The King of Lawsuit Abuse rolls out another turd burger to plug up the court system. Someone needs to sanction him. Folks like Trump are the reason why we need the British "loser pays" system in the US. Although this sounds more like an appeal than a lawsuit.

Trump Suing NY Judge in Hush Money Trial

quote:

Michael Avenatti:
We can’t be hypocrites when it comes to the 1st Amendment. It is outrageous that Cohen and Daniels can do countless TV interviews, post on social, & make $$ on bogus documentaries - all by talking shit about Trump - but he’s gagged and threatened with jail if he responds

Even avowed Trump hater and Doug’s favored candidate for the presidency back in the 20teens…see’s what is going on.

https://x.com/michaelavenatti/...296572835893723?s=46

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:
The King of Lawsuit Abuse rolls out another turd burger to plug up the court system. Someone needs to sanction him. Folks like Trump are the reason why we need the British "loser pays" system in the US. Although this sounds more like an appeal than a lawsuit.

Trump Suing NY Judge in Hush Money Trial

Why blame Trump?

Your system has been hijacked by lawyers!

Can you explain to us why America has the highest rate of lawyers than anywhere else in the world!

Like bloody flies on a fresh turd!

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:
The King of Lawsuit Abuse rolls out another turd burger to plug up the court system. Someone needs to sanction him. Folks like Trump are the reason why we need the British "loser pays" system in the US. Although this sounds more like an appeal than a lawsuit.

Trump Suing NY Judge in Hush Money Trial

It's just bullshit to get headlines. Keep the trumptards like Lane happy.

I'm 100% certain it will be dismissed and I wouldn't want to be the lawyer who signed the pleading. I would guess that sanctions and fees will be assessed against trump and his attorney for the filing.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Michael Avenatti:
We can’t be hypocrites when it comes to the 1st Amendment. It is outrageous that Cohen and Daniels can do countless TV interviews, post on social, & make $$ on bogus documentaries - all by talking shit about Trump - but he’s gagged and threatened with jail if he responds

Even avowed Trump hater and Doug’s favored candidate for the presidency back in the 20teens…see’s what is going on.

https://x.com/michaelavenatti/...296572835893723?s=46

They are not attacking the presiding Judge and his daughter to create pressure upon the proceeding.

They are not attacking the integrity of the process.

How uninformed are you about how these things work.

Anyone else, would have been held in Contempt and jailed.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

They are not attacking the integrity of the process.

The integrity of the process is in question.

I know. That is why Trump and his lawyers need to be sanctioned for frivolous litigation.

The integrity of the process in general is lacking.

Why is it that Cohen and Daniels blab ad nausea why Trump is gagged.

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

They are not attacking the integrity of the process.

The integrity of the process is in question.

I know. That is why Trump and his lawyers need to be sanctioned for frivolous litigation.

I erased that post because I can’t figure out what the hell King Lowe is saying for sure.

If I thought his typing was accurate maybe. But we all know he is famous for typo-word-salad.

If you can’t find it on Twitter by a far right commentator then consider it questionable.

The issue is not who is taking. The issue is what is being said.

Now, I would never let my client talk period in the media about litigation. Folks talk about clients firing lawyers. Well, we can and do fire clients too.

Anyone else would have long been held in contempt and jailed. President Trump has gotten more rope from this judge than you, any citizen, or I would have.



That move came after Trump personally attacked Merchan’s daughter, calling her a “Rabid Trump Hater” and suggesting that the judge was “compromised” because of her work for a Democratic-aligned digital marketing company.

https://www.washingtonpost.com...-gag-order-merchan/#

https://www.wlbt.com/video/202...ter-after-gag-order/

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/ne...oney-case-gag-order/

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/0...-judge-daughter.html

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68709900.amp

https://www.politico.com/news/...-money-case-00149656

https://www.reuters.com/legal/...daughter-2024-03-29/

L

I know you do not like it when real news outlets report your wannabe dictator’s words.

Everyone is lying except the hacks you listen to on Twitter.

quote:

The issue is what is being said.

Death to America is fine. Mitchell even defended it. Need I say more?

Avenatti is a far-left winger.

Have you listened to Daniels and Cohen!?

Tell me again Sire…that it is “what” is being said.

It is “who” is saying it.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
The integrity of the process in general is lacking.

Why is it that Cohen and Daniels blab ad nausea why Trump is gagged.

Cohen and Daniels are not defendants charged with a crime in this court.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
The integrity of the process in general is lacking.

Why is it that Cohen and Daniels blab ad nausea why Trump is gagged.

How? What went wrong, besides sand in your vagina? Present your evidence.

I do think there is some degree of conflict of interest when a parent is a judge, and the person in front of him is a politician whose politics are opposed by the daughter who works in politics.

I never realized how many judges are married to or have kids who are in political jobs or positions of authority.

It’s kind of odd… over 300 million people, and judges are related way more often to people with authority than should be just by plain old statistics.

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
The integrity of the process in general is lacking.

Why is it that Cohen and Daniels blab ad nausea why Trump is gagged.

Cohen and Daniels are not defendants charged with a crime in this court.

So defendants no longer have equal rights under the law?

quote:

Originally posted by LongDistanceOperator:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
The integrity of the process in general is lacking.

Why is it that Cohen and Daniels blab ad nausea why Trump is gagged.

How? What went wrong, besides sand in your vagina? Present your evidence.

It’s kind of like the man who asked Butch Dorer how much it would cost to make him a pure beaver hat. Butch replied: “If you have to ask…you can’t afford one.”

Thus LDO, if you have to ask…your too stupid to engage with.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by LongDistanceOperator:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
The integrity of the process in general is lacking.

Why is it that Cohen and Daniels blab ad nausea why Trump is gagged.

How? What went wrong, besides sand in your vagina? Present your evidence.

It’s kind of like the man who asked Butch Dorer how much it would cost to make him a pure beaver hat. Butch replied: “If you have to ask…you can’t afford one.”

Thus LDO, if you have to ask…your too stupid to engage with.

Ahem…”you’re”

quote:

Originally posted by LongDistanceOperator:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by LongDistanceOperator:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
The integrity of the process in general is lacking.

Why is it that Cohen and Daniels blab ad nausea why Trump is gagged.

How? What went wrong, besides sand in your vagina? Present your evidence.

It’s kind of like the man who asked Butch Dorer how much it would cost to make him a pure beaver hat. Butch replied: “If you have to ask…you can’t afford one.”

Thus LDO, if you have to ask…your too stupid to engage with.

Ahem…”you’re”

Maybe work on King Lowe...he needs it worse.

Yeah...even I make a typo once in a while.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

The issue is what is being said.

Death to America is fine. Mitchell even defended it. Need I say more?

Avenatti is a far-left winger.

Have you listened to Daniels and Cohen!?

Tell me again Sire…that it is “what” is being said.

It is “who” is saying it.

Fucking idiot. I don't need you to interpret my posts. I defended the right to say it, not the concept or idea. You're apparently too stupid to understand the difference and what the Constitution says about it. It's you and your ilk trying to destroy America via your J6 insurrection and trying to re-elect the guy responsible for it.

Dr. Easter is on record he is voting for the one candidate that has called for the Constitution to be suspended and that candidate returned to power by dictate.

Oh, and it is the what that is said. Not who says that triggers constitutional rights for Citizens.

That is why we allow Nazis to march in the U.S. I support the Right that has some due limitations.

That is why we allow people to wear t hurts that say profanity for sex in courts as protected speech.

We do not allow a defendant to attempt to scare a judge by speaking about his daughter.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by LongDistanceOperator:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
The integrity of the process in general is lacking.

Why is it that Cohen and Daniels blab ad nausea why Trump is gagged.

How? What went wrong, besides sand in your vagina? Present your evidence.

It’s kind of like the man who asked Butch Dorer how much it would cost to make him a pure beaver hat. Butch replied: “If you have to ask…you can’t afford one.”

Thus LDO, if you have to ask…your too stupid to engage with.

Let me interpret this: "I don't have any evidence because there isn't any."

Great debate provided by Dr. Easter.

After all, Dr. Easter really believes the election was unrighteousness in delivering the election to President Biden.

Dr. Easter believes President Trump and those who tried to enact President Trump’s will on Jan 6 where patriots.

Dr. Easter cannot explain how voter harvesting kept President Trump from winning the GA, but somehow the person who he says mobilized voter harvesting could not win her own election in GA.

quote:

Originally posted by crbutler:
I do think there is some degree of conflict of interest when a parent is a judge, and the person in front of him is a politician whose politics are opposed by the daughter who works in politics.

I never realized how many judges are married to or have kids who are in political jobs or positions of authority.

It’s kind of odd… over 300 million people, and judges are related way more often to people with authority than should be just by plain old statistics.

So, I assume then that you would agree that Justice Thomas should recuse himself from any matter relating to trump that ends up in front of the SCOTUS, right? Since his wife is a right-wing whackjob trumptard who works in politics and was actively involved in trying to overturn the result of the 2020 election? And, who attended that J6 rally at the White House?

https://abcnews.go.com/Politic...n/story?id=106803474

quote:

Originally posted by crbutler:
I do think there is some degree of conflict of interest when a parent is a judge, and the person in front of him is a politician whose politics are opposed by the daughter who works in politics.

I never realized how many judges are married to or have kids who are in political jobs or positions of authority.

It’s kind of odd… over 300 million people, and judges are related way more often to people with authority than should be just by plain old statistics.

Like the wife of a Supreme Court Justice helping organize an insurrection that Justice then hears cases about?

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
The integrity of the process in general is lacking.

Why is it that Cohen and Daniels blab ad nausea why Trump is gagged.

Cohen and Daniels are not defendants charged with a crime in this court.

So defendants no longer have equal rights under the law?

Criminal defendants fall under a presiding Judge's jurisdiction in a much different way than witnesses do.

Show me in the Constitution where you are guaranteed a Right to attack family members of officers of the Court in an attempt to intimidate the Court.

You or I would be in pre-trial confinement for the shit Trump has pulled.

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

The issue is what is being said.

Death to America is fine. Mitchell even defended it. Need I say more?

Avenatti is a far-left winger.

Have you listened to Daniels and Cohen!?

Tell me again Sire…that it is “what” is being said.

It is “who” is saying it.

Fucking idiot. I don't need you to interpret my posts. I defended the right to say it, not the concept or idea. You're apparently too stupid to understand the difference and what the Constitution says about it. It's you and your ilk trying to destroy America via your J6 insurrection and trying to re-elect the guy responsible for it.

I’ll interpret what you say or post here any time I feel like it…here or to your face.

I understand the Constitution well and your point on free speech is well taken.

It is the part about it not being applied evenly across the population I take exception too.

If she should be, then this judge who is judging Trump should be as well.

And yes, I do think Thomas should recuse himself. He’s not a disinterested party.

But then none of the SCOTUS justices really are, are they?

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by crbutler:
I do think there is some degree of conflict of interest when a parent is a judge, and the person in front of him is a politician whose politics are opposed by the daughter who works in politics.

I never realized how many judges are married to or have kids who are in political jobs or positions of authority.

It’s kind of odd… over 300 million people, and judges are related way more often to people with authority than should be just by plain old statistics.

So, I assume then that you would agree that Justice Thomas should recuse himself from any matter relating to trump that ends up in front of the SCOTUS, right? Since his wife is a right-wing whackjob trumptard who works in politics and was actively involved in trying to overturn the result of the 2020 election? And, who attended that J6 rally at the White House?

https://abcnews.go.com/Politic...n/story?id=106803474

quote:

Originally posted by crbutler:
If she should be, then this judge who is judging Trump should be as well.

And yes, I do think Thomas should recuse himself. He’s not a disinterested party.

But then none of the SCOTUS justices really are, are they?

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by crbutler:
I do think there is some degree of conflict of interest when a parent is a judge, and the person in front of him is a politician whose politics are opposed by the daughter who works in politics.

I never realized how many judges are married to or have kids who are in political jobs or positions of authority.

It’s kind of odd… over 300 million people, and judges are related way more often to people with authority than should be just by plain old statistics.

So, I assume then that you would agree that Justice Thomas should recuse himself from any matter relating to trump that ends up in front of the SCOTUS, right? Since his wife is a right-wing whackjob trumptard who works in politics and was actively involved in trying to overturn the result of the 2020 election? And, who attended that J6 rally at the White House?

https://abcnews.go.com/Politic...n/story?id=106803474

The guru of false analogies. So, any judge who has offspring that are Democrats should recuse themselves from any case involving trump? Only judges with Republican spawn can hear a trump case? That's gonna be tough given the number of cases pending against trump right now.

What about the folks on the venire in trump's cases? Should all Democrats automatically be struck? What if their children are democrats? Struck?

trump's cases can only be heard by Republicans judges who have Republican offspring?

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

The issue is what is being said.

Death to America is fine. Mitchell even defended it. Need I say more?

Avenatti is a far-left winger.

Have you listened to Daniels and Cohen!?

Tell me again Sire…that it is “what” is being said.

It is “who” is saying it.

Fucking idiot. I don't need you to interpret my posts. I defended the right to say it, not the concept or idea. You're apparently too stupid to understand the difference and what the Constitution says about it. It's you and your ilk trying to destroy America via your J6 insurrection and trying to re-elect the guy responsible for it.

I’ll interpret what you say or post here any time I feel like it…here or to your face.

I understand the Constitution well and your point on free speech is well taken.

It is the part about it not being applied evenly across the population I take exception too.

You do not understand the Constitution well. President Trump is being restricted per the Constitution for what he is saying, not because he is a false Republican.

You and I had said what he said would done be held in contempt and jailed. He is getting, if anything, more rope.

Crbutler can wake me up when this judge’s daughter tries to influence the judge against President Trump or engaged in a concentrated effort to deny the next GOO president the White House.

This is going to get tossed fast and painfully by the appellate panel.

Oh, and jury selection starts Monday in the NY State case, and a future president cannot pardon President Trump from a state court conviction. That assumes a conviction is made and upheld by the NY courts of appeal. In addition, any conviction survives a right to effective assistance of federal right challenge. A right Justice Thomas managed to near gut in 2023 or 22.

quote:

Originally posted by crbutler:
If she should be, then this judge who is judging Trump should be as well.

And yes, I do think Thomas should recuse himself. He’s not a disinterested party.

But then none of the SCOTUS justices really are, are they?

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by crbutler:
I do think there is some degree of conflict of interest when a parent is a judge, and the person in front of him is a politician whose politics are opposed by the daughter who works in politics.

I never realized how many judges are married to or have kids who are in political jobs or positions of authority.

It’s kind of odd… over 300 million people, and judges are related way more often to people with authority than should be just by plain old statistics.

So, I assume then that you would agree that Justice Thomas should recuse himself from any matter relating to trump that ends up in front of the SCOTUS, right? Since his wife is a right-wing whackjob trumptard who works in politics and was actively involved in trying to overturn the result of the 2020 election? And, who attended that J6 rally at the White House?

https://abcnews.go.com/Politic...n/story?id=106803474

Do you ever get sick of never taking a position on a subject, just more of “on the one hand, on the other hand”? Seems pretty tepid.

Why should I?

Its reality.

I would be happy to have Thomas recuse first.

Then we would have to bounce any negative finding this Judge in the Trump case made because of potential bias.

I think Trump did what he is accused of... but I also think that the folks who are accusing and trying him are living in glass houses.

I'm more than happy to have the book thrown at him, and then throw it at them as well.

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:

quote:

Originally posted by crbutler:
If she should be, then this judge who is judging Trump should be as well.

And yes, I do think Thomas should recuse himself. He’s not a disinterested party.

But then none of the SCOTUS justices really are, are they?

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by crbutler:
I do think there is some degree of conflict of interest when a parent is a judge, and the person in front of him is a politician whose politics are opposed by the daughter who works in politics.

I never realized how many judges are married to or have kids who are in political jobs or positions of authority.

It’s kind of odd… over 300 million people, and judges are related way more often to people with authority than should be just by plain old statistics.

So, I assume then that you would agree that Justice Thomas should recuse himself from any matter relating to trump that ends up in front of the SCOTUS, right? Since his wife is a right-wing whackjob trumptard who works in politics and was actively involved in trying to overturn the result of the 2020 election? And, who attended that J6 rally at the White House?

https://abcnews.go.com/Politic...n/story?id=106803474

Do you ever get sick of never taking a position on a subject, just more of “on the one hand, on the other hand”? Seems pretty tepid.

quote:

Originally posted by crbutler:
Why should I?

Its reality.

I would be happy to have Thomas recuse first.

Then we would have to bounce any negative finding this Judge in the Trump case made because of potential bias.

I think Trump did what he is accused of... but I also think that the folks who are accusing and trying him are living in glass houses.

I'm more than happy to have the book thrown at him, and then throw it at them as well.

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:

quote:

Originally posted by crbutler:
If she should be, then this judge who is judging Trump should be as well.

And yes, I do think Thomas should recuse himself. He’s not a disinterested party.

But then none of the SCOTUS justices really are, are they?

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by crbutler:
I do think there is some degree of conflict of interest when a parent is a judge, and the person in front of him is a politician whose politics are opposed by the daughter who works in politics.

I never realized how many judges are married to or have kids who are in political jobs or positions of authority.

It’s kind of odd… over 300 million people, and judges are related way more often to people with authority than should be just by plain old statistics.

So, I assume then that you would agree that Justice Thomas should recuse himself from any matter relating to trump that ends up in front of the SCOTUS, right? Since his wife is a right-wing whackjob trumptard who works in politics and was actively involved in trying to overturn the result of the 2020 election? And, who attended that J6 rally at the White House?

https://abcnews.go.com/Politic...n/story?id=106803474

Do you ever get sick of never taking a position on a subject, just more of “on the one hand, on the other hand”? Seems pretty tepid.

Who is it you think committed crimes, and what crimes would that be?

quote:

Originally posted by crbutler:
Why should I?

Its reality.

I would be happy to have Thomas recuse first.

Then we would have to bounce any negative finding this Judge in the Trump case made because of potential bias.

I think Trump did what he is accused of... but I also think that the folks who are accusing and trying him are living in glass houses.

I'm more than happy to have the book thrown at him, and then throw it at them as well.

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:

quote:

Originally posted by crbutler:
If she should be, then this judge who is judging Trump should be as well.

And yes, I do think Thomas should recuse himself. He’s not a disinterested party.

But then none of the SCOTUS justices really are, are they?

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by crbutler:
I do think there is some degree of conflict of interest when a parent is a judge, and the person in front of him is a politician whose politics are opposed by the daughter who works in politics.

I never realized how many judges are married to or have kids who are in political jobs or positions of authority.

It’s kind of odd… over 300 million people, and judges are related way more often to people with authority than should be just by plain old statistics.

So, I assume then that you would agree that Justice Thomas should recuse himself from any matter relating to trump that ends up in front of the SCOTUS, right? Since his wife is a right-wing whackjob trumptard who works in politics and was actively involved in trying to overturn the result of the 2020 election? And, who attended that J6 rally at the White House?

https://abcnews.go.com/Politic...n/story?id=106803474

Do you ever get sick of never taking a position on a subject, just more of “on the one hand, on the other hand”? Seems pretty tepid.

More absurd analogies. You are nothing if not consistent.

Who should "get the book thrown at them" and for what?

I don’t think it’s absurd.

Define what is a conflict of interest…

Should Nancy Pelosi be allowed to vote on items having to do with financial regulation given her husband is involved in it directly?

You wouldn’t be allowed to represent a client who your wife was charging…

Face it, if there is discretion involved, there is some degree of undue influence, at least potentially.

Does everyone get a ticket for going 1MPH over the speed limit? Does anyone? Why? Is it right?

. . . more appeals filed today. For someone anxious to clear his good name he sure doesn't seem very anxious to go to trial and do so.

From 1976 to 2016, Trump filed almost 4100 lawsuits. Since 2016 Lord only knows what the number is today. And the Trumplicans like to bitch and moan about "lawfare". What a joke. Man is the poster child for needed tort reform.

Judge quickly dismissed one of these claims concerning the gag order.

quote:

Originally posted by crbutler:
I don’t think it’s absurd.

Define what is a conflict of interest…

Should Nancy Pelosi be allowed to vote on items having to do with financial regulation given her husband is involved in it directly?

You wouldn’t be allowed to represent a client who your wife was charging…

Face it, if there is discretion involved, there is some degree of undue influence, at least potentially.

Does everyone get a ticket for going 1MPH over the speed limit? Does anyone? Why? Is it right?

The reason no one gets a 1 mph speed tick and charges start at 5 over is tech uses on law enforcement cannot read 1 mph. This is stupid.

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:

quote:

Originally posted by crbutler:
I don’t think it’s absurd.

Define what is a conflict of interest…

Should Nancy Pelosi be allowed to vote on items having to do with financial regulation given her husband is involved in it directly?

You wouldn’t be allowed to represent a client who your wife was charging…

Face it, if there is discretion involved, there is some degree of undue influence, at least potentially.

Does everyone get a ticket for going 1MPH over the speed limit? Does anyone? Why? Is it right?

The reason no one gets a 1 mph speed tick and charges start at 5 over is tech uses on law enforcement cannot read 1 mph. This is stupid.

Really? No one ever got a ticket for going 31MPH in a 30 zone?

I get it’s very rare, but it’s happened.

And I call BS that the equipment doesn’t read in increments of 1MPH.

quote:

Originally posted by crbutler:

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:

quote:

Originally posted by crbutler:
I don’t think it’s absurd.

Define what is a conflict of interest…

Should Nancy Pelosi be allowed to vote on items having to do with financial regulation given her husband is involved in it directly?

You wouldn’t be allowed to represent a client who your wife was charging…

Face it, if there is discretion involved, there is some degree of undue influence, at least potentially.

Does everyone get a ticket for going 1MPH over the speed limit? Does anyone? Why? Is it right?

The reason no one gets a 1 mph speed tick and charges start at 5 over is tech uses on law enforcement cannot read 1 mph. This is stupid.

Really? No one ever got a ticket for going 31MPH in a 30 zone?

I get it’s very rare, but it’s happened.

And I call BS that the equipment doesn’t read in increments of 1MPH.

It may have the resolution but does it have the accuracy under all conditions of weather and traffic (meaning multiple targets in the field of view).

Look at your statute like every it goes up in numbers of 5