I am new in this forum, so forgive me if this is chewed through allready.
I was just wandering if you have chance to own only two rifles for all of your lifetime - what calibre would it be ??
You don't know beforehand what type of game or where you would be hunting - this is the point. Select calibres that can bring the pot full of meat in any conditions, plains, bush, Alaska, Africa...
My choice:
- 7x57 - 9.3x62
Should be sufficient in any conditions IMHO. I am traditionalist and do believe that most good things have been invented a looooong time a go.
Regards, Mark V
Posts: 21 | Location: Finland | Registered: 14 January 2003
Lots of good choices and this topic always brings endless debate. For my own use it would be the 300Wby and the 416Rem. But then again I have a new 375Wby and I could easily make do with that pair as well. I am not a traditionalist and want the best tools for the job, regardless of when they were invented.
Posts: 1148 | Location: The Hunting Fields | Registered: 22 May 2002
If it's smaller than an elk, 257 Roberts imp. firing 117gr. Hornady SSTs. For elk and up, 30-06 imp. firing 180gr. Hornady SPs or Speer Grand Slams. I don't consider the 06 imp. adequate for the big bears but I doubt that I will ever get an opportunity to hunt them so I'm going with these two calibers. Elk Country
Posts: 180 | Location: Northern Colorado, USA | Registered: 26 March 2002
quote:Originally posted by John S: Lots of good choices and this topic always brings endless debate.[/
I know.
quote:I am not a traditionalist and want the best tools for the job, regardless of when they were invented.
The selection for lighter rifle seems to be a bit high side for me, if all game is considered, but i don't know the calibre too well and there might be good light loadings for it.
I don't think these good old Mausers have anything to feel inferior against new calibres. Let the track record speak...
Regards, Mark V
Posts: 21 | Location: Finland | Registered: 14 January 2003
I own them. A 300 win mag and a 375 H&H built on left handed model 70 actions. My reasons are: readily availably ammunition and reloading components, their field proven, and they allow some overlap if something was to go wrong with one of them (heaven forbid).
Joe Bishop, a man who hunts extensively throughout the world uses two synthetic stocked Sakos, a 7mm rem mag and a 375 H&H, do do his hunting with.
A better combination might be out there, but for my requirements and in my opinion these two are tough to beat.
If the nightmare of a two Rifle "rest of my life" were to actually happen - I would immediately commit Hari Kari! Don't even talk like two Rifles! EVER! Hold into the wind VarmintGuy
Posts: 3067 | Location: South West Montana | Registered: 20 August 2002
I'll take VarmintGuy's post a bit further and say:
I'm sick of these useless questions. What's the point of asking what one rifle, or two rifle, or five rifle would you choose? You get a lot of opinions and occassionally some pointless debate...
POINTLESS!
Posts: 557 | Location: Various... | Registered: 29 December 2002
Just to approach this from a slightly different angle, I always think if limited to 2 calibers, the rifles they come in are more important than the actual caliber. I often see people excited to get a new caliber, but in my opinion (whatever that's worth) they spend too little time planning the rifle it comes in. Whether it's optimal for the intended purpose.
In my case, #1 would be a relatively light, flat shooting rifle that I could use for backpack sheep hunting, and can also be about perfect as an all-around deer rifle. Mine is a M70 classic stainless short-action custom 284Win in a Bansner stock and a Pac-Nor barrel which weighs in at just under 7 pounds with scope. A 140 SST for deer and a 140 failsafe to help me sleep soundly while sheep hunting in grizzly country.
The other rifle would be used for moose/elk/bigger bears and will be a bit heavier due to the caliber it comes in. Mine is taking shape as we speak, also on a M70 classic stainless action, this one in a Brown stock. I'm having my 300Wby rebarreled to 358 Norma. It will weigh just over 8 pounds complete. With a 225 Ballistic Tip for long range moose and elk, and a heavier bullet for close range/bigger critter gittin'. Depending on what the rifle likes, it will be a North Fork 270 grainer, an A-Frame 280 grainer or a 250 "X".
Either rifle could be in about a dozen other calibers that would work just as well, but it's the rifles and how they are set up that is the important part.
Posts: 235 | Location: British Columbia | Registered: 08 November 2000
My pick would be a .257 Wby and a .358 STA. Another pick would be a .300 Win mag and a .416 Rem. Or I could have said .22 Mag and .340 Wby. Or how about 7MM STW and .338 Lapua. My first pick would still be at the top of the list and I would call it a chambering, instead of a Caliber. Good shooting.
It is absolutley imperative and essential that you own a rifle in either .338, .375, .416, .458, .475, or .510! Your wife does not realize that you can not get into Heaven(whatever your relegious belief)without owning one of the calibers I mentioned. And yes, you must keep all firearms you curently have.
For the world, if all possible game is on the list: a .223 or 22/250 and a .375 H&H or .375 RUM.
For North America, a .223 or 22/250 and a .338 or one of the 300 magnums.
For the world, provided elephant, Cape buffalo, lion, rhino, and the biggest eland are left off the list: a .223 or 22/250 and one of the .300 magnums.
Posts: 5883 | Location: People's Republic of Maryland | Registered: 11 March 2001
I can't see myself hunting outside of North America so this makes it a easy one. 25/06 and one of any of the 338mags. The 25 for varm. and deer and the 338 for eveything else.
Posts: 4326 | Location: Under the North Star! | Registered: 25 December 2002
I'll never see Africa so this is easy as well. My 257 and 340 Weatherbys can do anything I want to do anywhere I want to go. These hypothetical questions are kinda pointless, but pass the time. Sometimes the answers can get interesting. Take it easy on the topic starters.
Posts: 323 | Location: Keithville, La. USA | Registered: 14 February 2002
A .22 hornet for things up to coyotes and diminutive deer and antelope species. A .30-06 for the big stuff. If it were three calibers then make that .22lr, and 6.5 swede or 7x57, and .338-06 or .35 whelan or 9.3x62.
quote:Originally posted by Gonzo FreakPower: I'll take VarmintGuy's post a bit further and say:
I'm sick of these useless questions. What's the point of asking what one rifle, or two rifle, or five rifle would you choose? You get a lot of opinions and occassionally some pointless debate...
POINTLESS!
Gonzo Then why do you bother reading and posting a reply? Why not just skip the topic altogether? Greg
Posts: 1230 | Location: Saugerties, New York | Registered: 12 March 2002
I guess i have a wild hair up my ass. happens sometimes.
Rather than "yelling" at someone here let me try it this way:
Instead of asking such a broad question that doesn't really have any point, try asking something a little more specific. With a little more focus you'd learn a lot more.
I just don't see what good comes from asking a question that's so far removed from reality. No one here would ever want to live in a world that allowed only 2 rifles per person (or 3 or 5).
I don't mean to offend anyone here. I've seen people get way too excited in these forums, getting bent out of shape. Witness the "270 vs 30-06" post or the "why you say no to 30-06."
I will try my best to leave things like this alone. To each his own.
Posts: 557 | Location: Various... | Registered: 29 December 2002
quote:Originally posted by Buliwyf: My dear NutCase:
It is absolutley imperative and essential that you own a rifle in either .338, .375, .416, .458, .475, or .510! Your wife does not realize that you can not get into Heaven(whatever your relegious belief)without owning one of the calibers I mentioned. And yes, you must keep all firearms you curently have.
Go in peace.
B
Thank you, I showed the wife this reply and I know where I can get my hands on a .338
Posts: 77 | Location: Ohio | Registered: 02 February 2002
That's a tough one, but I would probably go with the 6.5x55 and 375 H&H. The 6.5 works great on everything from coyotes to mule deer, and the 375 on everything larger.
Posts: 3317 | Location: USA | Registered: 15 November 2001
300 and 378 Weatherby Magnums,scoped with Leupolds,loaded with Nosler Partitions.Can't really think of anything that combo wouldn't be good for,in North America or Africa.