THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM HANDGUN HUNTING FORUM


Moderators: MS Hitman
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Should I be "Ashamed"???
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
All I did was post the results of an "Unscientific" penetration test, of shooting a pig with a 45 ACP, in a Commander.

Remember I stated it was "Unscientific", you know for general info...

How does such a first post, cause responses to go into a Hatfield and McCoy "Quantum Physics" Fued???

I will not take total blame, shameafter all my [unnamed] buddy fired a few shots in to the pig with the 45 ACP as well...


DOUBLE RIFLE SHOOTERS SOCIETY
 
Posts: 16134 | Location: Texas | Registered: 06 April 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I'm a firm believer in real world testing trumping equations when it comes to ballistics. Granted, one real world test does not account for the variables encountered from one scenario to another, but it provides tangible evidence when testing a particular projectile/caliber. I don't think you should be ashamed at all. For those who want to know whether a fast .270 provides similar ballistic performance to a slower .45-70, I say get out there and shoot something with both to draw conclusions from.

I agree that proven scientific equations/laws/theories can be a great framework, but the proof comes when the lead (copper, etc) hits the meat.
 
Posts: 1451 | Location: New England | Registered: 22 February 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Yes you need real world info. Winchester developed a fancy rifle bullet by their computer types with little field testing.It was a failure !!
Then back to reality they redesigned it with considerable field testing - that one worked.
 
Posts: 7636 | Registered: 10 October 2002Reply With Quote
Moderator
posted Hide Post
No, you shouldn't be.



If ignorance is bliss; there are some blissful sonofaguns around here. We know who you are, so no reason to point yourselves out.
 
Posts: 2389 | Registered: 19 July 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 700xcr
posted Hide Post
You didn't do anything wrong. You might go back out and do another testing of penetration with same firearm and get something different then your last results. Then try different loads. Sometimes there is no ideal situations on testing. I know I will get flamed but. I carry my 45acp. while hunting. I would not be afraid to use it on an animal. Exspecailly on my elk hunting. Have elk within 7yds. to 10yds. and try to put a rifle bead on them are hard at times. My feeling on the subject is use what best that works for you in the situation that you are in at the time.
 
Posts: 191 | Location: Kennewick,Wa. | Registered: 20 November 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Nothing wrong at all. Realize penetration alone does not kill fast. That is where the discussion starts.
 
Posts: 4068 | Location: Bakerton, WV | Registered: 01 September 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
No you did nothing wrong. Next time though, you should do your testing on live wild beasts and post pictures!
Unfortunately , there are a few obnoxious types here who seem to run off more interesting people. It’s too bad.
 
Posts: 189 | Registered: 17 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by kaboom:
No you did nothing wrong. Next time though, you should do your testing on live wild beasts and post pictures!
Unfortunately , there are a few obnoxious types here who seem to run off more interesting people. It’s too bad.


shall i call for the:



jumping


Bob
 
Posts: 2989 | Location: North Carolina | Registered: 12 October 2011Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Lar45
posted Hide Post
I enjoyed the read and was glad that you posted it. Thanks


Lar45

White Label Lube Co.
www.lsstuff.com
Carnauba Red high speed cast bullet lube.
 
Posts: 2924 | Location: Arkansas | Registered: 23 December 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia