THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM HANDGUN HUNTING FORUM


Moderators: MS Hitman
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
500 magnum
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
I can't find a good place to ask this, so I thought I would try here. Does anyone have ballistics for 500 magnum ammo fired out of the new S&W 2 3/4" extreme survival revolver. I can not find info on it any where. I would be interested in any billet wts. or any brands of ammo fired from the short barrel. Thanks for any help and information.
 
Posts: 929 | Location: southern illinois | Registered: 29 July 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Try the "hand gun hunting forum"
they live for revolvers
 
Posts: 3785 | Location: B.C. Canada | Registered: 08 November 2005Reply With Quote
Moderator
posted Hide Post
'Pistol Shooting' or 'Handgun Hunting' are your best bets.

Let me know which one you want this thread moved to.

George


 
Posts: 14623 | Location: San Antonio, TX | Registered: 22 May 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
George, please move to hand gun hunting thread, thanks Ken
 
Posts: 929 | Location: southern illinois | Registered: 29 July 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Come on guys! Somebody has to have some information on this????????
 
Posts: 929 | Location: southern illinois | Registered: 29 July 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The velocity loss, the inability to burn any powder charge, the extreme muzzle blast and noise would make it a poor choice.
 
Posts: 4068 | Location: Bakerton, WV | Registered: 01 September 2003Reply With Quote
Moderator
posted Hide Post
Now, don't hasty bfr; the muzzle blast and noise may just scare the hell out of a bear.



If ignorance is bliss; there are some blissful sonofaguns around here. We know who you are, so no reason to point yourselves out.
 
Posts: 2389 | Registered: 19 July 2002Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
Could blind, burn and deafen the bear as well! jumping



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I can't believe that there is much difference between this bl. length and the 4" model. Remember, the 4" model only has a 3" barrel ans a 1" brake. This gun does kick more with no muzzle brake.
 
Posts: 929 | Location: southern illinois | Registered: 29 July 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
With my 500 Mag with 8.25" barrel I get 1620 FPS
with the 400gr bullet. There is a way to figure
out what a 3" barrel would do.I figured 589 FPS
with 400gr bullet. Thats with the same load I used for 1620 FPS.
 
Posts: 2209 | Location: Delaware | Registered: 20 December 2002Reply With Quote
Moderator
posted Hide Post
I can't believe anyone actually wants one of those things with a barrel that short. Come on; where do you mount the axle on it?



If ignorance is bliss; there are some blissful sonofaguns around here. We know who you are, so no reason to point yourselves out.
 
Posts: 2389 | Registered: 19 July 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ManCannon
posted Hide Post
In my 4" 500S&W, I get 1725fps using the 275gr Barnes XPB, and I get 1550fps using the 385gr Rem CLHP. I'm guessing that the 2.75" barrel is going to be quite close in ballistics... Which, by the way, blows the Ruger Alaskan away. The 500 S&W is truly an awesome cartridge, and I'm quite happy to own one. Those that bash the 500S&W, are generally the ones that don't have one... moon


"The atomic bomb made the prospect of future war unendurable. It has led us up those last few steps to the mountain pass; and beyond there is a different country." - J. Robert Oppenheimer
 
Posts: 385 | Location: Midwestern Corn Desert | Registered: 13 November 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
MSHITMAN'
With my smaller grips on the 2 3/4" 500, it weighs 53 oz. That is heavy, but not unreasonable to me. My 5.3" LAR grizzly in 50 A.E. weighs 54 oz. and I have been enjoying it for over 10 years. I think if people practice enough they can become quite competent with this gun. I enjoy shooting mine....jro45, I think 589 ft/sec is way to low, that would only be 307 ft. lbs, no way.
 
Posts: 929 | Location: southern illinois | Registered: 29 July 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Redhawk1
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jro45:
With my 500 Mag with 8.25" barrel I get 1620 FPS
with the 400gr bullet. There is a way to figure
out what a 3" barrel would do.I figured 589 FPS
with 400gr bullet. Thats with the same load I used for 1620 FPS.


I think you are way off, my 4 inch is still over 1300 fps and that is an actual 3 inch barrel with a 1 inch comp. So I am guessing it would be real close with the 2 3/4 inch barrel.


If you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Member of the Delaware Destroyers
Member Reeders Misfits
NRA Life Member ENDOWMENT MEMBER
NAHC Life Member
DSA Life Member
 
Posts: 3142 | Location: Magnolia Delaware | Registered: 15 May 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Have any of you seen the night shots of the .500 Smith with an 8-3/8 barrel? I would love to see it with the short barrel!
 
Posts: 4068 | Location: Bakerton, WV | Registered: 01 September 2003Reply With Quote
Moderator
posted Hide Post
Guys,

My last post was a joke. Lighten up! I've got a .500 Linebaugh and a .54 Scout muzzleloading pistol, so I don't really want a .500 S&W. I've got things covered in the half inch plus category.

As far as proficiency, I believe I've got that covered.

So not to worry, there is no case of X-frame envy on this end.



If ignorance is bliss; there are some blissful sonofaguns around here. We know who you are, so no reason to point yourselves out.
 
Posts: 2389 | Registered: 19 July 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The way I figured it out was I took 1620 divided
by 8.25 and then multiplied by 3 and thats what I got but then you got to consider the powders explosive properties. I didn't say I was right.
 
Posts: 2209 | Location: Delaware | Registered: 20 December 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Good, cuase you are't. HA HA
 
Posts: 929 | Location: southern illinois | Registered: 29 July 2006Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia