THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Ran out of XLC's ... now what???
 Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of BigNate
posted
I had a stash of 115gr XLC's and managed to get them mixed in with some other Barnes. So I thought I had two more boxes of .257" now I just got some TSX's in the mail.

Where do I start for a Roberts and a .25-06? Nate
 
Posts: 2376 | Location: Idaho Panhandle | Registered: 27 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Heat
posted Hide Post
The Barnes nr 3 manual will show the differences between the classic X bullet and the XLCs. It does not however show the differences between the XLCs and the TSXs. Originally Barnes said to use the X bullet data for the TSXs which is what I've been doing and have had no issues. The new nr 4 manual shows completely different numbers then the nr 3 so it's kind of a toss up as to which you prefer to trust. I use predominately nr 3 data with the TSXs and TTSXs and have had zero pressure signs and good velocities thumb.

Ken....


"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn't so. " - Ronald Reagan
 
Posts: 5386 | Location: Phoenix Arizona | Registered: 16 May 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of BigNate
posted Hide Post
Thanks.

I guess I'm not excited about switching and having to work up using a bunch of time and components at the last minute. I dropped down to 100gr from 115 and was just going to go mid level and .050" back from the lands. If they're acceptable I'll play more later.

I was hoping for some discussion from others who had to switch.
 
Posts: 2376 | Location: Idaho Panhandle | Registered: 27 November 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I "switched" and best thing ever happened.


Remember, forgivness is easier to get than permission.
 
Posts: 3994 | Location: Hudsonville MI USA | Registered: 08 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Doc
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BigNate:
I had a stash of 115gr XLC's and managed to get them mixed in with some other Barnes. So I thought I had two more boxes of .257" now I just got some TSX's in the mail.

Where do I start for a Roberts and a .25-06? Nate


I will be going to a couple of stores early next week that I know have XLC bullets and several of them, however, I do not know the calibers/weights. If you are interested in any then send me a PM. I'll let you know what they have. If I see what you've been shooting, I'll be glad to pick some up.


Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my guns
 
Posts: 7906 | Registered: 05 July 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of BigNate
posted Hide Post
Thanks Doc for the offer.
Sorry I have not responded. I didn't get a chance to try them yet but I loaded some of the "new" 100gr TSX's for the .25-06 using H4350 & WLR's. Other than tweeking them a bit I'm hoping they'll be acceptable. If they're all over the place I'm probably gonna be back asking for success stories & loads. Nate
 
Posts: 2376 | Location: Idaho Panhandle | Registered: 27 November 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of BigNate
posted Hide Post
Tried the 100gr TSX last Sunday and am not impressed yet. I put together two loads of 5 each same everything but seated one batch to the Barnes recommended OAL and one batch to about .060" from lands.

Neither were impressive. I had scrubbed my barrel spotless to start. Fired three fouling shots and let cool. The first batch of five went nearly 2" with one wild flier about 6" high. Second batch was closer to 1 1/2" but again had one high one. At the price of these I'm hating the developmental stage!!

Are these know for unusual vibrations? I was getting honest 1/2" groups with this rifle and Hornady SST's.
 
Posts: 2376 | Location: Idaho Panhandle | Registered: 27 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I shoot 48gr of RL19 and 100gr TSX's in my Roberts for about .75" groups and at 2,942fps. It's a mannlicher stocked Ruger so I called it good.

Robert


Bruz

"Honor,Courage and Character"

NRA Lifetime Member
 
Posts: 342 | Location: Jawja | Registered: 20 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Heat
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BigNate:
Tried the 100gr TSX last Sunday and am not impressed yet. I put together two loads of 5 each same everything but seated one batch to the Barnes recommended OAL and one batch to about .060" from lands.

Neither were impressive. I had scrubbed my barrel spotless to start. Fired three fouling shots and let cool. The first batch of five went nearly 2" with one wild flier about 6" high. Second batch was closer to 1 1/2" but again had one high one. At the price of these I'm hating the developmental stage!!

Are these know for unusual vibrations? I was getting honest 1/2" groups with this rifle and Hornady SST's.


Sorry to hear that Nate. Obviously one thing to do is try different powders as well. I've been fortunate with the TSXs and their variants in that the 3 rifles I shoot them in all like them. One thing that I've heard is that some rifles may just not like them.

Ken....


"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn't so. " - Ronald Reagan
 
Posts: 5386 | Location: Phoenix Arizona | Registered: 16 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I had great luck with 52 gr RL-19 and the 100 gr. TSX in my 25-06. Seated .050" off lands. .75" group of 15 shots.
 
Posts: 283 | Location: SW Oregon | Registered: 12 June 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of BigNate
posted Hide Post
I'll try seating a bit closer. I don't think I have any RL19.
Have any of you found these to have completely different vibration signatures than the same load with a normal bullet?
 
Posts: 2376 | Location: Idaho Panhandle | Registered: 27 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
All I know is 85 gr. Nosler BT's and 100 gr. TSX's shoot. Nosler 110 AB's don't. In my 25-06.

https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/2511043/m/616105019
 
Posts: 283 | Location: SW Oregon | Registered: 12 June 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
What did the groups look like?
Vertical, horizontal, big triangle, two close one flyer?

Seating depth is the last thing I play with for fine tuning a load. So it doesn't surprise me that you had two bad groups with everything the same except seating depth. It makes sense the second group was bad because the first group was.

If the first group would have been good, then the second would have followed pretty close. The seating depth can't make a bad load good. It has to be good to start with, then it can make it excellent. At least that's been my experience.

My guess is that you probably need to adjust the powder charge. If the groups were tight but flyers opened them up, you need to try a different primer.

I am also a big believer in loading at the rifle range, saves time and materials.
 
Posts: 2034 | Location: Black Mining Hills of Dakota | Registered: 22 June 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of BigNate
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SDhunter:
What did the groups look like?
Vertical, horizontal, big triangle, two close one flyer?

Seating depth is the last thing I play with for fine tuning a load. So it doesn't surprise me that you had two bad groups with everything the same except seating depth. It makes sense the second group was bad because the first group was.

If the first group would have been good, then the second would have followed pretty close. The seating depth can't make a bad load good. It has to be good to start with, then it can make it excellent. At least that's been my experience.

My guess is that you probably need to adjust the powder charge. If the groups were tight but flyers opened them up, you need to try a different primer.

I am also a big believer in loading at the rifle range, saves time and materials.


I agree with what you're saying.
The five shot groups were triangle shaped, top two within 5/8" and the bottom two were about 1 1/2" wide and and inch or so below. The flyer's were SEVERAL INCHES HIGH.
This rifle has done well with IMR & H4350 as well as H4831sc but with heavier bullets. It was printing honest 1/2" 100 yard three shot groups with 117gr SST's.
I'll probably try pick up Some RL19 as I've had good success with it as well. I didn't think I was haphazardly trying a random load and expecting perfection.
I was posting here looking for others experiences and some good recipes possibly.
 
Posts: 2376 | Location: Idaho Panhandle | Registered: 27 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Big Nate,

Just thinking out loud.

Why did you switch to 100gr TSX when the heavier bullets were shooting so well for you?

Why not the 115 TSX. I would try and match the bullet length as close as possible to the XLC's and Hornady SST's.

Worse case scenario you end up using SST's.

quote:
I didn't think I was haphazardly trying a random load and expecting perfection.


It is really nice when a "random" load prints exceptional. I have had it happen a couple times. Normally when it is a beautiful day at the range and planned on spending a bunch of time playing around. Never forgot anything, had lunch and cold beverages packed. Reading material for down time allowing the barrel to cool.

It never seems to happen when the weather is crappy and time is short, forgot a bunch of stuff at home. Oh yeah, hunting season right around the corner. Wink
 
Posts: 2034 | Location: Black Mining Hills of Dakota | Registered: 22 June 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of BigNate
posted Hide Post
Well had some do-gooder types not interfered, I'd have left well enough alone; but I am now required by law to use non-lead ammo. It's a crying shame as I have quite a few boxes of Woodleigh PP collecting dust, and way more target fodder than I will need. I have a feeling I may have to use some slower powder.
 
Posts: 2376 | Location: Idaho Panhandle | Registered: 27 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I was wondering about the lead thing with you being from California.

Good luck, you know the rifle is good, just have to mess with finding another load.
 
Posts: 2034 | Location: Black Mining Hills of Dakota | Registered: 22 June 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of BigNate
posted Hide Post
Have any of you tried MagPro or RL22 with the 100gr?
 
Posts: 2376 | Location: Idaho Panhandle | Registered: 27 November 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia