THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AMERICAN BIG GAME HUNTING FORUMS

Page 1 2 

Moderators: Canuck
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Kimber mountain ascent rifles
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
Anyone have any personal experience? Since I have more money than cartilage in my knees I picked one up in 280 AI. My ejection issues in my tikka lite still annoys me although it’s very accurate. 5 lbs 6 oz in believe long action. The 280 interests me as well. Will get it Friday and try it out


White Mountains Arizona
 
Posts: 2863 | Registered: 31 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of DCS Member
posted Hide Post
The .280 AI is impressive. I don’t have one, but my father has at least 5. I do t know why, but that’s just how he is...

The Kimber sounds pretty cool. Good luck with it!


I meant to be DSC Member...bad typing skills.

Marcus Cady

DRSS
 
Posts: 3464 | Location: Dallas | Registered: 19 March 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Heard it was an accurate combo. We shall see but the package sounds pretty handy. And no ejection issues I’m sure


White Mountains Arizona
 
Posts: 2863 | Registered: 31 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ted thorn
posted Hide Post
I've owned and dumped more Kimbers then I care to admit.

I wont ever buy another


________________________________________________
Maker of The Frankenstud Sling Keeper
Proudly made in the USA
Acepting all forms of payment
 
Posts: 7361 | Location: South East Missouri | Registered: 23 November 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thanks for the detailed explanation......You talking rifles? Handguns? Models? Issues?


White Mountains Arizona
 
Posts: 2863 | Registered: 31 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I am with Ted on this question.

Personally I have owned four different Kimber Montana rifles in three different calibers. I guess you can say that I am a slow learner. While I never had any problem with ejection, I have had feeding problems and the best of them was not much of a shooter.

Spend a little bit of money on your ejection problem and get it fixed. You will be far better off in the long run.


Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times.

Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.

 
Posts: 697 | Location: Dublin, Georgia | Registered: 19 November 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Ok not a glowing endorsement. But a trade off for a superlight rifle maybe. It has an moa guarantee but those can only be worth the paper it’s printed on sometimes. Will follow up more later


White Mountains Arizona
 
Posts: 2863 | Registered: 31 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Just checked and I have a 14 day inspection period. While I can’t shoot it I can check feeding. Interesting most all internet web board feedback was positive. If it feeds I guess I’ll shoot it.


White Mountains Arizona
 
Posts: 2863 | Registered: 31 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ted thorn
posted Hide Post
I could get detailed but don't feel like writing pages of grief in an attempt to save you some.....

They don't have a reputation of standing behind what they sell and I can vouch for that

My advise.....don't buy a Kimber product

If you do.....you were warned


________________________________________________
Maker of The Frankenstud Sling Keeper
Proudly made in the USA
Acepting all forms of payment
 
Posts: 7361 | Location: South East Missouri | Registered: 23 November 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
My Montana seems to resist all of the normal things that should make it shoot better. It has been re-bedded, magazine box is not rubbing, etc. Many combinations of handloads have been tried and the blasted thing is still a 2 moa performer.

It is a nice looking rifle but it just does not shoot well. My choices seem to be putting a new barrel it, or just learning to live with it.
 
Posts: 156 | Registered: 06 November 2012Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I'm with Ted on this one. I had one in 308 that would not shoot better than 2-3" at 100 yards. If a 308 won't do that, it is gone. Kimber said, NOPD....Not Our Problem Dude. Never again.


Larry

"Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading" -- Thomas Jefferson
 
Posts: 3942 | Location: Kansas USA | Registered: 04 February 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Kimber seems to suffer from "hit or miss" syndrome (pun intended).

My daughter's Mountain Rifle" (I forget the real name) in 270 WSM shoots 130 TTSX abd 130 Accubond bullets into sub-MOA. It's a keeper now I've moved the front sling stud forward, bedded and repainted the thing.

I built one like you're asking about but on a Rem 700 with a Lilja #2, Brown Precision Kevlar stock, 280 AI. It shoots!!!!!

Zeke
 
Posts: 2270 | Registered: 27 October 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Buy a Fieldcraft instead.You will be very happy.
 
Posts: 4372 | Location: NE Wisconsin | Registered: 31 March 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I solved the inconsistent group problem on my featherweight 7mm-08 by bedding 6lbs upward pressure on the barrel at the front of the stock to eliminate barrel whip. Now it’s shoots tiny little groups all the time with ttsx bullets. I wonder if a similar issue is going on here. So sub moa guaranty and they said pound sand? Hmmm not good. How old are these? Are they mountain ascents? They have several models. (The expensiver ones are the ascents).


White Mountains Arizona
 
Posts: 2863 | Registered: 31 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
“Mountain ascent”? Yeah building one is an option as well. How old is your daughters gun?


quote:
Originally posted by ZekeShikar:
Kimber seems to suffer from "hit or miss" syndrome (pun intended).

My daughter's Mountain Rifle" (I forget the real name) in 270 WSM shoots 130 TTSX abd 130 Accubond bullets into sub-MOA. It's a keeper now I've moved the front sling stud forward, bedded and repainted the thing.

I built one like you're asking about but on a Rem 700 with a Lilja #2, Brown Precision Kevlar stock, 280 AI. It shoots!!!!!

Zeke


White Mountains Arizona
 
Posts: 2863 | Registered: 31 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I’ll look at them. Are they “super” light?

quote:
Originally posted by OLBIKER:
Buy a Fieldcraft instead.You will be very happy.


White Mountains Arizona
 
Posts: 2863 | Registered: 31 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
How much does the one you made weigh? Barrel length?

quote:
Originally posted by ZekeShikar:
Kimber seems to suffer from "hit or miss" syndrome (pun intended).

My daughter's Mountain Rifle" (I forget the real name) in 270 WSM shoots 130 TTSX abd 130 Accubond bullets into sub-MOA. It's a keeper now I've moved the front sling stud forward, bedded and repainted the thing.

I built one like you're asking about but on a Rem 700 with a Lilja #2, Brown Precision Kevlar stock, 280 AI. It shoots!!!!!

Zeke


White Mountains Arizona
 
Posts: 2863 | Registered: 31 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Appears they weigh about the same as the kimber but don’t offer the caliber I want. I got an inspection period so I will call kimber and if they don’t stand behind it I’ll send it back and use an existing rifle and make a 280 AI down the road as I am interested in the caliber


White Mountains Arizona
 
Posts: 2863 | Registered: 31 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ted thorn
posted Hide Post
If you are on the hunt for a light rifle look at Forbs but if you want a sub moa rifle Kimbers are notorious for poor CS and poor QC with bad accuracy thrown in to boot

There is a guy on 24 hr campfire as I type this telling a tale of his brand new Kimbers safetey not working.....AT ALL!!


________________________________________________
Maker of The Frankenstud Sling Keeper
Proudly made in the USA
Acepting all forms of payment
 
Posts: 7361 | Location: South East Missouri | Registered: 23 November 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have a 270 Win Montana and it is a great rifle.
 
Posts: 1581 | Location: Either far north Idaho or Hill Country Texas depending upon the weather | Registered: 26 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ted thorn
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Boxhead:
I have a 270 Win Montana and it is a great rifle.


I have more then one Kimber rifles that are great.....(3)

But I have owned more then one that had severe issues....(4)

Not counting my K22 Kimber Classic 22LR that is a great rifle and a collector's piece


________________________________________________
Maker of The Frankenstud Sling Keeper
Proudly made in the USA
Acepting all forms of payment
 
Posts: 7361 | Location: South East Missouri | Registered: 23 November 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The more I read the internet woes with kimber it seems I am not sure what to think. Good thing I got an inspection period 14 days and can look at all the obvious around that supposedly are issues. I do believe a auperlight rifle poses issues to shooting especially if the shooter is not used to it. I have many rifles. I am looking for an Ultralight one. Mauser claw and 3 position safety. I’ll know this week if the visual inspection is passed


White Mountains Arizona
 
Posts: 2863 | Registered: 31 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ted thorn
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by gunslinger55:
The more I read the internet woes with kimber it seems I am not sure what to think. Good thing I got an inspection period 14 days and can look at all the obvious around that supposedly are issues. I do believe a auperlight rifle poses issues to shooting especially if the shooter is not used to it. I have many rifles. I am looking for an Ultralight one. Mauser claw and 3 position safety. I’ll know this week if the visual inspection is passed


All of mine looked great


________________________________________________
Maker of The Frankenstud Sling Keeper
Proudly made in the USA
Acepting all forms of payment
 
Posts: 7361 | Location: South East Missouri | Registered: 23 November 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Use Enough Gun
posted Hide Post
quote:
Not counting my K22 Kimber Classic 22LR that is a great rifle and a collector's piece

Yep, me too! tu2
 
Posts: 18590 | Registered: 04 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
How old are these ? Time frame?

quote:
Originally posted by ted thorn:
quote:
Originally posted by gunslinger55:
The more I read the internet woes with kimber it seems I am not sure what to think. Good thing I got an inspection period 14 days and can look at all the obvious around that supposedly are issues. I do believe a auperlight rifle poses issues to shooting especially if the shooter is not used to it. I have many rifles. I am looking for an Ultralight one. Mauser claw and 3 position safety. I’ll know this week if the visual inspection is passed


All of mine looked great


White Mountains Arizona
 
Posts: 2863 | Registered: 31 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Cougarz
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ted thorn:
I could get detailed but don't feel like writing pages of grief in an attempt to save you some.....

They don't have a reputation of standing behind what they sell and I can vouch for that

My advise.....don't buy a Kimber product

If you do.....you were warned


Unless they were the earlier Oregon rifles, they were very good.

While I've never owned one of the new New York guns I have heard enough to not want to roll the dice in hopes I got a good one especially for what they want for one. Instead either get the Tikka fixed or maybe look at a Winchester M70 Featherweight or Weatherby Ultra Lightweight. Very appealing rifles.


Roger
___________________________
I'm a trophy hunter - until something better comes along.

*we band of 45-70ers*
 
Posts: 2819 | Location: Washington (wetside) | Registered: 08 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of graybird
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by gunslinger55:
How old are these ? Time frame?

quote:
Originally posted by ted thorn:
quote:
Originally posted by gunslinger55:
The more I read the internet woes with kimber it seems I am not sure what to think. Good thing I got an inspection period 14 days and can look at all the obvious around that supposedly are issues. I do believe a auperlight rifle poses issues to shooting especially if the shooter is not used to it. I have many rifles. I am looking for an Ultralight one. Mauser claw and 3 position safety. I’ll know this week if the visual inspection is passed


All of mine looked great


Based upon your responses, you've already made up your mind regarding the Kimber. You realize that by "looking at it", you cannot gain any knowledge regarding the rifle itself, other than looks.

I hope your Kimber shoots for you, but I've personally heard enough problems with them, I'll never think about owning one.

I'd save a little more money and purchase a Cooper over a Kimber.


Graybird

"Make no mistake, it's not revenge he's after ... it's the reckoning."
 
Posts: 3722 | Location: Okie in Falcon, CO | Registered: 01 July 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ted thorn
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by graybird:
quote:
Originally posted by gunslinger55:
How old are these ? Time frame?

quote:
Originally posted by ted thorn:
quote:
Originally posted by gunslinger55:
The more I read the internet woes with kimber it seems I am not sure what to think. Good thing I got an inspection period 14 days and can look at all the obvious around that supposedly are issues. I do believe a auperlight rifle poses issues to shooting especially if the shooter is not used to it. I have many rifles. I am looking for an Ultralight one. Mauser claw and 3 position safety. I’ll know this week if the visual inspection is passed


All of mine looked great


Based upon your responses, you've already made up your mind regarding the Kimber. You realize that by "looking at it", you cannot gain any knowledge regarding the rifle itself, other than looks.

I hope your Kimber shoots for you, but I've personally heard enough problems with them, I'll never think about owning one.

I'd save a little more money and purchase a Cooper over a Kimber.


This ^^^^^


________________________________________________
Maker of The Frankenstud Sling Keeper
Proudly made in the USA
Acepting all forms of payment
 
Posts: 7361 | Location: South East Missouri | Registered: 23 November 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
You can see if it’s free floated or bedded correctly. If scope base holes are centered. If it feeds. These are some of the many complaints I’ve read about. I understand that extremely light weight barrels can be temperamental. But nothing I can do now except look at it and decide whether to send back or shoot it. Many people have had great shooters. But if their customer service sucks that is a problem. I’ll look at coopers to see if Winchester style action


White Mountains Arizona
 
Posts: 2863 | Registered: 31 December 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Ive owned one and it was fine, but considering the cost I will always opt for a pre 64 fwt Win. in a 270, 30-06, or a good Mauser 98..


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42312 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of TREE 'EM
posted Hide Post
I bought 2 Montana’s last year. The 270 Win was crap and the 6.5CM was total shit. Kimber did nothing to fix the issues with accuracy or the safety.


All We Know Is All We Are
 
Posts: 1225 | Location: E Central MO | Registered: 13 January 2014Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
you will never get a light,thin, whippy barrel to shoot well. The physics and barrel dynamics are just not there.
 
Posts: 513 | Location: NE Washington | Registered: 27 September 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of DCS Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bentaframe:
you will never get a light,thin, whippy barrel to shoot well. The physics and barrel dynamics are just not there.


Rifles Inc. will, but that’s a different league.


I meant to be DSC Member...bad typing skills.

Marcus Cady

DRSS
 
Posts: 3464 | Location: Dallas | Registered: 19 March 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DCS Member:
quote:
Originally posted by bentaframe:
you will never get a light,thin, whippy barrel to shoot well. The physics and barrel dynamics are just not there.


Rifles Inc. will, but that’s a different league.


I've used my bud's Rifles, Inc. .270 on most trips out west and killed a pile with it. As light as it is accurate, trigger is as light as you'd ever want one.....learned that when I shot right over the back of a big deer.....NEVER put your finger on that trigger until it's on the target.
 
Posts: 2717 | Location: NH | Registered: 03 February 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
So how did they address their “accuracy guarantee”? Say sub MOA with factory ammo and skilled shooter. So you are saying you had a defective safety and they did not fix it?

quote:
Originally posted by TREE 'EM:
I bought 2 Montana’s last year. The 270 Win was crap and the 6.5CM was total shit. Kimber did nothing to fix the issues with accuracy or the safety.


White Mountains Arizona
 
Posts: 2863 | Registered: 31 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Big Wonderful Wyoming
posted Hide Post
I owned a 270WSM that wouldn't feed, and a 257 Roberts that wouldn't shoot.

A friend of mine, has 5 of them and has never had a bad one. He lives in Australia, he told me that Kimber only sent good ones to Australia.

I don't believe that, but it is interesting to note that his rifles are rare in that I knew other folks in Australia that had the shit Kimber disease.
 
Posts: 7782 | Location: Das heimat! | Registered: 10 October 2012Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of loud-n-boomer
posted Hide Post
I don’t own one, but have heard good things about the Barrett Fieldcraft. I have a Cooper Back Country in .300 Winchester, but would think hard about buying one again knowing what I know now. The Cooper shoots sub MOA groups with 165-grain Accubonds, but is very finicky about loads. Of the six loads with four different bullets I have tried, only the one shot consistently better than 1-1/2 MOA. Also, the pin that holds the magazine release is too short so can back out and shear off (I replaced mine with a longer one I made after this happened to me) and the magazine spring needs to be stronger or it is easy to accidentally eject the magazine (I also fixed this on mine). The rifle does balance well and looks good for a stainless synthetic gun. Still, at the price point, were I to do it again, I would spend a bit more and look at a true custom like a Rifles Inc. or spend less and buy the Barrett.


One morning I shot an elephant in my pajamas. How he got into my pajamas I'll never know. - Groucho Marx
 
Posts: 3866 | Location: Eastern Slope, Colorado, USA | Registered: 01 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bentaframe:
you will never get a light,thin, whippy barrel to shoot well. The physics and barrel dynamics are just not there.

Hmmm...Just shot my 308 NULA(well under 6 lbs) at 300 yards 1.5 inch group. Lucky I guess? Anyway Im a NULA man. Only problem 6-8 month wait,and I have the patience of 7 year old on Christmas morning....But highly recommend
 
Posts: 124 | Location: Hickory, PA | Registered: 13 May 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of TREE 'EM
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by gunslinger55:
So how did they address their “accuracy guarantee”? Say sub MOA with factory ammo and skilled shooter. So you are saying you had a defective safety and they did not fix it?

quote:
Originally posted by TREE 'EM:
I bought 2 Montana’s last year. The 270 Win was crap and the 6.5CM was total shit. Kimber did nothing to fix the issues with accuracy or the safety.



They sent me the rifle back with a target showing .01 under MOA with target ammo, not hunting ammo and claim that’s within spec.
They claimed the safety was within spec also. Even though you could not find the middle setting and it would not pass a 1 foot drop test before I sent it and after I received it back.
I passed it on to a friend after explaining all of the issues with it. He thinks he can get it right.

I hear the term Kimber lottery used quite a bit. From now on I’ll waste my money on scratch off tickets.


All We Know Is All We Are
 
Posts: 1225 | Location: E Central MO | Registered: 13 January 2014Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Snellstrom
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bentaframe:
you will never get a light,thin, whippy barrel to shoot well. The physics and barrel dynamics are just not there.


That is absolutely not true. I have a pile of ultra light rifles that shoot fantastic.
None are Kimbers however.
 
Posts: 5604 | Location: Eastern plains of Colorado | Registered: 31 October 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia