THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Scope for .340 Weatherby
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
I'm about to acquire a slightly used .340 Weatherby Deluxe with a Weatherby scope (don't know if it's an Imperial or Premier). I will want to replace the Weatherby scope with a nice piece of glass. I'm thinking of a Swarovski since I don't currently own one, but don't want to run much over $1,000. Any recommendations on a Swaro (or something else) that will handle the .340 recoil over time? Thanks.
 
Posts: 40 | Location: Texas | Registered: 08 August 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Leupold VX-3 3.5-10x40 with B&C reticle or M1 elevation & windage turrets.
 
Posts: 409 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 06 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I'd put a 3-9x Zeiss on it and pocket the $600. You'd never notice the difference, and you could have a lot of fun with the extra cash, heck buy another rifle.


A shot not taken is always a miss
 
Posts: 2788 | Location: gallatin, mo usa | Registered: 10 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
For me it would be the 3-9 Leo with LR dotz in it and or the 3-9 Burris with BP in it.

I'm a big time fan of the .340 and these two have always done well for me.

Good luck to ya

Mark D
 
Posts: 1089 | Location: Bozeman, Mt | Registered: 05 August 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Iron Buck
posted Hide Post
Leupold vx-III 2.5-8x. GREAT hunting scope
 
Posts: 813 | Location: Wexford PA, USA | Registered: 18 July 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Iron Buck:
Leupold vx-III 2.5-8x. GREAT hunting scope

+1
or a 2-7 if budgeted.
 
Posts: 3986 | Location: in the tall grass "milling" around. | Registered: 09 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
What about the Night Force NXS 1.25-10X24.......built like a M1 tank and plenty of eye relief Big Grin


Verbera!, Iugula!, Iugula!!!

Blair.

 
Posts: 8808 | Location: Sydney, Australia. | Registered: 21 March 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Clayman
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jstevens:
I'd put a 3-9x Zeiss on it and pocket the $600. You'd never notice the difference, and you could have a lot of fun with the extra cash, heck buy another rifle.
+1

That's what I've got on mine (a 3-9 Conquest) and I've yet to find it lacking. It handles the recoil fine and is a pleasure to use. If I had the cash, I might look into something from S&B; they're about the best scopes I've ever seen. Swarovski's Z6 would be another great choice.


_____________________________________________________
No safe queens!
 
Posts: 1225 | Location: Gilbertsville, PA | Registered: 08 December 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Techsan ----- I mounted a 4 X 16 Burris Signature on my .340 Wby and it has served me well from home to Colorado to Alaska. 700 rounds through it so far and aside from a bum mounting originally and a lesson learned on the mounts, all is well. If I had it to do now, I would mount a 4.5 X 14 Ziess Conquest to go with the other five I have on other big boomers that have given no problems. Good shooting.


phurley
 
Posts: 2371 | Location: KY | Registered: 22 September 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Karoo
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Iron Buck:
Leupold vx-III 2.5-8x. GREAT hunting scope

+1
or a 2-7 if budgeted.


A link to this thread: which of Leupold's VX line will NOT handle the recoil of the 340 Wby?
 
Posts: 787 | Location: Eastern Cape, South Africa | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Go look through them. I would put a 4.5x14 on it. The 340 has lots of long range potential.


Free men should not be subjected to permits, paperwork and taxation in order to carry any firearm. NRA Benefactor
 
Posts: 1652 | Location: Deer Park, Texas | Registered: 08 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I've got several Leupolds, a Conquest, a Kahles,a Nikon Monarch, and a Weaver on my current guns, but I don't own a Swaro, which is why I'm considering one for this Weatherby. I think a Schmitt & Bender will be out of my price range. I do appreciate the comments folks.
 
Posts: 40 | Location: Texas | Registered: 08 August 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I had a Swaro 3-10x, but switched it out for a vxiii 2-8x or is it 2.5-8x? Gun is a sako 338 laupa. Just found the smaller scope to be a bit more handy. Fine for groundhogs out to about 300 yds.
 
Posts: 831 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 28 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I have Leupole and Burris On all my rifles.
I haven't had any problems with them either.
 
Posts: 2209 | Location: Delaware | Registered: 20 December 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Heat
posted Hide Post
For the eye relief I have a VXIII 3.5-10x40 Leupy on my 338-378 Wby... The Zeiss 3-9x40 would be an excellent choice as they have the eye relief and some excellent glass... Two of the Swaro A-line scopes are under a grand if your heart is set on a Swaro... The Nightforce are excellent scopes but are over a thousand...

Ken....


"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn't so. " - Ronald Reagan
 
Posts: 5386 | Location: Phoenix Arizona | Registered: 16 May 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Iron Buck:
Leupold vx-III 2.5-8x. GREAT hunting scope


Ditto.
I have had one of those on a 340 Wby since 1985.
Hunted Alaska with it may years. Never a problem. Bear in the alders, caribou at 350 yards, always just right. It has great eye relief and the light weight that makes it easy on the mounts. You will never need anything more or less than the Leupold 2.5-8X. Anything more is just puffery, anything less is just less.
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia