THE ACCURATE RELOADING POLITICAL CRATER

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Guns, Politics, Gunsmithing & Reloading  Hop To Forums  The Political Forum    Trump blows up the notion his Canada talk was just a fleeting fancy

Moderators: DRG
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Trump blows up the notion his Canada talk was just a fleeting fancy Login/Join 
One of Us
posted
for all the naysayers lol ...

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/...w-analysis-1.7519086

Trump blows up the notion his Canada talk was just a fleeting fancy
'I'm really not trolling,' he tells Time Magazine, of his dream to make Canada a state

There's been no shortage of speculation about how U.S. President Donald Trump's comments about Canada might impact the federal election.

It's now time to start asking a new, longer-term question: About how his attitude will impact Canada beyond Monday's election.

It now seems increasingly obvious that Trump's expansionist aspirations are no fleeting fancy. He kept quiet for a while, leading some to wonder whether he'd gotten it out of his system — that maybe he was just simply trolling our former prime minister, Justin Trudeau.

But in recent days, the president has been blunt in different encounters with media that he seriously would love to see Canada become a state.

Lest anyone think he might be joking, he made clear he wasn't. Time magazine asked him in an interview: Maybe you're trolling a bit when talking about Canada as 51st state.

"Actually, no, I'm not," he told Time in an interview conducted Tuesday, and published Friday.

"I'm really not trolling. Canada is an interesting case.… I say the only way this thing really works is for Canada to become a state."

He repeated his oft-stated claim about the U.S. subsidizing Canada, restating figures that appear to take the trade deficit, add Canada's under-spending on defence and wildly exaggerate that total sum.

Asked if he wanted to grow the American empire, as part of his talk about Canada, Greenland and the Panama Canal, Trump replied, "If we had the right opportunity. Yeah."

Asked again if he wanted to be remembered as a president who expanded American territory, he replied, "Wouldn't mind."

At this point, it's no longer tenable to assume the president is just joking, says one of the best-connected Canadians in Washington. After all, Trump even put his desire for territorial expansion in his inaugural address.

"Nobody says something repeatedly for months of this nature without believing it," said Eric Miller, an international trade consultant in Washington and adviser on Canada-U.S. relations.

He said Trump believes two things: that the U.S. doesn't need Canada under their current economic arrangement, and that he wishes he could acquire it.

How, when, under what conditions and how determined he is to put the effort into making this happen — all of that's unclear, Miller said.

"I don't think there's a master plan right now which says, 'Three months from now we will do X, and six months from now we will do Y,'" Miller said.

"But the desire is clearly there.… Certainly this is going to be a top priority for the next prime minister.

"It will be an issue that the next government in Canada will constantly have to monitor. And they will have to assess what President Trump's intentions are over time, because his interest and his intentions may evolve over time."
The challenge for Canada's next government

There will be early points of contact between the next government and Trump. For starters, there's the G7 summit in Alberta in June. The countries are also set to enter comprehensive trade and security negotiations.

For a while, it seemed plausible that these events might unfold without Trump disparaging, and calling into question, Canada's sovereignty.

After all, he'd stopped talking about Canada as the 51st state for a few weeks, since Mark Carney replaced Trudeau as prime minister and Liberal leader last month.

After their first phone call, Carney said Trump had respected Canada's sovereignty in that conversation. But it turns out there was more to the story.

The first indication this was merely a temporary pause in his rhetoric came in a comment from the White House press secretary: Karoline Leavitt told a CBC reporter that Trump still believed in making Canada a state.

Then he said it again to other reporters in the Oval Office. Then again to Time Magazine, when asked about it, insisting he wasn't joking.

And this week Radio-Canada reported that — Carney's public statement notwithstanding — Trump indeed mentioned wanting to make Canada the 51st state in their call last month.

When asked on the campaign trail about the discrepancy, Carney insists he wasn't lying about his previous statement that Trump had respected Canada's sovereignty; the Liberal leader said they'd had the conversation as two sovereign nations.

Carney says Trump raised '51st state' during their call but 'the president says a lot of things'

Still, in response to questions Friday about the Time interview, Carney acknowledged that something has changed between the countries.

"The president's latest comments are more proof, as if we needed any, that the old relationship with the United States that we've had is over," the Liberal leader told reporters in Sault Ste. Marie, Ont., using a line he first said last month.

"And it's proof, it's a reminder, it's a call to action that we need to chart a new path. That's the new reality."

Awkward G7 incoming

What's yet to be determined is whether managing Trump's aspirations will be Carney's challenge, after Monday's election — or Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre's.

But they'll be busy soon thereafter, preparing for a highly unusual G7. On Canadian soil, with Trump as their guest.

Analysis
Three ways this Canada-U.S. dispute will end

Miller's advice? In public comments, welcome Trump to Canada. Don't publicly back him into a corner. In private, spell out clear consequences for threats to Canada's sovereignty.

Meanwhile, work with the other G7 countries. Miller proposes a group statement reaffirming the principle of national sovereignty. Then release that statement, with or without the signature of the United States.


https://time.com/7280114/donal...nterview-transcript/

just the part on expansionnism but again worth the reading of the whole interview ...

You've talked about acquiring Greenland, taking control of the Panama Canal, making Canada the 51st state. Maybe you're trolling a little bit on that one. I don't know.

Actually, no, I’m not.

Well, do you want to grow the American empire?

Well, it depends as an empire, it wasn't, these are not things that we had before, so I'd view it a little bit differently if we had the right opportunity. Yeah, I think Greenland would be very well off if they I think it's important for us for national security and even international security. I think Canada, what you said that, “Well, that one, I might be trolling.” But I'm really not trolling. Canada is an interesting case. We lose $200 to $250 billion a year supporting Canada. And I asked a man who I called Governor Trudeau. I said, ”Why? Why do you think we're losing so much money supporting you? Do you think that's right? Do you think that's appropriate for another country to make it possible, for a country to sustain and he was unable to give me an answer, but it costs us over $200 billion a year to take care of Canada?” We’re taking care of their military. We're taking care of every aspect of their lives, and we don't need them to make cars for us. In fact, we don't want them to make cars for us. We want to make our own cars. We don't need their lumber. We don't need their energy. We don't need anything from Canada. And I say the only way this thing really works is for Canada to become a state.

Steven Cheung: We’re coming up on time, about 10 minutes.

Okay, we'll move quickly then. Last note: Do you want to be remembered as a president who expanded American territory?

Wouldn’t mind.
 
Posts: 3490 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I blame Terrence and Phillip.
 
Posts: 5680 | Location: South Island NZ | Registered: 21 July 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
But in recent days, the president has been blunt in different encounters with media that he seriously would love to see Canada become a state.


I would seriously love to see Trump become a cadaver in a neurosurgery lab at Harvard. Remember when he said “Maybe some of those 2A people could look into that.”?

I reckon turnabout is fair play.
 
Posts: 6603 | Location: Alberta | Registered: 14 November 2002Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
I blame Terrence and Phillip.


OMG, i nearly flooded my keyboard laughing


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 42793 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
I blame Terrence and Phillip.


a funny post lol up to the time it will come to your island ... i do hope that day i will find it funny as well ...
 
Posts: 3490 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by medved:
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
I blame Terrence and Phillip.


a funny post lol up to the time it will come to your island ... i do hope that day i will find it funny as well ...


islandS

and share the same monarch and governor general system as yourself ...

and the southpark reference is actually funny and irreverent


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 42793 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Yeah MEdved, You have an amazing ability to alienate supporters.

Watch the South Park episode and realise what its actually saying.

I can support you and have a sense of humour. You fucker! (another reference for humour.. among other things.)
 
Posts: 5680 | Location: South Island NZ | Registered: 21 July 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of M.Shy
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
quote:
Originally posted by medved:
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
I blame Terrence and Phillip.


a funny post lol up to the time it will come to your island ... i do hope that day i will find it funny as well ...


islandS

and share the same monarch and governor general system as yourself ...

and the southpark reference is actually funny and irreverent


That’s one of issues I would not want it here, British monarch and governor general and have millions of Pakis moving in super easy so technically the question is…is Canada really independent country or dependent on someone from somewhere else?
Seems weird to me


Never been lost, just confused here and there for month or two
 
Posts: 1233 | Location: Idaho, Montana, Washington and Europe at times | Registered: 24 February 2024Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
"new comers" actually IS an election issue in Canada, which may be decided monday


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 42793 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Speaking from my perspective, the monarchy is a non issue. They dont interfere and govt policy is decided in NZ.
In fact the only real effect on us is the honours system, which is not bad. I knighthood is a very eloquent and historical method of recognising someone's acheivemments. Likewise the Victoria cross recipients. The history of bravery, not just from our nation, but all the commonwealth nations means those from our nation who receive it are truly up in an elite group of people.
And that's it really. The govenor general is probably a safeguard on democracy, but has no other effect on the nation.
 
Posts: 5680 | Location: South Island NZ | Registered: 21 July 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
Yeah MEdved, You have an amazing ability to alienate supporters.

Watch the South Park episode and realise what its actually saying.

I can support you and have a sense of humour. You fucker! (another reference for humour.. among other things.)


funny you present as a supporter lol always wondered which side you were ...
 
Posts: 3490 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
quote:
Originally posted by medved:
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
I blame Terrence and Phillip.


a funny post lol up to the time it will come to your island ... i do hope that day i will find it funny as well ...


islandS

and share the same monarch and governor general system as yourself ...

and the southpark reference is actually funny and irreverent


new zealand is a country and i magine i forgot they have more than one island lol ...

funny you pretented to put me on your ignore list and still reading my posts hilarious ...
 
Posts: 3490 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by medved:
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
Yeah MEdved, You have an amazing ability to alienate supporters.

Watch the South Park episode and realise what its actually saying.

I can support you and have a sense of humour. You fucker! (another reference for humour.. among other things.)


funny you present as a supporter lol always wondered which side you were ...


And I have constantly wondered at your comprehension abilities.

Look dude, in an effort to be hospitable, I have taken the time to search out a very relevant clip from the episode I used as humour.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOR38552MJA

I sincerely hope you now understand.

Hint- Irony. and the last sentence.
 
Posts: 5680 | Location: South Island NZ | Registered: 21 July 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
quote:
Originally posted by medved:
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
Yeah MEdved, You have an amazing ability to alienate supporters.

Watch the South Park episode and realise what its actually saying.

I can support you and have a sense of humour. You fucker! (another reference for humour.. among other things.)


funny you present as a supporter lol always wondered which side you were ...


And I have constantly wondered at your comprehension abilities.

Look dude, in an effort to be hospitable, I have taken the time to search out a very relevant clip from the episode I used as humour.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOR38552MJA

I sincerely hope you now understand.

Hint- Irony. and the last sentence.


never thought you were on our side as you do not have a problem with gun control ... making fun is great and if the message is not understandable maybe the problem is not the receiver but the sender ...
 
Posts: 3490 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
It's always possible that it's me for sure. But then it only seems to be yourself that mis understands.

Gun control- Do you want to give me example of your claim?

I think really my problem is with idiots.
 
Posts: 5680 | Location: South Island NZ | Registered: 21 July 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
It's always possible that it's me for sure. But then it only seems to be yourself that mis understands.

Gun control- Do you want to give me example of your claim?

I think really my problem is with idiots.



you are absolutely right im an idiot and it was a quote from naki not from you ... so sorry ...
 
Posts: 3490 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
No problem.

Good on you for admitting it.
tu2
 
Posts: 5680 | Location: South Island NZ | Registered: 21 July 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Some people are of the opinion that Trump deliberately started the tariff BS as a means of weakening Canada, via re-election of the Liberal government. While I have trouble believing Trump is intelligent enough to play such a complex game, there is little doubt he turned the prospects for a conservative landslide upside down. His meddling may have doomed Canada to a truly dark age. My choice, if the Liberals do indeed win, is whether I am better off in a Canada which has been screwed up by Trump's actions or in a US which is also being screwed up by Trump's actions. I'm old enough that emigrating to another country is probably off the table. Most don't want more geezers. Otherwise, New Zealand is semi-attractive. While I'm fairly comfortable in North Idaho, it's so damn crowded. The outlook just isn't great. Regards, Bill.
 
Posts: 4112 | Location: Elko, B.C. Canada | Registered: 19 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Leeper:
Some people are of the opinion that Trump deliberately started the tariff BS as a means of weakening Canada, via re-election of the Liberal government. While I have trouble believing Trump is intelligent enough to play such a complex game, there is little doubt he turned the prospects for a conservative landslide upside down. His meddling may have doomed Canada to a truly dark age. My choice, if the Liberals do indeed win, is whether I am better off in a Canada which has been screwed up by Trump's actions or in a US which is also being screwed up by Trump's actions. I'm old enough that emigrating to another country is probably off the table. Most don't want more geezers. Otherwise, New Zealand is semi-attractive. While I'm fairly comfortable in North Idaho, it's so damn crowded. The outlook just isn't great. Regards, Bill.


that will be hard but it is not over yet let s keep some hope before the end of the night ...
 
Posts: 3490 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Well, there is no hope now. My Airdale, very sensitive to my mood, has been lying on my feet since the election was lost.
Canada has chosen to continue sinking deeper into debt. Socially, we have chosen pro-drug addiction, pro-crime, pro-immigration (as long as they aren't white), and pro elitist. Not a bright outlook. Bill
 
Posts: 4112 | Location: Elko, B.C. Canada | Registered: 19 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Leeper:
Well, there is no hope now. My Airdale, very sensitive to my mood, has been lying on my feet since the election was lost.
Canada has chosen to continue sinking deeper into debt. Socially, we have chosen pro-drug addiction, pro-crime, pro-immigration (as long as they aren't white), and pro elitist. Not a bright outlook. Bill


no majority so will how it goes but seems it will be hard for the next few years ,,,
 
Posts: 3490 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Skyline
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by medved:
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Leeper:
Well, there is no hope now. My Airdale, very sensitive to my mood, has been lying on my feet since the election was lost.
Canada has chosen to continue sinking deeper into debt. Socially, we have chosen pro-drug addiction, pro-crime, pro-immigration (as long as they aren't white), and pro elitist. Not a bright outlook. Bill


no majority so will how it goes but seems it will be hard for the next few years ,,,


One thing we can count on...nothing good will come of this.


______________________________________________

The power of accurate observation is frequently called cynicism by those who are bereft of that gift.



 
Posts: 1940 | Location: Northern Rockies, BC | Registered: 21 July 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Skyline:
quote:
Originally posted by medved:
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Leeper:
Well, there is no hope now. My Airdale, very sensitive to my mood, has been lying on my feet since the election was lost.
Canada has chosen to continue sinking deeper into debt. Socially, we have chosen pro-drug addiction, pro-crime, pro-immigration (as long as they aren't white), and pro elitist. Not a bright outlook. Bill


no majority so will how it goes but seems it will be hard for the next few years ,,,


One thing we can count on...nothing good will come of this.


 
Posts: 3490 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
I blame Terrence and Phillip.


Snort!
 
Posts: 43572 | Location: Crosby and Barksdale, Texas | Registered: 18 September 2006Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Guns, Politics, Gunsmithing & Reloading  Hop To Forums  The Political Forum    Trump blows up the notion his Canada talk was just a fleeting fancy

Copyright December 1997-2025 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia