Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
I just read �11th Hour Ram� by A.E. Walsh in Augusts American Hunter Magazine. In this article, the guide spends two day riding to a area he calls the �Fortress of the Rams�. Once they finally get there, Walsh decides he doesn�t want to climb the mountain, so they ride back. This made me so sick, I have to make a couple of comments. First, why are gun rags publishing articles from people who obviously lacks the �heart of a hunter�. From his picture, the guy looks in his thirties, and in good shape. I have a bad back and a bum leg, and I would have carried my guide up the hill if that�s what it took. Can you imagine O�Conner wimping out like that? Hell, I would expect his bones to crawl out of his grave to get a chance like that. And what about American Hunter. This is from the same organization that is supposed to protect my rights, and they made this the cover story. If they have the same type of people running the NRA, I�ll give up on them right now and save my donations. The second point is from the guides view. Can you imagine what he was thinking the two days they limped home. This guy probably demanded the best guide there was. What he deserved was to sit on the lake eating bon bon�s and reading romance novels. Nothing kills the spirit of a good guide faster that a client like this. I suspect the guide will think twice before taking another client into that area. Walsh may have ruined this guide for the next hunter. The feeling is that if the client pays the money, he deserves the best his guide can offer, but the guide deserves some effort on the part of the client. If the client isn�t willing to give this effort, the guide should take him to a petting zoo and hold back the children while the client takes his trophy. Finally to A.E. Walsh, you can say you killed a sheep, but don�t ever call yourself a sheep hunter. | ||
|
one of us |
what was his reason for not climbing after the sheep??? | |||
|
one of us |
He didn't want to put forth the effort. As he quoted in his article "I ain't that mad at 'em". All this after spending two days to get there. Unreal. | |||
|
one of us |
"Mad at 'em"????? I've never been "mad" at any animal I've hunted. That's a ridiculous statement that betrays laziness, at best. RSY | |||
|
One of Us |
If he was just being a whimp then your right, he doesnt belong in an outdoors writers position, and that is the kind of weak ass mentality that makes re-runs of the Waltons riding in their rumble seat and in the back of their trucks look like thrillseekers, and furthermore, that guy should be at home in the kitchen with a freaking apron on and let his woman wear his boots, pack his rifle and bring home the bacon. | |||
|
one of us |
Wstrnhuntr, quote:You find a woman like that you let us know eh. | |||
|
one of us |
I like men like this. They leave the elk (and hopefully, one day, sheep) for me. JMO, Dutch. | |||
|
one of us |
quote:Not to mention a total disrespect for a magnificent creature. This guy is not a hunter. There is no doubt in my mind now. This guy is only a shooter and hasn't the first clue about why we hunt. How he wound up on such a hunt is beyond me. What a shame. What a useless life he must lead. | |||
|
one of us |
I've never been on a sheep hunt in my life but have read enough about them to know that if I were going on a sheep hunt, I would want to be in the very best shape possible. Conditioning is so important. Its what lets you trudge that last half mile to peep over one more mountain before going back to camp. Did he perhaps think the guide was going to lead his horse into point blank range of the sheep and let him step down, put his cell phone on pause, pop the sheep and start composing his article of what a hairy-chested outdoorsman he was? | |||
|
one of us |
This is one writer who needs to write about others. I found an article of his at: http://www.utahelkhunt.com/content/hm20021.html He complains in the article about being physically exhausted from sitting a horse and glassing for elk. I don't get it. Didn't he understand what an elk hunt involved before he went? He is a not sheep hunter. He moans and wails about the physical demands of an elk where he only spent an hour on the ground. So what type of hunting does he do? Does he expect to be driven to a blind, sit down and wait for a whitetail to come to the auto feeder? He obviously is not paying for these hunts out of his own pocket... Pete [ 08-20-2003, 18:54: Message edited by: Quail Wing ] | |||
|
one of us |
quote:Good deal! Some high and mighty soul wants to break out the stereotypes and assail them with thinly veiled, hypocritical attacks! My turn. Regarding the elk story, what did you expect, considering all the camo the guy wears and his fancy binocular, not to mention his synthetic-stocked rifle shooting a belted magnum? He, and others like him, are not hunters; just avid Cabela's catalog readers. Friggin' amateurs! My favorite part of the story was right after he missed a 300-yard shot with that MAGNUM: "When he never came back out, we agreed to close in tighter if there was another shot to be had." Translation: I just tipped my hand and showed the guide I had more rifle than shooting skill. Now, don't I feel superior? And about those low-lifes that use bait to hunt whitetail, how despicable. (Tongue firmly planted in cheek) RSY | |||
|
one of us |
I seriously encourage you to write a letter to the editors of American Hunter and send the exact same message worded exactly the same way. Might add that your letter represents many other hunters feel the same way, and that you were "chosen" to send the message for all of us. | |||
|
one of us |
On a more serious note, surely there are enough aspiring writers out there that they can find someone willing to make a climb for a sheep. This guy must be somebody's son, brother, cousin, etc. As for who's footing the bill for his aborted hunts, let me just say that it had better not be coming out of my NRA dues. RSY | |||
|
one of us |
quote:12,00o acres with 2000 fenced for "trophy elk" Not much of a hunt or hunter by his article and quite the whiner. | |||
|
one of us |
quote: I loved all your comments, this thread made my day (and I fully agree)! Regards! Martin | |||
|
one of us |
There are a lot of "hunters" who watch the shows on TV and believe them. They don't see the effort, the sweat, and sometimes the fear that must be overcome to get over the next ridge, cross the cold, swift stream and climb the mountain to get to the point where the shot is the easy part. They believe that writing a check will solve the problem....so many want to get in quick, shoot one of everything and get back to work without "wasting" any more time than needed. Unfortunately the cost of running a hunting outfit almost makes it necessary to maximize the number of clients taken or else charge prices that only the very, very rich can afford. Prime examples of this can be found thru out the West and Canada with things like "Govenor's Tags" where someone will pay hugh amounts of money for a special tag and then hire people to go out and find and track a specific trophy animal until it's legal to hunt...when the season comes the "hunter" is contacted...he flies in...changes clothing and the crew begins to close in....the hunter may take the shot (and he certainly paid for that right) but he didn't do any hunting. I quit hunting in the West quite awhile as I got tired of states charging outrageous non-resident liscense fees to hunt on government land plus of course the sky-high outfitting fees to hunt deer and elk. I like hunting but at some point you have to ask yourself "at what cost?" You have to forgive me a little for this as I'm an old fart who remembers the "good old days" and am more than a little grumpy that I can no longer get to the top of the mountain. | |||
|
one of us |
What I read into this, is that this guy Walsh evidently is writing for the SUV Yuppie crowd. He must have left out anything about his Eddie Bauer portable field cappuccino machine. That whole attitude is how the younger generation crowd is going. If they get into hunting, it may be the most positive impact on me to decide to stop hunting. I don't want to be out in the field with those type of people, especially considering they will be carrying a loaded firearm! Those that told me that their is a use for cougars in our society and in our forests, may have been right after all! So Snagglepuss, do you prefer your Yuppies with a side of Cappuccino or a Latte'?? | |||
|
one of us |
Hold your horses Seafire. That is a pretty broad generalization that the younger generations are not true hunters. I am what most would consider young and feel that me and my buddies can and do hunt as hard and as ethically as anyone else. Age doesn't have anything to do with how you hunt! I've seen some of the older generations do some pretty dumb stuff. | |||
|
one of us |
I'm an old fart myself but I got to agree with pregler. I do think the younger gen is more "things" oriented, ie, the STW will make up for the fact they can't shoot their .270 worth a shit; the range finder will make up for the fact they haven't a clue as to how their rifle is sighted in, etc. BUT they certainly do not have a corner on the stupidity market nor unethical hunting. | |||
|
one of us |
quote:Mr. Regler; I do stand partially corrected. You are from Oklahoma. Hunting is still much more accepted where you are from. I don't know of a lot of Animal Rights activists out of Oklahoma. However, here on the West Coast, you are looked at like a criminal by a lot of these Urban People, regardless of age, if you hunt. Also I will concede, that a lot of Older Guys don't have their shit together. However, if they don't when they get old, then they NEVER had it together, and I am sure you would want to Move on down the road if you are hunting near them. I am glad you spoke up, because it shows me that Some Younger people do give a shit, and that is a real reward to me. Us older people want to see hope in our future generations, not stupidity and lacidasicalness( screwed up that spelling!). It is a pleasure to see someone standing up and saying so! | |||
|
one of us |
I quit hunting in the West quite awhile as I got tired of states charging outrageous non-resident liscense fees to hunt on government land plus of course the sky-high outfitting fees to hunt deer and elk. Geez, Bill. Sure wish a lot more folks would realize that those high rates have a purpose. Then maybe I would be able to draw a permit in my own state. -TONY | |||
|
one of us |
the range finder will make up for the fact they haven't a clue as to how their rifle is sighted in, Beemanbeme, Actually, that's not the case at all. The guys who DO KNOW how their rifle shoots make the optimum use of a rangefinder. Hard to use the sight-in trajectory effectively if you don't know the range to the target. And a rangefinder sure beats the hell out of a guestimate in that regards. The difference between 300 or 320 yards can mean the difference between a dead or a wounded animal. As my wife always tells me, "...an inch or two makes a HUGE difference." -TONY [ 08-21-2003, 23:57: Message edited by: Outdoor Writer ] | |||
|
one of us |
And to think I have been humpin' my rump up and down the backside of a steep lake dam for the last two months every morning just to get in shape for hunting KANSAS. (OK Missouri too) And this after knee surgery (second time) and a broken ankle this year. If I knew I could just call it quits and RIDE back down, I might have stayed on the couch. NOT! I guess I will keep doing it the old fashioned way and being happy with my hunts. | |||
|
one of us |
Tony...you're welcome I was mostly thinking of Montana but didn't want to say so up-front as you know how prickly those Big Sky guys can be I do, however, love their speed limits. I don't really mind it if locals get a break on non-Federal land but it sure does burn my butt when the rest of us don't get an even break on Federal land AND now that some states begin the seasons earlier for residents than non-residents it just adds to the flame.....and of course, lets not forget split seasons so you need to make more than one trip if you want to "use" everything you pay for on the license which in many cases is just the "fee" you pay to be able to apply and pay for specific tags. At lease the sunsets are mostly free. | |||
|
one of us |
I liked the part in the elk story where he 'snuck away for a shower at the lodge.' Who goes on a horse trip and wastes a day goign back to the cabin for a shower? | |||
|
Moderator |
quote:Sounds like a nancy boy to me. | |||
|
new member |
That's a helluva good question RSY....Who is footing the bill for this crap??? | |||
|
one of us |
Hey Old Fart (always wanted to say that) Thanks for this thread as it has been very entertaining. I agree with the comments that the attitude displayed by this person is certainly not one of a typical hunter. I think the suggestion to write a letter to the editor of the magazine is a good one. Thanks again for the thread. | |||
|
one of us |
quote:I always thought that the Aussies were the only ones who used the term "Nancy Boy" It always seemed so appropriate- I'm glad it's universal | |||
|
one of us |
Outdoor Writer, naaaaah. Just another toy to be justified. Your example of the difference between 300 and 350 yards doesn't really hold up. A 140gr 7mm bullet @2900fps with a 200 yard zero will show a differnce of 3 inches in drop between 300 and 400 yards. Also, using the duplex cross hairs in your scope a range estimater is handy and quick. And certainly accurate enough for real world hunting. You should learn how it works. Then you'd have something to write about. | |||
|
one of us |
I have taken the advice of Chico and Elkslayer, and will send a copy of my post as well as a link to this thread to American Hunter. Having spent my early years reading O'Conner and Page, I feel the younger hunters have lost the "Heart of a Hunter". I'm encouraged by the comments of bmpregler and other young hunters. Maybe the gun rags are more interested in hiring writers than hunters. | |||
|
one of us |
quote: Depending on exact bc of the specific 140 gr 7mm bullet, it would be about 7" low at 300 yds and about 20" low at 400. By my math that is 13", not 3". Wind drift, assuming a 15 mph breeze, would also determine whether you effect a humane kill or wound an animal. The difference between 300 and 400 yds would be about 9". | |||
|
new member |
...just thought I'd drop in and take it on the chin. But as your slugging away, I also thought I should give you a bit more info on the points you've made, as 2,500 words per story isn't enough to go into all the details. The point was made about not crawling further into the Fortress of the Rams...First of all, there were no sheep. And given that we were hunting sheep and running out of precious time, the guide made the decision to get back on our horses and check other areas. Old Fart: I'm not sure were you read that "Walsh decides he doesn’t want to climb the mountain," but just about all comments that followed bought into your words as Gospel...you should be a writer! And to Pete, Quail Wing, my job as a writer is to write about my experiences and relate those to others. One thing you will always find in my writing is honesty: when I miss, I will say so, and when I'm tired, I will also say so. (Would you rather I lie?) If you have never been exhausted hunting elk, then I admire your stamina. But having grown up hunting elk in the straight-up-and-down rainforests of western Oregon, I've busted my hump after elk...and blacktails, and bears. I know a hard hunt, and I enjoy a hard hunt, contrary to popular belief. I'm sorry you didn't enjoy the article. Maybe something down the road will catch your interest. Until then, you can e-mail directly if you'd like; I'd be happy to answer your concerns directly: awalsh@nrahq.org Best regards, Abe | |||
|
one of us |
ruffhewn, you are right about the drop between 300 and 400 yards. I thought I was quoting from a Speer reloading manual but when I went back to it the words had changed. I still stand by my point tho. Maybe while sage rat shooting a ranger might be a cute toy but for "real life big game hunting" they are not needed if you are shooting at what I call ethical ranges, ie 350yards or less. | |||
|
one of us |
quote:Just to set the record straight, a short quote: "After dismounting and tying our horses at the edge of the timber, we gathered up backpacks and took a slug of water. Although the bull was directly across from us, to get a shot we would have to get well above him, then cross over to close the distance. We guessed correctly that it would take us about an hour. When we closed to within 300 yards, we noticed the bull was walking with a limp. Though we could see no obvious sign of a wound, Rulon didn't want to risk pushing this bull into the timber to suffer further, so he asked if I thought I could take him from this distance. The 180-grain Partition erupted from the muzzle of my .300 Win. Mag. At 3000 fps, but missed cleanly. With this, the bull whirled, crossed the canyon just below our horses, and disappeared into an island of still-turning aspens. When he never came back out, we agreed to close in tighter if there was another shot to be had. Another hour and a half back to an overlook above the bowl into which the bull had settled, and we began picking apart the shadows with our glasses. Eventually, Rulon spotted the bull cruising the timber for a place to bed, and we scrambled to find a solid rest. Determined not to make the same mistake, I waited until the bull was well within 200 yards, and as his front shoulder crossed through a small opening, I squeezed the trigger. The "thud" of the bullet was distinct in the still air, but the bull did nothing more than take another step and lay down" So, you get up early and ride in. You walk for an hour. Miss the shot, then walk for another hour and a half. The rest of the article describes a hunt were you get up early, ride in and glass from a ridge. Or you run off for a shower. I have no problem with that. I am sure for many that is a "hunt". I am not into counting vertical miles. I have no problem with the guy who wants to hunt a high fenced area, sitting in a shack while watching deer come to a feeder. Or riding in the mountains and glassing. Heck given the choice, give me the horse to ride or the shack to sit in. What I don't care for is all the whining about how tired and exhausted all the hunters are. If I don't understand their exhaustion, is that my fault or yours as writer? Your article never made me feel like I was there. It never increased my understanding of the terrain, or the game. It never conveyed an emotion the only thing I got was I felt tired after reading it. True, you sold the article, more power to you. Everyone needs to earn a living. I just look for something more than Veni, Vidi, Vinci from a hunting article. Gosh, tell a story, make someone laugh, make them feel like they were there or wish they could have been. But please don't tell me 2 hours on foot is exhausting.... This is not about machismo, it about poor story telling. I walked from downtown to my house, it took 2 hours. Then I went horseback riding. When I came back, some one was there to cook my dinner. Boy what an exhausting experience? Where is the story? There was a writer, Ted Trueblood, who used to write for Field & Stream. Though it has been almost 30 years, I can still recount, retell many of his articles. In 30 years, who will be retelling your stories? Regards, Pete | |||
|
<Rimrock> |
On a somewhat more positive note.... It usually takes me about five minutes to flip through American Hunter. Not that I blame 'em, but it's clearly aimed at the Bubba demographic, with all the ATV ads & such, & just isn't really my thing. The one that kills me is the two guys riding their Polaris Ranger "deep into Big Game Country". Whatever.... But I gotta say I am impressed with the September issue. What really caught my eye was Don Thomas' article about bowhunting antelope. The writing is good, but what I think is really top-tier is the opening photo (which he took). It's a 2-page spread of him glassing over a big chunk of eastern MT. About the top half is blue sky, with the text laid over it in white. The kicker is sort of an opaque petroglyph-style antelope and archer behind the text. Even the font for the headline "An Ancient Way to Antelope" is about perfect. Most readers might not even notice that kind of stuff, but if you have an eye for photo editing or layout, that is some top-notch work. | ||
one of us |
Dutch, I am with you on this, guys like that I love. I bet he "drives by" alot of game..... Up close and personal, by foot, that is hunting. | |||
|
one of us |
beemanbeme, quote:After reading the above, I was reminded of an adage I heard years ago that basically says, "never get into an argument you can't lose." And since the figures in your statement above seem to verify your other comment of, ..."they haven't a clue as to how their rifle is sighted in, etc.," this appears to be one of those arguments that I can't lose. After all, anyone with a rudimentary knowledge of ballistics would readily see you have no idea what the trajectory of a 7mm is. quote:Another thing I learned many years ago is not to assume something about someone you don't know or eventually it might come back to bite you in the ass. Have a nice weekend. -TONY [ 08-22-2003, 19:03: Message edited by: Outdoor Writer ] | |||
|
one of us |
Mr. Walsh, First welcome to the forum, and if I missed something, by all means I want you to set me straight. But after reading you comments here, I'm wondering if you read your story after it was printed. From your article, you describe how tough it was getting to the "Fortress of the Rams", and then, quoting from your article: "Coke is quick to inform you, however, that you are at the mouth of a hidden draw that curls back 5 miles to the sheep. As Leica's Terry Moore is fond of saying about hunting sheep, 'I ain't that mad at 'em.'" You ask Old Fart: I'm not sure were you read that "Walsh decides he doesn�t want to climb the mountain," How could I not jump to that conclusion? And where does it say that it was the guide who decided not to climb that hidden draw. He seems to be saying that you should expect the sheep after a 5 mile climb. Your comment at not being "that mad at 'em", implies that it was you who gave up. I get the impression that you became a outdoor writer so you didn't have to get a real job. I envy you for that decision and the sucess you have had. But unless you have the "Heart of a Hunter", your success will be limited. So far, I haven't seen it. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia