THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MISCELLANEOUS FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Other Topics  Hop To Forums  Miscellaneous Topics    A maths problem to solve .....probably need high school maths at maybe age 16
Page 1 2 

Moderators: Canuck
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
A maths problem to solve .....probably need high school maths at maybe age 16 Login/Join 
One of Us
posted
Two sides to the equation. On the right side you have to get answers from 1 through to 12.

On the left side of the equation the number 2 must be there 3 times, not more of not less. You can use any mathematical symbol you like but the 2 must be there 3 times. If you want to head into deep maths or stuff about with Access or Excel you are on the wrong tack.

A couple of obvious ones

2 + 2 + 2 = 6
2 X 2 X 2 = 8

Again the numeral 2 must appear 3 times on the left and get answers from 1 through to 12. I first saw this problem in the early 1970s and I have only seen one person solve it and he is a dentist. I have put it in a couple data base forums Access/SQL Server etc but no one has got the 12. It has been shown to engineers, medical specialists, maths teachers but so far only the dentist got the 12 done.

Only the number 2 can be on the left and again, it must be there 3 times.
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 14 September 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 4sixteen
posted Hide Post
2 + 2 + 2 = 6
2 X 2 X 2 = 8



2 -2 + 2 = 2

2^4 /2^3 + 2 = 4

2^0 + 2^0 + 2^0 = 3

2^3 / 2 + 2^0 = 5

2^3 - (2^-1 + 2^-1) = 7

2^3 + 2^-1 + 2^-1 = 9

2^3 + 2 + 2 = 12

2^3 + 2^0 + 2 = 11

2^3 + 2^0 + 2^0 = 10

2^2 / 2 - 2^0 = 1

Smiler
 
Posts: 897 | Registered: 03 May 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 4sixteen:
2 + 2 + 2 = 6
2 X 2 X 2 = 8



2 -2 + 2 = 2

2^4 /2^3 + 2 = 4

2^0 + 2^0 + 2^0 = 3

2^3 / 2 + 2^0 = 5

2^3 - (2^-1 + 2^-1) = 7

2^3 + 2^-1 + 2^-1 = 9

2^3 + 2 + 2 = 12

2^3 + 2^0 + 2 = 11

2^3 + 2^0 + 2^0 = 10

2^2 / 2 - 2^0 = 1

Smiler


First problem, you can only have 2s on the left side and you have 3s and a 4

Also brackets are important so 2 -2 + 2 = 2 would be (2-2) + 2 = 2

A good first attempt. I will give one clue. Some of the answers are much more easily obtained than you think.

2^3 + 2 + 2 = 12 Another one for brackets as in ((2^3) +2) + 2

For those not familiar with ^ it is raising a number to a power so 5^2 = 25 and 5^3 = 125

Also, check Windows Character as will make it easier for others to follow.

Again, NOTHING but 2s on the left and there must be three of them. That is why it got called the Three 2s problem.
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 14 September 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Mister Jines with his connections will be along soon with the 12
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 14 September 2015Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I move that Mike McGuire be banned.
 
Posts: 13919 | Location: Texas | Registered: 10 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 4sixteen
posted Hide Post
You inadvertently omitted 'base' number 2 in the problem definition. For my correct solution the base number 2 does in fact appear exactly 3 times. Wink

Cryptozoologists rule. holycow
 
Posts: 897 | Registered: 03 May 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 4sixteen:
You inadvertently omitted 'base' number 2 in the problem definition. For my correct solution the base number 2 does in fact appear exactly 3 times. Wink

Cryptozoologists rule. holycow


But also have a 3.

So a 2 must appear three times on the left side and no other number
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 14 September 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Kensco:
I move that Mike McGuire be banned.


Take it up with Saeed.

Good luck rotflmo
 
Posts: 15784 | Location: Australia and Saint Germain en Laye | Registered: 30 December 2013Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mike McGuire:
quote:
Originally posted by 4sixteen:
You inadvertently omitted 'base' number 2 in the problem definition. For my correct solution the base number 2 does in fact appear exactly 3 times. Wink

Cryptozoologists rule. holycow


But also have a 3.

So a 2 must appear three times on the left side and no other number


Got it, but I'm not going to spoil the ending...


TomP

Our country, right or wrong. When right, to be kept right, when wrong to be put right.

Carl Schurz (1829 - 1906)
 
Posts: 14749 | Location: Moreno Valley CA USA | Registered: 20 November 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TomP:

Got it, but I'm not going to spoil the ending...


And you always have three 2s, not more not less on one side?

So 2/2 = 1 would not qualify.

If you have got it then you are the second person I have seen do it since about 1970.

When I first saw it I could not do it and the person who gave it to me did not have the answers.
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 14 September 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of muzza
posted Hide Post
In my little world I have to ask - who cares ?


________________________

Old enough to know better
 
Posts: 4472 | Location: Eltham , New Zealand | Registered: 13 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Crazyhorseconsulting
posted Hide Post
quote:
In my little world I have to ask - who cares ?


Finally, someone added a dose of reality!!!!! Roll Eyes


Even the rocks don't last forever.



 
Posts: 31014 | Location: Olney, Texas | Registered: 27 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of NormanConquest
posted Hide Post
I have to agree that this is an abstract puzzle along the lines of the "Feducci Principle",(that of consentrict #'s equaling a whole).Never mind,look it up if you're interested. Myself,since I am in the s/m business I use geometry every day so I find math interesting.But that's just me.


Never mistake motion for action.
 
Posts: 17357 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 11 March 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
It requires a lot of lateral thinking.
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 14 September 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of NormanConquest
posted Hide Post
Yes it does;+ a lot of interest in that thinking. Some of us are math nuts;some are not.I don't pass judgment on those who are not. I suppose I could add as an addendum that the same could be said of our gun laws issue.


Never mistake motion for action.
 
Posts: 17357 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 11 March 2013Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ramrod340
posted Hide Post
quote:
In my little world I have to ask - who cares ?

tu2 coffee

When I didn't know ^ meant to the "power" I knew I was over my head. Big Grin


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
 
Posts: 12881 | Location: Mexico, MO | Registered: 02 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ramrod340:
quote:
In my little world I have to ask - who cares ?

tu2 coffee

When I didn't know ^ meant to the "power" I knew I was over my head. Big Grin


The ^ is used in when making things in Access and Excel etc. and also at times in general writing. However, programs like MS Access or Excel are not needed for this.

5² will be what you are used to instead of 5^2

You might at times see something like 6*7 which is 6 X 7 but the * is used in stuff like Access etc. instead of X. In those programs if 6 X 7 or 6X7 was used the program would read it as written, that is, not read the X for multiply.
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 14 September 2015Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ramrod340
posted Hide Post
Wink Fully understand.. Heck I used both a Post and Pickett slide rule in getting my engineering degrees. Big Grin So I could adjust. rotflmo


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
 
Posts: 12881 | Location: Mexico, MO | Registered: 02 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Sometime ago I posted this same problem on Australia's biggest Guns/Hunting site and response was small although bigger than AR. I think that is because on the Australian site (which is as active AR, probably more so) I could put it Off Topic and that is one of their most active forums whereas Miscellaneous not quite so on AE.

The biggest response was a data base forum I am on and I suppose that is not surprising. No one got it but a couple came close. One of the answers that is often missed needs arithmetic at maybe age 9 or similar. Some very good lateral thinkers get that answer but hit a wall with a few of the others as they have forgotten high school arithmetic as they no longer use it. Simple arithmetic is all that is needed, no algebra, calculus, trigonometry or witchcraft.

TomP said he has the answers but have not heard back from so at this stage things still stand unchanged, only one person I have seen who could do all 12 answers.
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 14 September 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Crazyhorseconsulting
posted Hide Post
Mike, here is one of my Dad's favorite riddles.

Lots of folks miss it it a few get it right off so I am putting it on here for you.

You have two ducks in front of a duck and two ducks behind a duck and a duck in the middle, how many ducks have you got?


Even the rocks don't last forever.



 
Posts: 31014 | Location: Olney, Texas | Registered: 27 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
5
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 14 September 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
When it comes to lateral thinking I am sure there must be at least one person in the world who is worse than me. Big Grin The dentist who solved the "three 2s" has the greatest lateral thinking I have even see. We have know each other since we were about age 7.

Lateral thinkers are great at getting an invention basically off the ground. They are also great at getting an initial hand on solving a problem. On the other hand the very poor latera; thinker who has similar knowledge, intellect etc. is much better at developing the invention or takin the solution to a problem though to the most refined end.

One has very broad but shallow thinking and the other has very narrow but deep thinking.

Back in 1971 I was in a course with about 20 people. We were asked how many things you could use a paper clip for. The non latera; thinkers like myself wrote down all the things I could think of you could use a paper clip for. The lateral thinkers wrote down what you could use a paper clip for BUT also what you could use the piece of wire for when you straightened out the paper clip.

Each of read out our answers I and I still remember like it was yesterday when I heard the first bloke with the paper clip tuned into a straightened out bit of wire. My reaction was "why the fuck didn't I think of that" Big Grin

The group was then asked to do the test again. This time the very poor lateral thinkers like myself were top of the group instead of being last. The lateral thinkers were now last. Second time around we had a lot more answer for what a paper clip could be used for but it was the lateral thinkers in session 1 that were responsible.
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 14 September 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of NormanConquest
posted Hide Post
I'm sure it's not 5;that would be too easy. Reminds me of the poem/riddle of "As I was going to St. Ives."Not sure of the answer yet Randle;lets give it a few days then I would like to know.


Never mistake motion for action.
 
Posts: 17357 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 11 March 2013Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mike McGuire:
quote:
Originally posted by TomP:

Got it, but I'm not going to spoil the ending...


And you always have three 2s, not more not less on one side?

So 2/2 = 1 would not qualify.

If you have got it then you are the second person I have seen do it since about 1970.

When I first saw it I could not do it and the person who gave it to me did not have the answers.


Oops. Only twos but five of them.

((2^2)^2) - (2^2) = 12

or four

(22+2)/2 = 12

Back to the drawing board.


TomP

Our country, right or wrong. When right, to be kept right, when wrong to be put right.

Carl Schurz (1829 - 1906)
 
Posts: 14749 | Location: Moreno Valley CA USA | Registered: 20 November 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TomP:


Oops. Only twos but five of them.

((2^2)^2) - (2^2) = 12

or four

(22+2)/2 = 12

Back to the drawing board.


Don't worry, I have posted the problems in all sorts of ways and no matter which was the message is not clear Big Grin \

I will give you a clue on getting 12.

To get 12 is almost identical to the way you get 8
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 14 September 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by NormanConquest:
I'm sure it's not 5;that would be too easy. Reminds me of the poem/riddle of "As I was going to St. Ives."Not sure of the answer yet Randle;lets give it a few days then I would like to know.


5 does require being familiar with arithmetic. However, I am sure 100% of people would instantly understand how the calculation is done. Lateral thinking.

Another clue. Getting 5 is related to getting 8 and 12. Another clue, although it does not go to 20, getting 20 would also relate to getting 12, 8 and 5.

Again, one of the answers is so simple from an arithmetic point of view I reckon someone who never learned to read or write would understand the answer. If he worked as a shop keeper or was selling something etc. he would not only understand the answer but probably does the same type of calculation every hour of every day.
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 14 September 2015Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mike McGuire:
quote:
Originally posted by TomP:

Oops. Only twos but five of them.

((2^2)^2) - (2^2) = 12

or four

(22+2)/2 = 12

Back to the drawing board.


Don't worry, I have posted the problems in all sorts of ways and no matter which was the message is not clear Big Grin \

I will give you a clue on getting 12.

To get 12 is almost identical to the way you get 8


Fair?
((2+2)!)/2 = 12

Unfair?
(2/.2) + 2 = 12


TomP

Our country, right or wrong. When right, to be kept right, when wrong to be put right.

Carl Schurz (1829 - 1906)
 
Posts: 14749 | Location: Moreno Valley CA USA | Registered: 20 November 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TomP:

Unfair?

(2/.2) + 2 = 12



Correct
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 14 September 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
From an arithmetic point of view 7 and 10 are the toughest but still high school arithmetic, no algebra, calculus but lots of lateral thinking.
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 14 September 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
One other tip. Any mathematical symbol used will be understood by anyone on the forum.
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 14 September 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Crazyhorseconsulting
posted Hide Post
quote:
I'm sure it's not 5;that would be too easy. Reminds me of the poem/riddle of "As I was going to St. Ives."Not sure of the answer yet Randle;lets give it a few days then I would like to know.


Okay, I will give the answer New Years Day, unless someone gets it sooner.

Keep in mind this came from a man that was born in 1897 and did not finish the Third grade and he was 54 when I was born. He always got a kick out of messing with people with it.


Even the rocks don't last forever.



 
Posts: 31014 | Location: Olney, Texas | Registered: 27 March 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ramrod340
posted Hide Post
! Isn’t simple mathematics


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
 
Posts: 12881 | Location: Mexico, MO | Registered: 02 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mike McGuire:
One other tip. Any mathematical symbol used will be understood by anyone on the forum.


Does 2^2 count for one two, or two twos?

22/2 = 11?


TomP

Our country, right or wrong. When right, to be kept right, when wrong to be put right.

Carl Schurz (1829 - 1906)
 
Posts: 14749 | Location: Moreno Valley CA USA | Registered: 20 November 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ramrod340:
! Isn’t simple mathematics


I know and note the correct answer I posted for TomP and the post I made about symbols
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 14 September 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TomP:
quote:
Originally posted by Mike McGuire:
One other tip. Any mathematical symbol used will be understood by anyone on the forum.


Does 2^2 count for one two, or two twos?

22/2 = 11?


22/2 = 11 Correct

2^2 counts as two 2s because you are actually writing 2²
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 14 September 2015Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mike McGuire:
quote:
Originally posted by TomP:
quote:
Originally posted by Mike McGuire:
One other tip. Any mathematical symbol used will be understood by anyone on the forum.


Does 2^2 count for one two, or two twos?

22/2 = 11?


22/2 = 11 Correct

2^2 counts as two 2s because you are actually writing 2²


So 7 and 9 have me puzzled. No matter, there are two days left.


TomP

Our country, right or wrong. When right, to be kept right, when wrong to be put right.

Carl Schurz (1829 - 1906)
 
Posts: 14749 | Location: Moreno Valley CA USA | Registered: 20 November 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TomP:

So 7 and 9 have me puzzled. No matter, there are two days left.


List what you have.

If don't have 7 I would be surprised if you have 10

If don't have them a clue for 8 and 9. You already have the basis for them.
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 14 September 2015Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mike McGuire:
quote:
Originally posted by TomP:

So 7 and 9 have me puzzled. No matter, there are two days left.


List what you have.

If don't have 7 I would be surprised if you have 10

If don't have them a clue for 8 and 9. You already have the basis for them.



2 - (2/2) = 1
2^(2-2) = 1

2+2-2 = 2
2^(2/2) = 2

2+(2/2)=3

SQRT(2) x SQRT(2) + 2 = 4
SQRT(2) x SQRT(2) x 2 = 4

(2/2)/(.2) = 5
2/(2*.2) = 5

2+2+2 = 6
((2/2)+2)! = 6

7?

2x2x2=8
2*(2^2) = 8
(2/.2)-2 = 8

9?

(SQRT(2) x SQRT(2))/(.2) = 10

22/2 = 11

((2+2)!)/2 = 12
(2/.2) + 2 = 12


TomP

Our country, right or wrong. When right, to be kept right, when wrong to be put right.

Carl Schurz (1829 - 1906)
 
Posts: 14749 | Location: Moreno Valley CA USA | Registered: 20 November 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
(2+2)!)/2 = 12 Only symbols that anyone would know what they are.

(2/.2) + 2 = 12 Correct
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 14 September 2015Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Nice job TomP! You got more than I did!
I am puzzled by your use of the factorial (!, exclamation point) though.
Peter.


Be without fear in the face of your enemies. Be brave and upright, that God may love thee. Speak the truth always, even if it leads to your death. Safeguard the helpless and do no wrong;
 
Posts: 10515 | Location: Jacksonville, Florida | Registered: 09 January 2004Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Other Topics  Hop To Forums  Miscellaneous Topics    A maths problem to solve .....probably need high school maths at maybe age 16

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia