The Accurate Reloading Forums THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS Guns, Politics, Gunsmithing & Reloading The Political Forum Let's call a spade a spade.Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply | |
| One of Us |
This Revolution of Destroyers Demands New Names Mafia state. Führer democracy. We need honest terms that signal the threat posed by Trump and his mimics. Andrew Nikiforuk YesterdayThe Tyee Tyee contributing editor Andrew Nikiforuk is an award-winning journalist whose books and articles focus on epidemics, the energy industry, nature and more. SHARE: 181 Comments Two late-middle-aged white men in dark suits are seated and shake hands. Reject the grip of soft words like ‘populist’: President Donald Trump with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban at the White House in 2019. Photo by Evan Vucci, Associated Press. History, a tragic cycle of gain and loss, has a way of slapping our illusions of progress in the face. ANNOUNCEMENTS, EVENTS & MORE FROM TYEE AND SELECT PARTNERS See Judy Collins Live in Concert See Judy Collins Live in Concert The folk music legend visits the Massey Theatre for a special evening of song on March 30. And to fully appreciate our new world disorder with its daily menu of betrayals, threats, tariffs, annexations and outright villainy, we require an honest political vocabulary. So let’s call a spade a spade — and place the words we need in bold-faced italics. Words like revolution. Führer democracy. Orbánization. Mafia state. Our neighbours to the south are in the throes of an ugly and (so far) bloodless, full-scale second American revolution. Trump and his radical cadres have threatened Canada, abandoned European allies, humiliated and blackmailed Ukraine, dismantled the state’s bureaucracy, attacked its universities and embraced the ugly worldview of Russian dictator, Vladimir Putin. These acts do not represent just another disruption or a transactional presidency. Or some new form of unconventional politics. We are witnessing a revolution that pretends to address numerous and often legitimate grievances by overthrowing the ruling social order. In this revolution the virtual guillotines are now lining up for shocked members of government, media and universities. The crows are circling and there is no expiry date on the growing disorder. (Yes, fascism by its very nature is exhausting.) In revolutionary times, perfidy, calculation and fear carry the day. Moreover, his remarkable upheaval, orchestrated by an ambitious clique of Christian nationalists, oligarchs and techno-fascists, seeks to mould a Führer democracy — a term coined by Hungarian political scientist Andras Körösényi. Billionaires Don’t Control Us Get The Tyee’s free daily newsletter in your inbox. Journalism for readers, not profits. SUBSCRIBE The Hungary-born Austrian journalist Paul Lendvai is the one who has warned about the “Orbánization of America” last year. Might makes Reich But before parsing the Orbán model, let’s briefly revisit the thoughts of Hermann Göring, an old school strongman for some historical perspective. Hitler’s number-two man operated as a ruthless technician of totalitarian rule before its material seductions undid his influence. He would certainly recognize this Trumpian moment as well as its insurrectionary character. Let us not forget that Hitler and company also used democratic institutions to erase democracy. One of Göring’s first jobs in 1933 was to remove unreliables from the Prussian police force and replace them with loyalists. “My measures will not be enfeebled by any legalistic hesitations,” promised Göring in one of several shameless speeches on the need for revolutionary change. “My measures will not be enfeebled by any bureaucracy. Here I have not to exercise justice, here I have only to destroy and exterminate, nothing else.” How Trumpian is that rhetoric? How Muskian the tone? Göring’s shamelessness underscores something highly relevant to our current predicament. Every preening autocrat, including Viktor Orbán, Elon Musk, Donald Trump or Danielle Smith speaks without shame in a post-truth world. Once shame has been banished, the lawless can rule with impunity. This is why lies circulate more freely than house flies; why moral compasses pile up like plastic in a landfill and why reasoned arguments hold less currency than a Bill Maher joke. What did Hitler say? “Close your hearts to pity.” Now Göring knew that Hitler’s nationalist revolution (and Hitler called it “the most bloodless revolution in world history”) was essentially about tearing down the ruling order and expanding lebensraum or “living space” for Germans in eastern Europe. (Trump and his acolytes now propose to expand America’s living space into Canada, Greenland and Panama.) Before Göring committed suicide in 1946, he lectured a Nuremberg defence lawyer about evil and power in a way that should resonate with our feverish times. Evil lurches to full form, confessed Göring, in tyrannies that wield total power over life and death. Such power, he added, demands a whole-hearted embrace of professional villainy. “Let me have men about me who are arrant knaves. The wicked, who have something on their conscience are obliging, quick to hear threats, because they know how it’s done and for booty… Let me have men about me that are utter villains.” Göring understood the dark ethic of the totalitarian world. Today’s mainstream media, a largely ahistorical and wounded animal, still thinks drinking from a fire hose is just a disruption. It is more interested in virtue signalling than truth-telling. Hence the need for an impolite vocabulary. Ways of the Viktator Fortunately, Hungarians can teach us a thing or two about this subject. The terms Führer democracy and its companion mafia state originated among Hungarian thinkers and journalists. For that’s how they now describe Viktor Orban and his authoritarian regime: a Führer democracy enriching a mafia state. Even locals refer to Orbán as “Viktator.” Orbán, a consummate lawyer and cynic, has ruled Hungary with an iron hand for the last 15 years. Critics think he could do so for another 20. On the public stage, Orbán performs as a national populist defending “the real people” of Hungary. But backstage, he has neutered the courts, changed election laws and taken over the majority of media to extend his rule. Orbán proudly calls his concoction an “illiberal democracy.” Meanwhile, friends and family of Orbán count themselves among the richest people in Hungary. “Hungary is a mafia state — the only one in the European Union, by the way, and very similar to Russia,” notes Bálint Magyar, a Hungarian sociologist and former politician. “The government acts like a centralized and hierarchical criminal organization.” In a mafia state, a sort of adopted criminal family replaces the status quo. “The two basic motives of such autocracies are to concentrate political power and accumulate personal wealth,” notes Magyar. Meanwhile, whenever the European Union tries to teach a criminal organization like Orbán’s government how to fight corruption, it deludes itself into thinking a lion “can become a vegetarian.” Writing the Trump and Vance playbook Orbán’s tireless promotion of his autocratic brand has long excited right-wing national populist revolutionaries around the world. In 2022, Kevin Roberts, president of the Trump-supporting U.S. Heritage Foundation, proclaimed that “Modern Hungary is not just a model for conservative statecraft, but the model. Americans, Brits, Spaniards, Australians — everyone — can and should learn from it.” America’s revolutionary Vice-President JD Vance agrees and says Orbán has made “smart decisions” the U.S. can learn from. In fact, Orbán has become something of a magnet to aspiring autocrats in a might-makes-right world. Canada’s former prime minister Stephen Harper has trekked to Budapest and encouraged conservatives to forge closer ties with Orbán’s government. The Hungarian Conservative magazine has written glowingly of Danielle Smith, premier of Canada’s most Orbánized province. Orbán, of course, salutes the rulers of China and Turkey as pillars of muscular governance. He embraces Saudi Arabia, a petro-state ruled by a murderous monarch. He remains Putin’s greatest ally in Europe and sings the executioner’s praises like some perverse nightingale. Israeli strongman Benjamin Netanyahu also salutes Orbán. For many years the two shared the same winning team of political consultants (George Birnbaum and Arthur Finkelstein). Netanyahu, who well fits the mould of Führer democrat, also played a critical role in introducing Trump to Orbán’s autocratic wiles. As a result, Orbán was the first political leader to endorse Trump’s 2016 presidential candidacy. Since then, Trump has repeatedly described Orbán as “a very great leader, a very strong man.” Not surprisingly, Orbán’s English language think tank has forged ties with the U.S. Heritage Foundation, the author of Project 2025 — a guide for turning a representative democracy into a Führer democracy. The Orbán model is not rocket science or strictly ideological. It is all about concentrating power in the Führer or godfather by selectively changing the machinery of government. Orbán has done so with greater subtlety than either Trump or the chain-saw wielding Musk are now doing in the early days of the second American revolution. Orbán began eroding Hungary’s democracy by first capturing the constitutional court. (He has since amended Hungary’s constitution 12 times.) He then gutted the bureaucracy not so much to downsize the state but to put his political servants in control of all key institutions. After a massive centralization of the executive branch, Orbán used the state budget as a cudgel against any who might oppose him. He particularly singled out NGOs critical of his government. Meanwhile opposition newspapers lost all state advertising. He fired all the workers at the public broadcaster and made it a reliable instrument of state propaganda. The majority of Hungary’s media is now under Orbán’s control or that of friendly oligarchs. A Führer democracy follows the logic of power: a captured judiciary will not protect a free press, and a captured press will not defend an independent judiciary. And that’s how the rule of law becomes the law of rule. To disguise his incremental power grab, Orbán often orchestrated any number of public distractions and conspiracy theories explains constitutional expert Kim Scheppele in a revealing interview with the economist Paul Krugman. One example included putting up “statues to raving anti-Semites” in order to preoccupy “the entire liberal opposition.” While they protested the statues, Orbán passed one statute after another “through the parliament consolidating Orbán’s power.” Change the vocabulary Various parts of Orbán’s model now seem self-evident in the United States. The Supreme Court is largely captured and has even given the president immunity for his actions. Much of the media is controlled by oligarchs sympathetic to the revolution. An unelected billionaire has knee-capped the federal bureaucracy. Inspector generals, the people in charge of rooting out government corruption, have lost their jobs. The president, who dabbles in unaccountable cryptocurrencies, demanded and got a billion dollars in campaign contributions from the oil and gas industry in return for favourable treatment. When consumers rejected Teslas as a symbol of rampant fascism, the Trump government readied an order for $400-million worth of Tesla armoured vehicles. U.S. Senator Chris Murphy has documented much of this corruption more cogently than the media. image atom In ‘Democracy Noir,’ a Reminder of the Power in People READ MORE So revolutionary times require unique political vocabularies. Using the term “Führer democracy” or mafia state won’t necessarily stop the mayhem but it might dispel us of our delusions and remind us that, yes, political forces can act like tornadoes in a trailer park. image atom Trump and the Politics of Pathology READ MORE Referring to Trump as a revolutionary instead of a populist president won’t alter his behaviour, but it will better prepare people for the unpredictable historical forces now unleashed. image atom A Reeling Left Must Face the Great Divide READ MORE Expressions like Orbánization also remind us that there is precise method to the seeming madness. The voice of reason cannot turn lions into vegetarians. In 2010, the historian and complexity expert Peter Turchin warned that the United States would enter an era of intense political instability in the 2020s. It was a prediction based on a data rich examination of the behaviour of 200 states over a 5,000-year period. Over time states rise and collapse. Only a few ever renew themselves. The cycle begins with decades of stability before erupting into violence or state failure. That’s when four things typically go wrong: society’s wealth pump becomes a one-way pipeline that engorges the rich; as a result ordinary people experience declining fortunes from reduced life spans to smaller incomes; ruling elites lose their footing about what really matters and ignore the cancer of rising inequality; counter elites emerge with revolutionary ambitions due to elite overproduction. Elite overproduction explains why we see crazed political instability. It is what befalls societies that have too many elite wannabes all vying for a fixed number of power positions. Subtracting chairs while adding players to the power game of musical chairs in faltering democracies tends to end in ruthless political brawls. The frustrated players often form alliances with marginalized working people to foment political turmoil and insurrection. And that’s the Trump revolution. According to Turchin’s research the historical cycle of wild instability, civil war or state collapse only ends when the wealth pump flows back to the people, and the surplus elites are killed off or overthrow the social order. When Turchin published his revelatory book End Times two years ago, he described “the United States as being in a revolutionary situation. Now, I would say we are in a true revolution. There are two aspects to this revolution. First, it’s a revolution of the elites — Trump and his network are trying to replace the established elites with their own members. Second, their intent is to make this revolution transformative, meaning they aim to fundamentally change attitudes toward their agendas and America’s role on the geopolitical stage.” So don’t be afraid to use a bold vocabulary for our present reality. A serious revolution is underway, and it is being led by a Führer democrat along with a shameless gang of counter-elites and oligarchs. A mafia state is emerging. Years of discord await us. Last year Orbán met Trump at Mar-a-Lago after Trump’s triumphant election. The two talked warmly about the politics of strong men. Viktator then tweeted the familiar hubris of revolutionaries: “The future has begun.” And yes, history has a way of rudely slapping progress in the face. [Tyee] IHMSA BC Provincial Champion and Perfect 40 Score, Unlimited Category, AAA Class. | ||
|
| One of Us |
Brian, Orban might the first one to get a remember of what 1956 was for his country ... once ukraine finished putin will not stop ... | |||
|
Moderator |
might be the dumbest statement since before there were billionaires, back when a million was a mountain of money opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club Information on Ammoguide about the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR. 476AR, http://www.weaponsmith.com | |||
|
| One of Us |
Really? We actually agree on something? Close enough, anyway. | |||
|
One of Us |
Again, how? How will Vlad not stop? How will or can Vlad continue? Glad has demonstrated himself to be a empty shell, a paper tiger. Having suffered the losses he has, how will it can Vlad continue? | |||
|
| One of Us |
stopping the support of ukraine will permit russia to rebuilt ... i do understand that it is hard to understand as it is the new friend of your country but do not assume they are done ... listen again his speech just before the invasion/war he started and you will understand what he is after ... http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67843 worth the reading. remember nato has been weakened and it is not anymore what it was ... | |||
|
One of Us |
Absolutely true that Russia will rebuild.. The debate/argument is how quickly, and to what end? This is a reasonably non-biased article that looks at what Russia can/cant do and why.. https://nationalinterest.org/b...r-ukraine-war-213800 The real question is what is in the national strategic interest for the US, and what is in the collective strategic interest for NATO and/or the EU? Is it better to continue to support Ukraine and further deplete Russian stockpiles (and people)? or is it better for the EU, NATO, and the US to start replenishing its own stockpiles? and how does either of those answers better position everyone for the future Russia? Depending on who you believe, the US stockpiles are either still reasonably filled and most of what has been sent to Ukraine has been munitions and materials that were already scheduled for destruction anyway (so very limited impact on the US's ability to fight a future war)... or... US stockpiles are at a dangerous low.. between a 20 year war in Afghanistan and Iraq, fighting in Syria, and other locales, and supporting Ukraine... some sources say the US only has enough munitions on hand to sustain a global level fight (against an adversary like China) for 14-30 days at the moment... So.. who do you believe... Then factor in no one seems to be able to agree on how quickly the Russians can rebuild.. if you follow the money and consider the size of the Russian defense industrial complex, the Russian economy, population density, etc.. many think its 20+ years before they could be a serious threat to any other neighboring nation.. and that if Europe and the US do what it is supposed to do and spends those same 20 years rebuilding and resupplying, that Russia never actually catches up... That said, others claim that the Russian economy is better than much of the world thinks.. that they have already begun expanding their defense industrial base, and that they could be back to 100% strength in less than 10 years.. and then they would be a viable threat to their former Soviet Bloc neighbors, who cant grow their own militaries to a defensible position against larger Russia in a single decade.. If you look at the state of most of NATO's militaries.. I tend to believe the latter.. Canada for example has a fleet of 18 Gen 4 fighters.. all more than 40 years old.. that at any given time only 50% are air worthy.. I don't think 10 years is nearly enough time for Canada to make the progress it needs to.. it doesn't have the economy or the industrial base to get things done that quickly.. Many EU countries are in a similar position.. So.. assuming Russia can actually rebuild in 10 years (big assumption.. but a viable one nonetheless).. that puts NATO and the EU in a pretty tough place if the intent is not to have to square off with Russia again in another proxy war by 2035.. and there would be cause for the EU and NATO to want to continue to support Ukraine in an effort to further inhibit the Russians... | |||
|
| One of Us |
"Russia will rebuild" What? Russia will rebuild what? Russia's tanks have Tourettes Syndrome it's single Carrier is permanently at port and by my math it's going to take 28 years to grow new soldiers to replace the ones they've already put back in the ground as fertilizer. The Russian Air Force? Do you mean the Russian Air Force that uses turbo prop planes and the on board navigation systems don't work? Russia's economy is the size of Texas and I read recently that Poland is angling to become a regional military force. I'm thinking Poland will side with Germany before Russia. All I see offered to bolster the idea of Russian might is fears and claims. | |||
|
| One of Us |
Scott im glad you believe they are down and done... and that is the reason your country is helping them for now on the economical side what s next ... you certainly do not understand their mentality and despite being closer than most of us ... yes look up the border from the pacific ocean ... my family escaped that kind of country and putin brought back pride in slavics countries and it might be hurtful to understand a simple word: narod ... most even interpreters will not understand properly. | |||
|
| One of Us |
Russia has nuclear weapons. Russia also has shown a willingness to neglect other areas in order to have military strength. Russia has made fighter aircraft that can do things that ours cannot, and they certainly can buy Chinese electronic equipment if they so desire. Russia does not lack good scientific minds. Remember that copying something that someone else has proven can be done is easier than doing it the first time. Russia rearming under Putin is concerning. I’m not sure how long he will last, but 10 years is possible. NATO does need to modernize and reequip. Sure, Poland is making the effort. However, I don’t see any commitment to sustained preparedness on the part of the rest of the NATO nations. That includes the US. The US spends a lot of money… schizoid fashion. We build carriers and neglect the supporting ships. We build a few first rate fighters and then neglect to let our pilots train with them enough. We let perceptions of social need interfere with preparedness (Trump’s new fighter program is an example of that as well…) | |||
|
| One of Us |
i never said that Eu, Nato or even canada are not at fault and did not contribute to their own issues ... i do agree with the f18 issues especially knowing we bought second hand well used australian f18s ...btw is not 18 f18 but 80 still not a lot but way bigger number and i doubt our answer is the f35 as today your country is not anymore our ally or friend. we are neighbour that is about it. you do not understand how the russians works and it is interesting that you do not see that they got alliances with iran, china and north korea. not talking about manpower but more the technology and weapons provided on both sides .. never celebrate about how great you are as a country in the military side ... it did not end well in afghanistan (were nato countries were present you might have forgotten that) or even irak ... you certainly do not understand that the world at large is not interested in your model. you should focus on your own issues as we discovered we cannot rely on you nor on your signatures : truth might hurt but that is what it is. | |||
|
| One of Us |
I don't know that Russia is down and done, but I don't know they aren't either. You still offer nothing more than fear and claims. I have come to see over the last few years an opportunity for the West to neuter the Old Bear. Given Russia's demonstrated ineptitude this looks to me to be a good opportunity to silence Vlad's saber rattling. What Trump sees in Russia I can't tell but it's certainly nothing to envy. Even if Trump and Vlad did cozy up to the point of sharing socks, it'd take a bailout of WW2, "Lend a Lease" proportions to give Russia any fighting strength. New, used, reconditioned, remodeled, refurbished, restored,....Vlad doesn't have anything to use. A turbo prop bomber will still be a turbo prop bomber no matter how many new coats of paint and upholstery is layed on. Russian pride is neato, but if they're making saber charges with sharpened sticks pride will go before their fall. | |||
|
| One of Us |
i m not making any claims or fear but showing your desdain will not make it work better ... the easiest way to have put it down and done the war in ukraine will have been to continue and expand the support to ukraine but we all know that all countries are at the border to collapse with not that much to provide extra ... and we all know that your country for whatever reasons that some might know is supporting the enemy of the rest of the western world ... still think i cannot believe that usa is sidding and seating with russia ... | |||
|
| One of Us |
There is something going on between Trump and Putin that no one knows about, for sure. | |||
|
| Powered by Social Strata |
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia