THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM HANDGUN HUNTING FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Hunting  Hop To Forums  Handgun Hunting    If a large meplat is desireable?
Page 1 2 

Moderators: MS Hitman
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
If a large meplat is desireable?
 Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of RMiller
posted
Why are there no hunting wadcutters? Seems a wadcutter would be a great hunting bullet.


--------------------
THANOS WAS RIGHT!
 
Posts: 9823 | Location: Montana | Registered: 25 June 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
There is such a thing as too much of a good thing. Wide is good, to a certain degree. You want to create shock/deliver energy but at the same time need penetration too.
 
Posts: 4115 | Location: Pa. | Registered: 21 April 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of RMiller
posted Hide Post
Anyone know a manufacturer of .45 cal wadcutters?


--------------------
THANOS WAS RIGHT!
 
Posts: 9823 | Location: Montana | Registered: 25 June 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Shoot a plain base bullet backwards if you want a wadcutter. Nothing magical.


Well, at least have an OK day Smiler
 
Posts: 242 | Location: NW Oregon | Registered: 08 January 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
One could load a normal bullet backwards. I know some that load the Barnes XPB bullets backwards.


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of RMiller
posted Hide Post
I was thinking of loading backwards also. I have a box of 255 grain SWC that I am loading in my new 45 Colt Blackhawk. For my loads and that bullet I figure forward is good enough.

A friend and I loaded 115 grain 9mm FMJ's backwards at full tilt in 357 mag before. Makes for a killer hollow point load.

------

We also shot 3/16" steel plates with various rifle loads. 223 fmj would go through one, 243 115 would go through two, 30-06 180 would go through three and a 115 loaded backwards in the 243 would go through four. If anyone tries to load backwards remember the bullet will be seated ultra deep!


--------------------
THANOS WAS RIGHT!
 
Posts: 9823 | Location: Montana | Registered: 25 June 2001Reply With Quote
Moderator
posted Hide Post
I have shot rabbits with .38 wadcutters before and it puts them down.



If ignorance is bliss; there are some blissful sonofaguns around here. We know who you are, so no reason to point yourselves out.
 
Posts: 2389 | Registered: 19 July 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Lar45
posted Hide Post
I think part of the problem with a full wadcutter would be long range stability. The wrong bullet proportions can destabilize somewhere in flight and then who knows where the bullet ends up.
I have some 45 cal moulds in the 320-350gn range, all the same basic bullet, same base, just a different nose meplat(70%, 80% and 90%).
I tried them all with the same load in my 454 at 1350fps at a 1000yd range.
The 70's looked good all the way out.
The 80% nose bullets started to vear off course somewhere around 300yds. At 400yds, they could be 15-20yds off to either side.
With this I thought the 90's would be even worse, but they flew great to about 800yds.

Has there been any comparison on straight line penetration with different nose profiles? Or is that more of a bullet integrity thing?


Lar45

White Label Lube Co.
www.lsstuff.com
Carnauba Red high speed cast bullet lube.
 
Posts: 2924 | Location: Arkansas | Registered: 23 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The problem with a full wad cutter and a semi wad cutter is alignment at the forcing cone. The front edge can be wiped off on one side before going into the rifling and that will not pull the cylinder in line.
You need the proper shaped boolit nose for the forcing cone.
 
Posts: 4068 | Location: Bakerton, WV | Registered: 01 September 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of rnovi
posted Hide Post
.38 special's loaded with 148gr. wadcutters at 800 fps are devasatating on bunnies.

I'm not sure I'd trust 'em for Trophy Squirell though!


Regards,

Robert

******************************
H4350! It stays crunchy in milk longer!
 
Posts: 2322 | Location: Greater Nashville, TN | Registered: 23 June 2006Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
yuck



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of RMiller
posted Hide Post
I have shot a few bunnies with 38 wadcutters too. Big Grin


--------------------
THANOS WAS RIGHT!
 
Posts: 9823 | Location: Montana | Registered: 25 June 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
When I was a kid I would bow hunt where you could not shoot a gun. Loaded with rabbits. I never came out of there with less then 16 rabbits in shopping bags.
I would glue a .38 case on the end of wooden arrows and that was the best use I ever found for a .38! jumping
I ate so many back then that I can not eat a rabbit at all today.
The slingshot with lead balls did as good for me. I even killed a few with a blowgun and another ton with a cheap crossbow.
I can't count the pheasants I shot either.
The best bow shot I ever made was a pheasant that flew too far for my flu-flu arrow and it bounced off. I watched him fly away and hit the electric wires, he broke his neck and fell at the side of the road. I can still see all the people stopped at the light when I picked him up. Roll Eyes
 
Posts: 4068 | Location: Bakerton, WV | Registered: 01 September 2003Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
Was there electricity back then? Confused

jumping



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of RMiller
posted Hide Post
I went deer hunting with friend who brought along a 38 pistol. He shot his biggest deer of the trip it and 158 lead round nose. Apparently no one ever told him that a .38 was worthless Big Grin.

I once shot a moose in the head with a .38 special round nose at point blank range and the bullet bounced off and hit me in the inner leg. I swore I would find bone shards in my leg but all there was was a bullet that looked liked a nickel and a bruise to match. :P


--------------------
THANOS WAS RIGHT!
 
Posts: 9823 | Location: Montana | Registered: 25 June 2001Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
Yup, round nosed bullets are notorious for sucking! hilbily



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Lar45:
I think part of the problem with a full wadcutter would be long range stability. The wrong bullet proportions can destabilize somewhere in flight and then who knows where the bullet ends up.
I have some 45 cal moulds in the 320-350gn range, all the same basic bullet, same base, just a different nose meplat(70%, 80% and 90%).
I tried them all with the same load in my 454 at 1350fps at a 1000yd range.
The 70's looked good all the way out.
The 80% nose bullets started to vear off course somewhere around 300yds. At 400yds, they could be 15-20yds off to either side.
With this I thought the 90's would be even worse, but they flew great to about 800yds.

Has there been any comparison on straight line penetration with different nose profiles? Or is that more of a bullet integrity thing?



You are correct about the long range performance. Penetration is about bullet integrety and nose shape/ profile as well as the percent of the meplat


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
The problem with a full wad cutter and a semi wad cutter is alignment at the forcing cone. The front edge can be wiped off on one side before going into the rifling and that will not pull the cylinder in line.



What an idiotic post... if your revolver is so sloppy that firing a bullet into a barrel will align the chamber with the centerline of the barrel, you are shooting a worn out piece of crap. Period.

And yes, as a matter of fact, I DO cast a full wadcutter for the 45 Colt. 200 grains, to be exact.
 
Posts: 4748 | Location: TX | Registered: 01 April 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Lar45
posted Hide Post
Many years ago I bought a brand new S&W M29 with 10 5/8" bbl and the 4 position adjustable front sight. I was casting and loading a 225gn SWC and it would spit lead and sometimes hit people standing near me. Is this what he was talking about? This was from a brand new gun. After awhile people would take several steps back while I was shooting.


Lar45

White Label Lube Co.
www.lsstuff.com
Carnauba Red high speed cast bullet lube.
 
Posts: 2924 | Location: Arkansas | Registered: 23 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
A good revolver will have .006" play at the lock notches. That is less towards the center so it amounts to a few thousandths at the chambers.
No one can build a super tight cylinder and have every chamber perfectly in line with the bore.
The boolit nose can move the cylinder just enough for the alignment.
Even replacing the pin with a super tight one can ruin accuracy.
 
Posts: 4068 | Location: Bakerton, WV | Registered: 01 September 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Doubless:
quote:
The problem with a full wad cutter and a semi wad cutter is alignment at the forcing cone. The front edge can be wiped off on one side before going into the rifling and that will not pull the cylinder in line.



What an idiotic post... if your revolver is so sloppy that firing a bullet into a barrel will align the chamber with the centerline of the barrel, you are shooting a worn out piece of crap. Period.

And yes, as a matter of fact, I DO cast a full wadcutter for the 45 Colt. 200 grains, to be exact.


Well you are wrong - period. That is exactly how a revolver works. Some of the most accurate revolvers are pretty loose.


Well, at least have an OK day Smiler
 
Posts: 242 | Location: NW Oregon | Registered: 08 January 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Then all these custom shops that take the slop out of revolvers by line boring the cylinder through the frame and ensuring it locks up like a bank vault at full cock are wasting money. They should all be loose as a goose?

Okay, I can admit being wrong, just makes no sense to me based on what I said above.
 
Posts: 4748 | Location: TX | Registered: 01 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Doubless:
Then all these custom shops that take the slop out of revolvers by line boring the cylinder through the frame and ensuring it locks up like a bank vault at full cock are wasting money. They should all be loose as a goose?

Okay, I can admit being wrong, just makes no sense to me based on what I said above.


Not sure what that has to do with anything. Do you have proof that revolvers are horribly inaccurate until they are sent to a shop? Obviously not.

Revolvers self-align.


Well, at least have an OK day Smiler
 
Posts: 242 | Location: NW Oregon | Registered: 08 January 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Do you have proof that revolvers are horribly inaccurate until they are sent to a shop? Obviously not.


No, I do not. But I have a custom Bowen 45 Redhawk that significantly outshoots the assembly line 45 Redhawk I have, and my Freedom Silhouette 654 shoots circles around my Model 57 Smiths.

I admitted being wrong, but I have perxonal experience that tells me all I need to know about custom work improving accuracy. I never said factory revolvers were "horribly inaccurate". Read the post and quit trying to put words in my mouth.
 
Posts: 4748 | Location: TX | Registered: 01 April 2005Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
They have to be locked up tight in order to line bore them for obvious reasons. That said, my BFR has a little slop and it'll do this at 50-yards:




"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Here is interesting discussion regarding boolit design http://castboolits.gunloads.co...wthread.php?t=111064 . Considering what James Gates stated there and your Lar45 experience, looks to me that for a hunting boolit optimum meplat is about 80%.

quote:
Originally posted by Whitworth:
They have to be locked up tight in order to line bore them for obvious reasons. That said, my BFR has a little slop and it'll do this at 50-yards:



Incredible accuracy! Is this 50 AE?
 
Posts: 158 | Registered: 21 September 2002Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
That's a .500 JRH and it's a 440 grain truncated cone bullet and the meplat is right around 78%.



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Whitworth:
That's a .500 JRH and it's a 440 grain truncated cone bullet and the meplat is right around 78%.


I see now, that big groove confused me. One question, what is 500 JRH in BFR max theoretical length of loaded round, measuring from the bottom of the case to the front face of the cylinder?

BTW, here is my little idea of the boolit with 80% meplat on 502-440-TCGC



Thanks, Onty
 
Posts: 158 | Registered: 21 September 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Whitworth, what are the cases formed from? That has to be a wrist-wrencher!
 
Posts: 4748 | Location: TX | Registered: 01 April 2005Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
It's a commercial offering now, so you can buy the properly headstamped brass new. Or you can cut .500 Smith brass down to 1.4-inches. The spec calls for a smaller rim as well, but I think the BFR will accept the wider rim of the .500 Smith. My load goes about 1,350 and it's not horrible to shoot.



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Lar45
posted Hide Post
Where did you find 500 JRH brass? I looked at Midway, Buffalo Bore and Starline but didn't find anything listed.


Lar45

White Label Lube Co.
www.lsstuff.com
Carnauba Red high speed cast bullet lube.
 
Posts: 2924 | Location: Arkansas | Registered: 23 December 2002Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
Call Jack Huntings (JRH) at 530/268-6877 -- he has a stockpile of Starline brass.



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Whitworth:
That's a .500 JRH and it's a 440 grain truncated cone bullet and the meplat is right around 78%.


My apology for being pushy but I would like to know what is for 500 JRH in BFR max. theoretical length of loaded round, measuring from the bottom of the case to the front face of the cylinder?

Thanks again.
 
Posts: 158 | Registered: 21 September 2002Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
Don't know. The BFR has plenty of cylinder length for the cartridge so we haven't run into any issues with bullet length. Here's a photo with a 440 grain load -- plenty of space for a longer nose, but probably not needed.




"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Here is a picture of two boolits. Notice they are both PB. The left is the 420 gr .475 and the right is the 440 gr .500 JRH. Whitworth's group at 50 was shot with this boolit. I made the molds.
Both boolits will shoot into 1" or less at 100 yards.
The cans were each shot twice at 100, the paint can with my BFR .475 and the left was with Whitworth's .500 JRH.
To make matters interesting, Whitworth shot the beer can once and I took the second shot. Both shots went into the same hole.
My .475 boolit has kept 4 out of 5 shots on a 6" swinger at 400 yards.
Maybe I need to get my guns tightened up! jumping
 
Posts: 4068 | Location: Bakerton, WV | Registered: 01 September 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I lost the picture, had to back and get it again.
 
Posts: 4068 | Location: Bakerton, WV | Registered: 01 September 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Then my old, worn out SBH .44 bought in the early 80's, shot IMSA, too many 39's and 40's to count and it won Ohio state with 79 out of 80. I should have had them all but I lost it on the last ram after 79 straight hits.
I kept track of primers for heavy loads and the count has gone over 61,000 plus uncounted light loads.
Funny it is as tight as the day I bought it and shows no wear.
I designed a new boolit, 330 gr and made the mold. I wanted a drop test at 200 yards so I shot 3 shots to measure. This boolit has dropped a LOT of deer out to 100 yards.
Now Doubless, I don't doubt what you are saying at all but maybe a few would like to see what you mean.
 
Posts: 4068 | Location: Bakerton, WV | Registered: 01 September 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Lar45
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Onty:
My apology for being pushy but I would like to know what is for 500 JRH in BFR max. theoretical length of loaded round, measuring from the bottom of the case to the front face of the cylinder?

Thanks again.


My 475 BFR's cylinder is 1.845"
With a fired case in, it is 1.858" from the rim to the front of the cylinder.
If I remember right the 50AE cylinder was the same length, I would bet the 500JRH cylinder will be the same also.
Hopefully mine will get here tomorrow. I'll cut down some 500 S&W cases to get me started, but order some JRH brass.(thanks for the info)


Lar45

White Label Lube Co.
www.lsstuff.com
Carnauba Red high speed cast bullet lube.
 
Posts: 2924 | Location: Arkansas | Registered: 23 December 2002Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
No problem, Lar, keep us posted!



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Lar45:
quote:
Originally posted by Onty:
My apology for being pushy but I would like to know what is for 500 JRH in BFR max. theoretical length of loaded round, measuring from the bottom of the case to the front face of the cylinder?

Thanks again.


My 475 BFR's cylinder is 1.845"
With a fired case in, it is 1.858" from the rim to the front of the cylinder.
If I remember right the 50AE cylinder was the same length, I would bet the 500JRH cylinder will be the same also.
Hopefully mine will get here tomorrow. I'll cut down some 500 S&W cases to get me started, but order some JRH brass.(thanks for the info)


You may need to turen the necks on the cut down 500 S&W brass to allow for the bullet inorder to not bulge the case. Check them to be sure


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Hunting  Hop To Forums  Handgun Hunting    If a large meplat is desireable?

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia