quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
If you want to make sense the Russian Hoax…go read Matt Taibbi’s The Twitter Files. It give the complete narrative.

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Well, this thread isn't about Russian involvement in our election.

Tell us how CBS's editing effected a material change in Harris's answers. What are the key words that are changed?

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
If you want to make sense the Russian Hoax…go read Matt Taibbi’s The Twitter Files. It give the complete narrative.

I’ll read Muller’s report.

https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/dl

And the Trump allocate convictions there from.

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
If there was no material change, how can anyone claim CBS tried to help Harris?

Looks like just another Republican whine about being victims again.

When the show is on the other foot, "material change " wasn't a consideration

Didn't stop the "Russia Russia Russia" claims, though, did it?

Don't be foolish and disingenuous. You well know that Russia's helping Trump in the 2016 election has nothing to do with this thread. But I understand: you just don't have anything material to say.

If you don't understand "material," go look it up. Immaterial changes are done all the time by networks in editing interviews.

I find you an unpleasant and mean little person. You seem to think you can build yourself up by putting others down. Constantly. You aren't content unless you have multiple fights going on at any given time.

In fact, you act like a troll on a website you're supposed to help moderate.

Ah, honey, show me in my 23 word post, where i put anyone down? Heck roland, one our very first exchanges you expressed the same thoughts, Though, today, after exchanging so many meaning posts together I find myself 100 times more crushed today by your disdain as I was then.. oh, it's still 0, but it's 100 times zero

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
If you want to make sense the Russian Hoax…go read Matt Taibbi’s The Twitter Files. It give the complete narrative.

I’ll read Muller’s report.

https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/dl

And the Trump allocate convictions there from.

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
If there was no material change, how can anyone claim CBS tried to help Harris?

Looks like just another Republican whine about being victims again.

When the show is on the other foot, "material change " wasn't a consideration

Didn't stop the "Russia Russia Russia" claims, though, did it?

Don't be foolish and disingenuous. You well know that Russia's helping Trump in the 2016 election has nothing to do with this thread. But I understand: you just don't have anything material to say.

If you don't understand "material," go look it up. Immaterial changes are done all the time by networks in editing interviews.

I find you an unpleasant and mean little person. You seem to think you can build yourself up by putting others down. Constantly. You aren't content unless you have multiple fights going on at any given time.

In fact, you act like a troll on a website you're supposed to help moderate.

Ah, honey, show me in my 23 word post, where i put anyone down? Heck roland, one our very first exchanges you expressed the same thoughts, Though, today, after exchanging so many meaning posts together I find myself 100 times more crushed today by your disdain as I was then.. oh, it's still 0, but it's 100 times zero

I apologize for the last two paragraphs of that post. I try not to be so mean and nasty myself.

My mother died on Friday, and I still haven't regained my ordinary equilibrium.

Btw, your use of inappropriate terms like "honey" is demeaning--to both you and your target.

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:


My mother died on Friday, and I still haven't regained my ordinary equilibrium.

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
If you want to make sense the Russian Hoax…go read Matt Taibbi’s The Twitter Files. It give the complete narrative.

I’ll read Muller’s report.

https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/dl

And the Trump allocate convictions there from.

As for the Mueller report, pay special attention to pp. 66-168. While the report details other instances of Russian interference, the referenced pages focus on contacts between Russian operatives and members of the Trump campaign.

The report found, "The Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election in sweeping and systematic fashion."

Propaganda, my ass.

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
If you want to make sense the Russian Hoax…go read Matt Taibbi’s The Twitter Files. It give the complete narrative.

I’ll read Muller’s report.

https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/dl

And the Trump allocate convictions there from.

As for the Mueller report, pay special attention to pp. 66-168. While the report details other instances of Russian interference, the referenced pages focus on contacts between Russian operatives and members of the Trump campaign.

The report found, "The Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election in sweeping and systematic fashion."

Propaganda, my ass.

Dr. Easter is not stupid. He does not believe what he is posting. He is what he accuses others who are performing a vital function of being. That being a propagandist.

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Well, this thread isn't about Russian involvement in our election.

Tell us how CBS's editing effected a material change in Harris's answers. What are the key words that are changed?

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
You still hang not answered Rolland’s question.

The Muller Repoint is legitimate and authoritative.

You just do not like it rejects and destroys your propaganda. Miller and his staff are professional prosecutors, constitutional scholars, and investigators who performed the task their nation charged.

Prosecutions were only negated by pardoned and commuting sentences.

Thus, the courts reinforced the Muller Report in the law.


You are nothing but a hack.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
You still hang not answered Rolland’s question.

The Muller Repoint is legitimate and authoritative.

You just do not like it rejects and destroys your propaganda. Miller and his staff are professional prosecutors, constitutional scholars, and investigators who performed the task their nation charged.

Prosecutions were only negated by pardoned and commuting sentences.

Thus, the courts reinforced the Muller Report in the law.


You are nothing but a hack.

The Mueller Report produced nothing of substance. They persecuted a few people that had almost nothing to do with Trump. Yeah I am sure these folks broke some laws but exacted zero change in the 2016 election.

Paul Manafort, Campaign Chairman- Roger Stone, Campaign Advisor- Michael Flynn, National Security Advisor-Rick Gates, Deputy Campaign Chairman- Michael Cohen, Personal Lawyer- Yep, folks who had almost nothing to do with Trump.

Russia has been expending huge effort to exert influence in our elections since the 1950s. Nothing new.

Now in the 21st century due to people who can’t think for themselves…they are having an effect. Russia loves the Mueller Report and all the idiots who champion it. It puts Russia on center stage.

The Mueller Investigation was a left wing hit job. It produced NOTHING of substance and wasted a huge amount of money for NADA.

Leave it to you to waive it like a flag. And further…to not keep up with all the revelations that have surfaced since. You are an uninformed liberal — just own it since you advertise. The fact that you have not kept up with Matt Taibbi’s reporting is proof enough.

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
You still hang not answered Rolland’s question.

The Muller Repoint is legitimate and authoritative.

You just do not like it rejects and destroys your propaganda. Miller and his staff are professional prosecutors, constitutional scholars, and investigators who performed the task their nation charged.

Prosecutions were only negated by pardoned and commuting sentences.

Thus, the courts reinforced the Muller Report in the law.


You are nothing but a hack.

The Mueller Report produced nothing of substance. They persecuted a few people that had almost nothing to do with Trump. Yeah I am sure these folks broke some laws but exacted zero change in the 2016 election.

Paul Manafort, Campaign Chairman- Roger Stone, Campaign Advisor- Michael Flynn, National Security Advisor-Rick Gates, Deputy Campaign Chairman- Michael Cohen, Personal Lawyer- Yep, folks who had almost nothing to do with Trump.

Russia has been expending huge effort to exert influence in our elections since the 1950s. Nothing new.

Now in the 21st century due to people who can’t think for themselves…they are having an effect. Russia loves the Mueller Report and all the idiots who champion it. It puts Russia on center stage.

The Mueller Investigation was a left wing hit job. It produced NOTHING of substance and wasted a huge amount of money for NADA.

Leave it to you to waive it like a flag. And further…to not keep up with all the revelations that have surfaced since. You are an uninformed liberal — just own it since you advertise. The fact that you have not kept up with Matt Taibbi’s reporting is proof enough.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
You still hang not answered Rolland’s question.

The Muller Repoint is legitimate and authoritative.

You just do not like it rejects and destroys your propaganda. Miller and his staff are professional prosecutors, constitutional scholars, and investigators who performed the task their nation charged.

Prosecutions were only negated by pardoned and commuting sentences.

Thus, the courts reinforced the Muller Report in the law.


You are nothing but a hack.

The Mueller Report produced nothing of substance. They persecuted a few people that had almost nothing to do with Trump. Yeah I am sure these folks broke some laws but exacted zero change in the 2016 election.

Paul Manafort, Campaign Chairman- Roger Stone, Campaign Advisor- Michael Flynn, National Security Advisor-Rick Gates, Deputy Campaign Chairman- Michael Cohen, Personal Lawyer- Yep, folks who had almost nothing to do with Trump.

Russia has been expending huge effort to exert influence in our elections since the 1950s. Nothing new.

Now in the 21st century due to people who can’t think for themselves…they are having an effect. Russia loves the Mueller Report and all the idiots who champion it. It puts Russia on center stage.

The Mueller Investigation was a left wing hit job. It produced NOTHING of substance and wasted a huge amount of money for NADA.

Leave it to you to waive it like a flag. And further…to not keep up with all the revelations that have surfaced since. You are an uninformed liberal — just own it since you advertise. The fact that you have not kept up with Matt Taibbi’s reporting is proof enough.

Yep.

Paul Manafort, recommended by the RNC, worked for Trump for less than 60 days before he was fired by Trump. Convicted on things that had NADA to do with Trump or 2016 election.

Roger Stone was never an advisor. Maybe an acquaintance but not an advisor. His conviction was a bunch of bull shit charges as well.

Flynn is a national hero. He did nothing wrong and finally prevailed legally. A true patriot. Watching what the US gvt did to General Flynn should give us all pause. Total railroad job.

Rick Gates just worked for Manafort and had zero to do with Trump. His charges were linked to Manafort past dealings.

Michael Cohen is a scumbag attorney. His conviction had zero to do with Russia and very little to do with Trump.

quote:

Michael Dean Cohen (born August 25, 1966) is an American lawyer who served as an attorney for former United States president Donald Trump from 2006 to 2018. Cohen served as vice president of the Trump Organization and personal counsel to Trump, often being described as his fixer. Cohen served as co-president of Trump Entertainment and was a board member of the Eric Trump Foundation, a children's health charity. From 2017 to 2018, Cohen was deputy finance chairman of the Republican National Committee.

Trump employed Cohen until May 2018, a year after the special counsel investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. elections began. In August 2018, Cohen pleaded guilty to eight counts including campaign-finance violations, tax fraud, and bank fraud. Cohen said he violated campaign-finance laws at Trump's direction "for the principal purpose of influencing" the 2016 presidential election. In November 2018, Cohen pleaded guilty to lying to U.S. congressional committees about efforts to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.

quote:

Former President Donald Trump’s team is in discussions with Paul Manafort, his 2016 campaign chairman whom he later pardoned, to potentially help with the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, three sources familiar with the ongoing conversations told CNN.

Manafort, who was one of several individuals who ran Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign, was pardoned by Trump after being found guilty of several financial crimes in 2018.

One source indicated that Manafort would be helping with fundraising around the July convention but noted that no final decisions had been made.

Trump has told allies he wanted to bring Manafort back into the fold, but it was unclear in what capacity.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
Lot’s of large businesses use multiple attorneys for multiple types of deals. Sometimes one needs a scumbag attorney.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
You still hang not answered Rolland’s question.

The Muller Repoint is legitimate and authoritative.

You just do not like it rejects and destroys your propaganda. Miller and his staff are professional prosecutors, constitutional scholars, and investigators who performed the task their nation charged.

Prosecutions were only negated by pardoned and commuting sentences.

Thus, the courts reinforced the Muller Report in the law.


You are nothing but a hack.

The Mueller Report produced nothing of substance. They persecuted a few people that had almost nothing to do with Trump. Yeah I am sure these folks broke some laws but exacted zero change in the 2016 election.

Russia has been expending huge effort to exert influence in our elections since the 1950s. Nothing new.

Now in the 21st century due to people who can’t think for themselves…they are having an effect. Russia loves the Mueller Report and all the idiots who champion it. It puts Russia on center stage.

The Mueller Investigation was a left wing hit job. It produced NOTHING of substance and wasted a huge amount of money for NADA.

Leave it to you to waive it like a flag. And further…to not keep up with all the revelations that have surfaced since. You are an uninformed liberal — just own it since you advertise. The fact that you have not kept up with Matt Taibbi’s reporting is proof enough.

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
Lot’s of large businesses use multiple attorneys for multiple types of deals. Sometimes one needs a scumbag attorney.

Do they make their scumbag attorneys Vice President of their Company and put them on the Board of their son's scam charity?

quote:

I sit on a few boards.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
Lot’s of large businesses use multiple attorneys for multiple types of deals. Sometimes one needs a scumbag attorney.

Do they make their scumbag attorneys Vice President of their Company and put them on the Board of their son's scam charity?

I sit on a few boards. Sometimes it amazes me who is sitting next to me. Board members are selected on many different qualities.

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Ledvm apparently lacks any examples of how CBS materially changed Harris's answers to make her look better.

Otherwise, he'd answer my question.

quote:

Originally posted by Magine Enigam:

quote:

I sit on a few boards.

I'm curious.

Why?

Do you do it for money or influence or ego or all three?

Please don't tell me what boards you shit on. It would probably upset me.

But I would like to know how much money they pay you, and how do they get their money's worth.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Ledvm apparently lacks any examples of how CBS materially changed Harris's answers to make her look better.

Otherwise, he'd answer my question.

Roland I posted the link to the 2 different transcripts above. I believe even you can see and admit the difference. If not I can’t help you. Material differences much.

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Ledvm, I'm not your research assistant to do your homework. I'm not going to wade through whole transcripts to guess what you may be talking about.

It's your claim--that CBS edited Harris's answers in a material way, that is to help her. You have the burden to come forward with something to support that claim.

As they used to say, "Pony up, or shut up."

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Ledvm apparently lacks any examples of how CBS materially changed Harris's answers to make her look better.

Otherwise, he'd answer my question.

Roland I posted the link to the 2 different transcripts above. I believe even you can see and admit the difference. If not I can’t help you. Material differences much.

I notice you haven't explained how this is okay since you've made clear editing is terrible...