sold fluid milk much cheaper than the subsidized Canadian counterpart. Hence Canadas huge tariff.
The Canadian timber co. were taken to court multiple times for breaking Nafta. They always made a side deal before a ruling.
Canadian mills have been ringing the phone off the hook, looking for logs. Every logger I know have been getting calls. The log yards along the border here, are empty, and they Canadians are worried. The big mills bought up, and closed, most of the small mills operating in the US next to the border. Timber was sent across the border, then sold as finished product back across to the US.
The good news is, it wouldnt be hard for mills to start back up in the US, and Canadian mills could go pound sand.
Sap will be running starting this month. I hope they put a tariff on Canadian subsidized maple syrup, and the US syrup market thrives this year!
 
Posts: 7757 | Registered: 10 April 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Yep, Some of that is our experience too. For many years we could not get dairy product into Canada except via the US in a round about way.
Finally we got access, but the hoops and restrictions were major.
I kind of understand it, as producing dairy in their environment is extremely more costly than in ours and you do need to make some protections on your food production for national security when that's the case. But then your area would have a similar climate Tony, so You'd be competing evenly.
 
Posts: 5226 | Location: South Island NZ | Registered: 21 July 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
let s tariffs canada ... so anti canadian and you guys are expecting us to bend ....
 
Posts: 2518 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
To be clear. We dont tariff all most anyone. We are free trade. I think Trumps bridge burning is stupid. But I do recognise that Canada is very protectionist.
 
Posts: 5226 | Location: South Island NZ | Registered: 21 July 2008Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
and, in a strange turn of the page, it's an indirect tariff on the chinese, as they own smithfield and other "brands" ==


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 41295 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
To be clear. We dont tariff all most anyone. We are free trade. I think Trumps bridge burning is stupid. But I do recognise that Canada is very protectionist.


so is usa but you are seeming to be drinking too much kool aid on trumpism ...
 
Posts: 2518 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by theback40:
Most, if not all ag in Canada is manipulated by the gov.
Dairy was all but prohibited to cross the border. The big dairy producing states could have sold fluid milk much cheaper than the subsidized Canadian counterpart. Hence Canadas huge tariff.
The Canadian timber co. were taken to court multiple times for breaking Nafta. They always made a side deal before a ruling.
Canadian mills have been ringing the phone off the hook, looking for logs. Every logger I know have been getting calls. The log yards along the border here, are empty, and they Canadians are worried. The big mills bought up, and closed, most of the small mills operating in the US next to the border. Timber was sent across the border, then sold as finished product back across to the US.
The good news is, it wouldnt be hard for mills to start back up in the US, and Canadian mills could go pound sand.
Sap will be running starting this month. I hope they put a tariff on Canadian subsidized maple syrup, and the US syrup market thrives this year!


your agriculture is subsidized as well but your president started it and suddenly the canada had enough and retaliated ... we are nice but not stupid ...
 
Posts: 2518 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by medved:
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
To be clear. We dont tariff all most anyone. We are free trade. I think Trumps bridge burning is stupid. But I do recognise that Canada is very protectionist.


so is usa but you are seeming to be drinking too much kool aid on trumpism ...


WTF??
 
Posts: 5226 | Location: South Island NZ | Registered: 21 July 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
we are nice but not stupid ...


I seen your idiot in charge of finances say that the other day.
why don't you guys import some Norinco products down here, then we'll talk.
 
Posts: 5043 | Location: soda springs,id | Registered: 02 April 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
quote:
Originally posted by medved:
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
To be clear. We dont tariff all most anyone. We are free trade. I think Trumps bridge burning is stupid. But I do recognise that Canada is very protectionist.


so is usa but you are seeming to be drinking too much kool aid on trumpism ...


WTF??


funny you mentionned that canada is using protectionnist while usa is doing exactly the same i imagine your lamb meat is seen everywhere in usa lol ... seems among the MAGA supporters it s the flavour of the day and you are doing the same ... you shown your true colors like it or not ...
 
Posts: 2518 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Lamar:
quote:
we are nice but not stupid ...


I seen your idiot in charge of finances say that the other day.
why don't you guys import some Norinco products down here, then we'll talk.


we have a bunch of idiots in charge that is a given but none are reaching the level of the master in charge of the whitehouse ...
 
Posts: 2518 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by medved:
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
quote:
Originally posted by medved:
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
To be clear. We dont tariff all most anyone. We are free trade. I think Trumps bridge burning is stupid. But I do recognise that Canada is very protectionist.


so is usa but you are seeming to be drinking too much kool aid on trumpism ...


WTF??


funny you mentionned that canada is using protectionnist while usa is doing exactly the same i imagine your lamb meat is seen everywhere in usa lol ... seems among the MAGA supporters it s the flavour of the day and you are doing the same ... you shown your true colors like it or not ...


English is your second language right?

The US takes 15% of our sheep meat exports. Canada about 5%. I wasn't taking sides on that issue other than saying Trump is wrong to be doing what he's doing, how he's doing, and that For a nation like Canada, where producing food is more costly due to the climate, Its understandable to have Protection on your agriculture for national security. Id love Canada and thew US to remove both their tariffs and quotas, But I understand why they dont.

This isn't a new thing, it's a topic Ive talked about on here before. Other maybe able to confirm.
 
Posts: 5226 | Location: South Island NZ | Registered: 21 July 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by theback40:
Most, if not all ag in Canada is manipulated by the gov.
Dairy was all but prohibited to cross the border. The big dairy producing states could have sold fluid milk much cheaper than the subsidized Canadian counterpart. Hence Canadas huge tariff.
The Canadian timber co. were taken to court multiple times for breaking Nafta. They always made a side deal before a ruling.
Canadian mills have been ringing the phone off the hook, looking for logs. Every logger I know have been getting calls. The log yards along the border here, are empty, and they Canadians are worried. The big mills bought up, and closed, most of the small mills operating in the US next to the border. Timber was sent across the border, then sold as finished product back across to the US.
The good news is, it wouldnt be hard for mills to start back up in the US, and Canadian mills could go pound sand.
Sap will be running starting this month. I hope they put a tariff on Canadian subsidized maple syrup, and the US syrup market thrives this year!


Maybe, where you are, this has some truth to it. Here, in western Canada, it is pure bullshit. Here, sawmills have been replaced by log sorting yards which sort logs going to US producers. Dairy farms in Canada are limited as to how much they can produce. This is done to maintain prices for producers. In the US, over production is fine and the desire is to be able to dump the surplus in Canada at prices lower than it is sold for in the US.
Meanwhile, our milk, eggs, and cheese are plentiful enough and affordable. Same for beef and chicken.
As it happens, many producers in Canada have committed to selling product in the US. They will have to switch gears and find new markets which are more reliable. Perhaps Canadian producers can establish trade with Mexico and by-pass the US. As well, Canada needs to establish stronger ties with Scandinavia and the British Isles. Bill.
 
Posts: 3965 | Location: Elko, B.C. Canada | Registered: 19 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I gather from news reports, this has nothing to do with tariffs but is a regulatory issue and once that is resolved their pork may be eligible to be imported again.


When the horse has been eliminated, human life may be extended an average of five or more years.
James R. Doolitle

I think they've been misunderstood. Timothy Tredwell
 
Posts: 1739 | Location: Central Alberta, Canada | Registered: 20 July 2019Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Leeper:
quote:
Originally posted by theback40:
Most, if not all ag in Canada is manipulated by the gov.
Dairy was all but prohibited to cross the border. The big dairy producing states could have sold fluid milk much cheaper than the subsidized Canadian counterpart. Hence Canadas huge tariff.
The Canadian timber co. were taken to court multiple times for breaking Nafta. They always made a side deal before a ruling.
Canadian mills have been ringing the phone off the hook, looking for logs. Every logger I know have been getting calls. The log yards along the border here, are empty, and they Canadians are worried. The big mills bought up, and closed, most of the small mills operating in the US next to the border. Timber was sent across the border, then sold as finished product back across to the US.
The good news is, it wouldnt be hard for mills to start back up in the US, and Canadian mills could go pound sand.
Sap will be running starting this month. I hope they put a tariff on Canadian subsidized maple syrup, and the US syrup market thrives this year!


Maybe, where you are, this has some truth to it. Here, in western Canada, it is pure bullshit. Here, sawmills have been replaced by log sorting yards which sort logs going to US producers. Dairy farms in Canada are limited as to how much they can produce. This is done to maintain prices for producers. In the US, over production is fine and the desire is to be able to dump the surplus in Canada at prices lower than it is sold for in the US.
Meanwhile, our milk, eggs, and cheese are plentiful enough and affordable. Same for beef and chicken.
As it happens, many producers in Canada have committed to selling product in the US. They will have to switch gears and find new markets which are more reliable. Perhaps Canadian producers can establish trade with Mexico and by-pass the US. As well, Canada needs to establish stronger ties with Scandinavia and the British Isles. Bill.


Hear, Hear. The US Government has no issue with uncontrolled expansion and producers going bankrupt as a result. How are things going with those egg shortages ? Our cost at the grocery store for a dozen large is about 4 bucks CDN. right now and I can buy all I want. Big Grin


When the horse has been eliminated, human life may be extended an average of five or more years.
James R. Doolitle

I think they've been misunderstood. Timothy Tredwell
 
Posts: 1739 | Location: Central Alberta, Canada | Registered: 20 July 2019Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by theback40:
Most, if not all ag in Canada is manipulated by the gov.
Dairy was all but prohibited to cross the border. The big dairy producing states could have sold fluid milk much cheaper than the subsidized Canadian counterpart. Hence Canadas huge tariff.
The Canadian timber co. were taken to court multiple times for breaking Nafta. They always made a side deal before a ruling.
Canadian mills have been ringing the phone off the hook, looking for logs. Every logger I know have been getting calls. The log yards along the border here, are empty, and they Canadians are worried. The big mills bought up, and closed, most of the small mills operating in the US next to the border. Timber was sent across the border, then sold as finished product back across to the US.
The good news is, it wouldnt be hard for mills to start back up in the US, and Canadian mills could go pound sand.
Sap will be running starting this month. I hope they put a tariff on Canadian subsidized maple syrup, and the US syrup market thrives this year!


I assume you are referring to an amicable settlement between the parties when you say side deal. There would be nothing unjust about that. If you mean something illegal, well more conspiracy.

To the last paragraph, sounds like those housing and building material prices going to go up with timber not in the supply chain. Good job Team Tariffs! Wreck the Economy on 3! 1,2,3
 
Posts: 13574 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
quote:
Originally posted by medved:
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
quote:
Originally posted by medved:
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
To be clear. We dont tariff all most anyone. We are free trade. I think Trumps bridge burning is stupid. But I do recognise that Canada is very protectionist.


so is usa but you are seeming to be drinking too much kool aid on trumpism ...


WTF??


funny you mentionned that canada is using protectionnist while usa is doing exactly the same i imagine your lamb meat is seen everywhere in usa lol ... seems among the MAGA supporters it s the flavour of the day and you are doing the same ... you shown your true colors like it or not ...


English is your second language right?

The US takes 15% of our sheep meat exports. Canada about 5%. I wasn't taking sides on that issue other than saying Trump is wrong to be doing what he's doing, how he's doing, and that For a nation like Canada, where producing food is more costly due to the climate, Its understandable to have Protection on your agriculture for national security. Id love Canada and thew US to remove both their tariffs and quotas, But I understand why they dont.

This isn't a new thing, it's a topic Ive talked about on here before. Other maybe able to confirm.


4th languages sorry to not be good enough for you ... and you just demonstrated that usa was not the best deal on that matter lol as i wrote ...
 
Posts: 2518 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Calm down dude, Im not attacking you or disagreeing.And Im not saying either is better or worse. But if what you are saying is what I think, then you are not understanding.
 
Posts: 5226 | Location: South Island NZ | Registered: 21 July 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
https://apple.news/Apy_XjX1TRhGgzZN-sD6ngA

I am just speechless that anyone could have pretended Team Tariffs was a good idea.


May not go over so good in Vancouver...


TomP

Our country, right or wrong. When right, to be kept right, when wrong to be put right.

Carl Schurz (1829 - 1906)
 
Posts: 15094 | Location: Moreno Valley CA USA | Registered: 20 November 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
Calm down dude, Im not attacking you or disagreeing.And Im not saying either is better or worse. But if what you are saying is what I think, then you are not understanding.


your turn dude ...

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/cou...over-nz-lamb-exports
 
Posts: 2518 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I dont know what your point is. Or what your antagonism is either.

Go back and read what Ive written.
 
Posts: 5226 | Location: South Island NZ | Registered: 21 July 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
I dont know what your point is. Or what your antagonism is either.

Go back and read what Ive written.


your tried to explain usa good canada bad because of protectionnism usa is taking 15% of your meat while we are taking only 5 % but we re not 1/3 of usa population ... you re showing your true colors do not be ashame a lot love trump for whatever reason ... usa is an open market and you re not biaised ...
 
Posts: 2518 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
No You havnt understood. Im not saying Canada is bad. Im saying the situation in the different countries needs different approaches and that I understand why some tariffs exist. That it would be great for us if they didn't, but I get why they do. I said that I think Trumps current plan is foolish and Think Canada has no option but too retaliate.

But im sick of explaining it too you. Think what you want.
 
Posts: 5226 | Location: South Island NZ | Registered: 21 July 2008Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by medved:
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
quote:
Originally posted by medved:
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
To be clear. We dont tariff all most anyone. We are free trade. I think Trumps bridge burning is stupid. But I do recognise that Canada is very protectionist.


so is usa but you are seeming to be drinking too much kool aid on trumpism ...


WTF??


funny you mentionned that canada is using protectionnist while usa is doing exactly the same i imagine your lamb meat is seen everywhere in usa lol ... seems among the MAGA supporters it s the flavour of the day and you are doing the same ... you shown your true colors like it or not ...


other than a zillion spelling errors

*I* am the only person I know, in Texas, that likes lamb/mutton as a preference, rather than as a "that's neat" thing -- and *I* prefer local to imported, as it's grain fed, rather than grass fed,

but that has ZERO ZERO ZERO to do with Canada US trade --

it's kinda cute to see Canadian loonies all jacked up about CANADA slamming tariffs down on the US, - sigh, you wouldn't be happy if they hung you with a new rope


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 41295 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
quote:
Originally posted by medved:
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
quote:
Originally posted by medved:
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
To be clear. We dont tariff all most anyone. We are free trade. I think Trumps bridge burning is stupid. But I do recognise that Canada is very protectionist.


so is usa but you are seeming to be drinking too much kool aid on trumpism ...


WTF??


funny you mentionned that canada is using protectionnist while usa is doing exactly the same i imagine your lamb meat is seen everywhere in usa lol ... seems among the MAGA supporters it s the flavour of the day and you are doing the same ... you shown your true colors like it or not ...


other than a zillion spelling errors

*I* am the only person I know, in Texas, that likes lamb/mutton as a preference, rather than as a "that's neat" thing -- and *I* prefer local to imported, as it's grain fed, rather than grass fed,

but that has ZERO ZERO ZERO to do with Canada US trade --

it's kinda cute to see Canadian loonies all jacked up about CANADA slamming tariffs down on the US, - sigh, you wouldn't be happy if they hung you with a new rope


the war was started by your orange friend after negoticiating and signing himself nafta 2.0 and now thelling the agreement was wrong lol how bad faith more do you need and you are trying to pretend he did nothing wrong ... now your kiwi zealot friend certainly loves trump for whatever reason but doesnt mean he s right ...
 
Posts: 2518 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
strange - i SAID nothing in support of trump -- you MADE UP CONNECTIONS -- this isn't the first time you've done this, and attempted to project YOUR "wit me or again me" thought processes --

you've bene charged prior, show me a SINGLE post where I support the trade/tariff war/kerfuffle .. JUST ONE ..

but you can't, as I have repeatedly called it wrong/stupid/dumb --

US libbies have the group mind, pack mentality that if you disagree with ONE THING, from THIS week's talking points, you are, obviously, a nazi -- you might look into that, and catch it pre-metastasis


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 41295 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Heym, the side deals, were deals not pertaining to the timber industry. So they offset breaking NAFTA timber deals with ones for oil or electricity and such. did nothing to reverse the timber side.
The west does not have the hardwood selection we do here.
 
Posts: 7757 | Registered: 10 April 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I assume any action submitted to international tribunal was dismissed by agreement as you explain it.
 
Posts: 13574 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
strange - i SAID nothing in support of trump -- you MADE UP CONNECTIONS -- this isn't the first time you've done this, and attempted to project YOUR "wit me or again me" thought processes --

you've bene charged prior, show me a SINGLE post where I support the trade/tariff war/kerfuffle .. JUST ONE ..

but you can't, as I have repeatedly called it wrong/stupid/dumb --

US libbies have the group mind, pack mentality that if you disagree with ONE THING, from THIS week's talking points, you are, obviously, a nazi -- you might look into that, and catch it pre-metastasis


if you did not vote for him but standing his grounds on policies it might that easy for you ...

you are against tariffs but you wrote your country will win at the end so exactly the same for me ... never said someone is a nazi but you are part of new order that might be worse than nazi but only time will tell.

do you agree on the take on foreign soil grounds? like panama, greenland and canada without their consents? very simple question.

do you agree on the no more support by your country of the war in ukraine started by the ennemy of western world?

do you agree that despite nato treaty you will not support a country if your president decide so?

do you support a return to USMCA or NAFTA 2.0? signed by the president trump or do you consider the signature of your country doesnt oblige when it fits ...

in all of those simple questions we will see where you stand ...
 
Posts: 2518 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by medved:
quote:
Originally posted by theback40:
Most, if not all ag in Canada is manipulated by the gov.
Dairy was all but prohibited to cross the border. The big dairy producing states could have sold fluid milk much cheaper than the subsidized Canadian counterpart. Hence Canadas huge tariff.
The Canadian timber co. were taken to court multiple times for breaking Nafta. They always made a side deal before a ruling.
Canadian mills have been ringing the phone off the hook, looking for logs. Every logger I know have been getting calls. The log yards along the border here, are empty, and they Canadians are worried. The big mills bought up, and closed, most of the small mills operating in the US next to the border. Timber was sent across the border, then sold as finished product back across to the US.
The good news is, it wouldnt be hard for mills to start back up in the US, and Canadian mills could go pound sand.
Sap will be running starting this month. I hope they put a tariff on Canadian subsidized maple syrup, and the US syrup market thrives this year!


your agriculture is subsidized as well but your president started it and suddenly the canada had enough and retaliated ... we are nice but not stupid ...


Some US agriculture is subsidized and some isn’t at all.

In regards to Canada having enough and retaliating…as Trump told Zelensky…you hold few cars. Why shouldn’t the US use leverage to make it best for America? I sure as hell take care of my family first before donating to charity.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
J. Lane Easter, DVM

A born Texan has instilled in his system a mind-set of no retreat or no surrender. I wish everyone the world over had the dominating spirit that motivates Texans.– Billy Clayton, Speaker of the Texas House

No state commands such fierce pride and loyalty. Lesser mortals are pitied for their misfortune in not being born in Texas.— Queen Elizabeth II on her visit to Texas in May, 1991.
 
Posts: 39313 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The Free Trade part of NAFTA never was.
There were concessions on both sides to keep tariffs in place. Like the mentioned dairy block from the US.
 
Posts: 7757 | Registered: 10 April 2009Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by medved:
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
strange - i SAID nothing in support of trump -- you MADE UP CONNECTIONS -- this isn't the first time you've done this, and attempted to project YOUR "wit me or again me" thought processes --

you've bene charged prior, show me a SINGLE post where I support the trade/tariff war/kerfuffle .. JUST ONE ..

but you can't, as I have repeatedly called it wrong/stupid/dumb --

US libbies have the group mind, pack mentality that if you disagree with ONE THING, from THIS week's talking points, you are, obviously, a nazi -- you might look into that, and catch it pre-metastasis


if you did not vote for him but standing his grounds on policies it might that easy for you ...

you are against tariffs but you wrote your country will win at the end so exactly the same for me ... never said someone is a nazi but you are part of new order that might be worse than nazi but only time will tell.
this is the closest you have come to saying what i actually said - trade war is BAD, outcome is a foregone conclusion - and just like nafta, the outcome will be equalized tariffs or tariff free -- which is the easier? IDK
quote:
Originally posted by medved:

do you agree on the take on foreign soil grounds? like panama, greenland and canada without their consents? very simple question.
very simple answer - HELL NO, i don't support this lunacy
quote:
Originally posted by medved:


do you agree on the no more support by your country of the war in ukraine started by the ennemy of western world?
i don't support supporting ANY war, including us undeclared wars - I do not agree with cutting Ukraine off - they were the attacked - i do not agree with cutting of Israel, they were attacked.
quote:
Originally posted by medved:


do you agree that despite nato treaty you will not support a country if your president decide so?
this is a whacky strawman - no current wars are with nato countries - and yeah, it depends - if a nato member becomes expansionist, trying to take territory from another nato member, which would all be on european soil, we obviously can't support both sides -

do you support a return to USMCA or NAFTA 2.0? signed by the president trump or do you consider the signature of your country doesnt oblige when it fits ...
[/QUOTE]redundant question to first one, and same answer. I'd rather see tariff free zone, but apparently our governments aren't mature enough to get along. i DO NOT think tariffs can replace income tax, and long term, the outcome, i HOPE will be reduced tariffs for all -- i do know that temporary new tariffs will fade away shortly, due to actions on both sides of the table
quote:
Originally posted by medved:


in all of those simple questions we will see where you stand ...


simple questions, for the most part, that I have answered, other than the nato one, before --

Now, i've played YOUR game-- where's SINGLE post i made on the topics, which seems to have infuriated you, but I never wrote -


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 41295 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
quote:
Originally posted by medved:
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
strange - i SAID nothing in support of trump -- you MADE UP CONNECTIONS -- this isn't the first time you've done this, and attempted to project YOUR "wit me or again me" thought processes --

you've bene charged prior, show me a SINGLE post where I support the trade/tariff war/kerfuffle .. JUST ONE ..

but you can't, as I have repeatedly called it wrong/stupid/dumb --

US libbies have the group mind, pack mentality that if you disagree with ONE THING, from THIS week's talking points, you are, obviously, a nazi -- you might look into that, and catch it pre-metastasis


if you did not vote for him but standing his grounds on policies it might that easy for you ...

you are against tariffs but you wrote your country will win at the end so exactly the same for me ... never said someone is a nazi but you are part of new order that might be worse than nazi but only time will tell.
this is the closest you have come to saying what i actually said - trade war is BAD, outcome is a foregone conclusion - and just like nafta, the outcome will be equalized tariffs or tariff free -- which is the easier? IDK
quote:
Originally posted by medved:

do you agree on the take on foreign soil grounds? like panama, greenland and canada without their consents? very simple question.
very simple answer - HELL NO, i don't support this lunacy
quote:
Originally posted by medved:


do you agree on the no more support by your country of the war in ukraine started by the ennemy of western world?
i don't support supporting ANY war, including us undeclared wars - I do not agree with cutting Ukraine off - they were the attacked - i do not agree with cutting of Israel, they were attacked.
quote:
Originally posted by medved:


do you agree that despite nato treaty you will not support a country if your president decide so?
this is a whacky strawman - no current wars are with nato countries - and yeah, it depends - if a nato member becomes expansionist, trying to take territory from another nato member, which would all be on european soil, we obviously can't support both sides -

do you support a return to USMCA or NAFTA 2.0? signed by the president trump or do you consider the signature of your country doesnt oblige when it fits ...
redundant question to first one, and same answer. I'd rather see tariff free zone, but apparently our governments aren't mature enough to get along. i DO NOT think tariffs can replace income tax, and long term, the outcome, i HOPE will be reduced tariffs for all -- i do know that temporary new tariffs will fade away shortly, due to actions on both sides of the table
quote:
Originally posted by medved:


in all of those simple questions we will see where you stand ...


simple questions, for the most part, that I have answered, other than the nato one, before --

Now, i've played YOUR game-- where's SINGLE post i made on the topics, which seems to have infuriated you, but I never wrote -[/QUOTE]

thank you very much for your honesty. i certainly missread and misinterpret your posts and wrong supports to trump instead of trying to support you county. like most of conservative cansdians that cannot stand trudeau but support their country. again sorry to have paint you as a MAGA supporter. hope you will not reverse those positions in the future ...
 
Posts: 2518 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
i am not aware of anything that would compel me to change these convictions -- I am a Texan, it's like a Western Canadian, but not nearly as nice - I don't agree with MANY of the stupid things Texas is doing, and agree with a good deal of them -- I don't agree with pushing religion, as that's entirely a "home training" thing - but I also don't agree with being anti-religion - as that equally forces a private view on others - EVERY time some fringe group sues and wins for their religion to be presented, i have a good laugh .. it's freedom OF religion, not from it

I don't agree with the abortion limits in Texas - I don't "like" abortion, but i fully support women's autonomy -

I have always been in favor of gay marriage -- well, let me say this differently - I don't think the government should be involved in "marriage" which I see as a religious scarcement, and think the government should be responsible for acknowledging what is now called "civil unions" (several countries in the EU follow this) -- and that EVERYONE should have full and equal rights - who the heck am i to tell someone who they can marry? sure seems like a clear equal rights and personal freedom issue, and entirely constitutional for equal rights

there's an old saw that goes "I support gay couples, protecting their adopted kids and their pot farms with ar15s" .. that seems to annoy a couple percentages on both sides

are there things trump is doing that seem like repeats and normal course of actions, both from past potus president AND from the corporate world? anyone that can read what is written would -

wrapping that back to women's rights - i am TOTALLY onboard with keeping males out of female spaces and sports-- there's a reason women "choose the bear" -- i am totally on board with full rights for transexuals - why not? they are people, which is important


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 41295 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
i am not aware of anything that would compel me to change these convictions -- I am a Texan, it's like a Western Canadian, but not nearly as nice - I don't agree with MANY of the stupid things Texas is doing, and agree with a good deal of them -- I don't agree with pushing religion, as that's entirely a "home training" thing - but I also don't agree with being anti-religion - as that equally forces a private view on others - EVERY time some fringe group sues and wins for their religion to be presented, i have a good laugh .. it's freedom OF religion, not from it

I don't agree with the abortion limits in Texas - I don't "like" abortion, but i fully support women's autonomy -

I have always been in favor of gay marriage -- well, let me say this differently - I don't think the government should be involved in "marriage" which I see as a religious scarcement, and think the government should be responsible for acknowledging what is now called "civil unions" (several countries in the EU follow this) -- and that EVERYONE should have full and equal rights - who the heck am i to tell someone who they can marry? sure seems like a clear equal rights and personal freedom issue, and entirely constitutional for equal rights

there's an old saw that goes "I support gay couples, protecting their adopted kids and their pot farms with ar15s" .. that seems to annoy a couple percentages on both sides

are there things trump is doing that seem like repeats and normal course of actions, both from past potus president AND from the corporate world? anyone that can read what is written would -

wrapping that back to women's rights - i am TOTALLY onboard with keeping males out of female spaces and sports-- there's a reason women "choose the bear" -- i am totally on board with full rights for transexuals - why not? they are people, which is important


you might make a good outfit for canada aside of the winter, snow and cold.

and when you mentionned ar15 still looking at mine prohibited by trudeau ...
 
Posts: 2518 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
And that post shows why I like Jeffe, he took the words right out of my mouth.
 
Posts: 7757 | Registered: 10 April 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
i am not aware of anything that would compel me to change these convictions -- I am a Texan, it's like a Western Canadian, but not nearly as nice - I don't agree with MANY of the stupid things Texas is doing, and agree with a good deal of them -- I don't agree with pushing religion, as that's entirely a "home training" thing - but I also don't agree with being anti-religion - as that equally forces a private view on others - EVERY time some fringe group sues and wins for their religion to be presented, i have a good laugh .. it's freedom OF religion, not from it

I don't agree with the abortion limits in Texas - I don't "like" abortion, but i fully support women's autonomy -

I have always been in favor of gay marriage -- well, let me say this differently - I don't think the government should be involved in "marriage" which I see as a religious scarcement, and think the government should be responsible for acknowledging what is now called "civil unions" (several countries in the EU follow this) -- and that EVERYONE should have full and equal rights - who the heck am i to tell someone who they can marry? sure seems like a clear equal rights and personal freedom issue, and entirely constitutional for equal rights

there's an old saw that goes "I support gay couples, protecting their adopted kids and their pot farms with ar15s" .. that seems to annoy a couple percentages on both sides

are there things trump is doing that seem like repeats and normal course of actions, both from past potus president AND from the corporate world? anyone that can read what is written would -

wrapping that back to women's rights - i am TOTALLY onboard with keeping males out of female spaces and sports-- there's a reason women "choose the bear" -- i am totally on board with full rights for transexuals - why not? they are people, which is important


Sadly As I feel similar, Its seems like we are old fashioned conservative or libertarian. Which seems to be a rare breed now.
 
Posts: 5226 | Location: South Island NZ | Registered: 21 July 2008Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2025 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia