THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Accurate Powders
 Login/Join
 
<SlimL>
posted
Has anyone used any of the Accurate line of powders? I was thinking of playing around with some of them probably the 2520, XMR 3100, or the 2700. I am going to be using it in my 257 Roberts. Any thoughts will be much appreciated. Slim
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bob338
posted Hide Post
I've used them. They work good. Except for 2015 I've never had one that worked best in any gun I tried, but that's just my guns. 3100 works particularly well in 300 WinMag. A buddy consistently gets half inch groups at pretty high velocity and no other propellant even comes close in his gun.
 
Posts: 1261 | Location: Placerville, CA, US of A | Registered: 07 January 2001Reply With Quote
<Chainsaw>
posted
Slim, In the past I have tried AA2520 in the one .308 I once owned. It worked better for me than W748 and Reloder 15. That was in my rifle though. I did notice a slight static problem in my RCBS powder measure with 2520 powder.-----------Chainsaw
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I've used a couple of the Accurate powders, with very good results. In .223, 2015 gives me the best muzzle velocity. In .308 (165 grain bullet), 2520 is very close to the best powder I've tried. I do get very slightly better results from Varget, but not by much. For my 6.5 Swede, using 129 grain bullets, Accurate 4350 works very well. The only application where I don't like their 4350 is in my 30-06. In that case, pressures seemed higher and muzzle velocity was lower. Also, the temperature coefficient was around 2.5 fps/degree F.

In our town, Accurate 4350 is $13.50, as opposed to $16-18 for everything else. That helps make the Swede a cheap gun to shoot, as well as being potent and fun.

 
Posts: 2281 | Location: Layton, UT USA | Registered: 09 February 2001Reply With Quote
<bobshawn>
posted
SlimL __

AA2230 proved to be more consistent in my wife's 223 Remington compared to the old standard IMR 3031. Tighter groups. Lower SD's. And a bit cleaner.

On the other hand, XMR 4350 produced identical results when compared to IMR 4350 in a 45-70 Sharps'. Though it too was a bit cleaner burning.

Good stuff. Try it.

Robert

 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ricciardelli
posted Hide Post
Gee, I thought I read where he was asking about a .25-06 and Accurate porders...

Then I read the replies and they concerned 300 magnums, 308, 223, 6.5 and 30-06.

Did I miss something in the translation? In the question?

Since the original question did NOT indicate the bullet weight, I suggest the poster go to http://stevespages.com/page8c.htm

 
Posts: 3282 | Location: Saint Marie, Montana | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ricciardelli
posted Hide Post
oops.....type 25-06 and intended 257 roberts...
 
Posts: 3282 | Location: Saint Marie, Montana | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia