THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Ruger 77 Control Feed?
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
I have an early model Ruger 77 in 338 WM. Unlike my custom 98 in 270 the extractor does not engage the rim of the case during feeding - works more like a push feed action. Is it suppose to? Thanks
 
Posts: 363 | Location: Madison Alabama | Registered: 31 July 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I think the Ruger started as a push feed, and became a CRF later -- I'm not sure when though.
 
Posts: 1248 | Location: North Carolina | Registered: 14 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I believe Todd is correct. Unless my memory fails me, the older Tang-Safety M77s used a plunger ejector and were push feed, the new Mark II M77s use a blade ejector and are CRF. Can't have a CRF with a Plunger ejector....

Regards, Bill
 
Posts: 1169 | Location: USA | Registered: 23 January 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Todd is correct. I have an older tang-safety M77 and it is indeed a push-feed that visually resembles a CRF.

Bigiron
 
Posts: 526 | Registered: 29 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Thanks guys
 
Posts: 363 | Location: Madison Alabama | Registered: 31 July 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
My M-77,200 th.year 7x57,with a tang safety,is a CRF.

Bravo five one
 
Posts: 109 | Location: New Mexico,USA | Registered: 06 June 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I believe it may also be possible to convert a push feed 77 to CRF by milling off the lower 1/3 of the bolt lip? I'm not sure if there is anything done to the ejector. I'm sure I read this here or at HuntAmerica, try doing a search at both to see.

Todd
 
Posts: 1248 | Location: North Carolina | Registered: 14 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
All the Ruger Mk 1's , with the tang safety were push feed. Also the original Mk 2's were push feed then changed to CRF. I had both versions of the Mk2 and had the older one converted to controlled feed. My understanding is the Mk1 has a different ejector and cannot be converted.
Mark
 
Posts: 277 | Location: melbourne, australia | Registered: 19 October 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by mark smith:
All the Ruger Mk 1's , with the tang safety were push feed. Also the original Mk 2's were push feed then changed to CRF. I had both versions of the Mk2 and had the older one converted to controlled feed. My understanding is the Mk1 has a different ejector and cannot be converted.
Mark

Ditto what Mark said, as I've read this in a firearms magazine back then, concerning the early MK II's initially being push feed, followed by the CRF they have now. I ordered a 308 win then, with crossed fingers that it would be the CRF version, and it was, much to my joy. It's now a 358 Win carbine. ~~~Suluuq
 
Posts: 854 | Location: Kotzebue, Ak. | Registered: 25 December 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Andre Mertens
posted Hide Post
Current 77 Mk II's are definitely CRF. Here's a close-up of the bolt head of my Varmint Target .22-250.
 -
 
Posts: 2420 | Location: Belgium | Registered: 25 August 2001Reply With Quote
<leo>
posted
It's been quite awhile since I owned my old model 77 tang safety ruger with the plunger ejecter but anytime I pushed the bolt forward over a loaded magazine, it grabed hold of the top cartridge everytime with just a little bit of forward motion.
 
Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia