quote:

Originally posted by JTEX:
Y'all liked trannies when sleepy joe was appointing them??? What's the deal????


.

quote:

Originally posted by JTEX:
Y'all liked trannies when sleepy joe was appointing them??? What's the deal????


.

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by JTEX:
Y'all liked trannies when sleepy joe was appointing them??? What's the deal????


.

When did ya'll quit despising them and heroin users like Hunter Biden?

Do you have no principles you actually hold or is literally everything just bad if you can attack other people for it but fine if it's one of your own?

quote:

Do you have no principles you actually hold or is literally everything just bad if you can attack other people for it but fine if it's one of your own?

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:
First, RFK Jr. says his 14 years injecting heroin improved his grades in school now J.D. Vance posts an image of himself in drag?

Link

Anybody seen any big white rabbits?

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Kind of hypocritical for Republicans to claim hypocrisy, when they condemn transvestites, transexuals, and other minorities, yet have a VP-elect who dresses like a girl.

Who's the kettle, who's the pot?

~Ann

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Kind of hypocritical for Republicans to claim hypocrisy, when they condemn transvestites, transexuals, and other minorities, yet have a VP-elect who dresses like a girl.

Who's the kettle, who's the pot?

quote:

Originally posted by Aspen Hill Adventures:

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Kind of hypocritical for Republicans to claim hypocrisy, when they condemn transvestites, transexuals, and other minorities, yet have a VP-elect who dresses like a girl.

Who's the kettle, who's the pot?

So Scott Bessent isn't gay enough for you? Must he wear a dress and have his package cut off to make grade for you?

What about all of multiple women selected so far to represent trump's cabinet?

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:

quote:

Originally posted by Aspen Hill Adventures:

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Kind of hypocritical for Republicans to claim hypocrisy, when they condemn transvestites, transexuals, and other minorities, yet have a VP-elect who dresses like a girl.

Who's the kettle, who's the pot?

So Scott Bessent isn't gay enough for you? Must he wear a dress and have his package cut off to make grade for you?

What about all of multiple women selected so far to represent trump's cabinet?

You've ignored the issue of Republican hypocrisy while trying to drag the discussion off the trail and into the weeds. Won't work. I ain't playing that game.

Maybe you should try Hunter's laptop next.

I usually oppose considering sex in making awards and appointments; but women and men do think differently in some ways, and there is strength in diversity. So overall it's a good thing Trump is appointing women.

I just hope they are women of the qualifications, experience, and gravitas needed for the positions. If their only qualification is fealty to Trump, I expect to oppose and make fun of them at every opportunity.

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:

quote:

Originally posted by Aspen Hill Adventures:

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Kind of hypocritical for Republicans to claim hypocrisy, when they condemn transvestites, transexuals, and other minorities, yet have a VP-elect who dresses like a girl.

Who's the kettle, who's the pot?

So Scott Bessent isn't gay enough for you? Must he wear a dress and have his package cut off to make grade for you?

What about all of multiple women selected so far to represent trump's cabinet?

You've ignored the issue of Republican hypocrisy while trying to drag the discussion off the trail and into the weeds. Won't work. I ain't playing that game.

Maybe you should try Hunter's laptop next.

I usually oppose considering sex in making awards and appointments; but women and men do think differently in some ways, and there is strength in diversity. So overall it's a good thing Trump is appointing women.

I just hope they are women of the qualifications, experience, and gravitas needed for the positions. If their only qualification is fealty to Trump, I expect to oppose and make fun of them at every opportunity.

~Ann

quote:

Originally posted by wymple:
trump won, but let's not forget how close it was. Stop pretending it was a dominating victory. There is no mandate & 2026 will return you to Earth. You won't have a woman to vote against.

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by wymple:
trump won, but let's not forget how close it was. Stop pretending it was a dominating victory. There is no mandate & 2026 will return you to Earth. You won't have a woman to vote against.

oh, stanley (i don't actually care if that's your name), sweety -- the only people that didn't vote for quemala was roughly 7m dems .. that's on ya'll ...

but don't let facts get in your way, why start now?

all swing states, popular vote (sure, only whne compared to quemala's results) house, senate, and white house .. it's just an anomaly... you still drinking that 90 proof bottom shelf whiskey ... or, sorry, that wasn't nice ... top shelf copium?

like fifi, naki, and ME, you are beneath contempt. headless is at least entertaining

quote:

Originally posted by Aspen Hill Adventures:

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:

quote:

Originally posted by Aspen Hill Adventures:

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Kind of hypocritical for Republicans to claim hypocrisy, when they condemn transvestites, transexuals, and other minorities, yet have a VP-elect who dresses like a girl.

Who's the kettle, who's the pot?

So Scott Bessent isn't gay enough for you? Must he wear a dress and have his package cut off to make grade for you?

What about all of multiple women selected so far to represent trump's cabinet?

You've ignored the issue of Republican hypocrisy while trying to drag the discussion off the trail and into the weeds. Won't work. I ain't playing that game.

Maybe you should try Hunter's laptop next.

I usually oppose considering sex in making awards and appointments; but women and men do think differently in some ways, and there is strength in diversity. So overall it's a good thing Trump is appointing women.

I just hope they are women of the qualifications, experience, and gravitas needed for the positions. If their only qualification is fealty to Trump, I expect to oppose and make fun of them at every opportunity.

Nope, I ignored nothing. You lefties are just sore losers.

Trump by and large is making different choices, most are young up and comers with diverse backgrounds. Unlike you, I do not care what color, race or persuasion anyone is as long as they can do the job. Trump has chosen a lot of women. Again, should be about merit rather than how weird they are. 0biden was all about promoting weird over merit. You've proven it matters to you that people should be picked over face rather than merit because you keep bringing it up. I cannot jump on that wagon.

BTW- Hunter is a POS, we all know it.

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:

quote:

Originally posted by Aspen Hill Adventures:

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:

quote:

Originally posted by Aspen Hill Adventures:

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Kind of hypocritical for Republicans to claim hypocrisy, when they condemn transvestites, transexuals, and other minorities, yet have a VP-elect who dresses like a girl.

Who's the kettle, who's the pot?

So Scott Bessent isn't gay enough for you? Must he wear a dress and have his package cut off to make grade for you?

What about all of multiple women selected so far to represent trump's cabinet?

You've ignored the issue of Republican hypocrisy while trying to drag the discussion off the trail and into the weeds. Won't work. I ain't playing that game.

Maybe you should try Hunter's laptop next.

I usually oppose considering sex in making awards and appointments; but women and men do think differently in some ways, and there is strength in diversity. So overall it's a good thing Trump is appointing women.

I just hope they are women of the qualifications, experience, and gravitas needed for the positions. If their only qualification is fealty to Trump, I expect to oppose and make fun of them at every opportunity.

Nope, I ignored nothing. You lefties are just sore losers.

Trump by and large is making different choices, most are young up and comers with diverse backgrounds. Unlike you, I do not care what color, race or persuasion anyone is as long as they can do the job. Trump has chosen a lot of women. Again, should be about merit rather than how weird they are. 0biden was all about promoting weird over merit. You've proven it matters to you that people should be picked over face rather than merit because you keep bringing it up. I cannot jump on that wagon.

BTW- Hunter is a POS, we all know it.

I don't tell you what you believe. That's kind of presumptuous, isn't it? Please show me the same courtesy.

When I want to communicate my beliefs, I will do it; I won't need you to interpret or correct.

As for what I believe, you've predictably got it wrong. You ignored my words that made it clear I believe otherwise.

~Ann

quote:

Originally posted by Aspen Hill Adventures:

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:

quote:

Originally posted by Aspen Hill Adventures:

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Kind of hypocritical for Republicans to claim hypocrisy, when they condemn transvestites, transexuals, and other minorities, yet have a VP-elect who dresses like a girl.

Who's the kettle, who's the pot?

So Scott Bessent isn't gay enough for you? Must he wear a dress and have his package cut off to make grade for you?

What about all of multiple women selected so far to represent trump's cabinet?

You've ignored the issue of Republican hypocrisy while trying to drag the discussion off the trail and into the weeds. Won't work. I ain't playing that game.

Maybe you should try Hunter's laptop next.

I usually oppose considering sex in making awards and appointments; but women and men do think differently in some ways, and there is strength in diversity. So overall it's a good thing Trump is appointing women.

I just hope they are women of the qualifications, experience, and gravitas needed for the positions. If their only qualification is fealty to Trump, I expect to oppose and make fun of them at every opportunity.

Nope, I ignored nothing. You lefties are just sore losers.

Trump by and large is making different choices, most are young up and comers with diverse backgrounds. Unlike you, I do not care what color, race or persuasion anyone is as long as they can do the job. Trump has chosen a lot of women. Again, should be about merit rather than how weird they are. 0biden was all about promoting weird over merit. You've proven it matters to you that people should be picked over face rather than merit because you keep bringing it up. I cannot jump on that wagon.

BTW- Hunter is a POS, we all know it.

quote:

Again, that's rich coming from a man (are you?) who calls a little girl with sickle cell anemia a 'behavior problem'.

~Ann

quote:

Originally posted by wymple:
trump won, but let's not forget how close it was. Stop pretending it was a dominating victory.
There is no mandate & 2026 will return you to Earth. You won't have a woman to vote against.

quote:

Originally posted by TomP:

quote:

Originally posted by wymple:
trump won, but let's not forget how close it was. Stop pretending it was a dominating victory.
There is no mandate & 2026 will return you to Earth. You won't have a woman to vote against.

Trump - about 78 million

Harris - about 74 million

Neither candidate worth the time off work to vote - about 89 million

"None of the Above" wins in a landslide...There is no mandate,

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by Aspen Hill Adventures:

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:

quote:

Originally posted by Aspen Hill Adventures:

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Kind of hypocritical for Republicans to claim hypocrisy, when they condemn transvestites, transexuals, and other minorities, yet have a VP-elect who dresses like a girl.

Who's the kettle, who's the pot?

So Scott Bessent isn't gay enough for you? Must he wear a dress and have his package cut off to make grade for you?

What about all of multiple women selected so far to represent trump's cabinet?

You've ignored the issue of Republican hypocrisy while trying to drag the discussion off the trail and into the weeds. Won't work. I ain't playing that game.

Maybe you should try Hunter's laptop next.

I usually oppose considering sex in making awards and appointments; but women and men do think differently in some ways, and there is strength in diversity. So overall it's a good thing Trump is appointing women.

I just hope they are women of the qualifications, experience, and gravitas needed for the positions. If their only qualification is fealty to Trump, I expect to oppose and make fun of them at every opportunity.

Nope, I ignored nothing. You lefties are just sore losers.

Trump by and large is making different choices, most are young up and comers with diverse backgrounds. Unlike you, I do not care what color, race or persuasion anyone is as long as they can do the job. Trump has chosen a lot of women. Again, should be about merit rather than how weird they are. 0biden was all about promoting weird over merit. You've proven it matters to you that people should be picked over face rather than merit because you keep bringing it up. I cannot jump on that wagon.

BTW- Hunter is a POS, we all know it.

Diverse backgrounds? That's now a good thing?

How about some demonstrated knowledge of what the Department or Agency does? An FBI Director who has never been an FBI agent, a Defense Secretary whose biggest command was a platoon credibly accused of being a habitual drunk and a rapist, a Health and Human Services Secretary who admits to a 14-year heroin addiction, a Secretary of Education who has never taught and a Navy Secretary who has never worn a uniform outside of a yachting cap?

Relevant experience and loyalty to the Constitution should be the important criteria, not campaign contributions or whose son married one of Trump's children.

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:

quote:

Originally posted by Aspen Hill Adventures:

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:

quote:

Originally posted by Aspen Hill Adventures:

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Kind of hypocritical for Republicans to claim hypocrisy, when they condemn transvestites, transexuals, and other minorities, yet have a VP-elect who dresses like a girl.

Who's the kettle, who's the pot?

So Scott Bessent isn't gay enough for you? Must he wear a dress and have his package cut off to make grade for you?

What about all of multiple women selected so far to represent trump's cabinet?

You've ignored the issue of Republican hypocrisy while trying to drag the discussion off the trail and into the weeds. Won't work. I ain't playing that game.

Maybe you should try Hunter's laptop next.

I usually oppose considering sex in making awards and appointments; but women and men do think differently in some ways, and there is strength in diversity. So overall it's a good thing Trump is appointing women.

I just hope they are women of the qualifications, experience, and gravitas needed for the positions. If their only qualification is fealty to Trump, I expect to oppose and make fun of them at every opportunity.

Nope, I ignored nothing. You lefties are just sore losers.

Trump by and large is making different choices, most are young up and comers with diverse backgrounds. Unlike you, I do not care what color, race or persuasion anyone is as long as they can do the job. Trump has chosen a lot of women. Again, should be about merit rather than how weird they are. 0biden was all about promoting weird over merit. You've proven it matters to you that people should be picked over face rather than merit because you keep bringing it up. I cannot jump on that wagon.

BTW- Hunter is a POS, we all know it.

I don't tell you what you believe. That's kind of presumptuous, isn't it? Please show me the same courtesy.

When I want to communicate my beliefs, I will do it; I won't need you to interpret or correct.

As for what I believe, you've predictably got it wrong. You ignored my words that made it clear I believe otherwise.

quote:

Originally posted by JTEX:

quote:

Originally posted by TomP:

quote:

Originally posted by wymple:
trump won, but let's not forget how close it was. Stop pretending it was a dominating victory.
There is no mandate & 2026 will return you to Earth. You won't have a woman to vote against.

Trump - about 78 million

Harris - about 74 million

Neither candidate worth the time off work to vote - about 89 million

"None of the Above" wins in a landslide...There is no mandate,

So tom? None of the above had 79 million????

None of the above did not win.

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:
I think that is a pretty fair characterization. I cannot recall a more pathetic choice of candidates in my lifetime. Who can blame folks for just saying fuck it.

quote:

Originally posted by Saeed:

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:
I think that is a pretty fair characterization. I cannot recall a more pathetic choice of candidates in my lifetime. Who can blame folks for just saying fuck it.

Hey!

Stop this!

Don’t you remember that you live in the country with the most freedoms!

Glorified by Hollywood for donkeys years!

You are the leaders in DEMOCRACY!

You invade and destroy other coupons teach them DEMOCRACY!