Looking for feedback on using 7.62x39 rifles for deer and hog hunting under 200 yards. While researching ballistics, I came across this 7.62x39 rifle comparison that suggested some interesting load options, but I'm more interested in field results from hunters.
For those using AK-pattern rifles or bolt-actions like the Ruger American Ranch in this caliber – what bullet weight and type have you found most effective on medium game? The standard 123gr FMJ seems marginal, but are there expanding or soft point loads that consistently deliver clean kills?
Also curious about practical accuracy – with quality ammo, can these platforms reliably hit vitals at 150+ yards? I've heard mixed reports about the Ruger's precision with steel case versus handloads.
Any first-hand experiences comparing terminal performance to traditional .30-30 or .300 BLK would be especially helpful.
my barrel was a 1/9 twist as well. I was getting 1" groups at 100 yards. if you are wanting to wack pigs inside of 75-80 yards, any load in a 7.62x39 will do the trick, I would think.
Posts: 715 | Location: Texas, USA | Registered: 10 March 2017
No personal experience with this calibre but I'll never forget the words of an older American woman who had been shot three times by a maniac with an AK. She was just glad he had not had something decent like a .30-30.
Posts: 5401 | Location: Melbourne, Australia | Registered: 31 March 2009
A friend (PH) used one in Kamchaca, Russia to hunt big Brown Bears. Their guns were confiscated in one of the 'stans, 'jans or 'bans (I forget which one) enroute to the hunt. The only guns available were AK's. This was maybe 3 years ago. They both got big boars.
PA Bear Hunter, NRA Benefactor
Posts: 1696 | Location: Potter County, Pennsylvania | Registered: 22 June 2005
I have a Savage bolt action 7.62x39 with a .308 bore. I have used the 130 gr Hornady bullets as well as 150 gr to fill a few doe tags. All my shots were broadside lung shots . The 130 opens up and puts deer down pretty quick. If I was going to use it on hogs I would opt for the 150 gr bullet. Or another option would be the 130 gr Barnes TSX. They would hold together a penetrate. In a bolt action they will do pretty much anything a 30-30 will do and that is quite a lot in the hands of a good shooter.
Haven't hunted with a 7.62x39, but my .300 Blackout built on an L461 Sako action yields velocities about a hundred or so fps slower. I've been very happy with a 130 grain Hornady out of it at 2175 fps on feral hogs, so I would think that the same bullet from a 7.62x39 at 2300 or so would make an excellent deer getter if kept within moderate ranges.
Posts: 13351 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001
Originally posted by snowman: I have a Savage bolt action 7.62x39 with a .308 bore. I have used the 130 gr Hornady bullets as well as 150 gr to fill a few doe tags. All my shots were broadside lung shots . The 130 opens up and puts deer down pretty quick. If I was going to use it on hogs I would opt for the 150 gr bullet. Or another option would be the 130 gr Barnes TSX. They would hold together a penetrate. In a bolt action they will do pretty much anything a 30-30 will do and that is quite a lot in the hands of a good shooter.
I have heard and read that Ruger used .308” barrels for their 7.62X39s but I didn’t know Savage did that.