THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AMERICAN BIG GAME HUNTING FORUMS

Page 1 2 3 

Moderators: Canuck
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Ethics matter....
 Login/Join
 
new member
Picture of TreeWalker
posted Hide Post
Ethics are fine and dandy until you have missed 7 meals in a row. Travel a bit and you will see how your family's and region's ethics have no more purity than the next person's. A ton of your ethics would upset or confound people as you put a few miles between yourself and home.

Is it ethical to serve up the mutt for dinner or that cow or that horse or any living creature? Go to Vietnam and India and Germany or a vegan grocer in Brooklyn to ask that question?

Prostitution? You never dated buying flowers and dinners then had sex but did not marry that person? How was that never degrading as you moved on?

Ethics? No thank you. I have my Code. Is flawed as I am human but I am not ignorant enough to think I know my Code is the one true path to ethical living.
 
Posts: 23 | Location: Northwest | Registered: 25 February 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TreeWalker:
Ethics are fine and dandy until you have missed 7 meals in a row. Travel a bit and you will see how your family's and region's ethics have no more purity than the next person's. A ton of your ethics would upset or confound people as you put a few miles between yourself and home.

Is it ethical to serve up the mutt for dinner or that cow or that horse or any living creature? Go to Vietnam and India and Germany or a vegan grocer in Brooklyn to ask that question?

Prostitution? You never dated buying flowers and dinners then had sex but did not marry that person? How was that never degrading as you moved on?

Ethics? No thank you. I have my Code. Is flawed as I am human but I am not ignorant enough to think I know my Code is the one true path to ethical living.



We are discussing hunting conservation ethics more traditionaly referred to as sport hunting. I prefer hunting conservation as the term as it more accurate defines the ebpndevor and removes negative connotation the word sport has gained.

You are free tho express your thoughts, but I do not see how your examples speak to the role or whether a higher level of ethical standards needs to be adopted by hunters through legislation.

You bet, if starving in Vetnam hand me the dullest knife and point me to the headiest tied up Vetnamism tractor.

But individuals shooting pen raised and released large exotic animals for animal size is not a starving Ethiopian with his Red Cross package seized by the war lord.

I do not think I need to say it clear than I have on most threads are all (most) high fence areas as described no. But operations are using our willing to be lose with regulation to exist to the determinent of them all.

I believe good high fenced outfitters can come up with a set of standards that allow them to exist and cull out pen raised kill kennel shoots. That is what this discussion on something like five threads has taught me.

If they refuse to well the old rule prescribed by Boone and Crocket is no high fence.
 
Posts: 12245 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Appreciate the civility in these discussions. It goes better without the name calling and other stuff.

Again, my point is that ethics matter and drive the law. Personal ethics are fine. We all have them. However, in a society the is governed by the rule of law, ethics of the majority drive the law.

My point using high fenced baited hunts for deer is a flashpoint for the ethical debate and dilemma. One camp sees no issue using enclosures, timed bait stations and camera to predict when deer arrive and leave in order to shoot them. The questions devolves to - how small is too small for the enclosure, or deer eat up the browse and need the food, or the hunting area is too thick to hunt deer.

We can rationalize all we want. We can generate personal ethics as well that allow us to see this action as "ok". Personally, I see no reason for speed limits on interstate highways. My ethics tell me that I can drive as fast as I want. however, society decides otherwise hence speed laws. The reason for this is the ethics of me driving 125 mph is not safe for the majority and the choice is still available to me but now I obey the law to avoid bad consequences. This was imposed on drivers because we are not all safe drivers. You can use the same logic for drinking and driving.

So it will go with hunting. If we do not rule ourselves, society will impose rules on us. Our demonstrated and articulated ethics matter when discussing our rules and standards. Again, B&C do a great job on this. SCI and DSC are catching up but not fast enough.

I could care less if you want to shoot your deer over a baited area in an enclosure and believe this to be hunting. What I care about is the perception by society, who will make laws if we do not, that this is unethical, not fair and makes no sense.

No one on this board hunts for survival or to feed your family. We do this for recreation and fun. Hence, as our society has changed, we must be able to articulate and defend our actions. In the case of my example of high fence, baited hunting - we cannot.

Again, thanks for civility. Keep the discussion going.
 
Posts: 10372 | Location: Texas... time to secede!! | Registered: 12 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
My old man was a tough old dude who survived Normandy.He had a saying"If you don`t have something good to say about someone or something then STFU.It is a good creed to live by and will save you from a lot of hateful thoughts and deeds directed at yourself .I don`t need anyone to tell me how to hunt,fish or conduct my life and sure do not want anymore Government intrusion.It is really that simple.OB Roll Eyes
 
Posts: 4372 | Location: NE Wisconsin | Registered: 31 March 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Outdoor Writer
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by dogcat:
Appreciate the civility in these discussions. It goes better without the name calling and other stuff.
...........
We can rationalize all we want. We can generate personal ethics as well that allow us to see this action as "ok".
...........
Again, B&C do a great job on this.


Agreed. But I'm sitting this one out; too much hypocrisy wafting through the air.


Tony Mandile - Author "How To Hunt Coues Deer"
 
Posts: 3269 | Location: Glendale, AZ | Registered: 28 July 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of boarkiller
posted Hide Post
I don’t see hypocrisy as much as I see different opinions on about everything and in some ways or many ways that’s good
There is definitely some types of killing everyone will agree on, but very few
Mostly we just will differ
Biggest thing I see is if we abide by every anti’s demand, we might as well bag it now.
I for one will fight them on local level tooth and nail and if they ever stop hunting altogether I will become an outlaw
As simple as that


" Until the day breaks and the nights shadows flee away " Big ivory for my pillow and 2.5% of Neanderthal DNA flowing thru my veins.
When I'm ready to go, pack a bag of gunpowder up my ass and strike a fire to my pecker, until I squeal like a boar.
Yours truly , Milan The Boarkiller - World according to Milan
PS I have big boar on my floor...but it ain't dead, just scared to move...

Man should be happy and in good humor until the day he dies...
Only fools hope to live forever
“ Hávamál”
 
Posts: 13376 | Location: In mountains behind my house hunting or drinking beer in Blacksmith Brewery in Stevensville MT or holed up in Lochsa | Registered: 27 December 2012Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Outdoor Writer
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by boarkiller:
I don’t see hypocrisy as much as I see different opinions on about everything and in some ways or many ways that’s good


My observation in regards to hypocrisy is not solely based on what has been stated in these recent threads only. Much of it amounts to the "do as I say, not as I do" variety.

That said, I will not single out any person(s) so as to not have it taken as a personal attack.


Tony Mandile - Author "How To Hunt Coues Deer"
 
Posts: 3269 | Location: Glendale, AZ | Registered: 28 July 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Crazyhorseconsulting
posted Hide Post
quote:
Your last comment is interesting and true from my experience.

However, should we turn hunting or fishing into a competition?

Both already have been, and that cannot be changed.

I would say that the competition is internal and not hunter vs hunter for the biggest and best.

And from what I have been witnessing during the past 2 decades is that is hunter versus hunter and that is EXACTLY WHY the High Fence/Trophy Operations exist.

That is where I like B&C and Rowland and Ward - they focus on the animal and not on participation trophies.

[B]Boone and Crockett are the biggest contributors to the problem in my opinion, if they REALLY wanted to keep things ETHICAL, then they would NOT identify the of hunter, just the measurements of the animal and where it was killed. But they do not do that, neither does SCI or any of the other record keeping organizations, because if they did not recognise the hunter, no one would be interested in trying to kill "Book Animals". Personal Glory and Competition is what fuels the situation.



Better yet, the personal struggle in hunting is the best struggle.

Honestly, how is there a "Personal" struggle? Maybe for hunters that are hunting without a guide may have some type of struggle, but for guided hunters the only struggle I see is whether or not to shoot a particular animal or wait for a bigger/better specimen.

[/B]


Even the rocks don't last forever.



 
Posts: 31014 | Location: Olney, Texas | Registered: 27 March 2006Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia