The Accurate Reloading Forums
United States Outfitters Inc?
15 November 2009, 06:44
woodsieUnited States Outfitters Inc?
Any pluses or negatives about using them to set up liscneces and bonus points. I figuire I would start applying for some of the hard to get hunts and preference points for items like Sheep, Goats, and elk, and Mule Deer.
Any advice is much appreciated.
Thanks,
W.

15 November 2009, 07:33
kudu56I think there was a long running controversial topic on them a few years back on here and about every hunting forum. I actually didn't know they were still in business. George Taulman was trying to change a lot of things pretaining to hunting big game in western states.
They do produce and at a fair price.
15 November 2009, 07:35
SevenxbjtI've never used them but I used Cabelas TAGS this year for sheep in Montana and Arizona. Seems like a similar service in concept.
15 November 2009, 07:59
kudu56Why don't you just apply on your own, and save the fees? I think you can apply for sheep online in every state that has a draw. I know three of my sons do it every year. I don't see how they could improve odds, just save you the keyboard work for over a $1000.
15 November 2009, 08:18
Slowpoke SlimJust remember the fine print in your agreement.
If you use their draw service, you MUST use their guide service for that hunt. They will not let you out of it!
I've never used them, nor will I ever, after the sh*t they pulled here in AZ, they can rot and fall off the earth for all I care.
Just my opinion only

Si tantum EGO eram dimidium ut bonus ut EGO memor
15 November 2009, 08:56
DesertRamI'm with Slim.

to USO.
_____________________
A successful man is one who earns more money than his wife can spend.
15 November 2009, 09:14
kudu56quote:
I've never used them, nor will I ever, after the sh*t they pulled here in AZ, they can rot and fall off the earth for all I care.

Not only in AZ, he was headed for every western state, George became a four letter word here!
15 November 2009, 09:23
SevenxbjtCan you guys enlighten us? I did use Cabelas last year as I was swamped and figured what the heck, if I by some fluke drew a tag I'll use them.
If there are activities going on out there that means we should steer clear of them or USO fill us in.
15 November 2009, 09:30
kudu56George Taulman USO, was trying to force states into allocating more tags for nonresidents, via law suits with cash strapped Game Depts. He lost, he started in Az, and I don't recall what all he accomplished there. There was also some illegal activites with one of his giudes. I have slept since then, I bet some of the other guys remember. Boiled down to states rights.
Back in 2004 I think.
15 November 2009, 18:33
JeremyKSI would look into the Hunting Fool. They produce a great magazine and they offer a tag applying service. I receive their magazine but haven't used their service but I have heard good things about them.
__________________________
Jeremy Gugelmeyer
www.sagebrushhunts.com16 November 2009, 02:10
KenscoI talked to USO years ago but they were just getting themselves in trouble at the time. I believe they were spotting elk from the air then calling in their "hunters" on top of them.
16 November 2009, 03:15
Hot Corequote:
Originally posted by woodsie:
Any pluses or negatives about using them ...
Hey woodsie, just above your name at the top of this thread is a "Find Button". Click on it and search on both USO and United States Outfitters.
There has been a goo dbit of discussion about them in the past.
Best of luck to you.
17 November 2009, 03:49
drummondlindseyPass on them. In fact, I would just pass tag services all together.
17 November 2009, 05:50
LBGuyi would never use uso, for anything. maybe cabelas, but since i put in for my own tags (easy and takes maybe 10 minutes on the web), no need to use any tag service. ymmv.
17 November 2009, 17:03
woodsieWhen you use a tag service, do they front the costs of the tags. THat seems like it was the one of hte benefits.
Maybe some one can review the process of applying for the tags.
Thanks so much,
W.

17 November 2009, 19:57
analog_peninsulaI've read enough controversial threads on enough sites that I'd do some serious digging before I gave them any of my money. I have no personal knowledge of their organization, but they certainly seem to generate plenty of heat and smoke ...
analog_peninsula
-----------------------
It takes character to withstand the rigors of indolence.
19 November 2009, 20:05
323quote:
Originally posted by kudu56:
George Taulman USO, was trying to force states into allocating more tags for nonresidents, via law suits with cash strapped Game Depts. He lost, he started in Az, and I don't recall what all he accomplished there. There was also some illegal activites with one of his giudes. I have slept since then, I bet some of the other guys remember. Boiled down to states rights.
Back in 2004 I think.
It was 2004 and they sued Arizona and Arizona lost and had to issue more elk and deer tags that year... Arizona was not happy and that was the 1st and only year I think Arizona offered that you could put in for tags online and you didn't have to buy tags up front. The following year it was back to the old system you had to buy your tags obviously if you didn't draw you got a refund. But it is expensive in Arizona. Especially at the time elk tags were going for 117.50 for residents... Then they targeted the state of New Mexico, Nevada they were suing states left and right but I think Arizona was the only state they won a lawsuit against the other states won, or something like that...
Handmade paracord rifle slings: paracordcraftsbypatricia@gmail.com
22 November 2009, 23:03
AnotherAZWriterTaulman sued the State of Arizona under the pretense of interstate commerce. His lawsuit sought to overturn the limits placed on non-resident licenses. The State of Arizona would have responded by jacking up license fees high enough that it would limit the non-resident licenses/tags. I don't have a problem with others hunting in AZ; frankly, I spend almost all of my big game time outside of AZ. If I draw, I draw. If I never do, I am okay with that as well. But this greedy move by Taulman would have resulted in non-resident tags becomming so expensive that a plumber in Ohio named Joe would simply give up his dream of hunting in AZ (and the other states once Taulman was successful). Once that happens, we all suffer. Once Joe stops buying .338s, the bullets, etc. we all lose.
Zumbo is another guy here who was surrounded by controversy. He lost his job at Outdoor Life because of his bone-headed rant about black guns. But I will give Zumbo a ton of credit: when Taulman pulled this crap Zumbo stopped doing business with him. Boddington, on the other hand, continues to do so. Frankly, it makes me ill to hear him speak about USO. But I guess he has no problem with it.
23 November 2009, 03:55
kudu56quote:
Boddington, on the other hand, continues to do so. Frankly, it makes me ill to hear him speak about USO. But I guess he has no problem with it.
When you have unlimited funds, sponsors, and backing, it isn't an issue, unfortunetly most of us don't have those luxuries!
23 November 2009, 08:40
AnotherAZWriterKudu:
Sponsors aren't the issue. Hell, Boddington can hunt with anyone he wants to. Maybe he doesn't want to alienate anyone. Who knows why he supports USO. Maybe he can answer that himself. Next time I see him I will ask him.
There were a lot of organizations and at least one writer (Zumbo) who came out against USO. I am disappointed CB did not. Kirk Kelso was pretty vehement in his disgust with USO. Spend your money with him.
24 November 2009, 00:10
MyNameIsEarlI have some friends I visit each year that live near New Mexico. I can tell you that most if not all Arizona hunters despise USO for the crap they pulled. My friends said that last year or maybe the year before several of their guides got in trouble to spotting game from the air and something about not reporting something to G&F.
I would not trust them for anything. IMO
26 November 2009, 01:31
AnotherAZWriter[QUOTE]Originally posted by AnotherAZWriter:
Kudu:
Earl:
It just amazes me that anyone would hunt with USO. It is obviously just about the money.
27 November 2009, 11:19
AnacondaIf I were to use a tag service, I would go with Garth Carter/Huntin Fool. They have a very good reputation.
There are a lot of reasons why many, many western hunters dislike USO.
The law suite fiasco is just one.
I have witnessed some antics in the field that led me to believe some of their guides have no idea what they are doing. Use them, hunt with them at your own risk, I wouldn’t recommend it.
I think I was last year when Cabelas T.A.G.S service messed up and sent a bunch of applications in to Arizona late, causing a lot of hunters to loose bonus points, and loyalty points in a state where points are very valuable. Those points are probably worth about a thousands bucks apiece, and are irreplaceable.
Once again, use Cabelas T.A.G.S. at your own risk.
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
27 November 2009, 19:13
dogcatThere are several other outfits that do the same thing. It costs about $50 per applied for tag. If you do not want to track the areas or the various state rules, use one of these outfits.
Also, you do not send your money to the various states for the tag fees, the agency uses their money and you pay a $50 fee (varies sometimes). They let the states sit on their money and you pay the agency for the privilege.
I would do it, but I have basically given up on hunting the in USA due to the various rules and hassles. I prefer Africa.
28 November 2009, 00:52
Larry SellersKirk Kelso and all his doings are a little/lot on the shady side as well. Wouldn't consider him for anything connected with hunting.
Larry Sellers
SCI Life Member
quote:
Originally posted by AnotherAZWriter:
Kudu:
Sponsors aren't the issue. Hell, Boddington can hunt with anyone he wants to. Maybe he doesn't want to alienate anyone. Who knows why he supports USO. Maybe he can answer that himself. Next time I see him I will ask him.
There were a lot of organizations and at least one writer (Zumbo) who came out against USO. I am disappointed CB did not. Kirk Kelso was pretty vehement in his disgust with USO. Spend your money with him.
28 November 2009, 21:53
drummondlindseyquote:
Originally posted by Anaconda:
If I were to use a tag service, I would go with Garth Carter/Huntin Fool. They have a very good reputation.
With some people they have a good reputation. It will be interesting to see if you still feel this way in the future
29 November 2009, 00:26
AnacondaI've been a member for about 5 years and still happy. One just needs to learn to read between the lines. The only complaint I've herd about Huntin Fool is when the recommend a unit the odds get worse because so many new people start applying for it.
Huntin fool is just another source for information, I never put all my eggs in to one basket.
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
30 November 2009, 04:41
AnotherAZWriterquote:
Originally posted by Larry Sellers:
Kirk Kelso and all his doings are a little/lot on the shady side as well. Wouldn't consider him for anything connected with hunting.
Larry Sellers
SCI Life Member
quote:
Originally posted by AnotherAZWriter:
Kudu:
Sponsors aren't the issue. Hell, Boddington can hunt with anyone he wants to. Maybe he doesn't want to alienate anyone. Who knows why he supports USO. Maybe he can answer that himself. Next time I see him I will ask him.
There were a lot of organizations and at least one writer (Zumbo) who came out against USO. I am disappointed CB did not. Kirk Kelso was pretty vehement in his disgust with USO. Spend your money with him.
Larry:
Can you expound on that?