The Accurate Reloading Forums THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS Hunting American Big Game Hunting New SCI World Record mule deerGo | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply | |
| New SCI World Record mule deer | Login/Join |
| One of Us |
Hunting Report subscriber Del Brady took what should easily be the new SCI World Record mule deer. Click this link for a look at this beautiful buck: http://www.huntingreport.com/w...te.cfm?articleid=433 The height on this rack is simply amazing. | ||
|
| one of us |
What a beauty! That site (hunting report) has lots of reading!  | |||
|
| one of us |
Wow!!! That one would make your hunting career more memorable  Mike -------------- DRSS, Womper's Club, NRA Life Member/Charter Member NRA Golden Eagles ... Knifemaker, http://www.mstarling.com | |||
|
| one of us |
Let's ses if we can link to that picture.... (courtesy of the Hunting Report, naturally...)  - mike ********************* The rifle is a noble weapon... It entices its bearer into primeval forests, into mountains and deserts untenanted by man. - Horace Kephart | |||
|
| one of us |
What's the B & C score of this toad?? Not sure how the SCI score differs from B & C, something like no deductions for non-typ points?? I've got a good buddy with 15 pref points for Utah, next year will be his year for the Henry's... an absolutely beautiful deer... Regards, Craig Nolan Best Regards, Craig Nolan | |||
|
| One of Us |
WOW!!!!!! | |||
|
| One of Us |
they should have mentioned how much it weighed. | |||
|
One of Us |
Unreal! That is one gorgeous deer.  | |||
|
| One of Us |
How do SCI records differ from B&C records?? I guess the proper question is WHY does SCI have it's own record system? Why not simply use B&C?? I'm not a big "numbers" guy so I'm out of the loop here. FN in MT 'I'm tryin' to think, but nothin' happens"! Curly Howard Definitive Stooge | |||
|
| One of Us |
i believe SCI is B&C gross | |||
|
One of Us |
You can download SCI scoresheets from their website. Basically, the difference between SCI scoring and B&C scoring, is that SCI does not deduct for horns or antlers not being symmetrical. Where this hurts the score is the case where a point or tine exists on one one side, but the corresponding point either didn't grow as long or was broken on the other side. Under the B&C scoring, the lengths of both of these points would be entered, then the difference in their length would be subtracted from the sub-total. Under the SCI scoring, the lengths of both of these points would be entered, and there would not be any deductions. For Typical entries, under B&C, lengths of non-typical points are entered, then subtracted. Under SCI scoring, lengths of non-typical points are only entered in the supplemental information section and are not included in the total score. Basically, under both systems, only typical measurements are counted for the total score. NRA Endowment Life Member | |||
|
| Powered by Social Strata |
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
The Accurate Reloading Forums THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS Hunting American Big Game Hunting New SCI World Record mule deer
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia