THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
.270 Win vs. .280 Rem
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
Question that I think I know the answer to:

I am looking at the reloading data (Barnes in this case) for a 280 vs. a 270 and find that for the same bullet weight with the same barrel length, that the manual suggests 1.0 to 4.0 fewer grains of the same powder in the .280 and gets from 100-200 less fps.
Okay, is this because the 280 is under loaded for fear of damaging a Remington pump or auto? If so and if all other things are more or less equal, since the case is virtually the same size and the pressure with the same bullet weight should be slightly less given there would be less because of less contact area,


Dick Gunn

“You must always stop and roll in the good stuff;
it may not smell this way tomorrow.”

Lucy, a long deceased Basset Hound

"
 
Posts: 180 | Registered: 25 June 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Correct. They're loading to SAAMI, which is lower then the 270 Win. Load them equal to each other and the 280 really shines.


If you think every possible niche has been filled already, thank a wildcatter!
 
Posts: 2287 | Location: CO | Registered: 14 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of chuck375
posted Hide Post
They're both great cartridges and with the advent of 160g spitzers for the 270 there's even less difference.


Regards,

Chuck



"There's a saying in prize fighting, everyone's got a plan until they get hit"

Michael Douglas "The Ghost And The Darkness"
 
Posts: 4796 | Location: Colorado Springs | Registered: 01 January 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Once upon a time, some idiot manufacturer chambered the .280 in a lever gun, so it's specs has been reduced to be safe in this one rife that no one has.
 
Posts: 3034 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 01 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Antelope Sniper:
Once upon a time, some idiot manufacturer chambered the .280 in a lever gun, so it's specs has been reduced to be safe in this one rife that no one has.


?? Really? Does the same hold true for other calibers offered in levers? details please
 
Posts: 551 | Location: utah | Registered: 17 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
SAAMI set pressure standard to the weakest action in which a cartridge was commonly made.

30-30: 42000 psi
.405 Winchester: 35.5k psi
.450 marlin: 48000 psi
300 savage: 53k psi

Here a related coorelarry:
30-40 Craig was a bolt rifle, with only one locking lug. It has a max of 47k psi


Perhaps one of my favorite example is the 8mm Mauser. Saami set the max at 35k psi becaure they are afraid someone will shoot a .323 bullet through a .318 barrel, despite the fact that most 8x57's were rebarreled to .323 in the 20' and 30's.

The 6.5 Sweed, was originally made in a 1896 action is rated at 55k.
30.06, a slightly newer action is rated at 60k


Compare all these to the WSM's. The WSM's are only made in modern, bolt action rifles, and all their pressure maxed are rated in the 63-65k PSI level.
 
Posts: 3034 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 01 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The .280 is a modern cartridge, quite a bit newer than the 30-06. Just curious why the the .280 was subject to the reduced SAAMI pressures.
 
Posts: 551 | Location: utah | Registered: 17 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 44magLeo
posted Hide Post
The 280 is a fine cartridge. When properly loaded it falls just short of the 7 mm Mag, but with less powder and much less recoil. It also holds one more round in the magazine.
Leo


The only way to know if you can do a thing is to do it.
 
Posts: 317 | Location: Lebanon NY | Registered: 08 February 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of cobra
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jon Beutler:
The .280 is a modern cartridge, quite a bit newer than the 30-06. Just curious why the the .280 was subject to the reduced SAAMI pressures.


If memory serves correct, it was initially offered in the Remington 740 and the thinking at the time was for reliable cycling. Nothing more sinister than that.


 
Posts: 8827 | Location: CANADA | Registered: 25 August 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by cobra:
quote:
Originally posted by Jon Beutler:
The .280 is a modern cartridge, quite a bit newer than the 30-06. Just curious why the the .280 was subject to the reduced SAAMI pressures.


If memory serves correct, it was initially offered in the Remington 740 and the thinking at the time was for reliable cycling. Nothing more sinister than that.


Cobra knoweth of what he speak! tu2


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of chuck375
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by chuck375:
They're both great cartridges and with the advent of 160g spitzers for the 270 there's even less difference.


My typo, I meant 165g BTSPs, the new Matrix .277 caliber 165g VLD Hunting bullets have a B.C. of .73 !

http://www.matrixballistics.co...r-rifle-bullets.html


Regards,

Chuck



"There's a saying in prize fighting, everyone's got a plan until they get hit"

Michael Douglas "The Ghost And The Darkness"
 
Posts: 4796 | Location: Colorado Springs | Registered: 01 January 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Way back one gun writer, and I can't remember which one, said it best IMO: "it'd be pointless to trade off your .270 to get a .280 but if you're just starting out, I believe the .280 is a slightly better rig....."


Aim for the exit hole
 
Posts: 4348 | Location: middle tenn | Registered: 09 December 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The .270 and the .280 are fantastic cartridges. In fact they are actually almost as good as the 30-06.
 
Posts: 317 | Location: Texas Panhandle | Registered: 09 July 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
25.06
.270
.280
30.06
8mm-06
338.06

Can you really say there is a bad one in the whole lot?
 
Posts: 3034 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 01 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Antelope Sniper:
25.06
.270
.280
30.06
8mm-06
338.06

Can you really say there is a bad one in the whole lot?


No. But you must include the 9,3x62 Wink

M
 
Posts: 413 | Location: Norway | Registered: 14 May 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by metric:
quote:
Originally posted by Antelope Sniper:
25.06
.270
.280
30.06
8mm-06
338.06

Can you really say there is a bad one in the whole lot?


No. But you must include the 9,3x62 Wink

M


You can't leave out the .35, .375, and .400 Whelen either. Wink
 
Posts: 2242 | Registered: 09 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Its a distinction with out a difference

And more angels can dance on the head of my pin than on yours----- hammering

beer

SSR
 
Posts: 6725 | Location: central Texas | Registered: 05 August 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
You didn't include the 7-08 and the 8x57. The 7-08 is the cartridge the .270 wisht it were.


Aim for the exit hole
 
Posts: 4348 | Location: middle tenn | Registered: 09 December 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of chuck375
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by wasbeeman:
You didn't include the 7-08 and the 8x57. The 7-08 is the cartridge the .270 wisht it were.


The 7mm-08 is just a 270 with a smaller ...


Regards,

Chuck



"There's a saying in prize fighting, everyone's got a plan until they get hit"

Michael Douglas "The Ghost And The Darkness"
 
Posts: 4796 | Location: Colorado Springs | Registered: 01 January 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by chuck375:
quote:
Originally posted by wasbeeman:
You didn't include the 7-08 and the 8x57. The 7-08 is the cartridge the .270 wisht it were.


The 7mm-08 is just a 270 with a smaller ...


animal
 
Posts: 551 | Location: utah | Registered: 17 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Nakihunter
posted Hide Post
The 7mm08 is not as long but thicker! They are equally hard ..... on game I mean!

And they both buck about the same .....

quote:
Originally posted by Jon Beutler:
quote:
Originally posted by chuck375:
quote:
Originally posted by wasbeeman:
You didn't include the 7-08 and the 8x57. The 7-08 is the cartridge the .270 wisht it were.


The 7mm-08 is just a 270 with a smaller ...


animal


"When the wind stops....start rowing. When the wind starts, get the sail up quick."
 
Posts: 11370 | Location: New Zealand | Registered: 02 July 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by wasbeeman:
The 7-08 is the cartridge the .270 wisht it were.


LOL! rotflmo
 
Posts: 119 | Registered: 24 January 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Eastcoaster:
quote:
Originally posted by wasbeeman:
The 7-08 is the cartridge the .270 wisht it were.

itu
LOL! rotflmo


Really your laughing at that? Wow, "easter" you should need to get out more. In my lifetime I have yet come across a situation where the 708 is even remotely applicable. Not even sure what the 708 is for other than Remmy has been steam rolled for the past 100 yrs and keeps trying to play catch up? Not to mention your inability to stay on topic. Its Summer time
 
Posts: 551 | Location: utah | Registered: 17 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Nakihunter:
The 7mm08 is not as long but thicker! They are equally hard ..... on game I mean!

And they both buck about the same .....


Yip, you can fill the tuna can with a 708, but cant touch the bottom. Ever seen one in the mirror? animal
 
Posts: 551 | Location: utah | Registered: 17 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Nakihunter
posted Hide Post
When in the "Tuna can" I canot see much in the mirror - no idea what caliber. Just know it works real good! Big Grin

quote:
Originally posted by Jon Beutler:
quote:
Originally posted by Nakihunter:
The 7mm08 is not as long but thicker! They are equally hard ..... on game I mean!

And they both buck about the same .....


Yip, you can fill the tuna can with a 708, but cant touch the bottom. Ever seen one in the mirror? animal


"When the wind stops....start rowing. When the wind starts, get the sail up quick."
 
Posts: 11370 | Location: New Zealand | Registered: 02 July 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by chuck375:
quote:
Originally posted by chuck375:
They're both great cartridges and with the advent of 160g spitzers for the 270 there's even less difference.


My typo, I meant 165g BTSPs, the new Matrix .277 caliber 165g VLD Hunting bullets have a B.C. of .73 !

http://www.matrixballistics.co...r-rifle-bullets.html


Probably require 1 in 9" twist to shoot those.
 
Posts: 1274 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada.  | Registered: 22 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
[/QUOTE]

In my lifetime I have yet come across a situation where the 708 is even remotely applicable.[/QUOTE]

I think you're the one that needs to get out more. Big Grin


Aim for the exit hole
 
Posts: 4348 | Location: middle tenn | Registered: 09 December 2009Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
Yawn. 7x64. What the pewpew 270 was design to match with anglish bullet size


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 39907 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jon Beutler:
quote:
Originally posted by wasbeeman:

In my lifetime I have yet come across a situation where the 708 is even remotely applicable.


I think you're the one that needs to get out more. Big Grin


And I completely stand by my statement 100%. Especially in a .270 v 280 thread!
 
Posts: 551 | Location: utah | Registered: 17 December 2007Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia