One of Us
| Try the "hand gun hunting forum" they live for revolvers |
| Posts: 3785 | Location: B.C. Canada | Registered: 08 November 2005 |
IP
|
|
Moderator
| 'Pistol Shooting' or 'Handgun Hunting' are your best bets. Let me know which one you want this thread moved to. George |
| |
One of Us
| George, please move to hand gun hunting thread, thanks Ken |
| Posts: 929 | Location: southern illinois | Registered: 29 July 2006 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Come on guys! Somebody has to have some information on this???????? |
| Posts: 929 | Location: southern illinois | Registered: 29 July 2006 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| The velocity loss, the inability to burn any powder charge, the extreme muzzle blast and noise would make it a poor choice. |
| Posts: 4068 | Location: Bakerton, WV | Registered: 01 September 2003 |
IP
|
|
Moderator
| Now, don't hasty bfr; the muzzle blast and noise may just scare the hell out of a bear.
If ignorance is bliss; there are some blissful sonofaguns around here. We know who you are, so no reason to point yourselves out.
|
| |
Moderator
| Could blind, burn and deafen the bear as well!
"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP
If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.
Semper Fidelis
"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
|
| |
One of Us
| I can't believe that there is much difference between this bl. length and the 4" model. Remember, the 4" model only has a 3" barrel ans a 1" brake. This gun does kick more with no muzzle brake. |
| Posts: 929 | Location: southern illinois | Registered: 29 July 2006 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| With my 500 Mag with 8.25" barrel I get 1620 FPS with the 400gr bullet. There is a way to figure out what a 3" barrel would do.I figured 589 FPS with 400gr bullet. Thats with the same load I used for 1620 FPS. |
| Posts: 2209 | Location: Delaware | Registered: 20 December 2002 |
IP
|
|
Moderator
| I can't believe anyone actually wants one of those things with a barrel that short. Come on; where do you mount the axle on it?
If ignorance is bliss; there are some blissful sonofaguns around here. We know who you are, so no reason to point yourselves out.
|
| |
One of Us
| MSHITMAN' With my smaller grips on the 2 3/4" 500, it weighs 53 oz. That is heavy, but not unreasonable to me. My 5.3" LAR grizzly in 50 A.E. weighs 54 oz. and I have been enjoying it for over 10 years. I think if people practice enough they can become quite competent with this gun. I enjoy shooting mine....jro45, I think 589 ft/sec is way to low, that would only be 307 ft. lbs, no way. |
| Posts: 929 | Location: southern illinois | Registered: 29 July 2006 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| quote: Originally posted by jro45: With my 500 Mag with 8.25" barrel I get 1620 FPS with the 400gr bullet. There is a way to figure out what a 3" barrel would do.I figured 589 FPS with 400gr bullet. Thats with the same load I used for 1620 FPS.
I think you are way off, my 4 inch is still over 1300 fps and that is an actual 3 inch barrel with a 1 inch comp. So I am guessing it would be real close with the 2 3/4 inch barrel.
If you're going to make a hole, make it a big one. ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ Member of the Delaware Destroyers Member Reeders Misfits NRA Life Member ENDOWMENT MEMBER NAHC Life Member DSA Life Member
|
| Posts: 3142 | Location: Magnolia Delaware | Registered: 15 May 2004 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Have any of you seen the night shots of the .500 Smith with an 8-3/8 barrel? I would love to see it with the short barrel! |
| Posts: 4068 | Location: Bakerton, WV | Registered: 01 September 2003 |
IP
|
|
Moderator
| Guys, My last post was a joke. Lighten up! I've got a .500 Linebaugh and a .54 Scout muzzleloading pistol, so I don't really want a .500 S&W. I've got things covered in the half inch plus category. As far as proficiency, I believe I've got that covered. So not to worry, there is no case of X-frame envy on this end.
If ignorance is bliss; there are some blissful sonofaguns around here. We know who you are, so no reason to point yourselves out.
|
| |
one of us
| The way I figured it out was I took 1620 divided by 8.25 and then multiplied by 3 and thats what I got but then you got to consider the powders explosive properties. I didn't say I was right. |
| Posts: 2209 | Location: Delaware | Registered: 20 December 2002 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Good, cuase you are't. HA HA |
| Posts: 929 | Location: southern illinois | Registered: 29 July 2006 |
IP
|
|