THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AMERICAN BIG GAME HUNTING FORUMS

Page 1 2 

Moderators: Canuck
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Pussy gun rag writers
 Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of Outdoor Writer
posted Hide Post
beemanbeme

quote:
...if you are shooting at what I call ethical ranges, ie 350yards or less.
Why would your "ethical ranges" apply to anyone else that has the skills and equipment to exceed them? And without a rangefinder, how do you know the range is not over 350 yards?? Or can you really tell the difference between 340 yards and 360 yards?? I didn't think so. [Wink]

This is from the GEAR chapter in the book, "How To Hunt Coues Deer." It seems I wrote it with you in mind. [Roll Eyes]

RANGEFINDERS
Some folks think of a rangefinder as one of those �for the guy who has everything� items. Yet knowing the exact distance from your position to a deer can mean the difference between missing it, killing it or seeing it run off wounded. With the popularity of glassing game from afar, knowing the range is even more important now as more hunters are taking long 350 to 500-yard shots.

A rangefinder can be quite handy to have even if you�re a guy who recognizes his shooting limitations and sticks to short-range shots. In this case, a rangefinder will quickly let you know when you�re within those limitations.


Maybe if you bone up on ballistics and start using a rangefinder, even your "ethical ranges" would increase. -TONY

[ 08-22-2003, 23:02: Message edited by: Outdoor Writer ]
 
Posts: 3269 | Location: Glendale, AZ | Registered: 28 July 2003Reply With Quote
<allen day>
posted
The one thing I do know is that no professional writer of hunting stories is going to be successful long-term or gain any kind of following unless he's a real hunter and skilled shooter ahead of being a writer. The guys who are real always stand out.

As the Bible says concencerning a more important topic, "you shall know them by their works".

AD
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bill C
posted Hide Post
Personally, I liked the article when I first read it over a bowl of cereal, finding it light-hearted and entertaining. I'd like to think I'd have done things differently, but I respect somebody who is honest in their accounts.
 
Posts: 3153 | Location: PA | Registered: 02 August 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Outdoor Writer
posted Hide Post
DB Bill,

quote:
I don't really mind it if locals get a break on non-Federal land but it sure does burn my butt when the rest of us don't get an even break on Federal land
Hey, anyone can come out here to AZ and use the "federal land" all they want. Heck, millions of people do it every year just as they do in CA. What they can't do, however, is kill our game, which belongs to the state, not the feds! Unless they pay a tidy sum for the privilege, of course. [Razz]

Maybe one of these days they'll raise the NR tags high enough where I can get an elk tag or hunt the North Kaibab again. Or, I might even draw a bighorn permit, which I haven't been able to do in 40 years of trying!

This year, I was shut out on every drawing in AZ, including deer. So that I don't go into withdrawal, I'll be heading to BC to hunt elk in an area that will be open for the first time ever. -TONY

[ 08-27-2003, 00:54: Message edited by: Outdoor Writer ]
 
Posts: 3269 | Location: Glendale, AZ | Registered: 28 July 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by beemanbeme:
ruffhewn, you are right about the drop between 300 and 400 yards. I thought I was quoting from a Speer reloading manual but when I went back to it the words had changed. [Confused]
I still stand by my point tho. Maybe while sage rat shooting a ranger might be a cute toy but for "real life big game hunting" they are not needed if you are shooting at what I call ethical ranges, ie 350yards or less.

Your mistake in the trajectory does make a point why many hunters should not shoot beyond the BPR of the rifle used. If it happened at the keyboard the same could happen in the field with failing light and a dozen fine animals grazing calmly 400 yds away. Fortunately, a mistake like that in the field would result in a clean miss assuming good marksmanship and no sudden problems with the rifle or the round fired.

However, ethics are a personal thing. My ethics are to not shoot unless I am sure of where the bullet is going. For me it varies with conditions so I can not quote a max range that will always apply to me.

If you have the dedication to extend your comfortable range for a shot, then a LRF can be a huge benefit. You will have to do a lot of shooting at varied ranges, enough that misreading come-ups plastered to the side of your stock will set of alarm bells in you mind causing you to double check the data. I also suggest a quality ranging rifle scope and developing the ability to estimate range accurately. While developing this ability, the LRF can be used to check your guess.

I know hunters who feel the animal has won if they can not get within some arbitrary distance of it and realize that is why some hunt with only a bow. I also know hunters who can not reliably make a shot much beyond 150 yds, either due to equipment or not enough dedication to develop the ability or the few that just do not possess the aptitude for long range shooting, and have a great repect for them because they do shoot within their limitation and never wound game. I would not ask them to attempt shots they are not comfortable with and they do not ask me to limit myself because of their beliefs or abilities.

Rick
 
Posts: 285 | Location: Alabama | Registered: 01 June 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Outdoor Writer
posted Hide Post
Good thoughts, Rick. If I had to guess, I would say 75% of hunters can't accurately judge range beyond 200 yards to within 25 yards. In rugged terrain, across canyons, etc., that % probably goes up to closer to 90%.

Of course, if a guy is hunting whitetail from a treestand in WV where he can't see more than 50 yards, it makes little difference whether he knows anything about his rifle's trajectory or can estimate range accurately. [Wink] -TONY

[ 08-22-2003, 23:02: Message edited by: Outdoor Writer ]
 
Posts: 3269 | Location: Glendale, AZ | Registered: 28 July 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Outdoor Writer:
Good thoughts, Rick. If I had to guess, I would say 75% of hunters can't accurately judge range beyond 200 yards to within 25 yards. In rugged terrain, across canyons, etc., that % probably goes up to closer to 90%.


I resemble that remark.

I went pig hunting in California last October and at one point we saw some pigs coming down the far side of the canyon. We were walking down a switchback jeep trail and thought they were oh, so far away. So we trotted down in the canyon bottom (where we couldn't figure out where the heck they went).

On the way back up we stopped and looked at some average-size trees and such, and decided the far side of the canyon was probably 150 yards. Looking at contour lines on the topo map later, I'm sure that wasn't too far off.

I recently bought a Leica LRF 1200 and have to say -- even a couple minutes here and there, guessing distances to different objects then using the LRF to check your guesses, is HIGHLY educational. I've done it to amuse myself while stuck in traffic and am most often surprised how close things are. No wonder I keep reading that most hunters miss over the backs of game.

John
 
Posts: 1246 | Location: Northern Virginia, USA | Registered: 02 June 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Outdoor Writer
posted Hide Post
John,

I think we've all been there at least once or twice. [Roll Eyes]

Long before laser rangefinders came into being, I spent three years guiding elk and deer hunters outside Durango, Colo. And I was totally amazed at how bad their estimations of range were. Of course, in many cases, their marksmanship was even worse. [Smile]

I was also a hunter safety instructor, and part of the final "exam" was walking along about a 1/2-mile course with orange flags placed at various distances away from the main trail. Each student had to make a guess for each flag. Few ever came close to the actual distances, and most of the answers were longer, as in your experience.

Now these were adults -- not kids. Many were experienced hunters already but didn't have a HS card as required in Colo. at the time. -TONY

[ 08-23-2003, 01:15: Message edited by: Outdoor Writer ]
 
Posts: 3269 | Location: Glendale, AZ | Registered: 28 July 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Gatehouse
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Outdoor Writer:
DB Bill,

quote:
I don't really mind it if locals get a break on non-Federal land but it sure does burn my butt when the rest of us don't get an even break on Federal land
Hey, anyone can come out here to AZ and use the "federal land" all they want. Heck, millions of people do it every year just as they do in CA. What they can't do, however, is kill our game, which belongs to the state, not the feds! Unless they pay a tidy sum for the privilege, of course. [Razz]

Maybe one of these days they'll raise the NR tags high enough where I can get an elk tag or hunt the North Kaibab again. Or, I might even draw a bighorn permit, which I haven't been able to do in 40 years of trying!

This year, I was shut out on every drawing in AZ, including deer. So that I don't go into withdrawal, I'll be heading to BC to hunt elk in an area that will be open for the first time ever. So maybe I'll see one of these guys. -TONY

 -

Where in BC is this newly opened area? I didn't see it in the regs? [Confused]
 
Posts: 3082 | Location: Pemberton BC Canada | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of OldFart
posted Hide Post
Mr. walsh replied to me with a personal email that I hope he posts to the list. After getting a better look inside the man, I would like to step back and say I likely misjudged the man. I would like to apologize to him and post the response I sent back to him.

Mr. Walsh,
Thanks for your response. I would like to post your letter on the Accurate Forum, because it does explain alot, and I feel others should read it. Having the guts to "stand in the line of fire" shows that commitment to the sport, that I feel is often lacking.

As a bit of background, I no longer read many gun rags. The articles have gotton to the point where they sound like paid advertisments. I understand where you do not want to offend the people who pay your bills, but alway reading how the tested product or outfitter is so superior, well its gotten old. Thats why I like Accurate Reloading so much, because I can get honest opinions (granted half of them are BS [Smile] .

What seems to be missing in most articles is the passion for the hunt, the emotions during the hunt, the respect for the animal, and that tough personalities exhibited by the guides and the hunters. When I read what I perceived was a lack of desire, I took offense. I know former guides who quit the business because of bad clients. They don't become guides to get rich as you know.

I don't expect outdoor writers to be in the same shape as Iron Man contestants. Hunting sheep is much more strenuous anyway [Wink] . But what I like to see, I can best describe with an example:

I have a buddy, who at the age of 70, drew a Buffalo tag in Utah's Henrys mountains. There was a dozen people, including myself, who went on the hunt to help this poor old man get a buffalo. To make a long story short, the Buffalo "Roamed", and near evening, in spite of the old boy walking 15+ miles, we hadn't seen hide or hair of a buffalo. Everyone was beat, and all but four of us elected to head back to camp. I pulled the hunter aside to see how he felt, and he said, "Why leave. I still think we are going to get my Buffalo today". Thats exactly what happened, and he showed that "Heart of a Hunter" that I like to see conveyed in a article.
 
Posts: 700 | Registered: 18 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Outdoor Writer
posted Hide Post
Gatehouse,

Area 7A. Must have a 6-pt. or better on one antler. I'll be hunting with the same outfitter I hunt bear with there. -TONY

[ 08-23-2003, 05:22: Message edited by: Outdoor Writer ]
 
Posts: 3269 | Location: Glendale, AZ | Registered: 28 July 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Michael Robinson
posted Hide Post
Here's my two cents:

Apart from those times when we get lucky, which sort of makes up for the rest, all really good and fun hunting is 99% hard work and 1% shooting.

And it's the 99% hard work that precedes it that makes that 1% shooting so pressure packed.

After all of that work, you somehow feel as though you had better make the first shot count.
 
Posts: 13876 | Location: New England | Registered: 06 June 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Gatehouse
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Outdoor Writer:
Gatehouse,

Area 7A. Must have a 6-pt. or better on one antler. I'll be hunting with the same outfitter I hunt bear with there. -TONY

Oh yeah..I see it now [Wink]

Good area...Lots of stuff to hunt around there [Smile]
 
Posts: 3082 | Location: Pemberton BC Canada | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Outdoor Writer
posted Hide Post
Gatehouse,

Uh-huh. I already have a license & wolf tag from my spring bear hunt, and my firearm import thingie is still good. So all I'll need to buy is the elk tag. BUT...moose, deer and bear seasons will also be open. I haven't decided if I'll "do" any of them yet, though. -TONY

[ 08-27-2003, 00:55: Message edited by: Outdoor Writer ]
 
Posts: 3269 | Location: Glendale, AZ | Registered: 28 July 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of kk
posted Hide Post
My God!

It's a BABY.

Also, where'd the beard come from?

kk
 
Posts: 1224 | Location: Southern Ontario, Canada | Registered: 14 October 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Outdoor Writer
posted Hide Post
KK,

Green, flat hide on the "baby" went 7'6" from nose to tail. I had killed two very black ones there on a previous hunt while "doing research" for a spring bear hunting article for OUTDOOR LIFE in 1990. I didn't want another black one, so I passed on several this year to get to that pretty reddish one.

Ol' graybeard has existed for more than two years now. It looks REALLY gray in that photo, though. Must be the light reflection since I'll be only 62 in Nov. [Roll Eyes] Here's a truer representation from my Africa trip a month or so ago. -TONY

 -

[ 08-27-2003, 00:57: Message edited by: Outdoor Writer ]
 
Posts: 3269 | Location: Glendale, AZ | Registered: 28 July 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by A.E. Walsh:
...just thought I'd drop in and take it on the chin. But as your slugging away, I also thought I should give you a bit more info on the points you've made, as 2,500 words per story isn't enough to go into all the details.

The point was made about not crawling further into the Fortress of the Rams...First of all, there were no sheep. And given that we were hunting sheep and running out of precious time, the guide made the decision to get back on our horses and check other areas. Old Fart: I'm not sure were you read that "Walsh decides he doesn’t want to climb the mountain," but just about all comments that followed bought into your words as Gospel...you should be a writer! [Smile]

And to Pete, Quail Wing, my job as a writer is to write about my experiences and relate those to others. One thing you will always find in my writing is honesty: when I miss, I will say so, and when I'm tired, I will also say so. (Would you rather I lie?) If you have never been exhausted hunting elk, then I admire your stamina. But having grown up hunting elk in the straight-up-and-down rainforests of western Oregon, I've busted my hump after elk...and blacktails, and bears. I know a hard hunt, and I enjoy a hard hunt, contrary to popular belief.

I'm sorry you didn't enjoy the article. Maybe something down the road will catch your interest. Until then, you can e-mail directly if you'd like; I'd be happy to answer your concerns directly: awalsh@nrahq.org

Best regards,

Abe

This man has a lot more class than Sarge.
 
Posts: 18352 | Location: Salt Lake City, Utah USA | Registered: 20 April 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Gee, outdoor writer, you can see my current home address and determine my style of hunting and my range estimating abilities. You're a fucking genius. Maybe even a mystic. The fact that you can't range distance using the dupleses in you rifle scope doesn't mean its not an accurate, reliable and quick method.
You ought to be very glad most of your pilgrims can't estimate distances. That's what a guide is paid to do. That and hold the horses.
Since you can read so much into my location, can I assume, since you're from AZ, that you're a Navaho that makes his real money hanging at the rest stops on the expressway selling junk jewelry to the tourist?
 
Posts: 2037 | Location: frametown west virginia usa | Registered: 14 October 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Outdoor Writer
posted Hide Post
Beebeemanbeme,

Nah, I didn't even need to see your home address, but thanks for the compliments anyway.

Have a nice weekend. -TONY

[ 08-24-2003, 06:58: Message edited by: Outdoor Writer ]
 
Posts: 3269 | Location: Glendale, AZ | Registered: 28 July 2003Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia