21 March 2009, 19:45
Dagga BoyNew SCI World Record mule deer
Hunting Report subscriber Del Brady took what should easily be the new SCI World Record mule deer. Click this link for a look at this beautiful buck:
http://www.huntingreport.com/w...te.cfm?articleid=433The height on this rack is simply amazing.
21 March 2009, 19:58
kudu56What a beauty!
That site (hunting report) has lots of reading!
21 March 2009, 22:01
mstarlingWow!!!
That one would make your hunting career more memorable
Let's ses if we can link to that picture.... (courtesy of the Hunting Report, naturally...)
- mike
21 March 2009, 23:23
Craig NolanWhat's the B & C score of this toad?? Not sure how the SCI score differs from B & C, something like no deductions for non-typ points?? I've got a good buddy with 15 pref points for Utah, next year will be his year for the Henry's...
an absolutely beautiful deer...
Regards,
Craig Nolan
22 March 2009, 01:59
Steffenthey should have mentioned how much it weighed.
22 March 2009, 02:20
Chris_KenneyUnreal! That is one gorgeous deer.
24 March 2009, 09:41
FN in MontanaHow do SCI records differ from B&C records?? I guess the proper question is WHY does SCI have it's own record system? Why not simply use B&C??
I'm not a big "numbers" guy so I'm out of the loop here.
FN in MT
24 March 2009, 15:53
ravenri believe SCI is B&C gross
30 March 2009, 00:36
buffybrYou can download SCI scoresheets from their website.
Basically, the difference between SCI scoring and B&C scoring, is that SCI does not deduct for horns or antlers not being symmetrical.
Where this hurts the score is the case where a point or tine exists on one one side, but the corresponding point either didn't grow as long or was broken on the other side. Under the B&C scoring, the lengths of both of these points would be entered, then the difference in their length would be subtracted from the sub-total. Under the SCI scoring, the lengths of both of these points would be entered, and there would not be any deductions.
For
Typical entries, under B&C, lengths of non-typical points are entered, then subtracted. Under SCI scoring, lengths of non-typical points are only entered in the supplemental information section and are not included in the total score. Basically, under both systems, only typical measurements are counted for the total score.