one of us
| The hold looks fine to me. Note the angle of the Elk. |
| | | Posts: 231 | Location: West Virginia | Registered: 22 December 2003 | 
IP
|
|
one of us
| Same here. Angle would result in a good lung hit which is what you want on and Elk. |
| | |
Moderator
| Rob, I agree with you; the hold should be a little more to the left. Either they were holding for windage  or the art department thought it looked better with the cross-hairs centered over the elk. George |
| | |
one of us
| Thanks for the replies. I removed the link to the website picture because I compared it to the ad and it's a bit different. The magazine ad has the shot plcement looking very low to me, more of a concern than the windage placement. I'd be intersted to hear from you if you can see the actual ad on the magazine.
Thanks, Rob |
| | | Posts: 1745 | Location: East Coast | Registered: 06 January 2003 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| You have to remeber that most of the art departments are not in house. They are in agencies where the designers have usually never had time behind a rifle. I own an ad agency specializing in the shooting industry and I have designers that have been with for a year, have been trained and have been at the range shooting and still have a habit of centering the animal in the circle and the crosshairs because it looks more balanced. That's why you see crosshaired animals that look like they would be gut shot sometimes. Naturally I catch these before they go out and have them corrected. Sometimes this isn't the case. In this case though, I would say that although the elk is centered tail to tips of antlers, that should would be acceptable, especially if someone's goal was to take out both shoulders. Instinctively I would normally aim a little differently but the angle looks okay to me. I would let it go if I was proofing it. |
| | | Posts: 244 | Location: Winnipeg, Canada | Registered: 02 December 2002 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| I've never had the opportunity to kill an Elk, so keep that in mind.
It looks like they have lined up to the right of the heart and into the "Off-Side" Shoulder. If that is wrong, someone speak up please.
And if that is what I'm seeing, I personally would shift the Point of Aim to the "On-Side" Shoulder and smash it with a nice HEAVY bullet.
Hey Wstrnhuntr(or any of you folks), Do Elk run with "heart shots" like Deer do? |
| | | Posts: 9920 | Location: Carolinas, USA | Registered: 22 April 2001 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Quote:
I've never had the opportunity to kill an Elk, so keep that in mind.
It looks like they have lined up to the right of the heart and into the "Off-Side" Shoulder. If that is wrong, someone speak up please.
And if that is what I'm seeing, I personally would shift the Point of Aim to the "On-Side" Shoulder and smash it with a nice HEAVY bullet.
Hey Wstrnhuntr(or any of you folks), Do Elk run with "heart shots" like Deer do?
Yes they do run after heart/lung shots, and it's ususally down to the bottom of the deepest darkest canyon you've ever seen with no road or trail except around the upper rim.  |
| | | Posts: 226 | Location: New Mexico | Registered: 10 October 2003 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Quote:
Quote:
I've never had the opportunity to kill an Elk, so keep that in mind.
It looks like they have lined up to the right of the heart and into the "Off-Side" Shoulder. If that is wrong, someone speak up please.
And if that is what I'm seeing, I personally would shift the Point of Aim to the "On-Side" Shoulder and smash it with a nice HEAVY bullet.
Hey Wstrnhuntr(or any of you folks), Do Elk run with "heart shots" like Deer do?
Yes they do run after heart/lung shots, and it's ususally down to the bottom of the deepest darkest canyon you've ever seen with no road or trail except around the upper rim.
I'll second that.I've often wondered why I didn't bring the salt and pepper. 
Jayco. |
| | | Posts: 565 | Location: Central Idaho | Registered: 27 February 2004 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Quote:
...Yes they do run after heart/lung shots, and it's ususally down to the bottom of the deepest darkest canyon you've ever seen with no road or trail except around the upper rim.
That really doesn't sound like a lot of fun.
OK, question 2. If a 1000# Elk is shot in the heart/lungs and then runs down "to the bottom of the deepest darkest canyon you've ever seen with no road or trail except around the upper rim", does it "gain weight" on the way down or on the pack coming out?  |
| | | Posts: 9920 | Location: Carolinas, USA | Registered: 22 April 2001 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Quote:
Maybe there is a right to left wind 
Hey MHC, Well......Duuuuuuuhhhhhhh!!!! I totally missed that breeze over here on the computer.
Outstandng answer!!! |
| | | Posts: 9920 | Location: Carolinas, USA | Registered: 22 April 2001 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Good grief, it was probably set up by some Madison Avenue type that has never seen a gun nor an elk. I don't think I would let a picture in a scope ad determine where I would shoot wild game. How many ads have you seen regarding honey flavored whatever that had a picture of a wasp nest in it? Hot Core, elk, like deer, begin gaining weight as soon as they're on the ground. They are at their heaviest after they have been cut up and put in the freezer. Especially if the discussion about their weight includes a couple of tots of snake bite medicine.  |
| | | Posts: 2037 | Location: frametown west virginia usa | Registered: 14 October 2001 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Hey beemanbeme, There is a fellow down the road from me that has had Fish gain weight in his freezer for years. I noticed this past year that his Deer are now doing the same thing. I'm real interested to see if his "Two Son's Deer" do the same. If so, I'll check on the make of the "Freezer" and let everyone in on it! |
| | | Posts: 9920 | Location: Carolinas, USA | Registered: 22 April 2001 |
IP
|
|
