one of us
| I would suggest that you find another set of rings - I like mine low too but in cases where I have had to go to a medium height ring I learn fast enough where to position my cheek - we are speaking of a fraction of an inch here - grinding a bolt scares me, not knowing how much metal has to be removed, but maybe someone from the gunsmith crowd could answer that better. Interesting to know that about the CZ though. Also, another manufacturer's low ring might just be high enough - I know on Midway's site they specify the height of most of the rings they sell. Good luck |
| Posts: 363 | Location: Madison Alabama | Registered: 31 July 2002 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| You may find that going to a non-variable makes a difference too. I ran into this on a large bore the other day. |
| Posts: 1238 | Location: Lexington, Kentucky, USA | Registered: 04 February 2003 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Checked out some of the suggestions here. The scope you have now has an occular dia of 42mm. The 2-7 compact and 2.5-8 Leupolds have an occular dia of 36mm - so just maybe a reduction of 3mm (radius) will allow the bolt to function without interference. |
| Posts: 363 | Location: Madison Alabama | Registered: 31 July 2002 |
IP
|
|
new member
| Thanks for all the replies! I've decided to exchange the rings and get the med. ht. ones. Grinding the bolt down didn't sit well with me either. I'll proberbly cut the comb and add spacers for proper stock weld. Went to the Leupold website and found that most of the scopes that I was interested in, had the same rear eyepiece dia. about 1.55 inches.(wouldn't clear bolt handle with low mount).The only one that I think might work is the VX II lx4x20. Eyepiece dia. is l inch. Mahalo again for the ideas, Maika |
| Posts: 8 | Location: hawaii | Registered: 04 March 2003 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| The Leupold 2-7X Compact will work fine with the low Talley rings. That is the setup I have on my 527. |
| Posts: 354 | Location: Texas, USA | Registered: 11 February 2001 |
IP
|
|
new member
| Thanks Ed, the Leupold compact is on order. I considered that scope but was afraid the rear eyepiece dia.(1.33) wouldn't clear the bolt. Glad to see that it does. Again thanks everybody for your input. Aloha, Maika |
| Posts: 8 | Location: hawaii | Registered: 04 March 2003 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| rifleman 1 the 1.75-6 and the 2.5-8 leupold have the same size ocular lens. the 2.5-8 won't help at all. the 2-7 compact by contrast has a 28 mm ocular, it will help as Ed has said. pineapple the 1-4 would not help you either. no you're not crazy though, leupold has the wrong specs. listed on their website. that scope like all the other VXI's, VXII's, and VXIII's has a 1.6" ocular lens. leupold just screwed up their data on the website. the scope that can help you though is that 2-7 compact that i mentioned. it has a 1.36" ocular lens and as Ed can attest, it will work. BTW have a great time with that 7.62X39 it's a great killer if you keep the ranges modest. gabe |
| Posts: 410 | Location: Granite City, WI | Registered: 10 March 2003 |
IP
|
|
new member
| Thanks for the heads up Papashmud. Was just thinking about ordering that scope this morning. Didn't feel comfortable with a 20mm front objective. Thought of giving it a day or two and if no replies, order it. Glad I waited. Mahalo, Maika |
| Posts: 8 | Location: hawaii | Registered: 04 March 2003 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| By the way, my boys and I used our 527 in 7.62x39 this past season to cull a number of whitetail does and hogs on a friends' ranch. Worked like a charm using cheapo ($45/500) Wolf 122 gr copper jacketed hollowpoints. All one shot kills to boot. A great little rifle IMO. |
| Posts: 354 | Location: Texas, USA | Registered: 11 February 2001 |
IP
|
|