THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Should i Buy it ?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
Found a cool 270 today,
Its a side safety FN one of my favorite actions,
Its been restocked in a the fashion of the late 50s and early 60s with the exaggerated roll over cheek piece and big pistol grip and little wooden inlays.
Its a good rifle even with the ugly stock, and the price is 525.00.
The negative is the weight, it is a heavy barreld action to start with , and the stock is a ton more wood than needed.
But i have a very good lightweight 270 now, in a Husqvarna, witch is great but has a short barrel.
For still hunting mule deer this old belgian rifle would be excellent. i have a couple stocks here that would fit it, and a good stock guy could reshape the one it has now.
What do you think ? ...tj3006
 
Posts: 605 | Location: OR | Registered: 28 March 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Of course you should buy it. If you try to steal it, you might get caught and go to jail.
 
Posts: 3811 | Location: san angelo tx | Registered: 18 November 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I wouldn't with a roll over stock and the heavy 1950s rifles sucked.. Smiler I could buy a better rifle for that or perhaps just a little more..I bought a pre 64 fwt. a while back for just a little more. ya gotta shop.


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42309 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of sambarman338
posted Hide Post
I don't suppose you could rework the stock, removing at least the roll-over? On the other hand, there was a philosophy behind that rollover beyond the funky look: it made for a high, gently rounded comb that might be easier on cheekbones, while removing a little wood on the r/h side. You never know, maybe these stocks will themselves become collectable some day - and it comes with a genuine FN Mauser sporter action.
 
Posts: 5188 | Location: Melbourne, Australia | Registered: 31 March 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
I wouldn't with a roll over stock and the heavy 1950s rifles sucked


I agree ray I prefer a much slimmer stock.
 
Posts: 19835 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
pretty sound reasoning gentelmen.
I do have a couple stocks here that fit that action, and the minute i dropped this action into one of them i would probably remember why i replaced them the 1st time around.
Ray is your Featherweight an 06 or a .270 ?
I have had a few over the years.a pre 64 featherweight 06 would be great , one sombody put a pad on so its not original And i can afford it.
A JC higgins Model 50 would be good to in 06 or 270...
 
Posts: 605 | Location: OR | Registered: 28 March 2012Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of z1r
posted Hide Post
Make an offer. I recently bought the same rifle only the barreled action had been relocated to a Parker Hale stock. The stock sux but the barreled action doesn't. It'll be restocked, and yes, it isn't gonna be a light weight, but then again, it makes for steady, good shooting long range rifle.

I snagged it for about $200 less than they're asking for the one you spotted. They were asking a good bit more.




Aut vincere aut mori
 
Posts: 4869 | Location: Lakewood, CO | Registered: 07 February 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia