Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
No. The reason so many live in such poverty is that they refuse the opportunity to assimilate. The U.S. is just about the only nation on the planet ever to give conquered people such a chance. . | |||
|
One of Us |
I grew up on the Wind River Reservation in Riverton Wyoming. What you talk about is not uncommon, but it is far from rare. Some survive and go on to live their lives some are stuck in the stone age. Eskimos in Alaska and Canada are the same. Some figure it out, some continue to be cave men. I visited aboriginal villages in Australia. I didn't see much difference between that and back home in Wyoming reservation. Served with quite a few natives from all over the West. If they had it figured out by the time they got to be an E3 or E4 they went on to do well. If they hit the booze, then they usually got kicked out. | |||
|
one of us |
BWW: you have certainly led an interesting life. | |||
|
one of us |
Having worked Law Enforcement on 6 reservations in Wis. The ones that wanted to succeed did so. They threw off the government chains. The ones that brought into the white man cause it all are nothing but professional victims. But far to many were/are willing to sit back and let someone else "take care" of them. As far as free housing goes it has been a disaster here. The owners don't care they trash and destroy them. I been in hundreds of homes on the Reservations. The attitude is they well give me another one. Alcohol and drug abuse is common. The worse thing you can do for anybody is to give them stuff. No matter who it is it makes them lazy. People who work for their things have a lot of pride in ownership. It is kind like feeding bears the more you feed them the more they want. Then when you stop they tend to get pushy demanding more. | |||
|
One of Us |
Much of what has been written here is opinion, including much of what I wrote. But why should it matter. The treaties were written long ago when things were different. Those treaties were contracts written in the good name of the U. S. Government. They should continue to be honored. | |||
|
one of us |
Nice sheep, good for him. Legal is legal. -------------------- THANOS WAS RIGHT! | |||
|
Administrator |
But some here do not like the treaties, it does not fit within their narrow, selfish opinions, and should be changed to suit them. May be we need to go back to those days and ask the Red Indians for their permission for those unwanted immigrants if they could come to the country. Sounds silly, I know, but no difference to what some want to change to suit themselves. | |||
|
One of Us |
If they want to prosper they will have to leave the reservation and just fit in with the general public. | |||
|
One of Us |
Speaking only for myself, I raise the question of the correctness of the treaty as a matter of fact saying: "did the treaty serve the signers well then and does it serve both well now?" It's a question, not a statement. If the document is harming both parties, why should it be continued? That can't be called kindness nor unselfish. "The liberty enjoyed by the people of these states of worshiping Almighty God agreeably to their conscience, is not only among the choicest of their blessings, but also of their rights." ~George Washington - 1789 | |||
|
One of Us |
a
I think both sides have a differing opinion on that. But it should continue because a treaty is in effect a contract. If we can no longer rely on contracts just because they no longer suit one of the parties we will have a mess on our hands that could not be repaired. And especially so if one of the parties to the contract is the U. S. Government. For example. What about all of the land grants from the U. S. Government to white settlors? What if the Government came in and said, "we are taking all of that land back, even if you ancestors built their house there, because other people are saying you shouldn't have been given that tract of land". Oh, and by the way, we aren't going to give you very much for it either. | |||
|
One of Us |
Agreed. What you describe has been done with eminent domain actions, and I suspect national park formations. Our government has made and canceled treaties through our history. Most recently with Iran and Russia. Thanks for allowing me to raise the question. I have no animus with the tribal groups. I do have pity even though their plight today is largely self imposed. "The liberty enjoyed by the people of these states of worshiping Almighty God agreeably to their conscience, is not only among the choicest of their blessings, but also of their rights." ~George Washington - 1789 | |||
|
One of Us |
Point of fact. We had no treaty with Iran. It was never ratified in the Senate, therefore there was no treaty to cancel. | |||
|
One of Us |
Point taken sir. Agreement signed by the president would be more accurate. "The liberty enjoyed by the people of these states of worshiping Almighty God agreeably to their conscience, is not only among the choicest of their blessings, but also of their rights." ~George Washington - 1789 | |||
|
One of Us |
First of all, I believe “ Indian” should be recognized as individual with either 50% or more true blood. Rest of them are just Americans, therefore subjects to US and State laws. Second, sad part of Tribal and Reservation culture is “ I want it all and I want it now “ with disregard to any next day consequences . There you have it. We are raising “ Indian privileged class” , ruining consequent generations " Until the day breaks and the nights shadows flee away " Big ivory for my pillow and 2.5% of Neanderthal DNA flowing thru my veins. When I'm ready to go, pack a bag of gunpowder up my ass and strike a fire to my pecker, until I squeal like a boar. Yours truly , Milan The Boarkiller - World according to Milan PS I have big boar on my floor...but it ain't dead, just scared to move... Man should be happy and in good humor until the day he dies... Only fools hope to live forever “ Hávamál” | |||
|
one of us |
I worked with a fellow deputy and considered him a friend. He looked as Scandinavian as any other swede around here. Blond hair blue eyes fair skinned. Didn't know that he had a drop of "so called native" Blood in him. Until treaty rights came around then he suddenly found some. He love hunting and shot a lot of big bucks and bears at times that were not available to the rest of us. Unfortunately he was killed on duty at a fairly young age. When I asked him about is sudden native family. He said he just had enough to make the tribal roles. At the time I believes was well less then a quarter. He just said well I have some of best hunting and fishing now. | |||
|
one of us |
I guess the Indians should have fought harder if they had wished to impose their definition of ownership. Hunting: Exercising dominion over creation at 2800 fps. | |||
|
Administrator |
They lost. You forced an agreement on them. Now honor it! | |||
|
One of Us |
Have you been to Pine Ridge? They don't look too privileged to me. | |||
|
One of Us |
Read my contribution again and then maybe you will see what I meant " Until the day breaks and the nights shadows flee away " Big ivory for my pillow and 2.5% of Neanderthal DNA flowing thru my veins. When I'm ready to go, pack a bag of gunpowder up my ass and strike a fire to my pecker, until I squeal like a boar. Yours truly , Milan The Boarkiller - World according to Milan PS I have big boar on my floor...but it ain't dead, just scared to move... Man should be happy and in good humor until the day he dies... Only fools hope to live forever “ Hávamál” | |||
|
one of us |
lindy2 is absolutely right, just don't interfere with the rights of native americans. By the way, the US government always broke treaties, only one treaty between the natives and the government was kept, never broken, the one between comanches and german settlers at Fredericksburg. | |||
|
One of Us |
https://www.adn.com/alaska-new...ety-in-rural-alaska/ "The liberty enjoyed by the people of these states of worshiping Almighty God agreeably to their conscience, is not only among the choicest of their blessings, but also of their rights." ~George Washington - 1789 | |||
|
One of Us |
| |||
|
one of us |
10 + 180" + rams since the late 70's ? subsistence hunting my ass ... Best Regards, Craig Nolan | |||
|
one of us |
A poacher is a poacher; even if he, by virtue of his race, is given rights not accorded to others. Regards, Bill. | |||
|
one of us |
You would have to live in Idaho to deal with this problem, and the legal violations of the tribes as to wild game and fish, partricularly the Salmon...I wont' go into this silly conversation in that it won't be settled on AR or by non residents, it will be settled in the courts, both good and bad decisions will result. Ray Atkinson Atkinson Hunting Adventures 10 Ward Lane, Filer, Idaho, 83328 208-731-4120 rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 4 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia