THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Re: Well well! How about that!
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
Old Sarge:

I agree with the basic premise here. I hunt with a .308 quite a bit. It ain't the fastest, or the sexiest, but it gets the job done. And for "normal" long range hunting shots, it isn't bad. I just don't find the need to take them that often.
 
Posts: 7580 | Location: Arizona and off grid in CO | Registered: 28 July 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Let's see. On boxes of .22LR, it says something to the effect, "Dangerous up to one and one-half mile." Now, if a 48 gr. bullet at roughly, what is it, 1300 FPS or less is dangerous up to half a mile, why wouldn't either a 150 or 170 gr. bullet at 2000 FPS or more not be deadly at 700 yards? Whether anyone can even see a der at that distance, or is even capable of deliberatly aiming and hitting that deer is irrelevant. It will kill a deer at 700 yards,IF you hit it in the right place. That would be damn good luck for the shooter and even worse luck for the deer.
Paul B.
 
Posts: 2814 | Location: Tucson AZ USA | Registered: 11 May 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of TC1
posted Hide Post
90% of the time? I couldn't do it.

Terry
 
Posts: 6315 | Location: Mississippi | Registered: 18 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Quote:

Hell, he killed a 300-pouind mule deer last year with that rifle - at 700 yards!!






With open sights no less? Estimated range with the naked eye? No wind?
 
Posts: 7580 | Location: Arizona and off grid in CO | Registered: 28 July 2004Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia