THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Mountain Rifle Choice
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of scottfromdallas
posted
These are both a little under 40" in length and weigh 6.5 lbs.

Question:
If you were going to buy a 7mm-08 and were limited to the choices below, what would you choose?

Choices:
Remington 7 CDL
Winchester Featherweight Compact

 



 
Posts: 1941 | Location: Texas | Registered: 19 July 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of cobra
posted Hide Post
I've got two Savage Sierras and a Mannlicher carbine from Remington's custom shop in that calibre and I wouldn't trade any of them. Of the choices you have I would go with the Winchester Featherweight.


 
Posts: 8827 | Location: CANADA | Registered: 25 August 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I would not choose either, my choice last year was to buy a beater Remmy 600 Mohawk,, strip it foe the action and begin to accumulate parts.

I bought a Remmy Mtn. Rifle sts. factory tube in 7-08.

I bought a sts triggerguard from Dave Kiff's outfit.

I bought a spare bolt and trigger and some other parts from a guy so I can have an "emerg." kit on backpack trips where this is my sole rifle.

I just found and bought a Brown Precision stocl made specifically for this action and have bolted it all together...a VERY light and nicely balanced rig, almost a pound and a half lighter than any of my custom light .270Win, .280Rem or other standard chamberings built on P-64, HVA and Brno 21 actions.

This, to me, is an easy and very effective way to go and with either Talley QRs or, if it will fit, the Leupy QR 1-piece base and low rings x 2 and a light scope x2, I will have a superb high country rifle for most BC game.
 
Posts: 2366 | Location: "Land OF Shining Mountains"- British Columbia, Canada | Registered: 20 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of raybass
posted Hide Post
Neither to be honest, Rem. 700 SS Mountain Rifle in the caliber of choice, add TI stock, Talley Lightweights and a lightweight scope.


Straight shootin to ya
 
Posts: 531 | Location: Montgomery, Texas | Registered: 11 September 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Blacktailer
posted Hide Post
Isn't the Winchester Compact made with short LOP for smaller shooters? Unless you are on the small side it may not fit you.


Have gun- Will travel
The value of a trophy is computed directly in terms of personal investment in its acquisition. Robert Ruark
 
Posts: 3831 | Location: Cave Creek, AZ | Registered: 09 August 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Hey Bwana, Thats two real nice choices. I doubt you could go wrong with either one. tu2
 
Posts: 9920 | Location: Carolinas, USA | Registered: 22 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of scottfromdallas
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Blacktailer:
Isn't the Winchester Compact made with short LOP for smaller shooters? Unless you are on the small side it may not fit you.


It's a 1/2" difference in LOP just like the RCMS. I doubt I would even notice.



 
Posts: 1941 | Location: Texas | Registered: 19 July 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by raybass:
Neither to be honest, Rem. 700 SS Mountain Rifle in the caliber of choice, add TI stock, Talley Lightweights and a lightweight scope.


and if just happens to be chambered in .280 Remington......all the better.


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I voted for the Winny...I have one in .308 Winchester in the CRF Compact Classic and it's a dandy rifle.
 
Posts: 4115 | Location: Pa. | Registered: 21 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of scottfromdallas
posted Hide Post
Whinny seems to be running away with it. Maybe I'll go with the standard size FW. Love the unique stock design of the FW.



 
Posts: 1941 | Location: Texas | Registered: 19 July 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by scottfromdallas:
Whinny seems to be running away with it. Maybe I'll go with the standard size FW. Love the unique stock design of the FW.

I really like the M-70 FWT rifles.....I have four of them.....but in all fairness one needs to know that they aren't as much of a featherweight as they might seem....they do tend to be a heavy featherweight.....if weight is real important....look elsewhere.


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of scottfromdallas
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by vapodog:
quote:
Originally posted by scottfromdallas:
Whinny seems to be running away with it. Maybe I'll go with the standard size FW. Love the unique stock design of the FW.

I really like the M-70 FWT rifles.....I have four of them.....but in all fairness one needs to know that they aren't as much of a featherweight as they might seem....they do tend to be a heavy featherweight.....if weight is real important....look elsewhere.


Thanks Vapo my friend. They list them at 6 3/4lbs. I'll strap a lightweight scope on the sucker and be happy with a sub 8lb rifle. I recently bought a CZ 550 FS in 6.5x55 and it weighs a little over 8lbs sans scope. Love the rifle for the place I recently bought in East Texas (stand hunting). If I head out West (maybe Western NE Big Grin ) and actually have to hoof it, I want a lighter rifle.



 
Posts: 1941 | Location: Texas | Registered: 19 July 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I would have to handle both and see which one feels the best to me.

LOP, how it comes to shoulder, point naturally, overall handling impression.
 
Posts: 2034 | Location: Black Mining Hills of Dakota | Registered: 22 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
quote:
'll strap a lightweight scope on the sucker and be happy with a sub 8lb rifle.

May I suggest Talley one piece (bases and rings) aluminum mounts and a Leupold 3-9 X 33 ultralite scope.....You'll be well under 8 pounds....and a sharp looker to boot!


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by vapodog:
...if weight is real important....look elsewhere.
Like a M7 in 308Win. tu2 BOOM
 
Posts: 9920 | Location: Carolinas, USA | Registered: 22 April 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia