THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Medium Bore Rifles    Adequate eye relief in scopes for medium bores

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Adequate eye relief in scopes for medium bores
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
I wonder what the collective opinion is for the required telescopic sight eye relief for medium bore rifles?

I am thinking of recoil levels from .300 Win Mag through .338 Win Mag upto 9.3x62 and .358 Norma Mag.

Barness states in his book Optics for the Hunter that a minimum of 3.5 inches, ideally 4 inches should be the goal for rifles like the .338 Win Mag.

I have read on various AR forums, posters using 1-4x22 Meopta scopes, nominal eye relief of 3 inches, on rifles like the 9.3x62. Those with CZ 550 rifles in .416 Rigby seem to prefer the Leupolds for their long eye relif. However, Barness states that eye relief also depends on whether the shooter 'stock crawls'.

There are a number of high end German scopes with more than 3.5 inch eye relief:

Schmidt & Bender 1.25-4x20, 3.75 inches.

Schmidt & Bender 1.25-4x22, 3.5 inches.

Gerhardt - Nickel 1.5-6x30, 4.9 inches.

New Zeiss 4x32 MC, 4 inches.

New Zeiss 1.8-5.5x38 MC, 4 inches.

The Austrian Kahles scopes in 1.25-4x22 offers, I believe 3.5 inches, but I do not think it is as good as the S&B scopes.

I checked some of my scopes for eye relief this evening. The results were:

S&B 4x36, West Germany (i.e. old, circa 1982), nominal 3.3 inches

Gerhardt - Nickel 4x36, nominal 6.5 inches (But this was a special request custom job direct from the factory)

Zeiss 6x42, West Germany, nominal 3.2 inches

S&B 6X42, nominal 3.2 inches

Habicht Nova 4x32, nominal 2.88 inches.
 
Posts: 1289 | Location: England | Registered: 07 October 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of mouse93
posted Hide Post
I have a 90mm (3.6 inch) relief on my Zeiss Victory Diavari 3 - 12 x 56 mounted on 9,3x62 and 8x68S and it works for me...
 
Posts: 2027 | Location: Slovenia | Registered: 28 April 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
3.5 inches for a minimum and 4 inches is better. I don't think I'd have a problem even with a .416 and 3.5 in.


A shot not taken is always a miss
 
Posts: 2788 | Location: gallatin, mo usa | Registered: 10 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The worst 'ding' I have had was from a light weight, 22 inch barrelled Remington .30-06 with a synthetic stock. Ouch!

Fortunately, it was not my rifle. However, my first rifle, a .270 Steyr Mannlicher Mod M, with the 4x36 S&B mentioned in my first post, gave me repeated crescent shaped scars if I did not pay attention.

I have a habit of stock crawling. And I think the Steyr Mannlicher, with the S&B 4x36 was a bit light for Norma 150grn .270 rounds and awkward shooting positions.
 
Posts: 1289 | Location: England | Registered: 07 October 2004Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Medium Bore Rifles    Adequate eye relief in scopes for medium bores

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia