EDIT: Looks as though the Utility patent

#5,826,361 has been supplanted by #6,675,717 B2

(and others)

AS such the fees are most likely moot---

________________________________________________

One can only hope they fail to continually pay the maintenance fees---

"
Attention is drawn to the patents that were issued on October 27, 1998
for which maintenance fees due at 11 years and six months may now be paid.

The patents have patent numbers within the following ranges:

Utility Patents 5,826,271 through 5,829,054

Reissue Patents based on the above identified patents.

No maintenance fees are required for design or plant patents.

Payments of maintenance fees in patents may be submitted electronically
over the Internet at www.uspto.gov.

Click on the "Site Index" link at the
top of the homepage (www.uspto.gov), and then scroll down and click on the
"Maintenance Fees" link for more information.

Payments of maintenance fees in patents not submitted electronically
over the Internet should be mailed to "United States Patent and Trademark
Office, P.O. Box 979070, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000".

Correspondence related to maintenance fees other than payments of
maintenance fees in patents is not to be mailed to P.O. Box 979070,
St. Louis, MO 63197-9000, but must be mailed to "Mail Stop M
Correspondence, Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, P.O.
Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450".

Patent owners must establish small entity status according to 37 CFR
1.27 if they have not done so and if they wish to pay the small entity
amount.

The current amounts of the maintenance fees due at 3 years and six
months, 7 years and six months, and 11 years and six months are set forth
in the most recently amended provisions in 37 CFR 1.20(e)-(g). To obtain
the current maintenance fee amounts, please call the USPTO Contact Center
at (800)-786-9199 or see the current USPTO fee schedule posted on the USPTO
Internet web site. At the top of the USPTO homepage at www.uspto.gov, click
on the "Site Index" link and then scroll down and click on the "Fees,
USPTO" link to find the current USPTO fee schedule."

more legal reading if you like


http://www.websupp.org/data/DOR/919774-DOR.pdf

patent:

http://www.google.com/patents?...#v=onepage&q&f=false

quote:

Originally posted by Warrior:

quote:

http://www.africansportinggazette.com/html/volumes/vol-12-1/shooting.html

Read the second last paragraph in Wieland article ... "Terry Wieland’s On Shooting':-

"So, at long last, everyone is bad-mouthing the short magnums. With the Model 70 gone, at least temporarily, the WSMs have lost their major vehicle. Independent riflemakers are finally telling their clients they really should look at other cartridges, for a variety of reasons."

Everyone must inlude Wieland himself (by deductive reasoning), ... as he is also bringing Kenny Jarrett's critizism in about escalated pressures with the use of long bullets, and he goes on to say that he agrees with him. (At least he is honest enough to admit it, but nevertheless still a critizism).

See this article in the time frame that it was written ... in 2006 ... after Wieland battled 6 years with Winchester to get money out of them. So yeas there must have been a lot of frustration on his part. And remember part of the deal was that Winchester made a settlement deal with him on the condition that he will never write again. So that tell the story .... so he is prevented by way of contract to stop critizing, heh?

Furthermore, Wieland is closing off with a stern message ... by putting the last nail in the coffin, and I quote .... "Since this is the 100th anniversary of the .30-06, look for a ‘rediscovery’ of its virtues and those of its offspring. Or even the original ‘short magnums. The .358 Norma, anyone? Or the .264 Winchester? Why not? They are great cartridges both – with no smoke, mirrors, or salad-bar bullshit."

It is pretty clear to me that Wieland is not bring forth an accolade of praise here.

Warrior

You are confused Warrior just like Gerard said above...
It seems that Gerard had you pegged when he said the you are Pontificus Erroneus in the link below..
http://forums.accuratereloadin...043/m/8471062011/p/1

quote:

Originally posted by Dutch:
JAMISON is bad-mouthing the WSM's?
Really? I would love to see a citation on that!
Thanks in advance, Dutch.

And then there is the post below from another thread warrior started insinuating that Winchester paid Terry Wieland instead of Rick Jamison..
I see now why in the past Gerard has referred to Warrior as Pontificus Erroneus..
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
quote:
Originally posted by Warrior:

quote:
Originally posted by Idaho Sharpshooter:
warrior, you never have said if you have any financial or business connections with wieland. Should we take that as a yes, you're in bed together and using this forum to promote that horse's ass...? Rich
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sharpshooter,

No Terry is not paying me nor am I promoting him. I think Winchester paid him a handsome amount of money in the settlement, and so believe Terry does not actually need to pay anyone to promote him.

Terry might be an idiot in your mind for whatever reason, but certainly not in my mind. I can only judge Terry on his few articles that I have read. Perhaps when I read his books I might also disagree with him on some points, who knows. That is life, but what I read so far seems in the ball-park.

My posting here on AR about Terry's article is purely for entertainment purposes, and we should be big enough to accommodate various opinions here, as we may just not have all the circumstances and facts in front of us. If there is righful critizism, then so be it - I am not fending for him. I am just taking his articles at face value, as if he is an electric Robot that writes about various aspects.

Warrior
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sorry, I mixed the names up.
Wieland published the negative report and not Jamison. My mistake, my apology.

Warrior

quote:

Originally posted by Warrior:
Mac,

Jameson, an Irish company, with an "e", does indeed make a whiskey.
I think we need to buy a bottle and send it to our very own Rasputin.
Then we invite Rick Jamison to have a drink with him.
I think Rasputin would love to interview him to give us the detailed facts.
But beware, I am sure he will put a spin on it.

Warrior

I'd like to have a few shots with all you whacked SA loons some time!! Y'all must be really bored to carry on with this feud over the years ...

quote:

Originally posted by Macifej:

quote:

Originally posted by Warrior:
Mac,

Jameson, an Irish company, with an "e", does indeed make a whiskey.
I think we need to buy a bottle and send it to our very own Rasputin.
Then we invite Rick Jamison to have a drink with him.
I think Rasputin would love to interview him to give us the detailed facts.
But beware, I am sure he will put a spin on it.

Warrior

I'd like to have a few shots with all you whacked SA loons some time!! Y'all must be really bored to carry on with this fued over the years ...

whacked SA loons???????
Not hardly you tight panty wearing, window licking, short bus riding Loser
Besides he started it.. double

WOW - I don't own a WSM or a WSSM!

After all this discussion, don't think I ever will!

quote:

Originally posted by Low Wall:

quote:

Originally posted by Macifej:

quote:

Originally posted by Warrior:
Mac,

Jameson, an Irish company, with an "e", does indeed make a whiskey.
I think we need to buy a bottle and send it to our very own Rasputin.
Then we invite Rick Jamison to have a drink with him.
I think Rasputin would love to interview him to give us the detailed facts.
But beware, I am sure he will put a spin on it.

Warrior

I'd like to have a few shots with all you whacked SA loons some time!! Y'all must be really bored to carry on with this fued over the years ...

whacked SA loons???????
Not hardly you tight panty wearing, window licking, short bus riding Loser
Besides he started it.. double

Like I said ...!!



I'll buy the shots too!!

The Shamwow and Whizzum are steps in the right direction,while the WSSM...blueprints how to piss up a rope.

quote:

Originally posted by RaySendero:
WOW - I don't own a WSM or a WSSM!

After all this discussion, don't think I ever will!

Ray,
I don't own one either..
This is just all in good fun eh?



Well I lied just a little bit as I bought a Rem. 7SAUM last spring only to find that either the scope rings I have are screwed or Remington didn't D&T the scope mounting holes straight.

Posilign and rock on,mechanically centering windage and maxxing ele.

quote:

Originally posted by Busheler:
Posilign and rock on,mechanically centering windage and maxxing ele.

I should have said the holes don't seem to be at 12 o'clock on top of the receiver but off to the left a bit say around 11:55 or so.. Not sure but I don't think the posilign's will help that situation..
A mechanical windage base would certainly help on my Marlin XS7 (ahem ) 7-08 as I have to use max windage on my scope to get on the target at 100 meters.. Looks like you put in a busy day today.. seem to remember you starting with only a few post to start the day with..

Posiligns will grant a 40MOA windage correction at 100yds,with opposed .020" eccentrics.

ANYTHING to avoid windage adjustable bases...there is nothing shittier.

quote:

Originally posted by Busheler:
Posiligns will grant a 40MOA windage correction at 100yds,with opposed .020" eccentrics.

ANYTHING to avoid windage adjustable bases...there is nothing shittier.

You are saying that I can mount the split inserts with the splits vertically ?
I have never used them is why I ask but was wondering if that was possible ..

You can index the eccentrics anywhere as per your whim,within their (obvious) 360 degree housing. +.020" on one side,-.020" opposite...mechanically center the windage and roll the balance to the elevation.

Nothing to it.

Thanks,
I'll see if the have any in town and pick up a bushing set also this weekend..

They are a great way to fly and noone HATES Burris more than I.

Terry Wieland has some real good books out. I've read one and stared on another.

I couldn't second that emotion.

larrys been drinking again...

Senility is one of the better plights to observe,especially when coupled with Retardation.

'shooter is rather a comedic marvel,for those simplistic reasons.