THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Medium Bore Rifles    a stupid question about 9.3x62 and 30-06

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
a stupid question about 9.3x62 and 30-06
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
Are these the same calibers?
 
Posts: 117 | Registered: 07 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
No. The 30cal.and is 7.62 metric and the 9.3 metric is 366 cal. The cases are close but not the same
 
Posts: 148 | Location: behind a cabbage plant on a hot August Day | Registered: 29 October 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Significantly different bullet weights too. Typically the 30.06 will shoot 165 and 180 grain bullets (you can go up to 220 grains and down to 110 grains). The 9.3x 62 will typically shoot 250 to 286 grain bullets at a lower velocity. Still gets the job done though. The 9.3 is a fine caliber!
Peter.


Be without fear in the face of your enemies. Be brave and upright, that God may love thee. Speak the truth always, even if it leads to your death. Safeguard the helpless and do no wrong;
 
Posts: 10515 | Location: Jacksonville, Florida | Registered: 09 January 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Bullet diameters:

.277 inches = 6.82mm (.270 Win, .270 Wby)
.284 = 7mm (.280 Rem, 7mm Rem Mag)
.308 = 7.62mm (.30-06, .308 Win, 300 WM)
.338 = 8.33mm (.338-06, .338 Win Mag)
.366 = 9.3mm (9.3X62, 9.3X64)
 
Posts: 265 | Registered: 11 January 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
http://www.accuratepowder.com/loaddata_caliber_rifle_standard.htm

This gives you a good idea as to Bullet dia. Seems as though AA has a 257 typo.
 
Posts: 1205 | Location: Minnesota | Registered: 07 February 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
some areas of Africa will allow a 9.3 x 62 for dangerous game...as in Cape Buffalo..... would you try that with an '06?

archdlx

mine should be pounding 250 AB's downrange soon!
 
Posts: 100 | Location: Edmonton & Wabasca, Alberta, Canada | Registered: 29 December 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post




-Bob F.
 
Posts: 3485 | Location: Houston, Texas | Registered: 22 February 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
ahh! a stupid question! thumb I've asked a few of them myself, my belief is if you don't ask you don't receive. 2 different beasts they are.
 
Posts: 1019 | Location: foothills of the Brooks Range | Registered: 01 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tieoneon:
Are these the same calibers?

One should compare .35 Whelen and 9,3x62. The Whelen has couple of real disadvantages: lack of factory rifles with virtues of CZ550 and factory loaded ammo with premium slugs of heavier weight. The 250gr Core Lockt just can't morph into premium Norma Oryx slug of 285 grains. I can think of couple Whelen chambered rifles Remington 'Classic' and good ole' Ruger 77 with tang safety. These in minty condition are probably elevated into collector status.
The difference between two cartridges loaded with slugs of medium weight is about 50m/s in favor of the German round.
 
Posts: 1126 | Registered: 03 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 900 SS
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Paolo9,5x73:
quote:
Originally posted by tieoneon:
Are these the same calibers?

One should compare .35 Whelen and 9,3x62. The Whelen has couple of real disadvantages: lack of factory rifles with virtues of CZ550 and factory loaded ammo with premium slugs of heavier weight. The 250gr Core Lockt just can't morph into premium Norma Oryx slug of 285 grains. I can think of couple Whelen chambered rifles Remington 'Classic' and good ole' Ruger 77 with tang safety. These in minty condition are probably elevated into collector status.
The difference between two cartridges loaded with slugs of medium weight is about 50m/s in favor of the German round.


Well. The 9,3x62 also has a few disatvantages if you compare it to the 9,3x64,but then the 375 H&H is even better. Not to mention the .416's
 
Posts: 408 | Location: Bardu, Norway | Registered: 25 August 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I would hunt Buffalo with a 30-06 and a good stout bullet if I had nothing else, but the 9.3x62 is much, much better any way you cut it..

The 9.3x62 is better compared to the .375 H&H. The 9.3x62, in a long 26 or 27 inch tube, can send a 320 gr. Woodleigh at near or at 2400 FPS with a proper handload of RL-15 in a modern bolt action.


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42190 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Atkinson:
I would hunt Buffalo with a 30-06 and a good stout bullet if I had nothing else, but the 9.3x62 is much, much better any way you cut it..

The 9.3x62 is better compared to the .375 H&H. The 9.3x62, in a long 26 or 27 inch tube, can send a 320 gr. Woodleigh at near or at 2400 FPS with a proper handload of RL-15 in a modern bolt action.

My fav ammo supplier carries 350gr Swede ammo that pushes 350gr. Woodleigh 'Weldcore' at 2300fps out of .375H&H hole (probably 24" test barrel). thumb
 
Posts: 1126 | Registered: 03 June 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Will
posted Hide Post
The 9.3x62 is almost a 375 H&H, and can get bullets up to 320 grs. It is a very efficient csrtridge for its size.

Of course at nominal loadings, it also recoils more like a 375 than a 30-06. They are not really comparable.


-------------------------------
Will Stewart / Once you've been amongst them, there is no such thing as too much gun.
---------------------------------------
and, God Bless John Wayne.

NRA Benefactor Member, GOA, N.A.G.R.
_________________________

"Elephant and Elephant Guns" $99 shipped
“Hunting Africa's Dangerous Game" $20 shipped.

red.dirt.elephant@gmail.com
_________________________

Hoping to wind up where elephant hunters go.
 
Posts: 19374 | Location: Ocala Flats | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 900 SS
posted Hide Post
quote:

The 9.3x62 is better compared to the .375 H&H. The 9.3x62, in a long 26 or 27 inch tube, can send a 320 gr. Woodleigh at near or at 2400 FPS with a proper handload of RL-15 in a modern bolt action.


I'm not sure what you mean by better, but its surely not powerwise. I think its reasonable to believe that the larger case and larger diameter of the 375 will give some power advantages when everything else is similar. I also think that if you get 2400 fps with 286 gn bullets in the 9,3x62 you should be happy with that.

What I really meant with my first post was that a little bigger or a little smaller doesnt really matter that much. To me its about using what you got to its full potential (the last statement only applies to riflecalibersSmiler
 
Posts: 408 | Location: Bardu, Norway | Registered: 25 August 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The original question and comments compared the 06 with the 9.3x62, and the 9.3 is clearly the winner although at the expense of more recoil. TNSTAAFL. The 9.3 doesn't have as many beans as a 375HH, but, again, the 375HH has more recoil. As a heavy light rifle or light medium rifle, the 9.3x62 is hard to beat. The good news is that more people are discovering it, and this is leading to more rifles and more bullets being available. Kudude
 
Posts: 1473 | Location: Tallahassee, Florida | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of raybass
posted Hide Post
quote:
.277 inches = 6.82mm (.270 Win, .270 Wby)
.284 = 7mm (.280 Rem, 7mm Rem Mag)
.308 = 7.62mm (.30-06, .308 Win, 300 WM)
.338 = 8.33mm (.338-06, .338 Win Mag)
.366 = 9.3mm (9.3X62, 9.3X64)

excuse me .358 shocker(358 win.,35whelen)


Straight shootin to ya
 
Posts: 531 | Location: Montgomery, Texas | Registered: 11 September 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by raybass:
quote:
.277 inches = 6.82mm (.270 Win, .270 Wby)
.284 = 7mm (.280 Rem, 7mm Rem Mag)
.308 = 7.62mm (.30-06, .308 Win, 300 WM)
.338 = 8.33mm (.338-06, .338 Win Mag)
.366 = 9.3mm (9.3X62, 9.3X64)

excuse me .358 shocker(358 win.,35whelen)


Sorry about that. The .358 comes out roughly to 9mm and the .35 Whelen is one of the many great cartridges for it. Wink
 
Posts: 265 | Registered: 11 January 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
My chronographs sez:

9.3x62:
320 gr, bullet at 2400 FPS

375 H&H:
300 gr. bullet at 2500 FPS

Both loads are mild and accurate in my rifles, if that is not comparible then I will eat my hat..and yes I understand that you can load a 9.3x62 or a .375 hotter, but I won't nor do I need to...Also I undersand that you can load the .375 with 350 gr. Woodlieghs at almost 2400 FPS and that puts the .375 over the top I suppose..

So lets just say for my purposes they are comparible..


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42190 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Medium Bore Rifles    a stupid question about 9.3x62 and 30-06

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia