That bastion of liberal reporting....Says somebody ought to sue him.

“He’s treating the North American economy as a personal plaything, as markets gyrate with each presidential whim,” the board wrote. “It’s doubtful Mr. Trump even has the power to impose these tariffs, and we hope his afflatus gets a legal challenge.”

https://thehill.com/homenews/a...onald-trump-tariffs/

who will dare to challenge him on your soil?

Well, every U.S. citizen on this forum who has highlighted and made the arguments against the Trump Administration’s actions are challenging him. Every court case is challenging him. Every time a vote is cast on the floor or in a committee in Congress is challenging him.

Come elections candidates will run on these issues. That is how we challenge folks in a feee, civilized, nation state that honors the rule of law.

Trump is being challenged. It is a process. The process matters more than the result.

Every time an American says X is not right and Why, Trump is being challenged.

I have long said on here President Trump does not have the authority under S. Ct., precedent to unilaterally apply tariffs.

Didn't the WSJ endorse Trump in the election?

Weren't those idiots listening to his campaign promises of tariffs?

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Didn't the WSJ endorse Trump in the election?

Weren't those idiots listening to his campaign promises of tariffs?

no, they didn't -- jesus you are just lazy and forgetful ... oh, wait, your ALSO said you only get your data from this forum ...

Jim, it's time .. go to canada and talk about your options to get it over with

https://www.wric.com/news/u-s-...ed-trump-and-harris/

did you, maggie, pymple, and fifi get a groupon for hormone treatments?

poor little guy, can't take coaching or correction .. never played team sports, did ya, tiger? just band camo for you? where did the trumpet go, again?

beneath contempt elitist

The Wall Street Journal does not endorse candidates.

Source

https://www.presidency.ucsb.ed...nts-major-newspapers

Now. I cannot speak to their editorial page coverage prior to the election.

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Didn't the WSJ endorse Trump in the election?

Weren't those idiots listening to his campaign promises of tariffs?

a self proclaimed liberal moves from a then strongly blue state, to a strongly red state, lives there 44 years, then moves to an even MORE red state, and still calls himself a liberal?

I call it a coward hiding amongst men

There is a reason why Dems like Red states…freedom of everything

Including the "freedom" to leach off the blue states teats?

quote:

Originally posted by M.Shy:
There is a reason why Dems like Red states…freedom of everything

There is a reason why Red States voted for Trump.

STUPIDITY!

The FT is no different -

Still, it is clear that the president has squandered what was a decent economic inheritance. Not long ago price pressures were fading, the US Federal Reserve was on the cusp of a steady rate-cutting cycle into a resilient economy, and the S&P 500 was gliding upwards. This is no longer true.


https://www.ft.com/content/477...8a-9ef1-1acc1e572d5d

Trump in America and Rachel in the UK!

He should be dating her.

Oh, sorry.

He is already dating Musk!

quote:

Originally posted by Saeed:

quote:

Originally posted by M.Shy:
There is a reason why Dems like Red states…freedom of everything

There is a reason why Red States voted for Trump.

STUPIDITY!

We in the west love it
Hey, even Dems love west and its freedom
We even have homegrown Dems who always talk about moving but they never leave

quote:

Originally posted by M.Shy:
There is a reason why Dems like Red states…freedom of everything

"freedom of everything"

Hummm

I suppose it depends on how you define "freedom".

FYI, you're not free nor sovereign, never have been, and based on your posts, never will be.

It's your fantasy.

How is it possible for someone supposedly freedom loving to vote for and support a fascist/autocrat wannabee?

One explanation is your fantasy has been manipulated. Thus, that vulnerability makes you neither free nor sovereign.