THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM

Page 1 2 

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Which cartridge to use for elk?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
I just found out today that I drew an antlerless elk tag for right out my back door in the Black Hills of South Dakota.

With all these threads about 270 vs 280, who has killed how many elk, suitable elk cartridges, I am more confused than ever.

So please help me decide.

Question:
Which combo would you use for antlerless elk?

Choices:
22-250 with 53gr TSX
270 WCF with 130gr TSX
338-06 with 210gr TSX
9.3x64 Brenneke with 293gr TUG
404 Jeffery with 400gr DGX

 
 
Posts: 2034 | Location: Black Mining Hills of Dakota | Registered: 22 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
When I hunted South Dakota last year I used a 9.3X62 and Nosler Accubonds for ridgeline/woods hunting and a 30-06 with Nosler 180 partition for more opportunities.

If I didn't know the terrain and trail patterns I'd take the 9.3.
Shotgun
 
Posts: 111 | Location: South Dakota | Registered: 30 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of cobra
posted Hide Post
Of the ones you listed I would go with the .338-06 with 210 gr. TSX's.


 
Posts: 8827 | Location: CANADA | Registered: 25 August 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by cobra:
Of the ones you listed I would go with the .338-06 with 210 gr. TSX's.

flameX2 dancing roger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
For a cow Elk, I would choose the .270Win., one of the best Elk rounds out there and easy to carry and shoot. I use 150NPs in mine and some 150ABs are loaded for testing and practice.

The 9.3 Brenneke is a wonderful round and two of my Elk hunting buddies have them and use them to considerable effect, but, the recoil is a bit "pushy", if that concerns you.
 
Posts: 2366 | Location: "Land OF Shining Mountains"- British Columbia, Canada | Registered: 20 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Recoil is not an issue with the 9.3. I had a 416 Rigby that proved to be too much. I haven't shot the Jeffery yet, just got the feeding issues worked out.

I should get 250gr TSX load worked up for the Brenneke, just haven't had time. It shoots the factory ammo very well.
 
Posts: 2034 | Location: Black Mining Hills of Dakota | Registered: 22 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Sevenxbjt
posted Hide Post
338-06
 
Posts: 1851 | Registered: 12 May 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
338.06 would be my vote.


DRSS
Kreighoff 470 NE
Valmet 412 30/06 & 9.3x74R
 
Posts: 1993 | Location: Denver | Registered: 31 May 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of z1r
posted Hide Post
I would use any but the first and last. Of the three remaining, I'd use whichever I could shoot the best.

That said, my last elk hunt was a success using a .338-06 with the lowly Hornady 225 SP.





Aut vincere aut mori
 
Posts: 4867 | Location: Lakewood, CO | Registered: 07 February 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Dr. Lou
posted Hide Post
Like most of us on this site, I have several rifles that are ideal for elk or whatever. To avoid causing hurt feelings in the ole gun safe, I bring 2-3 for each trip and use them all. Too many rifles, not enough seasons.

To answer your question, I'd bring the 270, 338-06 and 9.3 and use all of them!


****************
NRA Life Benefactor Member
 
Posts: 3316 | Location: USA | Registered: 15 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
i'd take the 270 win, and some accurate 150gr ammo (preferebly partitions or accubonds)
 
Posts: 678 | Location: lived all over | Registered: 06 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Dewey:
For a cow Elk, I would choose the .270Win., one of the best Elk rounds out there and easy to carry and shoot. I use 150NPs in mine and some 150ABs are loaded for testing and practice.

The 9.3 Brenneke is a wonderful round and two of my Elk hunting buddies have them and use them to considerable effect, but, the recoil is a bit "pushy", if that concerns you.


Crow gun. Cool
 
Posts: 558 | Location: Southwest B.C. | Registered: 16 November 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Mike, you have been shooting too many .460s and Lotts and Rigbys, we are talking COW ELK here, not friggin' Mastodons!

You jusr won't be happy until you are packing a .585 Nyati or .700 H&H when hunting Blacktails! Smiler
 
Posts: 2366 | Location: "Land OF Shining Mountains"- British Columbia, Canada | Registered: 20 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of TEANCUM
posted Hide Post
The .270 is well suited for the task. Many many elk have been taken with this cartridge in an efficient quick manner.

Good luck
 
Posts: 1788 | Location: IDAHO | Registered: 12 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of DuggaBoye
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by cobra:
Of the ones you listed I would go with the .338-06 with 210 gr. TSX's.


+1


DuggaBoye-O
NRA-Life
Whittington-Life
TSRA-Life
DRSS
DSC
HSC
SCI
 
Posts: 4594 | Location: TX | Registered: 03 March 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
you forgot 223 and 45/70 Big Grin stir
 
Posts: 13466 | Location: faribault mn | Registered: 16 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by butchloc:
you forgot 223 and 45/70 Big Grin stir
and the .25 ACP..... jumping


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The .270 or .338/06 would be fine, with the edge going to the .338/06. But using monometal bullets is something of a roll of the dice. Some percentage of the time (although a fairly small percentage) monometals simply fail to expand. A Nosler Partition in the .270 or almost any jacketed lead bullet in the .338/06 would make me more comfortable.
 
Posts: 13266 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
22 hornet..

45 grain Barnes X bullet...

6.5 grains of Blue Dot...

BOOM....... horse..... dancing
 
Posts: 16144 | Location: Southern Oregon USA | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Dewey:
Mike, you have been shooting too many .460s and Lotts and Rigbys, we are talking COW ELK here, not friggin' Mastodons!

You jusr won't be happy until you are packing a .585 Nyati or .700 H&H when hunting Blacktails! Smiler[/QUOTE

Just funnin with ya. The 270 will probably stick in.
 
Posts: 558 | Location: Southwest B.C. | Registered: 16 November 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fredj338
posted Hide Post
I voted 338-06 becasue I love hunting w/ that round, but most cow elk aren't that big, the 270/280 would work fine w/ the right bullets. I have a 404j too, too heavy for most elk country, but a fine woods rig if you don't mind the weight. Hell, I would shoot deer with it.


LIFE IS NOT A SPECTATOR'S SPORT!
 
Posts: 7752 | Location: kalif.,usa | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of buffybr
posted Hide Post
quote:
we are talking COW ELK here, not friggin' Mastodons!

Exactly!!

Although all of the cartridges you listed will (and have) killed elk, I feel that the .270 is best suited for a cow elk hunt.

The last cow elk that I shot was with my 7 mm Rem mag and a 160 gr Accubond bullet. At the shot, she dropped in her tracks and rolled about 30 yds down the hill toward me, stopping dead against a bush. Cow elk are not that hard to kill, if the shot is properly placed.


NRA Endowment Life Member
 
Posts: 1640 | Location: Boz Angeles, MT | Registered: 14 February 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
To answer your question, I'd bring the 270, 338-06 and 9.3 and use all of them!


I will be hunting from home, so I can just switch out rifles for whichever suits my fancy for the day.

quote:
you forgot 223 and 45/70


I do not own either caliber. But that's the spirit I am looking for. tu2

quote:
The .270 or .338/06 would be fine, with the edge going to the .338/06. But using monometal bullets is something of a roll of the dice. Some percentage of the time (although a fairly small percentage) monometals simply fail to expand. A Nosler Partition in the .270 or almost any jacketed lead bullet in the .338/06 would make me more comfortable.


Sorry, I have had way too many good results using TSX's. This may be blasphemous, but I just have not been that impressed with NP's, even though they are the standard. I would be more linclined to use a plain old Hornady Interlock.
 
Posts: 2034 | Location: Black Mining Hills of Dakota | Registered: 22 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Alberta Canuck
posted Hide Post
I'd pick the .338-06 wth 210 NPs.

95% of the time it will be more than you need for a cow elk, but sometimes a little bigger, heavier bullet comes in handy. Depends on the angle, the bush, and your own mental set at the time. Better a little too much rifle or load than even the slightest bit too little of either.
 
Posts: 9685 | Location: Cave Creek 85331, USA | Registered: 17 August 2001Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
17/22short bluedot?

404, as that was the largest you had listed, and its generaly a mild to shoot cartridge... don't you have any heavy mediums? (heh)


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 40083 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
SD Hunter, Personally I'd go with the 339-06 and the 200gr Nosler Accubond. The .270 will certainly work, but not being a Barnes fan, I'd choose either the 140 AB or the 150 Partition. Any of those three will put your cow in the freezer.
 
Posts: 3034 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 01 July 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Jerry Eden
posted Hide Post
quote:
Mike, you have been shooting too many .460s and Lotts and Rigbys, we are talking COW ELK here, not friggin' Mastodons!


I'm with Dewey on this one. You all know how we like the 270, but I am afraid this will turn in to a fiasco, once Ol' Hot Snatch shows up.

SD good for you on the tag, I got one in Arizona for Muzzell Loader this September. We should have some very good eats.

Jerry


NRA Benefactor Life Member
 
Posts: 1297 | Location: Chandler arizona | Registered: 29 August 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I am not going to make time for load development this summer. Every load I listed is "in stock" and it shoots.

I am going to spend my free time scouting and enjoying the woods. I have not spent very much time in this unit. So I think my success will hinge more on scouting than the particular rifle/cartridge combination used. Looking forward to seeing some new country and learning the ins and outs.
 
Posts: 2034 | Location: Black Mining Hills of Dakota | Registered: 22 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I chose the 338-06 but my first choice would have been the 9.3x62 loaded with any conventional bullet 283gr.

Runner up would be the 8x60 -great round!


http://www.tgsafari.co.za

"What doesn´t kill you makes you stranger!"
 
Posts: 2213 | Location: Finland | Registered: 02 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Jerry Eden
posted Hide Post
SDHunter:
Last year while hunting turkey, also scouting for elk, in the unit for which I now have the September cow tag, I took up a sitting stand under a little pine tree which had grown like a small rainbow. As I was sitting there enjoying the country and all it's sounds and critters, I caught a flash of movement off to one side. A few minutes latter, I had a herd of elk all over me, with the herd cow standing about 5 feet away from me, and wondering where that bad human smell was coming from. I sat very still for the next 20 minutes, and the herd milled around me, and got even closer. What a thrill! I have still not taken a shot at an elk much over 200yds, and this story I believe, is the norm for folks who know how to scout and hunt like an Indian. No need for a big bore under these conditions, I could have killed the cow with a 44 Mag pistol.

Jerry


NRA Benefactor Life Member
 
Posts: 1297 | Location: Chandler arizona | Registered: 29 August 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MTM:
quote:
Originally posted by Dewey:
For a cow Elk, I would choose the .270Win., ...


Crow gun. Cool
x2 animal

Nice list of Cartridges. I'd go with the 338-06 out of that bunch. But I'd prefer a 350RemMag with either the Original Fred Barnes 200gr 0.032" thickness Copper Tubing Spitzer SPs, or the 200gr Hornady SPs.
 
Posts: 9920 | Location: Carolinas, USA | Registered: 22 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Whichever cartridge you choose, stick a Barnes in it and go kill an elk.
 
Posts: 620 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
tu2
quote:
Originally posted by seafire/B17G:
22 hornet..

45 grain Barnes X bullet...

6.5 grains of Blue Dot...

BOOM....... horse..... dancing


told ya!
 
Posts: 16144 | Location: Southern Oregon USA | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
the 338-06 or 270 is fine.
i plain out use the 7x57 with hornady 139's or my 50 cal muzzle loader.
high/rear shoulder will work just fine.
elk hearts are at the top not the bottom.
 
Posts: 5004 | Location: soda springs,id | Registered: 02 April 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of T/C Nut
posted Hide Post
You left out the BEST cartridge EVER the 35 Whelen!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Posts: 608 | Location: Washington | Registered: 28 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of chuck375
posted Hide Post
Actually I've used a 270 Win with 150g Noslers to great effect for 35 years. Since my son's both now own identical 270s (lefty and righty, my younger son got mine), I have to use my 500 Jeffery.

So my new vote is: 500 Jeffery with 570g TSX!


Happy Fourth,

Chuck


Regards,

Chuck



"There's a saying in prize fighting, everyone's got a plan until they get hit"

Michael Douglas "The Ghost And The Darkness"
 
Posts: 4802 | Location: Colorado Springs | Registered: 01 January 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by the skirt wearing Queer teenScumee:
The .270 is well suited for the task. ...
rotflmo animal rotflmo
 
Posts: 9920 | Location: Carolinas, USA | Registered: 22 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of scottfromdallas
posted Hide Post
[/QUOTE] This may be blasphemous, but I just have not been that impressed with NP's, even though they are the standard. I would be more linclined to use a plain old Hornady Interlock.[/QUOTE]

You're right that is blasphemy. shame



 
Posts: 1941 | Location: Texas | Registered: 19 July 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Jerry Eden
posted Hide Post
Scott: I like partitions in the 270,30-06, and the 35 Whelen. They have always been superb performers.
Here's a couple of instances I have experienced: with the 30-06, and 180 NP'S, 5 elk have been shot with my rifle, and 57 grains of IMR4350. All were pass thrus, even at 200yds, and all were down in seconds, not flop like with a 270,LOL, but drt.

As to the Interlocks, I find them frangible in applications which I have used them, and not as accurate as the NP'S. Example, a 154 Grain Hornady, @3100 fps out of a 7mmMag, bullet went in behind the shoulder, and blew up while traveling down the left leg, after clipping the heart and left lung. Elk ran for about 75 yds, and dropped dead.

Just my 02

Jerry


NRA Benefactor Life Member
 
Posts: 1297 | Location: Chandler arizona | Registered: 29 August 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I use almost exclusively NPs in my big game rifles and have found them outstanding, especially the production since the early '90s.

I seriously doubt that a superior overall load for BC hunting/game to the .270-150, .280-160 and .30-06-180 NPs at 2900, 2825 and 2750 can be designed and many large Ek, Moose and Grizzlies are killed here, each year, with these outstanding loads.

I own, as of this past week, 35 big game rifles, from the .264WM to the .458WM and I load NPs in almost all of them and have for over 40 years. I have NO intention of changing this, just as I have no intention of giving up my guns and hunting until I literally can no longer move. They just plain work.
 
Posts: 2366 | Location: "Land OF Shining Mountains"- British Columbia, Canada | Registered: 20 August 2006Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia