Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
I'm looking at the differences between these for .300 Win Mag, and I figured they've both been out long enough to have been thoroughly tested by some of you. (By the way....I am referring to loaded ammunition from the manufacturer) _______________________________________________________ Hunt Report - South Africa 2022 Wade Abadie - Wild Shot Photography Website | Facebook | Instagram | ||
|
One of Us |
I picked the Barnes, in large part because I have used them since 1992, and have not used the GMX. I would expect the GMX to work like a Barnes though. | |||
|
One of Us |
Neither. I prefer a 180 gr in my 300 H&H. Given the choice of those two makers I'll pick the Barnes. Given a third I like the e-tip. Truth be told, I seriously doubt any critter would sense much of a difference... Regards, Robert ****************************** H4350! It stays crunchy in milk longer! | |||
|
one of us |
I say try both, and pick the one that shoots best in your rifle. I doubt that you'll be able to tell the difference in terminal performance. | |||
|
One of Us |
Generally, I like what I have used from Hornady. Accurate, effective, and usually priced closer to most big companies bargain ammo. I do have one rifle that doesn't shoot them well, however, but we all know rifles are different . Another option I suggest, would be the E-tip from Nosler. Their factory ammo has been very accurate, and again cheaper then most premium stuff from the big 3, and from boutique makers like double tap. If you think every possible niche has been filled already, thank a wildcatter! | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia