THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Case size versus barrel length
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
I've always thought it's worth while matching case size to barrel length when choosing a chambering for a particular rifle. I see Mannlicher style full stock rifles with 20" barrels offered in 30-06 and 270 chambering and I think what's the point? A 308W based cartridge or an 8x57 based cartridge would give about the same velocity, the faster burn rate powders preferred by these smaller cases would have a more complete burn rate in a 20" barrel than the medium and slower burn rate powders preferred in the larger capacity cases, and you are burning less powder for similar velocity and not blowing it out the end of the barrel. For the same reasons I think the 30-06 capacity cartridges are better suited to minimum 22" to 24" barrels and larger magnum capacity cartridges are better suited to 24" barrels or longer to take advantage of a more complete burn of their preferred powders and give the full increase in velocity.

What are other peoples thoughts and experiences?
 
Posts: 193 | Location: Oz | Registered: 22 July 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
the shorter barrels still make better use of the slower powders.
you just end up with a higher muzzle pressure.

barrel lengths are kind of subjective and people use them for various reasons.
I'm not a fan of 20" barrels on a 308 but I'm okay with them on the larger diameter cases like the 358 win.
the gas volume to bore ratio just works out better.
the shorter barrels sure are a lot easier to carry through the thick stuff or over long distances though.
 
Posts: 5002 | Location: soda springs,id | Registered: 02 April 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
WinkA good ,many years ago I hunted with a friend who used a Mod 760, 30-06 with an 18" barrel. It was light to carry and deadly.
tu2 This guy was the best athletic hunter I've ever seen and the 18" barrel always got game.
holycowroger beer


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Jiri
posted Hide Post
Just little test in QuickLoad:

.308 Winchester, Norma Oryx 200 gr
Calculated for 60k PSI limit, 115 % compressed load limit, first 12 results, 25" barrel:
53 loads produced a Loading Ratio below user-defined minimum of 85%. These powders have been skipped.
Powder type          Filling/Loading Ratio  Charge    Charge   Vel. Prop.Burnt P max  P muzz  B_Time
                                      %     Grains    Gramm   fps     %       psi     psi    ms
---------------------------------  -----------------------------------------------------------------
ReloadSwiss RS 60                  106,5     46,6     3,02    2652   100,0    60000    7400   1,235  ! Near Maximum !
Alliant Reloder-17                 105,7     46,3     3,00    2636   100,0    60000    7365   1,240  ! Near Maximum !
Elcho 17                           105,7     46,3     3,00    2636   100,0    60000    7365   1,240  ! Near Maximum !
ReloadSwiss RS 70                  109,1     48,5     3,14    2627    99,1    60000    7717   1,240  ! Near Maximum !
Somchem S365                       114,0     47,3     3,07    2624   100,0    60000    7011   1,245  ! Near Maximum !
ReloadSwiss RS 62                  108,6     47,5     3,08    2613    99,7    60000    7311   1,255  ! Near Maximum !
PB Clermont PCL 511                107,1     47,6     3,09    2596    98,4    60000    7465   1,253  ! Near Maximum !
Ramshot Hunter                     110,7     47,7     3,09    2595    98,4    60000    7454   1,253  ! Near Maximum !
Norma MRP                          115,0     50,1     3,25    2593    96,5    55392    8065   1,281  ! Near Maximum !
Hodgdon H414                       104,6     46,2     2,99    2587    97,7    60000    7396   1,257  ! Near Maximum !
Winchester 760                     104,6     46,2     2,99    2587    97,7    60000    7396   1,257  ! Near Maximum !
Norma URP                          110,4     45,6     2,95    2587    99,5    60000    7201   1,258  ! Near Maximum !
 
Posts: 2123 | Location: Czech Republic | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Jiri
posted Hide Post
.308 Winchester, Norma Oryx 200 gr
Calculated for 60k PSI, 20" barrel:

53 loads produced a Loading Ratio below user-defined minimum of 85%. These powders have been skipped.
Powder type          Filling/Loading Ratio  Charge    Charge   Vel. Prop.Burnt P max  P muzz  B_Time
                                      %     Grains    Gramm   fps     %       psi     psi    ms
---------------------------------  -----------------------------------------------------------------
ReloadSwiss RS 60                  106,5     46,6     3,02    2538   100,0    60000    9804   1,074  ! Near Maximum !
Alliant Reloder-17                 105,7     46,3     3,00    2523    99,8    60000    9731   1,079  ! Near Maximum !
Elcho 17                           105,7     46,3     3,00    2523    99,8    60000    9731   1,079  ! Near Maximum !
Somchem S365                       114,0     47,3     3,07    2515   100,0    60000    9314   1,083  ! Near Maximum !
ReloadSwiss RS 70                  109,1     48,5     3,14    2509    98,0    60000   10052   1,078  ! Near Maximum !
ReloadSwiss RS 62                  108,6     47,5     3,08    2500    99,0    60000    9607   1,092  ! Near Maximum !
PB Clermont PCL 511                107,1     47,6     3,09    2481    97,2    60000    9694   1,089  ! Near Maximum !
Ramshot Hunter                     110,7     47,7     3,09    2480    97,2    60000    9680   1,089  ! Near Maximum !
Norma URP                          110,4     45,6     2,95    2475    98,7    60000    9420   1,094  ! Near Maximum !
Bofors RP19 ~approximation         110,5     45,6     2,95    2475    98,7    60000    9417   1,094  ! Near Maximum !
Accurate 4350                      109,9     45,9     2,97    2475    98,8    60000    9414   1,106  ! Near Maximum !
Winchester 760                     104,6     46,2     2,99    2473    96,4    60000    9604   1,093  ! Near Maximum !
 
Posts: 2123 | Location: Czech Republic | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Jiri
posted Hide Post
The same for 15" barrel:

53 loads produced a Loading Ratio below user-defined minimum of 85%. These powders have been skipped.
Powder type          Filling/Loading Ratio  Charge    Charge   Vel. Prop.Burnt P max  P muzz  B_Time
                                      %     Grains    Gramm   fps     %       psi     psi    ms
---------------------------------  -----------------------------------------------------------------
ReloadSwiss RS 60                  106,5     46,6     3,02    2374    99,4    60000   14005   0,905  ! Near Maximum !
Alliant Reloder-17                 105,7     46,3     3,00    2360    98,7    60000   13784   0,908  ! Near Maximum !
Elcho 17                           105,7     46,3     3,00    2360    98,7    60000   13784   0,908  ! Near Maximum !
Somchem S365                       114,0     47,3     3,07    2358    99,6    60000   13384   0,912  ! Near Maximum !
ReloadSwiss RS 70                  109,1     48,5     3,14    2341    95,6    60000   13984   0,907  ! Near Maximum !
ReloadSwiss RS 62                  108,6     47,5     3,08    2338    97,3    60000   13532   0,920  ! Near Maximum !
PB Clermont PCL 511                107,1     47,6     3,09    2318    94,8    60000   13459   0,915  ! Near Maximum !
Ramshot Hunter                     110,7     47,7     3,09    2317    94,8    60000   13439   0,915  ! Near Maximum !
Norma URP                          110,4     45,6     2,95    2316    96,9    60000   13200   0,920  ! Near Maximum !
Bofors RP19 ~approximation         110,5     45,6     2,95    2315    96,9    60000   13196   0,920  ! Near Maximum !
Accurate 4350                      109,9     45,9     2,97    2315    96,9    60000   13246   0,932  ! Near Maximum !
Vihtavuori N550                    107,1     45,7     2,96    2312    96,7    60000   13304   0,927  ! Near Maximum !


BTW ReloadSwiss RS 60, RL-17 and Eicho 17 are the same powder, only "lot to lot" difference.
 
Posts: 2123 | Location: Czech Republic | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Similar tests have been done using short barreled handguns. The intuitive part that faster powders would yield faster velocities than slower powders turned out to be incorrect. Max charges of both fast and slow yielded high velocities. The test I recall most, primarily because it directly affected my carry firearm was loading for a 357 in a 2.5" barrel revolver.
 
Posts: 1421 | Location: WA St, USA | Registered: 28 August 2016Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Lots of things are going on here and the varibles are many that create the proper answer, and to what extent for instance a 30-06 with an 18 inch barrel is in effect a .308 Win. A 270 loses almost no velocity with 130 and 150 gr. bullets for whatever reason..I suspect in all cases it depends on the powder you use..H4831 in the 06 and 270 losses very little FPS and in many cases none at all..The old faster powder holds velocity up their is just not true in any since of the word..it doesn't in all cases, but will in some calibers of lesser powder space it seems..

One thing Im sure of is take all the specs and yakit yack by experts out there and grab your chronograph, that will be the only thing that tells the facts plain and simple..Its amazing how that machine voids conversation in most cases when it comes to gun gab..and the printed page..

If you ever doubt that look at the difference in max loads from one reloading book to another and they are are quoted on these blogs daily..

Todays chronograpeh are to had for a hundred dollars or less and most are accurate enough to get one by.

All that said I still concur that as a general rule a long barrel gets one more velocity most of the time, but one can work with powders and bullets and play with all the figures out there.


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42210 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Jiri, can you run the same numbers with a 30-06 example?

Bartche, no arguments here, a smaller lighter gun is way more handy to carry all day and over rough terrain. On the flip side, when you are fatigued after a long hunt or when your heart is pumping and you're breathing heavy after a chase, a heavier gun is way more steady on the target than a short light one when it comes to the crunch. When sitting in camp contemplating whether to lug the double through the bush all day or leave it behind in favour of the light weight lever gun, the decision to carry the heavier double always paid off. I don't mind admitting that I can be a bit off with the lever gun when fatigue kicks in......but back to the topic at hand, would your athletic friend have done as well with a 308 in the chamber of that 18" barrel and would the velocity have been within 50 fps or less?
 
Posts: 193 | Location: Oz | Registered: 22 July 2011Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Jiri
posted Hide Post
Sorry, previous data was calculated for 200 gr Oryx, not 165 gr (already corrected above).

Now the same, but .30-06, also 60k PSI (max pressure).

25"

75 loads produced a Loading Ratio below user-defined minimum of 85%. These powders have been skipped.
Powder type          Filling/Loading Ratio  Charge    Charge   Vel. Prop.Burnt P max  P muzz  B_Time
                                      %     Grains    Gramm   fps     %       psi     psi    ms
---------------------------------  -----------------------------------------------------------------
Norma MRP                          108,4     60,2     3,90    2790    99,4    60000    9864   1,230  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Vihtavuori N560                    109,9     59,7     3,87    2769    96,8    60000    9962   1,231  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
ReloadSwiss RS 60                   98,1     54,8     3,55    2761   100,0    60000    8726   1,228  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Accurate MAGPRO                    110,3     62,4     4,04    2760    95,3    60000    9979   1,236  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
ReloadSwiss RS 70                  100,9     57,2     3,71    2758   100,0    60000    9172   1,228  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Raufoss RA15                       110,3     59,3     3,84    2755    98,5    60000    9650   1,236  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Alliant Reloder-22                 110,3     59,3     3,84    2755    98,5    60000    9650   1,236  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Bofors RP5/NP ~approximation       110,3     59,3     3,84    2755    98,5    60000    9650   1,236  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Winchester WXR                     113,2     59,6     3,86    2754    98,4    60000    9658   1,237  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Bofors RP15                        113,2     59,6     3,86    2754    98,4    60000    9658   1,237  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
SNPE Vectan SP 12                  112,1     63,6     4,12    2750    97,5    60000    9758   1,226  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
PB Clermont PCL 517                112,2     63,7     4,13    2749    97,4    60000    9769   1,226  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!


20"

75 loads produced a Loading Ratio below user-defined minimum of 85%. These powders have been skipped.
Powder type          Filling/Loading Ratio  Charge    Charge   Vel. Prop.Burnt P max  P muzz  B_Time
                                      %     Grains    Gramm   fps     %       psi     psi    ms
---------------------------------  -----------------------------------------------------------------
Norma MRP                          108,4     60,2     3,90    2648    98,3    60000   12891   1,077  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
ReloadSwiss RS 60                   98,1     54,8     3,55    2633   100,0    60000   11575   1,074  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Vihtavuori N560                    109,9     59,7     3,87    2625    94,9    60000   12873   1,077  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
ReloadSwiss RS 70                  100,9     57,2     3,71    2623    99,7    60000   12120   1,074  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Accurate MAGPRO                    110,3     62,4     4,04    2615    93,1    60000   12856   1,081  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Raufoss RA15                       110,3     59,3     3,84    2615    97,0    60000   12538   1,081  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Alliant Reloder-22                 110,3     59,3     3,84    2615    97,0    60000   12538   1,081  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Bofors RP5/NP ~approximation       110,3     59,3     3,84    2615    97,0    60000   12538   1,081  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Winchester WXR                     113,2     59,6     3,86    2613    96,8    60000   12541   1,081  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Bofors RP15                        113,2     59,6     3,86    2613    96,8    60000   12541   1,081  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Alliant Reloder-17                  97,2     54,2     3,51    2613   100,0    60000   11503   1,081  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Elcho 17                            97,2     54,2     3,51    2613   100,0    60000   11503   1,081  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!


15"

75 loads produced a Loading Ratio below user-defined minimum of 85%. These powders have been skipped.
Powder type          Filling/Loading Ratio  Charge    Charge   Vel. Prop.Burnt P max  P muzz  B_Time
                                      %     Grains    Gramm   fps     %       psi     psi    ms
---------------------------------  -----------------------------------------------------------------
ReloadSwiss RS 60                   98,1     54,8     3,55    2444   100,0    60000   16718   0,910  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Norma MRP                          108,4     60,2     3,90    2442    95,6    60000   17970   0,913  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
ReloadSwiss RS 70                  100,9     57,2     3,71    2427    98,0    60000   17126   0,909  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Elcho 17                            97,2     54,2     3,51    2424    99,7    60000   16546   0,915  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Alliant Reloder-17                  97,2     54,2     3,51    2424    99,7    60000   16546   0,915  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Vihtavuori N560                    109,9     59,7     3,87    2420    91,3    60000   17712   0,912  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Alliant Reloder-22                 110,3     59,3     3,84    2414    94,0    60000   17374   0,915  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Bofors RP5/NP ~approximation       110,3     59,3     3,84    2414    94,0    60000   17374   0,915  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Raufoss RA15                       110,3     59,3     3,84    2414    94,0    60000   17374   0,915  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Bofors RP15                        113,2     59,6     3,86    2412    93,8    60000   17366   0,916  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Winchester WXR                     113,2     59,6     3,86    2412    93,8    60000   17366   0,916  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Accurate MAGPRO                    110,3     62,4     4,04    2411    89,2    60000   17632   0,915  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
 
Posts: 2123 | Location: Czech Republic | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Jiri
posted Hide Post
Just for fun, 30" .30-06:

75 loads produced a Loading Ratio below user-defined minimum of 85%. These powders have been skipped.
Powder type          Filling/Loading Ratio  Charge    Charge   Vel. Prop.Burnt P max  P muzz  B_Time
                                      %     Grains    Gramm   fps     %       psi     psi    ms
---------------------------------  -----------------------------------------------------------------
Norma MRP                          108,4     60,2     3,90    2897    99,9    60000    7886   1,376  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Vihtavuori N560                    109,9     59,7     3,87    2878    98,0    60000    8043   1,379  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Accurate MAGPRO                    110,3     62,4     4,04    2869    96,7    60000    8078   1,383  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Alliant Reloder-22                 110,3     59,3     3,84    2861    99,3    60000    7755   1,384  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Raufoss RA15                       110,3     59,3     3,84    2861    99,3    60000    7755   1,384  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Bofors RP5/NP ~approximation       110,3     59,3     3,84    2861    99,3    60000    7755   1,384  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Winchester WXR                     113,2     59,6     3,86    2860    99,2    60000    7766   1,385  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Bofors RP15                        113,2     59,6     3,86    2860    99,2    60000    7766   1,385  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
ReloadSwiss RS 70                  100,9     57,2     3,71    2858   100,0    60000    7284   1,377  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
SNPE Vectan SP 12                  112,1     63,6     4,12    2857    98,6    60000    7861   1,375  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
PB Clermont PCL 517                112,2     63,7     4,13    2857    98,5    60000    7873   1,375  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
ReloadSwiss RS 60                   98,1     54,8     3,55    2857   100,0    60000    6935   1,376  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
 
Posts: 2123 | Location: Czech Republic | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of buckeyeshooter
posted Hide Post
the handling is more important than velocity. I have a .308 Winchester in 26 inch barrel and one in 18.5 in a Remington 600. If I am hunting timber. I take the 600, on a stand I take the 26 inch Sendaro.
I also have a 600 in 350 Remington Magnum, very hard to beat as a bear gun in my book. Again, I will take the 250 to 310 grain bullet weight over speed any day on a bear at 100 yards or less.
 
Posts: 5723 | Location: Ohio | Registered: 02 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Jiri, interesting, it looks like the larger case still gives 100 to 130 fps increase in velocity in a 20" barrel so still worth chambering according to your numbers. Thanks for taking the time to post your info.


buckeye, I agree that a handy rifle is good along with balance and fit when you throw it to your shoulder. I've included velocity in the equation purely for terminal bullet performance and achieving maximum expansion and or penetration in game. For me being able to anchor game quickly and humanely is the most important thing, everything else comes second.
 
Posts: 193 | Location: Oz | Registered: 22 July 2011Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Jiri
posted Hide Post
Rhodes:

Something more for you . . .
.300 WSM, 60k PSI, 20"

105 loads produced a Loading Ratio below user-defined minimum of 85%. These powders have been skipped.
Powder type          Filling/Loading Ratio  Charge    Charge   Vel. Prop.Burnt P max  P muzz  B_Time
                                      %     Grains    Gramm   fps     %       psi     psi    ms
---------------------------------  -----------------------------------------------------------------
Vihtavuori N570                    113,3     76,6     4,96    2799    92,9    60000   15866   1,092  ! Near Maximum !
Alliant Reloder-33                 113,5     79,9     5,18    2783    93,1    60000   15666   1,092  ! Near Maximum !
Alliant Reloder-25                 110,0     70,1     4,54    2768   100,0    60000   13934   1,095  ! Near Maximum !
Norma MRP 2                        112,6     72,1     4,67    2767    97,8    60000   14708   1,104  ! Near Maximum !
Bofors RP30                        112,6     72,1     4,67    2767    97,8    60000   14708   1,104  ! Near Maximum !
Norma MRP                          101,9     68,1     4,42    2763    99,3    60000   14367   1,104  ! Near Maximum !
PB Clermont PCL 517                106,5     72,9     4,72    2753    97,6    60000   14390   1,091  ! Near Maximum !
SNPE Vectan SP 12                  106,4     72,8     4,71    2752    97,7    60000   14370   1,091  ! Near Maximum !
Vihtavuori N560                    103,6     67,8     4,40    2751    96,8    60000   14542   1,101  ! Near Maximum !
ReloadSwiss RS 80                  115,0     79,9     5,18    2742    93,0    57490   15469   1,111  ! Near Maximum !
Accurate MAGPRO                    103,9     70,8     4,59    2742    95,2    60000   14589   1,106  ! Near Maximum !
ReloadSwiss RS 70                   95,1     64,9     4,21    2740   100,0    60000   13410   1,097  ! Near Maximum !


.300 Win Mag (Norma cases), 60k PSI, 20"

139 loads produced a Loading Ratio below user-defined minimum of 85%. These powders have been skipped.
Powder type          Filling/Loading Ratio  Charge    Charge   Vel. Prop.Burnt P max  P muzz  B_Time
                                      %     Grains    Gramm   fps     %       psi     psi    ms
---------------------------------  -----------------------------------------------------------------
ADI AR 2218                        109,0     90,8     5,89    2862    94,9    60000   19240   1,088  ! Near Maximum !
Vihtavuori N570                    105,2     86,8     5,62    2854    95,0    60000   18858   1,110  ! Near Maximum !
ReloadSwiss RS 80                  108,4     92,0     5,96    2851    96,1    60000   18682   1,106  ! Near Maximum !
Alliant Reloder-33                 105,7     90,8     5,89    2844    95,4    60000   18659   1,110  ! Near Maximum !
Norma 217                          111,6     85,9     5,57    2843    99,9    60000   17668   1,123  ! Near Maximum !
ADI AR 2225                        108,9     85,6     5,55    2843   100,0    60000   17127   1,102  ! Near Maximum !
Hodgdon Retumbo                    108,9     85,6     5,55    2843   100,0    60000   17127   1,102  ! Near Maximum !
Hodgdon H870                       111,6     90,2     5,84    2840    96,8    60000   18365   1,112  ! Near Maximum !
PB Clermont PCL 517                 99,2     82,8     5,36    2806    98,9    60000   16968   1,107  ! Near Maximum !
SNPE Vectan SP 12                   99,0     82,7     5,36    2805    98,9    60000   16937   1,107  ! Near Maximum !
Alliant Reloder-25                 101,9     79,3     5,14    2805   100,0    60000   16116   1,110  ! Near Maximum !
Norma MRP 2                        104,1     81,4     5,28    2802    98,8    60000   17205   1,123  ! Near Maximum !


You can see, there are still loads with 100 % powder burned and good velocity.

Jiri
 
Posts: 2123 | Location: Czech Republic | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thanks Jiri, the magnums still have a hell of an edge from the shorter barrel going by your numbers.
 
Posts: 193 | Location: Oz | Registered: 22 July 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Rhodes:
Jiri, can you run the same numbers with a 30-06 example?

Bartche, no arguments here, a smaller lighter gun is way more handy to carry all day and over rough terrain.
.but back to the topic at hand, would your athletic friend have done as well with a 308 in the chamber of that 18" barrel

beerKnowing him, the answer is yes. The results would have been dead game if he were using an old slide action .30 or 35 Rem. or Ray's 250-3000.
Roll EyesI myself used to do rather good with a 18" barreled 6.5 Carcano.
tu2 To me the real disadvantage of the short barreled is the short sight radius when using open sights. With
practice, however, even this draw back can be minimized, and was. Winkroger beer


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Jiri
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Rhodes:
Thanks Jiri, the magnums still have a hell of an edge from the shorter barrel going by your numbers.


Yes, but look at muzzle pressure too.
Jiri
 
Posts: 2123 | Location: Czech Republic | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Holy crap....hadn't noticed that.

Heavy barrel needed to tame recoil AND pressure

.
 
Posts: 193 | Location: Oz | Registered: 22 July 2011Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of wildcat junkie
posted Hide Post
I refer 24" or longer barrels for balance.


GOOGLE HOTLINK FIX FOR BLOCKED PHOTOBUCKET IMAGES https://chrome.google.com/webs...inkfix=1516144253810
 
Posts: 2440 | Location: Northern New York, WAY NORTH | Registered: 04 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Not trolling, but what is the problem with relatively high muzzle pressure. Seems it would translate as increased noise, and make a brake more effective.

The QL charts demonstrate slow powders and higher case capacities both result in higher velocities at all barrel lengths.

Is there some other negative to higher muzzle residual pressure?
 
Posts: 670 | Location: Dover-Foxcroft, ME | Registered: 25 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Thanks, Alf. Hadn't considered shot-shot variation as result of higher muzzle pressure.

Is there a specific muzzle pressure (or range) that correlates with least shot-shot velocity variation? Eg., .308 Win optimal length 20" w/_____ muzzle pressure, or .300 Win optimal length 24" w/_____ muzzle pressure?
 
Posts: 670 | Location: Dover-Foxcroft, ME | Registered: 25 May 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia