08 October 2004, 14:20
AnotherAZWriterRe: Well well! How about that!
Old Sarge:
I agree with the basic premise here. I hunt with a .308 quite a bit. It ain't the fastest, or the sexiest, but it gets the job done. And for "normal" long range hunting shots, it isn't bad. I just don't find the need to take them that often.
11 October 2004, 05:52
Paul BLet's see. On boxes of .22LR, it says something to the effect, "Dangerous up to one and one-half mile." Now, if a 48 gr. bullet at roughly, what is it, 1300 FPS or less is dangerous up to half a mile, why wouldn't either a 150 or 170 gr. bullet at 2000 FPS or more not be deadly at 700 yards? Whether anyone can even see a der at that distance, or is even capable of deliberatly aiming and hitting that deer is irrelevant. It will kill a deer at 700 yards,IF you hit it in the right place. That would be damn good luck for the shooter and even worse luck for the deer.
Paul B.
13 October 2004, 20:26
TC190% of the time? I couldn't do it.
Terry