THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Best Ballistics Programs
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
Best ballistics software program, across the board. From basic to advanced, if you could only have one which would it be and why? Oh, and did I say moderately priced? Big Grin

Thats right, I want everything and I want it cheap!!! So what is your call?
 
Posts: 417 | Location: TX panhandle | Registered: 08 November 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
Exball is excellent for about $80.
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ricciardelli
posted Hide Post
I have found they all have their faults, but QuickLoad is the most fun to play with.
 
Posts: 3282 | Location: Saint Marie, Montana | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Ditto What ricciardelli said.

muck
 
Posts: 1052 | Location: Southern OHIO USA | Registered: 17 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I can hear ya on the most fun to play with, ballistics in all forms (internal, external, terminal) is a fascinating subject to me. BUT... as far as accurate results for the practical rifleman, is your vote still the same?
 
Posts: 417 | Location: TX panhandle | Registered: 08 November 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of asdf
posted Hide Post
The Powley Computer is free and doesn't do too bad a job. QuickLOAD is far more versatile and includes a fine exterior ballistics program, but it's the most expensive of the lot. Frankly, none of them seem to be accurate enough to trust with anything but a strong, modern gun, such as a Ruger No.1 or Rem. 700.
 
Posts: 980 | Location: U.S.A. | Registered: 01 June 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
If you're talking exterior ballistics only, one pretty much works as well as another. At least, it's difficult to tell the difference on the range. The biggest problem is getting the BC you program into the equation accurate. Without two chronographs and actually testing the load yourself at the velocity of your particular load, you must take somebody else's word for it, irrespective of the velocity they used to acquire that number.
 
Posts: 529 | Location: Missouri | Registered: 31 January 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia