Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
http://host.madison.com/news/s...7d-d0b3087e9afc.html Wisconsin has sold 10 hunting licenses to babies; a 4-year-old was youngest to register a kill 13 hrs ago The state Department of Natural Resources sold 10 hunting licenses to infants after Gov. Scott Walker signed a bill that eliminated the state's minimum hunting age. Walker signed a Republican bill on Nov. 13 doing away with the 10-year-old minimum age to participate in a mentored hunt. The DNR released data Tuesday that shows the agency had sold 1,814 mentored hunt licenses to children age nine or younger through Sunday. The vast majority — 1,011 licenses — went to nine-year-olds. Fifty-two licenses went to children under age 5, with 10 going to a child under a year old. A four-year-old was the youngest licensee to register a kill. Harvest data doesn't show who actually killed the deer, however. Until this month, a state resident had to be 12 years old to buy a hunting license or hunt with a gun. Children as young as 10 could participate in the mentored hunt program. The new law lets anyone of any age participate in a mentored hunt and the mentor and student are allowed to carry their own weapons. Hunters killed slightly fewer deer during Wisconsin's nine-day gun season this year than last, according to Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources data released Tuesday. The season began Nov. 18 and ran through Sunday. According to the DNR's preliminary totals, hunters killed 195,738 deer. That's less than the 197,262 killed last year and the 198,049 killed the year before, but more than the 192,111 killed in 2014. Overall license sales dipped slightly this year. The agency sold 588,387 licenses authorizing hunting with a firearm during the nine-day season, down 1.7 percent from 2016. Hundreds of young hunters purchased licenses after Gov. Scott Walker signed a bill Nov. 13 eliminating the 10-year-old minimum age to participate in a mentored hunt. Again, harvest data doesn't show who actually pulled the trigger; an older hunter could have killed the deer and registered the animal under the child's license. Opponents of eliminating the minimum hunting age warned putting guns in the hands of young children would put them and other hunters in danger, but it appears that wasn't an issue. No one was killed during the season, although seven hunters were wounded. Five of them, all at least 24 years old, shot themselves. A 53-year-old hunter was shot during a drive in Ozaukee County but the age of the shooter was still unknown on Tuesday. Another hunter was shot in Waukesha County but both the hunter and the shooter's ages were unknown. The DNR was still investigating both incidents. Kathi kathi@wildtravel.net 708-425-3552 "The world is a book, and those who do not travel read only one page." | ||
|
One of Us |
Group hunting is allowed in Wisconsin.As long as the kid is with you it does not matter how old they are. | |||
|
One of Us |
I have mixed feelings on this. Full Disclosure - I don't have any kids but I did drive a school bus for K - 12 students. Encouraging youngsters and women to take up hunting gives it a more positive, family-friendly reputation. Back in the days of the old traditional deer camps the "goings-on" were usually anything but "family friendly." I'm also in favor of eliminating regulations that don't serve a useful purpose to society. On the other hand, I have a lot of questions. Young children don't fully know the difference between fantasy and reality. This has been proven and is something that media (especially Disney) has long known and fully exploited. Is a 4 year old able to fully understand all of the ramifications of killing and that death is permanent - the deer is not going to get up and be OK like in a cartoon? Can they comprehend that killing an animal for food is good and perfectly natural while killing for fun is the sign of deranged mind? Will witnessing the killing of an animal affect them emotionally? It could be very positive experience or traumatizing, depending on the kid's stage of development. Years ago I killed a deer and brought it home to gut it while my 7 year old niece was visiting. She watched the process and was fascinated to the point of wanting to know what every part was for. He younger brother ran off crying at the first incision. The toys children play with and the other things they come in contact with are designed to be as harmless as possible (especially these days.) Then, one day, they are handed a deadly weapon. Do they know the difference? Is a young child strong enough to safely handle a firearm powerful enough to kill a deer? (I had shoulder surgery but even with rehab handling my lightweight .270 was sketchy for a few months.) It's great that an enthusiastic parent wants to spend 'quality time' with their children and introduce them to the ages-old tradition of hunting and the wonders of the outdoors. (I did not have that when was a kid.) But hunting is a rigorous, physically demanding activity with lots of do's and don'ts. It's hard to know if a kid really wants to take all of this on or just wants to do something cool with Dad. In other words is the parent or the child that is so enthusiastic about going hunting? Kids grow up at the their own pace. An average 10 year old pretty much has the fantasy/reality thing worked out and understands what's going on while a 12 year old has usually matured and developed enough to become a full-fledged hunter. Not so sure about a 4 or 6 year old. No longer Bigasanelk | |||
|
One of Us |
My son has had lifetime hunting license since before he was a year old. He killed his first deer when he was five and has killed over 15 now at age 14. God Bless, Louis | |||
|
One of Us |
Now then: Define Poaching!!! No matter what their law says, That's ridiculous! Fine to buy the license at birth. Avoids any further "cost adjustment" on the cost later. No damned way a kid under 5 could shoot game and everyone knows it. That's just taking advantage of a poorly written law imo. George "Gun Control is NOT about Guns' "It's about Control!!" Join the NRA today!" LM: NRA, DAV, George L. Dwight | |||
|
One of Us |
There is no poaching in this case even if the father did shoot the deer. "Party Hunting" is perfectly legal in Wisconsin. One licensed hunter can fill another licensed hunter's tag as long as both are within voice range of each other. (No walike-talkies, cell phones etc.) Poorly Written Law? The State wants to sell licenses and they sold 2 instead of one. That looks like a win-win to me. No longer Bigasanelk | |||
|
One of Us |
You are absolutely correct, the law was written to boost declining sales. From what I have heard, most hunters in WI were in opposition to the law. Personally, I'm opposed to the the law as it is written. I would have like to have the 1 weapon provision (previously law) used in the current bill. Also, I would have like to have seen some wording that mentored hunters would have to use a weapon that is tailored to their bodies. That would undoubtedly eliminate some of the issues pertaining to toddlers getting tags. I'm not entirely certain that parents would be willing/able to customize a stock OR drop 600.00 on a McMillan with a 9'' LOP. "though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will to be rightful must be reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights, which equal law must protect, and to violate would be oppression." ---Thomas Jefferson | |||
|
One of Us |
On the bright side, it will give bow hunters something other then the crossbow kill numbers to bitch about. "though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will to be rightful must be reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights, which equal law must protect, and to violate would be oppression." ---Thomas Jefferson | |||
|
One of Us |
I was WRONG! According to State Statute 29.324(4)(5), Wisconsin's group hunting law DOES NOT permit someone else to fill the tag of a youth or mentored hunter. If the father referenced in the OP did shoot the deer for the 4 year old he was in violation. No longer Bigasanelk | |||
|
one of us |
My opinion, but if a kid is still playing with toys, he is not ready to shoot a real gun; I don't care if he is 5 or 12. | |||
|
One of Us |
Must have been a Regional difference. As far back as I can remember, early/mid 70's, Deer camps here in Texas were for the most part "Family Affairs", and even more so today. Even the rocks don't last forever. | |||
|
One of Us |
"Must have been a Regional difference. As far back as I can remember, early/mid 70's, Deer camps here in Texas were for the most part "Family Affairs", and even more so today." You're probably right about Texas. Up North, a lot of alcohol is consumed. No too many years ago if you listened to the radio in any small town in WI or MI during deer season you'd hear this song about 4 times an hour: Second Week of Deer Camp My Dad didn't share my interest in hunting but he did tag along when my uncles took me on my first deer hunt. These "hunts" were just an excuse to get drunk. (To be fair, my uncles were sober for the 3 or 4 hours we actually spent in the woods during the weekend.) I've tried to figure out why Dad discouraged my interest in hunting. Maybe he didn't want to expose me to this sort of atmosphere at a young age. No longer Bigasanelk | |||
|
One of Us |
I love that song and the "Turdy Point Buck". On my way up to do an elk hunt in western Colorado one year at the Giant truck stop between Albuquerque and Gallup I bought the cassette the group that sang those songs had out at that time. Those were some of the funniest songs I ever heard. Even the rocks don't last forever. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia