THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Medium Bore Rifles    Lipseys Ruger 9.3x62 First impressions

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Lipseys Ruger 9.3x62 First impressions
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
.
 
Posts: 7857 | Registered: 16 August 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of mouse93
posted Hide Post
7 1/2 is rather on the light side IMO - additional 1/2 lb would make all the difference, but it will be up to you at the end tu2
 
Posts: 2034 | Location: Slovenia | Registered: 28 April 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have shot a 9.3x74 Merkel that probably weighed 7 1/2 lbs - recoil was certainly noticeable ad stout but perfectly manageable. Saying that I would n't want to shoot 20 cartridges in rapid succession. But that's not the job of a 9.3x62 - its a hunting rifle that will be carried lots. Sounds like a nice little rifle.
 
Posts: 987 | Location: Scotland | Registered: 28 February 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
My only complaint is the recoil pad is as effective as it could have been
 
Posts: 145 | Registered: 14 March 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
My first and last impression of them and Ive owned 3..they are about as close to perfect as a rifle can be..I find no fault at all in weight, balance, accuracy and just over all good looks..Best comm. rifle of my lifetime, including my Mausers and pre 64 win. at least its a push..Same for my 338s in the same persuasion..Problem is they have these special runs that the price goes sky high when the 250 sell and I sell them high dollar profit, the life of a gun whore..

the recoil is moderate IMO as compared to a .375 and about like a 35 Whelen, and that hard recoil pad is solid and its not a recoil pad its a butt pad..If you pull the gun into your shoulder hard it will push you not hit you. or add a good recoil pad is you need one.


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42210 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by buckdeer:
My only complaint is the recoil pad is as effective as it could have been


I REALLY do not care for the recoil pad, but as Ray pointed out, everything else is fantastic in our opinions.

I’ve stated this before, but the first thing I do on these rifles, is put a 1” black Decelerator recoil pad on them. Looks great and tames that light weight rifle nicely. It’s been mentioned that these rifles weigh 7 1/2 lbs., but my two (9.3x62)s weigh a little less, so the Decelerator is welcome.

Super rifles!! tu2
 
Posts: 2640 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 26 May 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bill/Oregon
posted Hide Post
Such a capable caliber. Hope you share some photos soon, ALF.


There is hope, even when your brain tells you there isn’t.
– John Green, author
 
Posts: 16669 | Location: Las Cruces, NM | Registered: 03 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
With such light contoured barrels on these, I think a lot of folks will be disappointed with just “minute of deer” accuracy. While sub-MOA is nice, it is just not needed in such a rifle as this. The previous run has heavier barrels and can do MOA. These might not. If not, it wouldn’t bother me one bit!


Matt
FISH!!

Heed the words of Winston Smith in Orwell's 1984:

"Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right."
 
Posts: 3296 | Location: Northern Colorado | Registered: 22 November 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of 458Win
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Atkinson:
My first and last impression of them and Ive owned 3..they are about as close to perfect as a rifle can be..I find no fault at all in weight, balance, accuracy and just over all good looks..Best comm. rifle of my lifetime, including my Mausers and pre 64 win. at least its a push..Same for my 338s in the same persuasion..Problem is they have these special runs that the price goes sky high when the 250 sell and I sell them high dollar profit, the life of a gun whore..

the recoil is moderate IMO as compared to a .375 and about like a 35 Whelen, and that hard recoil pad is solid and its not a recoil pad its a butt pad..If you pull the gun into your shoulder hard it will push you not hit you. or add a good recoil pad is you need one.


HERESY
But I certainly agree with Ray. The Ruger M 77 is a fantastic design. It's ejector and bolt stop are actual improvements over the M98 Mauser.


Anyone who claims the 30-06 is ineffective has either not tried one, or is unwittingly commenting on their own marksmanship
Phil Shoemaker
Alaska Master guide
FAA Master pilot
NRA Benefactor www.grizzlyskinsofalaska.com
 
Posts: 4210 | Location: Bristol Bay | Registered: 24 April 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Nakihunter
posted Hide Post
Very nice!

First time my heart jumped at the sight of a Ruger! Big Grin

I love the lines and the wood.

I agree that a thin hard pad needs to be replaced.

Varget is my go to powder. Some swear by Re17


"When the wind stops....start rowing. When the wind starts, get the sail up quick."
 
Posts: 11396 | Location: New Zealand | Registered: 02 July 2008Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Medium Bore Rifles    Lipseys Ruger 9.3x62 First impressions

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia