THE ACCURATE RELOADING POLITICAL CRATER

Page 1 2 

Moderators: DRG
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
How's Trump's tariff extortion threats working out? Login/Join 
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
I will happily provide receipts for all these things if you want, but I'm pretty sure you remember them all.



No, I don't remember them all, at least not the way you spin them. I'd like receipts where noted, please.

Also I'd like a receipt for this:

"Or Nancy Pelosi admitting she was responsible for the National Guard not being activated on J6."

I don't see a single one of your examples as support for your argument that the DOJ prosecutes Republicans for the same conduct they don't pursue Democrats for. Please support your argument, or withdraw.
 
Posts: 7135 | Location: Coeur d' Alene, Idaho, USA | Registered: 08 March 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JTEX:
quote:
Originally posted by wymple:
Fast & Furious was a sting operation that did not go according to plan. It was nothing intentionally nefarious & Holder did not personally plan anything. Guess who was NOT president in 2006? Yeah, but Bush was. And thru 2 years his guys made ZERO arrests. So calling it a "democratic" gun running operation is a real stretch at best. I've never read that the border agent was killed with one of these guns, only that one was found at the scene. As if there would have been no guns there without F&F. That is 100% laughable. The cartels had no other sources for guns?


It was totally nefarious you partisan hack!


And it was Obama and holder that orchestrated it, you ,as much as you want to, can not rewrite it!


It was "orchestrated" under Bush before Obama & Holder were even on the scene, you partisan butt boy!
 
Posts: 16304 | Location: Iowa | Registered: 10 April 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
I always bring receipts.



So where are the two I asked for, Steve?

Also, I spent quite a bit of time replying to your post. It would be nice to hear something back from you--or from your post admirers.
 
Posts: 7135 | Location: Coeur d' Alene, Idaho, USA | Registered: 08 March 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Point being Roland, you see the DOJ through a completely different and partisan prism than I do. And apparently the majority of America agree's with me. as we elected a rapist and a felon.

Pam Bondi will now, correct many of these actions and "you" will all be furious and claim selective prosecution. Those same things that "we" felt for years.

I will happily provide receipts for all these things if you want, but I'm pretty sure you remember them all.

I want equal justice under the law. I want R's and D'd both either prosecuted or not, based on the same law and justice, not a partisan DOJ or AG.


I guess the promise of receipts was false; maybe there is no evidence, is what I'm thinking.

Having thought about this some more, I've realized I disagree with Steve's partisan prism argument. Everything is not a matter of relativism. Sometimes things are either true or they are false. There is a difference between fact and fantasy.

Trump and Fox News have been selling you fantasies, and you've been swilling them down. I'm not using a political prism to see it either.

The DOJ went after Hunter Biden--was that an example that helps you? I wonder why you went right by that example. The prosecutor and judge were both harsh on Hunter, considering his crime has probably been committed by a million gun-owning pot smokers.

If I were a college prof and you were my student, I would have to give you a D on your paper. The reason is that you offer an argument that is nowhere supported by your litany of examples.

"The DOJ, will selectively prosecute Republicans for the same misdeeds that a democrat gets away with, penalty free." That's your argument.

None of your examples--I repeat, NONE--support your proposition. You get half a point on the example of the FBI and DOJ refusing to arrest Hillary, but where is the case of a Republican who was prosecuted in the same circumstances? You have none.

You have no case.
 
Posts: 7135 | Location: Coeur d' Alene, Idaho, USA | Registered: 08 March 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I agree w Rolland and add:

A president using his vested pardoning power divided, granted to the president by the Constitution is not a non issue. Such action does not support your thesis.

If you do not like it, change the Constitution. Yet, that would not be very conservative.
 
Posts: 12774 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
If you do not like it, change the Constitution. Yet, that would not be very historically conservative.


I added a word to your quote to compare it into the present. Smiler

When Trump is inaugurated and takes the oath of office to protect the constitution, he will be lying from the onset of his term.


*************
Degenerate 1:1
1 Then Trump said, "Let Us re-make a Nation in MY Image, after My likeness, to rule over everything in the Nation, and over all the earth itself and every creature that crawls upon it".

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Per my far-right friend: "reality sucks"

D.J. Trump aka Trumpism's Founding Farter, aka Farter Martyr. Qualifications: flatulence - mental, oral and anal.



 
Posts: 22061 | Location: Depends on the Season | Registered: 17 February 2017Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
quote:
If you do not like it, change the Constitution. Yet, that would not be very historically conservative.


I added a word to your quote to compare it into the present. Smiler

When Trump is inaugurated and takes the oath of office to protect the constitution, he will be lying from the onset of his term.


Like he lied so not to serve his country?? jumping


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 69688 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

With his hand on one of his grift Bibles, with the golden cover, his version of the oath may be:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully, to the best of my ability, execute , preserve, protect and defend the Office of President of the United States, and will execute the Constitution of the United States."

So, both definitions of "execute" are covered, 1 and 2. Financial deals are for sure, and the constitution executed per definition 2.

ex·e·cute
/ˈeksəˌkyo͞ot/
verb

1. carry out or put into effect (a plan, order, or course of action).
"the corporation executed a series of financial deals"
Similar:
carry out
accomplish
perform
implement
effect
bring off
bring about
achieve
carry off
carry through
complete
enact
enforce
put into effect
put into practice
do
discharge
prosecute
engineer
administer
attain
realize
fulfill
perpetrate
pull off
swing
cut
acquit oneself of
effectuate

2. carry out a sentence of death


*************
Degenerate 1:1
1 Then Trump said, "Let Us re-make a Nation in MY Image, after My likeness, to rule over everything in the Nation, and over all the earth itself and every creature that crawls upon it".

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Per my far-right friend: "reality sucks"

D.J. Trump aka Trumpism's Founding Farter, aka Farter Martyr. Qualifications: flatulence - mental, oral and anal.



 
Posts: 22061 | Location: Depends on the Season | Registered: 17 February 2017Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
In other words, if y'all don't do what I want, I'm going to tax my citizens until they lynch you for making me do it!


TomP

Our country, right or wrong. When right, to be kept right, when wrong to be put right.

Carl Schurz (1829 - 1906)
 
Posts: 14814 | Location: Moreno Valley CA USA | Registered: 20 November 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Aspen Hill Adventures
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
I agree w Rolland and add:

A president using his vested pardoning power divided, granted to the president by the Constitution is not a non issue. Such action does not support your thesis.

If you do not like it, change the Constitution. Yet, that would not be very conservative.


Will you feel the same with pardons and commutations that trump will do?


~Ann





 
Posts: 19749 | Location: The LOST Nation | Registered: 27 March 2001Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
quote:
I always bring receipts.



So where are the two I asked for, Steve?

Also, I spent quite a bit of time replying to your post. It would be nice to hear something back from you--or from your post admirers.

headless,
seeking external validation is a clear sign of poor self-esteem --

you might have that looked it, my wife recommends "betterhelp.com" for the bashful --


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 40232 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Steve Ahrenberg
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
quote:
I will happily provide receipts for all these things if you want, but I'm pretty sure you remember them all.



No, I don't remember them all, at least not the way you spin them. I'd like receipts where noted, please.

Also I'd like a receipt for this:

"Or Nancy Pelosi admitting she was responsible for the National Guard not being activated on J6."

I don't see a single one of your examples as support for your argument that the DOJ prosecutes Republicans for the same conduct they don't pursue Democrats for. Please support your argument, or withdraw.


Here's the video of NP telling her daughter that it was her responsibility.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oksVQrXRAkE

And excuse me for not being around. I was in a horrific dirt bike accident Wednesday, last week. I broke two vertebrae (T4, T5) and two ribs.

Im so stiff I cant hardly hold up anything at all.


Formerly "Nganga"
 
Posts: 3760 | Location: Phoenix, Arizona | Registered: 26 April 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Steve Ahrenberg
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
quote:
Point being Roland, you see the DOJ through a completely different and partisan prism than I do. And apparently the majority of America agree's with me. as we elected a rapist and a felon.

Pam Bondi will now, correct many of these actions and "you" will all be furious and claim selective prosecution. Those same things that "we" felt for years.

I will happily provide receipts for all these things if you want, but I'm pretty sure you remember them all.

I want equal justice under the law. I want R's and D'd both either prosecuted or not, based on the same law and justice, not a partisan DOJ or AG.


I guess the promise of receipts was false; maybe there is no evidence, is what I'm thinking.

Having thought about this some more, I've realized I disagree with Steve's partisan prism argument. Everything is not a matter of relativism. Sometimes things are either true or they are false. There is a difference between fact and fantasy.

Trump and Fox News have been selling you fantasies, and you've been swilling them down. I'm not using a political prism to see it either.

The DOJ went after Hunter Biden--was that an example that helps you? I wonder why you went right by that example. The prosecutor and judge were both harsh on Hunter, considering his crime has probably been committed by a million gun-owning pot smokers.

If I were a college prof and you were my student, I would have to give you a D on your paper. The reason is that you offer an argument that is nowhere supported by your litany of examples.

"The DOJ, will selectively prosecute Republicans for the same misdeeds that a democrat gets away with, penalty free." That's your argument.

None of your examples--I repeat, NONE--support your proposition. You get half a point on the example of the FBI and DOJ refusing to arrest Hillary, but where is the case of a Republican who was prosecuted in the same circumstances? You have none.

You have no case.


And FFS, the FBI actually suppressed the Hunter laptop prior the 2020 election. What more partisan proof do you require?

https://judiciary.house.gov/me...companies-about-hack

House Judiciary committee report not enough proof the DOJ selectively protects/investigates?

How about deadly force authorized to raid an X-Presidents residence?

https://www.newsweek.com/trump...deadly-force-1903247

Did Biden get a full blown armed FBI raid when his documents were found? Hell no.


Formerly "Nganga"
 
Posts: 3760 | Location: Phoenix, Arizona | Registered: 26 April 2010Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Steve Ahrenberg:
quote:
Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
quote:
I will happily provide receipts for all these things if you want, but I'm pretty sure you remember them all.



No, I don't remember them all, at least not the way you spin them. I'd like receipts where noted, please.

Also I'd like a receipt for this:

"Or Nancy Pelosi admitting she was responsible for the National Guard not being activated on J6."

I don't see a single one of your examples as support for your argument that the DOJ prosecutes Republicans for the same conduct they don't pursue Democrats for. Please support your argument, or withdraw.


Here's the video of NP telling her daughter that it was her responsibility.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oksVQrXRAkE

And excuse me for not being around. I was in a horrific dirt bike accident Wednesday, last week. I broke two vertebrae (T4, T5) and two ribs.

Im so stiff I cant hardly hold up anything at all.


Hope you heal up quick --


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 40232 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
I was in a horrific dirt bike accident Wednesday, last week. I broke two vertebrae (T4, T5) and two ribs.



I'm very sorry to hear about your accident. I hope you haven't suffered any permanent damage and heal quickly.

I took a couple of hard dirt bike spills when I was young. I was lucky I never broke anything.
 
Posts: 7135 | Location: Coeur d' Alene, Idaho, USA | Registered: 08 March 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Steve Ahrenberg
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
quote:
I was in a horrific dirt bike accident Wednesday, last week. I broke two vertebrae (T4, T5) and two ribs.



I'm very sorry to hear about your accident. I hope you haven't suffered any permanent damage and heal quickly.

I took a couple of hard dirt bike spills when I was young. I was lucky I never broke anything.


Thanks Roland and Jeff. I'm 63. Very, very fit from all my gym/cycling work. But it's not good. Broke the ribs on the backside, can't lay down to sleep. Been sleeping (trying)in a chair.

Was getting ready to ride the CDT (Continental Divide Trail). But I think I'm gonna pass. Can't leave my wife and son having to take care of a a crippled husband/father.


Formerly "Nganga"
 
Posts: 3760 | Location: Phoenix, Arizona | Registered: 26 April 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Steve Ahrenberg:
quote:
Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
quote:
I will happily provide receipts for all these things if you want, but I'm pretty sure you remember them all.



No, I don't remember them all, at least not the way you spin them. I'd like receipts where noted, please.

Also I'd like a receipt for this:

"Or Nancy Pelosi admitting she was responsible for the National Guard not being activated on J6."

I don't see a single one of your examples as support for your argument that the DOJ prosecutes Republicans for the same conduct they don't pursue Democrats for. Please support your argument, or withdraw.


Here's the video of NP telling her daughter that it was her responsibility.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oksVQrXRAkE

And excuse me for not being around. I was in a horrific dirt bike accident Wednesday, last week. I broke two vertebrae (T4, T5) and two ribs.

Im so stiff I cant hardly hold up anything at all.


Dude! Sorry about your injury.

I'll pray you make a 100% recovery.
 
Posts: 9718 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Yeah! Get better Steve.
 
Posts: 42532 | Location: Crosby and Barksdale, Texas | Registered: 18 September 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Hope the vertebral fractures are not near anything significant!

Rib fractures are one of the most irritating types. You can’t stop them from moving, so they take longer to heal and hurt the whole time.

Given your choice of sport, I’m sure you’ve had more than your share of injuries.

Best wishes for a speedy recovery!
 
Posts: 11298 | Location: Minnesota USA | Registered: 15 June 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
How about deadly force authorized to raid an X-Presidents residence?


The use of deadly force in these raids is commonly authorized.
 
Posts: 16304 | Location: Iowa | Registered: 10 April 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Steve Ahrenberg
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by crbutler:
Hope the vertebral fractures are not near anything significant!

Rib fractures are one of the most irritating types. You can’t stop them from moving, so they take longer to heal and hurt the whole time.

Given your choice of sport, I’m sure you’ve had more than your share of injuries.

Best wishes for a speedy recovery!


The Abrazo ER guy told me my column was not in danger. However, I am going to see a spinal specialist Wednesday.


Formerly "Nganga"
 
Posts: 3760 | Location: Phoenix, Arizona | Registered: 26 April 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Steve Ahrenberg
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by wymple:
quote:
How about deadly force authorized to raid an X-Presidents residence?


The use of deadly force in these raids is commonly authorized.


Was deadly force authorized on the raid on the Biden residence? Oh...wait...there was no raid on the Biden residence. Big Grin

This is all good with me. When you guys start screaming "lawfare-lawfare", I'll just laugh it off, just as you guys do.

Kash Patel is going to wreck the deep state.


Formerly "Nganga"
 
Posts: 3760 | Location: Phoenix, Arizona | Registered: 26 April 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Kash Patel is going to wreck the deep state.



God I hope so! We need it!
 
Posts: 42532 | Location: Crosby and Barksdale, Texas | Registered: 18 September 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Was deadly force authorized on the raid on the Biden residence? Oh...wait...there was no raid on the Biden residence.



Oh, wait...Biden didn't refuse to return the documents, like Trump did.
 
Posts: 7135 | Location: Coeur d' Alene, Idaho, USA | Registered: 08 March 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Steve Ahrenberg:
Kash Patel is going to wreck the deep state.


That's like sending Ghost Busters team, 50,000 shock troops, to wreck something from Steve Bannon's fantasy.

Whoever they nominate and is approved will be tethered to Heritage Foundation's project 2025, plus some rogue ideas, conspiracy theories, of their own and Trump's too.

You got one thing right, "wreck". And it ain't a deep state. That's just a pejorative term to spin what it really is. It's the whole working fundamentals developed over time of the federal govt, and agencies, etc.

We have seen it many times where the Rightist goons harp about some aspect of govt being dysfunctional, such as the EPA, then they cut funding and say see - I told you they were dysfunctional.

We haven't seen anything like the dysfunction Trump Team will render, and they will spin it. We have lots of dysfunction from Trump and Team already. There is reason to think the only thing they will get better at is dysfunction.

But, of course, "wreck" is something you are proud of and cherish and look forward to. After all, that's why Trump got elected - the promise to wreck the system.


*************
Degenerate 1:1
1 Then Trump said, "Let Us re-make a Nation in MY Image, after My likeness, to rule over everything in the Nation, and over all the earth itself and every creature that crawls upon it".

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Per my far-right friend: "reality sucks"

D.J. Trump aka Trumpism's Founding Farter, aka Farter Martyr. Qualifications: flatulence - mental, oral and anal.



 
Posts: 22061 | Location: Depends on the Season | Registered: 17 February 2017Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
quote:
Was deadly force authorized on the raid on the Biden residence? Oh...wait...there was no raid on the Biden residence.



Oh, wait...Biden didn't refuse to return the documents, like Trump did.


Let me help with the spin: Roll Eyes

Oh, wait, Biden just did a better job of hiding the documents he stole, and besides DOJ wasn't after him anyway. The two-tiered thing, you know.

There is no end to the spin, excuses, lies, conspiracy theories, belief in fiction Rightists can dream up. It's a bottomless rabbit hole.


*************
Degenerate 1:1
1 Then Trump said, "Let Us re-make a Nation in MY Image, after My likeness, to rule over everything in the Nation, and over all the earth itself and every creature that crawls upon it".

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Per my far-right friend: "reality sucks"

D.J. Trump aka Trumpism's Founding Farter, aka Farter Martyr. Qualifications: flatulence - mental, oral and anal.



 
Posts: 22061 | Location: Depends on the Season | Registered: 17 February 2017Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I watched the Pelosi video, and wish there was more context for her statements. I'd like to know the source of any authority by the Speaker of the House to mobilize the National Guard.

Are you saying, Steve, that the DOJ should have arrested Pelosi and put her on trial for the events of January 6? On what charge?

When they never arrested Trump for sitting on his hands, watching the events unfold?

What's your point, anyway?
 
Posts: 7135 | Location: Coeur d' Alene, Idaho, USA | Registered: 08 March 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
There’s no authority for the Speaker to mobilize the DC Guard.
 
Posts: 12774 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Steve Ahrenberg
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
There’s no authority for the Speaker to mobilize the DC Guard.


Maybe the DC guard, but the rest is just semantics.

https://cha.house.gov/2024/8/n...ecurity-on-january-6


Formerly "Nganga"
 
Posts: 3760 | Location: Phoenix, Arizona | Registered: 26 April 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
No it is not.

I have posted the federal law and the Executive Order that controls the DC Guard. Along with a historical summation of its creation.

It rested on Trump’s head.
 
Posts: 12774 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Steve Ahrenberg
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
No it is not.

I have posted the federal law and the Executive Order that controls the DC Guard. Along with a historical summation of its creation.

It rested on Trump’s head.


The J6 "Trump is an Insurrectionist" narrative is crumbling. Why can't some of you just read the data and house reports. Just because the MSM won't make it public, doesn't make it truth.

https://cha.house.gov/2024/3/c...ranscribed-interview


Formerly "Nganga"
 
Posts: 3760 | Location: Phoenix, Arizona | Registered: 26 April 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Steve Ahrenberg:
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
No it is not.

I have posted the federal law and the Executive Order that controls the DC Guard. Along with a historical summation of its creation.

It rested on Trump’s head.


The J6 "Trump is an Insurrectionist" narrative is crumbling. Why can't some of you just read the data and house reports. Just because the MSM won't make it public, doesn't make it truth.

https://cha.house.gov/2024/3/c...ranscribed-interview


What is your source of information, if not the media?

I know, I know: the mainstream media is conspiring against you too.

Have you ever listened to Trump's speech when he incited the crowd to riot? If not legal responsibility, Trump sure has moral responsibility for January 6.
 
Posts: 7135 | Location: Coeur d' Alene, Idaho, USA | Registered: 08 March 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I know what the actual responsibilities of the President are.

I know what Washington on form would have done when a violent mob stormed the Capitol in defiance of my Constitution.

The election does not change who and what Trump is.
 
Posts: 12774 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Steve Ahrenberg
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
quote:
Originally posted by Steve Ahrenberg:
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
No it is not.

I have posted the federal law and the Executive Order that controls the DC Guard. Along with a historical summation of its creation.

It rested on Trump’s head.


The J6 "Trump is an Insurrectionist" narrative is crumbling. Why can't some of you just read the data and house reports. Just because the MSM won't make it public, doesn't make it truth.

https://cha.house.gov/2024/3/c...ranscribed-interview


What is your source of information, if not the media?

I know, I know: the mainstream media is conspiring against you too.

Have you ever listened to Trump's speech when he incited the crowd to riot? If not legal responsibility, Trump sure has moral responsibility for January 6.


I’ve found the house committee reports to be both readily available and factual.


His speech where he clearly says “peacefully and patriotically”?

Roland- I’m not saying Trump is completely guiltless in that day, however the evidence I’m providing should give you at least some pause.


Formerly "Nganga"
 
Posts: 3760 | Location: Phoenix, Arizona | Registered: 26 April 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
the evidence I’m providing should give you at least some pause.


It is well known and evident that Trump has a way of saying things that can be taken at least two ways. He's an expert at plausible denial. He also said, "fight like hell or you won't have a country anymore".

Sure, he and his supporters want to focus on the “peacefully and patriotically” thing. He also calls those convicted for the invasion that day, patriots and political hostages.

Also, the focus on the “peacefully and patriotically” ignores the other parts of the story, the planning, the push on Pence, Eastman's and MAGA Mike's fake electors scheme, etc.

It was a coordinated plan, including GOPers in congress.

He would have done it again had the election 2024 not gone his way.

I don't have any "pause" at all except at how you rationalize it.


*************
Degenerate 1:1
1 Then Trump said, "Let Us re-make a Nation in MY Image, after My likeness, to rule over everything in the Nation, and over all the earth itself and every creature that crawls upon it".

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Per my far-right friend: "reality sucks"

D.J. Trump aka Trumpism's Founding Farter, aka Farter Martyr. Qualifications: flatulence - mental, oral and anal.



 
Posts: 22061 | Location: Depends on the Season | Registered: 17 February 2017Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Steve Ahrenberg
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
quote:
the evidence I’m providing should give you at least some pause.


It is well known and evident that Trump has a way of saying things that can be taken at least two ways. He's an expert at plausible denial. He also said, "fight like hell or you won't have a country anymore".

Sure, he and his supporters want to focus on the “peacefully and patriotically” thing. He also calls those convicted for the invasion that day, patriots and political hostages.

Also, the focus on the “peacefully and patriotically” ignores the other parts of the story, the planning, the push on Pence, Eastman's and MAGA Mike's fake electors scheme, etc.

It was a coordinated plan, including GOPers in congress.

He would have done it again had the election 2024 not gone his way.

I don't have any "pause" at all except at how you rationalize it.


ME-

I clearly stated Trump is not without some guilt. Why did you leave that off my quote, then go on to show some of his guilt?

Hmmmm? Smiler


Formerly "Nganga"
 
Posts: 3760 | Location: Phoenix, Arizona | Registered: 26 April 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
He said "peaceful" one time.

He said "fight" eighteen times in that one speech. Fight, "or you won't have a country left."

Trump doesn't just have "some guilt" for January 6. He has primary guilt for it.
 
Posts: 7135 | Location: Coeur d' Alene, Idaho, USA | Registered: 08 March 2013Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
He said "peaceful" one time.

He said "fight" eighteen times in that one speech. Fight, "or you won't have a country left."

Trump doesn't just have "some guilt" for January 6. He has primary guilt for it.


And harris said it 19 times. Do you have a point?
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy4gnq4dpd5o


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 40232 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Steve Ahrenberg:

ME-

I clearly stated Trump is not without some guilt. Why did you leave that off my quote, then go on to show some of his guilt?

Hmmmm? Smiler


To answer your question:

"some guilt" leaves room for "some innocence". It's a rationalization.

It's like being halfway between --- whatever --- reality vs fiction maybe.

I tried to show all his guilt, and his innocence is null. Trump is never innocent.

"Not without" is the clue of the halfway thing. How is that measured? Where does the scale tilt?

He led the plan. The Jan 6 event was last resort - stall, remove Pence from the scene, let the GOPers in congress take charge of it and recognize the fake electors.

There is no way Trump is innocent. He still denies he lost the election simply because it serves him, and that's because he has supporters like you who WILL rationalize.


*************
Degenerate 1:1
1 Then Trump said, "Let Us re-make a Nation in MY Image, after My likeness, to rule over everything in the Nation, and over all the earth itself and every creature that crawls upon it".

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Per my far-right friend: "reality sucks"

D.J. Trump aka Trumpism's Founding Farter, aka Farter Martyr. Qualifications: flatulence - mental, oral and anal.



 
Posts: 22061 | Location: Depends on the Season | Registered: 17 February 2017Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
quote:
Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
He said "peaceful" one time.

He said "fight" eighteen times in that one speech. Fight, "or you won't have a country left."

Trump doesn't just have "some guilt" for January 6. He has primary guilt for it.


And harris said it 19 times. Do you have a point?
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy4gnq4dpd5o


So, I ask you Jeffee, do you have a point?

Excerpt from the article you linked:

Her supporters responded with loud boos when she noted that she had had a phone call with President-elect Trump, and "I told him we will help him and his team with his transition. And we will engage in a peaceful transfer of power."

"While I concede this election, I do not concede the fight that fuelled this campaign," she added. Her speech referenced "fight" or "fighting" 19 times.

During the campaign the rivals often traded insults, with Harris calling Trump a "fascist" and a threat to American democracy.

Harris told her supporters on Wednesday: "I know many people feel like we are entering a dark time. But for the benefit of us all, I hope that is not the case."

Trump Team has not coordinated in the transition.

When referring to Trump and Trumpism, "fighting" is not the same as when Harris uses the word. He implies and invites violence, Harris does not. Trump never uses the word "hope". Hope is not a strategy. It's a last resort. Instead of Hope, Trump just hires lawyers. His first and last resort is to lie.

Here's the difference in GOPers and Dems:

GOPers > when all you have is a hammer, use it.

Dems > Your lever is decency, reason, virtue - use it.


*************
Degenerate 1:1
1 Then Trump said, "Let Us re-make a Nation in MY Image, after My likeness, to rule over everything in the Nation, and over all the earth itself and every creature that crawls upon it".

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Per my far-right friend: "reality sucks"

D.J. Trump aka Trumpism's Founding Farter, aka Farter Martyr. Qualifications: flatulence - mental, oral and anal.



 
Posts: 22061 | Location: Depends on the Season | Registered: 17 February 2017Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia

Since January 8 1998 you are visitor #: