03 December 2002, 08:56
rifleman1Ruger 77 Control Feed?
I have an early model Ruger 77 in 338 WM. Unlike my custom 98 in 270 the extractor does not engage the rim of the case during feeding - works more like a push feed action. Is it suppose to? Thanks
03 December 2002, 09:00
TGetzenI think the Ruger started as a push feed, and became a CRF later -- I'm not sure when though.
03 December 2002, 09:08
Bill MI believe Todd is correct. Unless my memory fails me, the older Tang-Safety M77s used a plunger ejector and were push feed, the new Mark II M77s use a blade ejector and are CRF. Can't have a CRF with a Plunger ejector....
Regards, Bill
03 December 2002, 10:02
BigIronTodd is correct. I have an older tang-safety M77 and it is indeed a push-feed that visually resembles a CRF.
Bigiron
03 December 2002, 13:33
Bravo five oneMy M-77,200 th.year 7x57,with a tang safety,is a CRF.
Bravo five one
03 December 2002, 17:00
TGetzenI believe it may also be possible to convert a push feed 77 to CRF by milling off the lower 1/3 of the bolt lip? I'm not sure if there is anything done to the ejector. I'm sure I read this here or at HuntAmerica, try doing a search at both to see.
Todd
03 December 2002, 18:11
mark smithAll the Ruger Mk 1's , with the tang safety were push feed. Also the original Mk 2's were push feed then changed to CRF. I had both versions of the Mk2 and had the older one converted to controlled feed. My understanding is the Mk1 has a different ejector and cannot be converted.
Mark
04 December 2002, 00:57
Andre MertensCurrent 77 Mk II's are definitely CRF. Here's a close-up of the bolt head of my Varmint Target .22-250.

04 December 2002, 12:59
<leo>It's been quite awhile since I owned my old model 77 tang safety ruger with the plunger ejecter but anytime I pushed the bolt forward over a loaded magazine, it grabed hold of the top cartridge everytime with just a little bit of forward motion.